Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Saturday 22 March 2014 06:10:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
 Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
  Here are the two archives. AA-PBR contains the spbasic.bst, after
  having archived the AA-PBR.lyx file, AA-SP.tar.gz does not, after
  having archived the AA-SP.lyx file.
   
  I have tried to adjust the document- and tool settings in both lyx
  files.
 
 The different behavior is triggered by the Add bibliography to TOC
 checkbox (it is checked in AA-SP.lyx but not in AA-PBR.lyx).
 
  exporting both files to .tex gives these differences:
 You should rather look at the differences in the .lyx files.
 This is the relevant hunk:
 
 diff -u AA-PBR.lyx AA-SP.lyx
 [...]
 @@ -100,7 +99,7 @@
  \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex
  LatexCommand bibtex
  bibfiles A-Test
 -options spbasic
 +options bibtotoc,spbasic
 
 As you can see, checking Add bibliography to TOC changes the
 options field. However, lyxpak.py is not expecting more than one
 bst file and thus does not try to split the options field at commas.
 It simply checks whether the file bibtotoc,spbasic.bst exists.
 As that file does not exist, it is not added to the archive.
 
 The fix is trivial and simply consists in replicating what is
 already done for bib files (which are expected to be a comma
 separated list).
 
 Please, file a bug about this issue.

Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.

When I changed 
Add bibliography to TOC
to NOT,
the archive still did not export the .bst file.
I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.

Where and how do I file a bug?

Wolfgang

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Saturday 22 March 2014 07:50:47 Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
 On Saturday 22 March 2014 06:10:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
  Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
   Here are the two archives. AA-PBR contains the spbasic.bst, after
   having archived the AA-PBR.lyx file, AA-SP.tar.gz does not, after
   having archived the AA-SP.lyx file.
   
   I have tried to adjust the document- and tool settings in both lyx
   files.
  
  The different behavior is triggered by the Add bibliography to TOC
  checkbox (it is checked in AA-SP.lyx but not in AA-PBR.lyx).
  
   exporting both files to .tex gives these differences:
  You should rather look at the differences in the .lyx files.
  This is the relevant hunk:
  
  diff -u AA-PBR.lyx AA-SP.lyx
  [...]
  @@ -100,7 +99,7 @@
  
   \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex
   LatexCommand bibtex
   bibfiles A-Test
  
  -options spbasic
  +options bibtotoc,spbasic
  
  As you can see, checking Add bibliography to TOC changes the
  options field. However, lyxpak.py is not expecting more than one
  bst file and thus does not try to split the options field at commas.
  It simply checks whether the file bibtotoc,spbasic.bst exists.
  As that file does not exist, it is not added to the archive.
  
  The fix is trivial and simply consists in replicating what is
  already done for bib files (which are expected to be a comma
  separated list).
  
  Please, file a bug about this issue.
 
 Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.
 
 When I changed
 Add bibliography to TOC
 to NOT,
 the archive still did not export the .bst file.
 I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.
 
 Where and how do I file a bug?

I tried lyx bug report out but apparently I used it already, since:

Die angegebene E-Mail-Adresse wird bereits verwendet. Bitte geben Sie eine 
andere an.

It says, 
Das Eintragen Ihrer E-Mail-Adresse ermöglicht es Ihnen ausserdem, Ihr 
Kennwort zurückzusetzen, falls Sie es jemals vergessen sollten. 

But I don't know how to do that

 Wolfgang

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Enrico Forestieri]

Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
  
 Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.
  
 When I changed 
 Add bibliography to TOC
 to NOT,
 the archive still did not export the .bst file.
 I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.

Note that lyxpak.py scans the .lyx file on disk. So, you have to save
the file before exporting (no need to give it another name).
 
 Where and how do I file a bug?

I did it for you:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9044

-- 
Enrico

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Saturday 22 March 2014 16:04:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
 Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
   
  Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.
   
  When I changed
  Add bibliography to TOC
  to NOT,
  the archive still did not export the .bst file.
  I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.
 
