Re: including nonstandard hyphenation patterns
On 2012-09-14, Heinrich W Puschmann wrote: Dear Developers, I am using LyX Version 2.0.0 with Ubuntu 11.4 (will soon be switchinig to Ubuntu 12.4). I need to define hyphenation patterns of my own, in order to test nonstandardized non-English language features. I know how to define the patterns, but I cannot include them in the preamble because, according to the error message, patterns can be loaded only by INITEX. I searched the included help document, but apparently that question is not worried about, while it is implicitly assumed that the list of covered languages will be sufficient for all users. What is the correct way of overwriting the default hyphenation pattern by a pattern generated by oneself? Can I do that within LyX, do I have to use LaTeX directly, or do I have to revert to plain TeX? This depends. If you have a set of patterns generated with patgen, then inclusion of them is indeed not LyX stuff but requires a LaTeX re-initialisation. You will need to browse LaTeX documentation and/or ask at a TeX user list or consult a local texpert. OTOH, if there are only few to-be-hyphenated words (less than the ca. 50 words in the list to generate the German patterns), you can create a file with a \hyphenation list and include this from DocumentSettingsLaTeX preamble. Günter
Viewing Bold Calligraphy characters in pdf
I am using LyX 2.04. I inserted a bold calligraphy 'J' as an inline equation,
and it looked fine. [The sourece code is $\mathcal{\boldsymbol{J}}$]
However, when I viewed the file in pdf format, what appeared was a bold
italic 'J' in the default font. In contrast, normal (not bold)
calligraphy 'J' displays properly in pdf. To attempt to fix this problem, I
used the MiKTeX Package Manager to install the Calligra package, used MiKTeX
Options to update formats and refresh FNDB, and finally reconfigured and
restarted LyX. Nothing changed. Perhaps I need to install a different font
package. Any advice would be appreciate.
Re: Viewing Bold Calligraphy characters in pdf
On 09/23/2012 06:27 PM, Brendan Godfrey wrote:
I am using LyX 2.04. I inserted a bold calligraphy 'J' as an inline equation,
and it looked fine. [The sourece code is $\mathcal{\boldsymbol{J}}$]
However, when I viewed the file in pdf format, what appeared was a bold
italic 'J' in the default font. I
I got that as well, but if I entered \boldsymbol{\mathcal {J}} it
worked correctly. That is, in math-mode, first enter \boldsymbol , then
within that inset enter \mathcal then J.
Looks like a TeX problem (or at least that the order matters in TeX).
Both look the same in LyX, but not in the pdf.
--
David L. Johnson
Department of Mathematics
Lehigh University
Re: Review toolbar not hidden in fullscreen
For me (LyX 2.0.4 on Linux Mint) auto toolbars appear and disappear the same in fullscreen mode as in a normal windowed mode. Paul
Re: math bold revisited
Have a look at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.text.tex/ c8B-57irOaY/ecy76Jcr9LgJ There was a bug in MiKTeX involving broken font packages. I would have thought it fixed by now, but perhaps not. The answer back then seemed to be to install the symbol package (or maybe, if that fails or if it's already installed, the ly1 package). Paul
Re: math bold revisited
On 09/23/2012 08:03 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Have a look at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.text.tex/ c8B-57irOaY/ecy76Jcr9LgJ There was a bug in MiKTeX involving broken font packages. I would have thought it fixed by now, but perhaps not. The answer back then seemed to be to install the symbol package (or maybe, if that fails or if it's already installed, the ly1 package). Paul That link didn't work, but this is not just a MiKTeX issue. I use linux (debian wheezy), which has texlive, and it has the same issue. -- David L. Johnson Department of Mathematics Lehigh University
Re: including nonstandard hyphenation patterns
On 2012-09-14, Heinrich W Puschmann wrote: Dear Developers, I am using LyX Version 2.0.0 with Ubuntu 11.4 (will soon be switchinig to Ubuntu 12.4). I need to define hyphenation patterns of my own, in order to test nonstandardized non-English language features. I know how to define the patterns, but I cannot include them in the preamble because, according to the error message, patterns can be loaded only by INITEX. I searched the included help document, but apparently that question is not worried about, while it is implicitly assumed that the list of covered languages will be sufficient for all users. What is the correct way of overwriting the default hyphenation pattern by a pattern generated by oneself? Can I do that within LyX, do I have to use LaTeX directly, or do I have to revert to plain TeX? This depends. If you have a set of patterns generated with patgen, then inclusion of them is indeed not LyX stuff but requires a LaTeX re-initialisation. You will need to browse LaTeX documentation and/or ask at a TeX user list or consult a local texpert. OTOH, if there are only few to-be-hyphenated words (less than the ca. 50 words in the list to generate the German patterns), you can create a file with a \hyphenation list and include this from DocumentSettingsLaTeX preamble. Günter
Viewing Bold Calligraphy characters in pdf
I am using LyX 2.04. I inserted a bold calligraphy 'J' as an inline equation,
and it looked fine. [The sourece code is $\mathcal{\boldsymbol{J}}$]
However, when I viewed the file in pdf format, what appeared was a bold
italic 'J' in the default font. In contrast, normal (not bold)
calligraphy 'J' displays properly in pdf. To attempt to fix this problem, I
used the MiKTeX Package Manager to install the Calligra package, used MiKTeX
Options to update formats and refresh FNDB, and finally reconfigured and
restarted LyX. Nothing changed. Perhaps I need to install a different font
package. Any advice would be appreciate.
