Change tracking
Hello! Right now the change tracking feature does only allow to reject or accept all changes. This is a very restrictive behaviour. Normally one wants to accept some changes and reject others. Can anyone tell me if there are plans for a more flexible change tracking? And when? Thanks Nicolás
Re: Change tracking
Nicolás wrote: Hello! Right now the change tracking feature does only allow to reject or accept all changes. This is a very restrictive behaviour. Normally one wants to accept some changes and reject others. Sure you can. Document-Change Tracking-Merge Changes. Jürgen
Re: lyx-users Digest 8 Jun 2006 00:42:35 -0000 Issue 1922
Hello everyone,
I exported my PhD thesis LyX file to html by exporting from LyX to
latex and then running htlatex, bibtex'ing each aux file corresponding
to each bib file included (I have sectioned bibliography, i.e. I'm
using bibtopic in LyX, I guess). I also found somewhere that the bug
with exporting to html from LyX may be related to the use of bibtex
itself.
Now I have a new problem: equations in the object html document don't
show as figures but rather as:
( )T G(x,y) = ∂I, ∂I∂x ∂y -- in Firefox
(2.1)
in MS internet explorer
I think it is a mix of misinterpreted figure and text...
I had a look on various discussion groups but couldn't find any
problem report like this. Have any hint on this? What kind of
information is needed to detect the problem source?
Thanks for your support,
Diego
Re: Instant Preview working in LyX 1.4.1?
On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:15, Stefano Grioni wrote: Do you know which package does the math-preview? Because on arch they aren't packaged so I'd like to package on my own the right one . A subpackage of auctex: http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/ Thx -- José Abílio
Re: Bibliography Style apalike
Richard, thank you. I really appreciate the help. Bruce On Jun 16, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Richard Heck wrote: That file should be on your TeX installation. Use whatever find-a-file stuff you have available to locate it. I tend to put translator info in the Note field. Whatever you put there will be set at the end of the entry, using apalike (and probably apalike2). It's not a great solution. I should modify apalike so that it does have a translator field that is put in a sensible place. I'd guess it's already been done, however. Richard Bruce Pourciau wrote: Thanks, Richard. That helps. When you say Just hit the browse button in the dialog where you choose a bibliography style, and then go find the file apalike2.bst. do you mean find it in my tex installation or find it on the web and donwnload it? What field would normally be used for additional information -- translator, privately published, an add-on to the title, etc? Bruce On Jun 16, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Richard Heck wrote: Look at the file apalike.bst, which will tell you want fields are defined. (There is no field translator, by the way.) And you can use apalike2, if you wish. Just hit the browse button in the dialog where you choose a bibliography style, and then go find the file apalike2.bst. It is, by the way, not that terribly hard to modify these styles once you get the hang of it. Richard Bruce Pourciau wrote: The closest bib style to what a certain journal want seems to be apalike2, while apalike is not as close but OK. LyX supports apalike (Can it be made to support apalike2?) Suppose then I use apalike. Does anyone know how I can find out what fields are supported in apalike style? For example, does it have a field called Translator and if so, does that mean I should define a custom field in BibDesk called Translator? Thanks for any help the list can provide. Bruce
Re: jurabib question
John Ward wrote: I'm having a difficult time getting jurabib set-up the way that I want. I have it close, but there are still a couple of issues. First, I have the 'titleformat=italic command in the preamble, but am still not getting my titles italicized (in either the original references or the bibliography). I thought that was the purpose of that command. I have the oxford option enabled as well--is that the problem? Any ideas? Yes, you have forgotten the comma at the end of the italic line I also have the 'bibformat=ibidem' command set. It works well, but I am getting duplicate authors listed with 'idem' and would like that replaced with the standard '---'. The documentation seems to be saying that the dash should be the default, so I'm not sure what I can do to fix it. Where, in the final bibliography or in the footnotes ? Finally, I'm can't seem to get the 'chicago' format command to work. The chicago option in jurabib is broken. Cheers, Charles -- http://www.kde-france.org
Re: Layout copyright; was: Re: Sharing layout files
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:36:09AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: In a related thread somebody mentioned GPL wouldn't be good because some people use LyX for commercial purposes. I'd imagine the only thing being sold are the pdf or paper output (please let me know if you think I'm wrong), and I'd imagine (please let me know if you think I'm wrong) that the pdf or paper output would be like a report made by the software, not a compiled version of the software. That sound correct. Andre'
postscript converter
Hello i just installed Lyx 1.4.1 for windows with the installer package from wiki.lyx. i tried to convert the tutorial to postscript, just for checking if everything works. I got the following errors: A number should have been here; I inserted `0'. (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number, look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.) and second, there are problems running python (error ocurred running Lyx141/resources/script/clea how can I get Lyx work properly? I updated Miktex, and tried reconfigeration of Lyx. Didn´t work. Thanks a lot Karin E