 Note that lyxpak.py scans the .lyx file on disk. So, you have to save
 the file before exporting (no need to give it another name).
  
Good to know.
 
  Where and how do I file a bug?
 
 I did it for you:
 http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9044

Thanks a lot, Enrico

Wolfgang 

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Enrico Forestieri]

William Seager writes:
 
 On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 15:47:47 Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
  I regard exportLyx Archive tar.gz as a very handy feature of lyx.
 
 Hi - I agree IF it worked. I find that nothing but the .lyx file is
 included in the archive - no images, no bibs, no bst, no
 nothing.

Most probably you didn't save the file before exporting. If this is
not so, you are kindly requested to provide a minimal test case.

-- 
Enrico

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Scott Kostyshak]

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote:
 Wolfgang Engelmann writes:

 Where and how do I file a bug?

 I did it for you:
 http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9044

Hi Wolfgang,

It would still be helpful if you're able to register. You're an active
member of the list here and your input on existing bugs and new bugs
would be useful.

Are you able to register under a different email? For example, you
could easily create a gmail account and just have it forward to you
any emails it receives.

Alternatively, what if you try capitalizing a letter in your email
address. Does trac treat it as a different email address and do you
still get email with the capitalized version?

Best,

Scott

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Saturday 22 March 2014 06:10:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
 Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
  Here are the two archives. AA-PBR contains the spbasic.bst, after
  having archived the AA-PBR.lyx file, AA-SP.tar.gz does not, after
  having archived the AA-SP.lyx file.
   
  I have tried to adjust the document- and tool settings in both lyx
  files.
 
 The different behavior is triggered by the Add bibliography to TOC
 checkbox (it is checked in AA-SP.lyx but not in AA-PBR.lyx).
 
  exporting both files to .tex gives these differences:
 You should rather look at the differences in the .lyx files.
 This is the relevant hunk:
 
 diff -u AA-PBR.lyx AA-SP.lyx
 [...]
 @@ -100,7 +99,7 @@
  \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex
  LatexCommand bibtex
  bibfiles A-Test
 -options spbasic
 +options bibtotoc,spbasic
 
 As you can see, checking Add bibliography to TOC changes the
 options field. However, lyxpak.py is not expecting more than one
 bst file and thus does not try to split the options field at commas.
 It simply checks whether the file bibtotoc,spbasic.bst exists.
 As that file does not exist, it is not added to the archive.
 
 The fix is trivial and simply consists in replicating what is
 already done for bib files (which are expected to be a comma
 separated list).
 
 Please, file a bug about this issue.

Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.

When I changed 
Add bibliography to TOC
to NOT,
the archive still did not export the .bst file.
I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.

Where and how do I file a bug?

Wolfgang

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Saturday 22 March 2014 07:50:47 Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
 On Saturday 22 March 2014 06:10:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
  Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
   Here are the two archives. AA-PBR contains the spbasic.bst, after
   having archived the AA-PBR.lyx file, AA-SP.tar.gz does not, after
   having archived the AA-SP.lyx file.
   
   I have tried to adjust the document- and tool settings in both lyx
   files.
  
  The different behavior is triggered by the Add bibliography to TOC
  checkbox (it is checked in AA-SP.lyx but not in AA-PBR.lyx).
  
   exporting both files to .tex gives these differences:
  You should rather look at the differences in the .lyx files.
  This is the relevant hunk:
  
  diff -u AA-PBR.lyx AA-SP.lyx
  [...]
  @@ -100,7 +99,7 @@
  
   \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex
   LatexCommand bibtex
   bibfiles A-Test
  
  -options spbasic
  +options bibtotoc,spbasic
  
  As you can see, checking Add bibliography to TOC changes the
  options field. However, lyxpak.py is not expecting more than one
  bst file and thus does not try to split the options field at commas.
  It simply checks whether the file bibtotoc,spbasic.bst exists.
  As that file does not exist, it is not added to the archive.
  
  The fix is trivial and simply consists in replicating what is
  already done for bib files (which are expected to be a comma
  separated list).
  