Re: Viewing Bold Calligraphy characters in pdf
On 09/23/2012 06:27 PM, Brendan Godfrey wrote:
I am using LyX 2.04. I inserted a bold calligraphy 'J' as an inline equation,
and it looked fine. [The sourece code is $\mathcal{\boldsymbol{J}}$]
However, when I viewed the file in pdf format, what appeared was a bold
italic 'J' in the default font. I
I got that as well, but if I entered \boldsymbol{\mathcal {J}} it
worked correctly. That is, in math-mode, first enter \boldsymbol , then
within that inset enter \mathcal then J.
Looks like a TeX problem (or at least that the order matters in TeX).
Both look the same in LyX, but not in the pdf.
--
David L. Johnson
Department of Mathematics
Lehigh University
Re: Review toolbar not hidden in fullscreen
For me (LyX 2.0.4 on Linux Mint) auto toolbars appear and disappear the same in fullscreen mode as in a normal windowed mode. Paul
Re: math bold revisited
Have a look at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.text.tex/ c8B-57irOaY/ecy76Jcr9LgJ There was a bug in MiKTeX involving broken font packages. I would have thought it fixed by now, but perhaps not. The answer back then seemed to be to install the symbol package (or maybe, if that fails or if it's already installed, the ly1 package). Paul
Re: math bold revisited
On 09/23/2012 08:03 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Have a look at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.text.tex/ c8B-57irOaY/ecy76Jcr9LgJ There was a bug in MiKTeX involving broken font packages. I would have thought it fixed by now, but perhaps not. The answer back then seemed to be to install the symbol package (or maybe, if that fails or if it's already installed, the ly1 package). Paul That link didn't work, but this is not just a MiKTeX issue. I use linux (debian wheezy), which has texlive, and it has the same issue. -- David L. Johnson Department of Mathematics Lehigh University
Re: including nonstandard hyphenation patterns
On 2012-09-14, Heinrich W Puschmann wrote: > Dear Developers, > I am using LyX Version 2.0.0 with Ubuntu 11.4 (will soon be switchinig > to Ubuntu 12.4). > I need to define hyphenation patterns of my own, in order to test > nonstandardized non-English language features. I know how to define the > patterns, but I cannot include them in the preamble because, according > to the error message, "patterns can be loaded only by INITEX". I > searched the included help document, but apparently that question is > not worried about, while it is implicitly assumed that the list of > covered languages will be sufficient for all users. > What is the correct way of overwriting the default hyphenation pattern > by a pattern generated by oneself? Can I do that within LyX, do I have > to use LaTeX directly, or do I have to revert to plain TeX? This depends. If you have a set of patterns generated with patgen, then inclusion of them is indeed not "LyX stuff" but requires a LaTeX re-initialisation. You will need to browse LaTeX documentation and/or ask at a TeX user list or consult a local "texpert". OTOH, if there are only few to-be-hyphenated words (less than the ca. 50 words in the list to generate the German patterns), you can create a file with a \hyphenation list and include this from Document>Settings>LaTeX preamble. Günter
Viewing Bold Calligraphy characters in pdf
I am using LyX 2.04. I inserted a bold calligraphy 'J' as an inline equation,
and it looked fine. [The sourece code is $\mathcal{\boldsymbol{J}}$]
However, when I viewed the file in pdf format, what appeared was a bold
italic 'J' in the default font. In contrast, normal (not bold)
calligraphy 'J' displays properly in pdf. To attempt to fix this problem, I
used the MiKTeX Package Manager to install the Calligra package, used MiKTeX
Options to update formats and refresh FNDB, and finally reconfigured and
restarted LyX. Nothing changed. Perhaps I need to install a different font
package. Any advice would be appreciate.
Re: Viewing Bold Calligraphy characters in pdf
On 09/23/2012 06:27 PM, Brendan Godfrey wrote:
I am using LyX 2.04. I inserted a bold calligraphy 'J' as an inline equation,
and it looked fine. [The sourece code is $\mathcal{\boldsymbol{J}}$]
However, when I viewed the file in pdf format, what appeared was a bold
italic 'J' in the default font. I
I got that as well, but if I entered \boldsymbol{\mathcal {J}} it
worked correctly. That is, in math-mode, first enter \boldsymbol , then
within that inset enter \mathcal then J.
Looks like a TeX problem (or at least that the order matters in TeX).
Both look the same in LyX, but not in the pdf.
--
David L. Johnson
Department of Mathematics
Lehigh University
Re: Review toolbar not hidden in fullscreen
For me (LyX 2.0.4 on Linux Mint) auto toolbars appear and disappear the same in fullscreen mode as in a normal windowed mode. Paul
Re: math bold revisited
Have a look at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.text.tex/ c8B-57irOaY/ecy76Jcr9LgJ There was a bug in MiKTeX involving broken font packages. I would have thought it fixed by now, but perhaps not. The answer back then seemed to be to install the symbol package (or maybe, if that fails or if it's already installed, the ly1 package). Paul
Re: math bold revisited
On 09/23/2012 08:03 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Have a look at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.text.tex/ c8B-57irOaY/ecy76Jcr9LgJ There was a bug in MiKTeX involving broken font packages. I would have thought it fixed by now, but perhaps not. The answer back then seemed to be to install the symbol package (or maybe, if that fails or if it's already installed, the ly1 package). Paul That link didn't work, but this is not just a MiKTeX issue. I use linux (debian wheezy), which has texlive, and it has the same issue. -- David L. Johnson Department of Mathematics Lehigh University