Re: postscript converter
Karin E wrote: Hello i just installed Lyx 1.4.1 for windows with the installer package from wiki.lyx. Which version of the installer did you use? There are two linked from the wiki, one that installs just LyX (and will take you to the download sites for anything else you need) and the other that installs everything you lack. i tried to convert the tutorial to postscript, just for checking if everything works. I got the following errors: A number should have been here; I inserted `0'. (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number, look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.) I can't reproduce this, but I used the first installer, and I believe there are differences in the help files (or at least in the images they contain). and second, there are problems running python (error ocurred running Lyx141/resources/script/clea how can I get Lyx work properly? I updated Miktex, and tried reconfigeration of Lyx. Didn´t work. Do you have python installed, and is it on either your system command path or the LyX path prefix (Tools-Preferences-Paths-PATH Prefix)? You can test by typing python -V at a command prompt. (You'll have to cd to the Python directory, or use path to python\python -V, if it's not already on the command path.) /Paul
How to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below?
Hi all, I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure. How do I do this using LyX? I can't find any button in the Math Panel the performs this task, is there any? I have only suceeded in writing an integral with the limits to the right of the integral sign, as in the second example of the attached figure. Thanks in advance, Andreas K. integrals.png Description: JPEG image
Re: How to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below?
On 6/17/06, Andreas Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the
integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure.
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Paul
Re: postscript converter
Karin E schrieb: i just installed Lyx 1.4.1 for windows with the installer package from wiki.lyx. i tried to convert the tutorial to postscript, just for checking if everything works. I got the following errors: ... This will hopefully be fixed for the next LyX release. (description of the bug: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2653 ) For the meantime I'll send you a correct de_Tutorial.lyx in a private mail. regards Uwe
Re: xpm-Konverter?
Matthias Schmidt schrieb: I`m starting to work with Lyx again with Lyx 1.4.1 (windows installer, german). I cannot view the tutorial als a PDF-file: I get the information: Keine Information vorhanden, um Dateien im xpm-Format nach png zu konvertieren. Definieren Sie einen Konverter in den Einstellungen. This is a known bug that will hopefully be fixed for the next release: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2653 I'll send you a corrected tutorial by private mail. regards Uwe
Re: How to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below?
Paul Smith wrote:
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Alternatively set the cursor behind the integral in the formula and use
then the menu Edit - Math - Change Limits Type
regards Uwe
Re: jurabib question
On 6/17/06, Charles de Miramon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Ward wrote: I'm having a difficult time getting jurabib set-up the way that I want. I have it close, but there are still a couple of issues. First, I have the 'titleformat=italic command in the preamble, but am still not getting my titles italicized (in either the original references or the bibliography). I thought that was the purpose of that command. I have the oxford option enabled as well--is that the problem? Any ideas? Yes, you have forgotten the comma at the end of the italic line Thank you. I really should have noticed that. I also have the 'bibformat=ibidem' command set. It works well, but I am getting duplicate authors listed with 'idem' and would like that replaced with the standard '---'. The documentation seems to be saying that the dash should be the default, so I'm not sure what I can do to fix it. Where, in the final bibliography or in the footnotes ? I would like to have the dash in the bibliography. I looked over the documentation again and still have no idea what I'm missing. Finally, I'm can't seem to get the 'chicago' format command to work. The chicago option in jurabib is broken. Cheers, Charles -- http://www.kde-france.org Thank you so much, John
Change tracking
Hello! Right now the change tracking feature does only allow to reject or accept all changes. This is a very restrictive behaviour. Normally one wants to accept some changes and reject others. Can anyone tell me if there are plans for a more flexible change tracking? And when? Thanks Nicolás
Re: Change tracking
Nicolás wrote: Hello! Right now the change tracking feature does only allow to reject or accept all changes. This is a very restrictive behaviour. Normally one wants to accept some changes and reject others. Sure you can. Document-Change Tracking-Merge Changes. Jürgen
Re: lyx-users Digest 8 Jun 2006 00:42:35 -0000 Issue 1922
Hello everyone,
I exported my PhD thesis LyX file to html by exporting from LyX to
latex and then running htlatex, bibtex'ing each aux file corresponding
to each bib file included (I have sectioned bibliography, i.e. I'm
using bibtopic in LyX, I guess). I also found somewhere that the bug
with exporting to html from LyX may be related to the use of bibtex
itself.