  Please, file a bug about this issue.
 
 Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.
 
 When I changed
 Add bibliography to TOC
 to NOT,
 the archive still did not export the .bst file.
 I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.
 
 Where and how do I file a bug?

I tried lyx bug report out but apparently I used it already, since:

Die angegebene E-Mail-Adresse wird bereits verwendet. Bitte geben Sie eine 
andere an.

It says, 
Das Eintragen Ihrer E-Mail-Adresse ermöglicht es Ihnen ausserdem, Ihr 
Kennwort zurückzusetzen, falls Sie es jemals vergessen sollten. 

But I don't know how to do that

 Wolfgang

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Enrico Forestieri]

Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
  
 Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.
  
 When I changed 
 Add bibliography to TOC
 to NOT,
 the archive still did not export the .bst file.
 I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.

Note that lyxpak.py scans the .lyx file on disk. So, you have to save
the file before exporting (no need to give it another name).
 
 Where and how do I file a bug?

I did it for you:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9044

-- 
Enrico

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Saturday 22 March 2014 16:04:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
 Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
   
  Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.
   
  When I changed
  Add bibliography to TOC
  to NOT,
  the archive still did not export the .bst file.
  I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.
 
 Note that lyxpak.py scans the .lyx file on disk. So, you have to save
 the file before exporting (no need to give it another name).
  
Good to know.
 
  Where and how do I file a bug?
 
 I did it for you:
 http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9044

Thanks a lot, Enrico

Wolfgang 

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Enrico Forestieri]

William Seager writes:
 
 On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 15:47:47 Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
  I regard exportLyx Archive tar.gz as a very handy feature of lyx.
 
 Hi - I agree IF it worked. I find that nothing but the .lyx file is
 included in the archive - no images, no bibs, no bst, no
 nothing.

Most probably you didn't save the file before exporting. If this is
not so, you are kindly requested to provide a minimal test case.

-- 
Enrico

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Scott Kostyshak]

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote:
 Wolfgang Engelmann writes:

 Where and how do I file a bug?

 I did it for you:
 http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9044

Hi Wolfgang,

It would still be helpful if you're able to register. You're an active
member of the list here and your input on existing bugs and new bugs
would be useful.

Are you able to register under a different email? For example, you
could easily create a gmail account and just have it forward to you
any emails it receives.

Alternatively, what if you try capitalizing a letter in your email
address. Does trac treat it as a different email address and do you
still get email with the capitalized version?

Best,

Scott

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Saturday 22 March 2014 06:10:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
> > Here are the two archives. AA-PBR contains the spbasic.bst, after
> > having archived the AA-PBR.lyx file, AA-SP.tar.gz does not, after
> > having archived the AA-SP.lyx file.
> >  
> > I have tried to adjust the document- and tool settings in both lyx
> > files.
> 
> The different behavior is triggered by the "Add bibliography to TOC"
> checkbox (it is checked in AA-SP.lyx but not in AA-PBR.lyx).
> 
> > exporting both files to .tex gives these differences:
> You should rather look at the differences in the .lyx files.
> This is the relevant hunk:
> 
> diff -u AA-PBR.lyx AA-SP.lyx
> [...]
> @@ -100,7 +99,7 @@
>  \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex
>  LatexCommand bibtex
>  bibfiles "A-Test"
> -options "spbasic"
> +options "bibtotoc,spbasic"
> 
> As you can see, checking "Add bibliography to TOC" changes the
> options field. However, lyxpak.py is not expecting more than one
> bst file and thus does not try to split the options field at commas.
> It simply checks whether the file "bibtotoc,spbasic.bst" exists.
> As that file does not exist, it is not added to the archive.
> 
> The fix is trivial and simply consists in replicating what is
> already done for bib files (which are expected to be a comma
> separated list).
> 
> Please, file a bug about this issue.

Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.

When I changed 
Add bibliography to TOC
to NOT,
the archive still did not export the .bst file.
I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.

Where and how do I file a bug?