Now I have a new problem: equations in the object html document don't
show as figures but rather as:
( )T G(x,y) = ∂I, ∂I∂x ∂y -- in Firefox
(2.1)
in MS internet explorer
I think it is a mix of misinterpreted figure and text...
I had a look on various discussion groups but couldn't find any
problem report like this. Have any hint on this? What kind of
information is needed to detect the problem source?
Thanks for your support,
Diego
Re: Instant Preview working in LyX 1.4.1?
On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:15, Stefano Grioni wrote: Do you know which package does the math-preview? Because on arch they aren't packaged so I'd like to package on my own the right one . A subpackage of auctex: http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/ Thx -- José Abílio
Re: Bibliography Style apalike
Richard, thank you. I really appreciate the help. Bruce On Jun 16, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Richard Heck wrote: That file should be on your TeX installation. Use whatever find-a-file stuff you have available to locate it. I tend to put translator info in the Note field. Whatever you put there will be set at the end of the entry, using apalike (and probably apalike2). It's not a great solution. I should modify apalike so that it does have a translator field that is put in a sensible place. I'd guess it's already been done, however. Richard Bruce Pourciau wrote: Thanks, Richard. That helps. When you say Just hit the browse button in the dialog where you choose a bibliography style, and then go find the file apalike2.bst. do you mean find it in my tex installation or find it on the web and donwnload it? What field would normally be used for additional information -- translator, privately published, an add-on to the title, etc? Bruce On Jun 16, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Richard Heck wrote: Look at the file apalike.bst, which will tell you want fields are defined. (There is no field translator, by the way.) And you can use apalike2, if you wish. Just hit the browse button in the dialog where you choose a bibliography style, and then go find the file apalike2.bst. It is, by the way, not that terribly hard to modify these styles once you get the hang of it. Richard Bruce Pourciau wrote: The closest bib style to what a certain journal want seems to be apalike2, while apalike is not as close but OK. LyX supports apalike (Can it be made to support apalike2?) Suppose then I use apalike. Does anyone know how I can find out what fields are supported in apalike style? For example, does it have a field called Translator and if so, does that mean I should define a custom field in BibDesk called Translator? Thanks for any help the list can provide. Bruce
Re: jurabib question
John Ward wrote: I'm having a difficult time getting jurabib set-up the way that I want. I have it close, but there are still a couple of issues. First, I have the 'titleformat=italic command in the preamble, but am still not getting my titles italicized (in either the original references or the bibliography). I thought that was the purpose of that command. I have the oxford option enabled as well--is that the problem? Any ideas? Yes, you have forgotten the comma at the end of the italic line I also have the 'bibformat=ibidem' command set. It works well, but I am getting duplicate authors listed with 'idem' and would like that replaced with the standard '---'. The documentation seems to be saying that the dash should be the default, so I'm not sure what I can do to fix it. Where, in the final bibliography or in the footnotes ? Finally, I'm can't seem to get the 'chicago' format command to work. The chicago option in jurabib is broken. Cheers, Charles -- http://www.kde-france.org
Re: Layout copyright; was: Re: Sharing layout files
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:36:09AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: In a related thread somebody mentioned GPL wouldn't be good because some people use LyX for commercial purposes. I'd imagine the only thing being sold are the pdf or paper output (please let me know if you think I'm wrong), and I'd imagine (please let me know if you think I'm wrong) that the pdf or paper output would be like a report made by the software, not a compiled version of the software. That sound correct. Andre'
postscript converter
Hello i just installed Lyx 1.4.1 for windows with the installer package from wiki.lyx. i tried to convert the tutorial to postscript, just for checking if everything works. I got the following errors: A number should have been here; I inserted `0'. (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number, look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.) and second, there are problems running python (error ocurred running Lyx141/resources/script/clea how can I get Lyx work properly? I updated Miktex, and tried reconfigeration of Lyx. Didn´t work. Thanks a lot Karin E
Re: postscript converter
Karin E wrote: Hello i just installed Lyx 1.4.1 for windows with the installer package from wiki.lyx. Which version of the installer did you use? There are two linked from the wiki, one that installs just LyX (and will take you to the download sites for anything else you need) and the other that installs everything you lack. i tried to convert the tutorial to postscript, just for checking if everything works. I got the following errors: A number should have been here; I inserted `0'. (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number, look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.) I can't reproduce this, but I used the first installer, and I believe there are differences in the help files (or at least in the images they contain). and second, there are problems running python (error ocurred running Lyx141/resources/script/clea how can I get Lyx work properly? I updated Miktex, and tried reconfigeration of Lyx. Didn´t work. Do you have python installed, and is it on either your system command path or the LyX path prefix (Tools-Preferences-Paths-PATH Prefix)? You can test by typing python -V at a command prompt. (You'll have to cd to the Python directory, or use path to python\python -V, if it's not already on the command path.) /Paul
How to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below?
Hi all, I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure. How do I do this using LyX? I can't find any button in the Math Panel the performs this task, is there any? I have only suceeded in writing an integral with the limits to the right of the integral sign, as in the second example of the attached figure. Thanks in advance, Andreas K. integrals.png Description: JPEG image
Re: How to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below?
On 6/17/06, Andreas Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the
integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure.
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Paul
Re: postscript converter
Karin E schrieb: i just installed Lyx 1.4.1 for windows with the installer package from wiki.lyx. i tried to convert the tutorial to postscript, just for checking if everything works. I got the following errors: ... This will hopefully be fixed for the next LyX release. (description of the bug: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2653 ) For the meantime I'll send you a correct de_Tutorial.lyx in a private mail. regards Uwe
Re: xpm-Konverter?
Matthias Schmidt schrieb: I`m starting to work with Lyx again with Lyx 1.4.1 (windows installer, german). I cannot view the tutorial als a PDF-file: I get the information: Keine Information vorhanden, um Dateien im xpm-Format nach png zu konvertieren. Definieren Sie einen Konverter in den Einstellungen. This is a known bug that will hopefully be fixed for the next release: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2653 I'll send you a corrected tutorial by private mail. regards Uwe
Re: How to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below?
Paul Smith wrote:
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Alternatively set the cursor behind the integral in the formula and use
then the menu Edit - Math - Change Limits Type
regards Uwe
Re: jurabib question
On 6/17/06, Charles de Miramon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Ward wrote: I'm having a difficult time getting jurabib set-up the way that I want. I have it close, but there are still a couple of issues. First, I have the 'titleformat=italic command in the preamble, but am still not getting my titles italicized (in either the original references or the bibliography). I thought that was the purpose of that command. I have the oxford option enabled as well--is that the problem? Any ideas? Yes, you have forgotten the comma at the end of the italic line Thank you. I really should have noticed that. I also have the 'bibformat=ibidem' command set. It works well, but I am getting duplicate authors listed with 'idem' and would like that replaced with the standard '---'. The documentation seems to be saying that the dash should be the default, so I'm not sure what I can do to fix it. Where, in the final bibliography or in the footnotes ? I would like to have the dash in the bibliography. I looked over the documentation again and still have no idea what I'm missing. Finally, I'm can't seem to get the 'chicago' format command to work. The chicago option in jurabib is broken. Cheers, Charles -- http://www.kde-france.org Thank you so much, John
Change tracking
Hello! Right now the change tracking feature does only allow to reject or accept all changes. This is a very restrictive behaviour. Normally one wants to accept some changes and reject others. Can anyone tell me if there are plans for a more flexible change tracking? And when? Thanks Nicolás
Re: Change tracking
Nicolás wrote: > Hello! > > Right now the change tracking feature does only allow to reject or > accept all changes. This is a very restrictive behaviour. Normally one > wants to accept some changes and reject others. Sure you can. Document->Change Tracking->Merge Changes. Jürgen
Re: lyx-users Digest 8 Jun 2006 00:42:35 -0000 Issue 1922
Hello everyone,
I exported my PhD thesis LyX file to html by exporting from LyX to
latex and then running htlatex, bibtex'ing each aux file corresponding
to each bib file included (I have sectioned bibliography, i.e. I'm
using bibtopic in LyX, I guess). I also found somewhere that the bug
with exporting to html from LyX may be related to the use of bibtex
itself.