Wolfgang

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Saturday 22 March 2014 07:50:47 Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> On Saturday 22 March 2014 06:10:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
> > > Here are the two archives. AA-PBR contains the spbasic.bst, after
> > > having archived the AA-PBR.lyx file, AA-SP.tar.gz does not, after
> > > having archived the AA-SP.lyx file.
> > > 
> > > I have tried to adjust the document- and tool settings in both lyx
> > > files.
> > 
> > The different behavior is triggered by the "Add bibliography to TOC"
> > checkbox (it is checked in AA-SP.lyx but not in AA-PBR.lyx).
> > 
> > > exporting both files to .tex gives these differences:
> > You should rather look at the differences in the .lyx files.
> > This is the relevant hunk:
> > 
> > diff -u AA-PBR.lyx AA-SP.lyx
> > [...]
> > @@ -100,7 +99,7 @@
> > 
> >  \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex
> >  LatexCommand bibtex
> >  bibfiles "A-Test"
> > 
> > -options "spbasic"
> > +options "bibtotoc,spbasic"
> > 
> > As you can see, checking "Add bibliography to TOC" changes the
> > options field. However, lyxpak.py is not expecting more than one
> > bst file and thus does not try to split the options field at commas.
> > It simply checks whether the file "bibtotoc,spbasic.bst" exists.
> > As that file does not exist, it is not added to the archive.
> > 
> > The fix is trivial and simply consists in replicating what is
> > already done for bib files (which are expected to be a comma
> > separated list).
> > 
> > Please, file a bug about this issue.
> 
> Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.
> 
> When I changed
> Add bibliography to TOC
> to NOT,
> the archive still did not export the .bst file.
> I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.
> 
> Where and how do I file a bug?

I tried lyx bug report out but apparently I used it already, since:

Die angegebene E-Mail-Adresse wird bereits verwendet. Bitte geben Sie eine 
andere an.

It says, 
Das Eintragen Ihrer E-Mail-Adresse ermöglicht es Ihnen ausserdem, Ihr 
Kennwort zurückzusetzen, falls Sie es jemals vergessen sollten. 

But I don't know how to do that

 Wolfgang

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Enrico Forestieri]

Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
>  
> Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.
>  
> When I changed 
> Add bibliography to TOC
> to NOT,
> the archive still did not export the .bst file.
> I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.

Note that lyxpak.py scans the .lyx file on disk. So, you have to save
the file before exporting (no need to give it another name).
 
> Where and how do I file a bug?

I did it for you:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9044

-- 
Enrico

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Saturday 22 March 2014 16:04:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Wolfgang Engelmann writes:
> >  
> > Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit.
> >  
> > When I changed
> > Add bibliography to TOC
> > to NOT,
> > the archive still did not export the .bst file.
> > I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works.
> 
> Note that lyxpak.py scans the .lyx file on disk. So, you have to save
> the file before exporting (no need to give it another name).
>  
Good to know.
> 
> > Where and how do I file a bug?
> 
> I did it for you:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9044

Thanks a lot, Enrico

Wolfgang 

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Enrico Forestieri]

William Seager writes:
> 
> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 15:47:47 Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > I regard export>Lyx Archive tar.gz as a very handy feature of lyx.
> 
> Hi - I agree IF it worked. I find that nothing but the .lyx file is
> included in the archive - no images, no bibs, no bst, no
> nothing.

Most probably you didn't save the file before exporting. If this is
not so, you are kindly requested to provide a minimal test case.

-- 
Enrico

Re: bst file not in tar.gz archive

[Scott Kostyshak]

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Enrico Forestieri  wrote:
> Wolfgang Engelmann writes:

>> Where and how do I file a bug?
>
> I did it for you:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9044

Hi Wolfgang,

It would still be helpful if you're able to register. You're an active
member of the list here and your input on existing bugs and new bugs
would be useful.

Are you able to register under a different email? For example, you
could easily create a gmail account and just have it forward to you
any emails it receives.

Alternatively, what if you try capitalizing a letter in your email
address. Does trac treat it as a different email address and do you
still get email with the capitalized version?

Best,

Scott