Now I have a new problem: equations in the object html document don't
show as figures but rather as:
( )T G(x,y) = ∂I, ∂I∂x ∂y -- in Firefox
(2.1)
in MS internet explorer
I think it is a mix of misinterpreted figure and text...
I had a look on various discussion groups but couldn't find any
problem report like this. Have any hint on this? What kind of
information is needed to detect the problem source?
Thanks for your support,
Diego
Re: Instant Preview working in LyX 1.4.1?
On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:15, Stefano Grioni wrote: > Do you know which package does the math-preview? Because on arch they > aren't packaged so I'd like to package on my own the right one . A subpackage of auctex: http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/ > Thx -- José Abílio
Re: Bibliography Style apalike
Richard, thank you. I really appreciate the help. Bruce On Jun 16, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Richard Heck wrote: That file should be on your TeX installation. Use whatever find-a-file stuff you have available to locate it. I tend to put translator info in the Note field. Whatever you put there will be set at the end of the entry, using apalike (and probably apalike2). It's not a great solution. I should modify apalike so that it does have a translator field that is put in a sensible place. I'd guess it's already been done, however. Richard Bruce Pourciau wrote: Thanks, Richard. That helps. When you say Just hit the "browse" button in the dialog where you choose a bibliography style, and then go find the file apalike2.bst. do you mean find it in my tex installation or find it on the web and donwnload it? What field would normally be used for additional information -- translator, privately published, an add-on to the title, etc? Bruce On Jun 16, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Richard Heck wrote: Look at the file apalike.bst, which will tell you want fields are defined. (There is no field "translator", by the way.) And you can use apalike2, if you wish. Just hit the "browse" button in the dialog where you choose a bibliography style, and then go find the file apalike2.bst. It is, by the way, not that terribly hard to modify these styles once you get the hang of it. Richard Bruce Pourciau wrote: The closest bib style to what a certain journal want seems to be apalike2, while apalike is not as close but OK. LyX supports apalike (Can it be made to support apalike2?) Suppose then I use apalike. Does anyone know how I can find out what fields are supported in apalike style? For example, does it have a field called Translator and if so, does that mean I should define a custom field in BibDesk called Translator? Thanks for any help the list can provide. Bruce
Re: jurabib question
John Ward wrote: > I'm having a difficult time getting jurabib set-up the way that I want. I > have it close, but there are still a couple of issues. > > First, I have the 'titleformat=italic" command in the preamble, but am > still not getting my titles italicized (in either the original references > or the bibliography). I thought that was the purpose of that command. I > have the "oxford" option enabled as well--is that the problem? Any ideas? Yes, you have forgotten the comma at the end of the italic line > > I also have the 'bibformat=ibidem' command set. It works well, but I am > getting duplicate authors listed with 'idem' and would like that replaced > with the standard '---'. The documentation seems to be saying that the > dash should be the default, so I'm not sure what I can do to fix it. Where, in the final bibliography or in the footnotes ? > > Finally, I'm can't seem to get the 'chicago' format command to work. The chicago option in jurabib is broken. Cheers, Charles -- http://www.kde-france.org
Re: Layout copyright; was: Re: Sharing layout files
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:36:09AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > In a related thread somebody mentioned GPL wouldn't be good because > some people use LyX for commercial purposes. I'd imagine the only > thing being sold are the pdf or paper output (please let me know if > you think I'm wrong), and I'd imagine (please let me know if you think > I'm wrong) that the pdf or paper output would be like a report made by > the software, not a compiled version of the software. That sound correct. Andre'
postscript converter
Hello i just installed Lyx 1.4.1 for windows with the installer package from wiki.lyx. i tried to convert the tutorial to postscript, just for checking if everything works. I got the following errors: A number should have been here; I inserted `0'. (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number, look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.) and second, there are problems running python (error ocurred running Lyx141/resources/script/clea how can I get Lyx work properly? I updated Miktex, and tried reconfigeration of Lyx. Didn´t work. Thanks a lot Karin E
Re: postscript converter
Karin E wrote: Hello i just installed Lyx 1.4.1 for windows with the installer package from wiki.lyx. Which version of the installer did you use? There are two linked from the wiki, one that installs just LyX (and will take you to the download sites for anything else you need) and the other that installs everything you lack. i tried to convert the tutorial to postscript, just for checking if everything works. I got the following errors: A number should have been here; I inserted `0'. (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number, look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.) I can't reproduce this, but I used the first installer, and I believe there are differences in the help files (or at least in the images they contain). and second, there are problems running python (error ocurred running Lyx141/resources/script/clea how can I get Lyx work properly? I updated Miktex, and tried reconfigeration of Lyx. Didn´t work. Do you have python installed, and is it on either your system command path or the LyX path prefix (Tools->Preferences->Paths->PATH Prefix)? You can test by typing python -V at a command prompt. (You'll have to cd to the Python directory, or use \python -V, if it's not already on the command path.) /Paul
How to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below?
Hi all, I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure. How do I do this using LyX? I can't find any button in the Math Panel the performs this task, is there any? I have only suceeded in writing an integral with the limits to the right of the integral sign, as in the second example of the attached figure. Thanks in advance, Andreas K. integrals.png Description: JPEG image
Re: How to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below?
On 6/17/06, Andreas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the
integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure.
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Paul
Re: postscript converter
Karin E schrieb: i just installed Lyx 1.4.1 for windows with the installer package from wiki.lyx. i tried to convert the tutorial to postscript, just for checking if everything works. I got the following errors: ... This will hopefully be fixed for the next LyX release. (description of the bug: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2653 ) For the meantime I'll send you a correct de_Tutorial.lyx in a private mail. regards Uwe
Re: xpm-Konverter?
Matthias Schmidt schrieb: I`m starting to work with Lyx again with Lyx 1.4.1 (windows installer, german). I cannot view the tutorial als a PDF-file: I get the information: "Keine Information vorhanden, um Dateien im xpm-Format nach png zu konvertieren. Definieren Sie einen Konverter in den Einstellungen." This is a known bug that will hopefully be fixed for the next release: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2653 I'll send you a corrected tutorial by private mail. regards Uwe
Re: How to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below?
Paul Smith wrote:
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Alternatively set the cursor behind the integral in the formula and use
then the menu Edit -> Math -> Change Limits Type
regards Uwe
Re: jurabib question
On 6/17/06, Charles de Miramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John Ward wrote: > I'm having a difficult time getting jurabib set-up the way that I want. I > have it close, but there are still a couple of issues. > > First, I have the 'titleformat=italic" command in the preamble, but am > still not getting my titles italicized (in either the original references > or the bibliography). I thought that was the purpose of that command. I > have the "oxford" option enabled as well--is that the problem? Any ideas? Yes, you have forgotten the comma at the end of the italic line Thank you. I really should have noticed that. > I also have the 'bibformat=ibidem' command set. It works well, but I am > getting duplicate authors listed with 'idem' and would like that replaced > with the standard '---'. The documentation seems to be saying that the > dash should be the default, so I'm not sure what I can do to fix it. Where, in the final bibliography or in the footnotes ? I would like to have the dash in the bibliography. I looked over the documentation again and still have no idea what I'm missing. > Finally, I'm can't seem to get the 'chicago' format command to work. The chicago option in jurabib is broken. Cheers, Charles -- http://www.kde-france.org Thank you so much, John
