Re: It is possible to get rid of these two lines of code automatically put in the preamble by LyX?

[CarLaTeX]

2016-09-02 7:20 GMT+02:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse :

> It's written by a German, who by the way, is very responsive :-)-O, but
> for the English speaking market,as much as Germany. All documentation is
> translated.
>
> It's a plug in replacement, with endless possibilities.
>
> el
>
> --
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4
>
> On 2 Sep 2016, at 05:44, CarLaTeX  wrote:
>
>
>
> 2016-09-01 14:40 GMT+02:00 Dr Eberhard Lisse :
>
>> Carla,
>>
>> very easy :-)-O
>>
>> It is included as standard in TeXLive (incl MacTeX) and MikTeX, so it
>> should be already in Document->Settings...  Document Class.
>>
>> Take a copy of your file, and try it out :-)-O
>>
>>
>> Once you have arrived at whatever you want in each file to appear
>> (Under Custom: I like something like parskip=half, DIV=13 for
>> example), you save as document standard.
>>
>> It does letters too :-)-O
>>
>> And if you want to see what is possible if your really want to dig
>> deep, look at http://www.ctan.org/pkg/tudscr
>>
>> el
>>
>>
>> On 2016-08-30 12:48, CarLaTeX wrote:
>>
>>> 2016-08-30 13:45 GMT+02:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse :
>>>
>>> It can do all the things the standard Article/Report/Book can,
>>> hence there is not much need to study for standard things, but
>>> on the other hand has a large number of possibilities.
>>>
>>> I do not use the standard Article/Report/Book any more.
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Is it easy to use with LyX?
>>>
>>>
>> I'm not German but I'll try KOMA-script, thank you!
>
> I'll study the English documentation, thank you!

Re: spellchecker keybindings {Find next, Ignore & aDd} conflict with {File, Insert & Document}

[Scott Kostyshak]

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:52:13PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote:
> 
> It would appear that on Aug 31, Scott Kostyshak did say:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:39:34PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote:
> > 
> > > Please tell me that I'm not looking at (3 x 3 = 9) nine trac tickets 
> > > here...
> > 
> > Good point. I don't have general advice on what topics should be
> > grouped. If they are topics that shoudl be addressed all at once and it
> > would be silly to address one and not the other, then I think such a
> > group of issues should be in one ticket. Just make your best guess.
> 
>  Ticket #10357 (new enhancement) 
> 
>  How did I do?

Looks good! I removed the keywords since we use a fixed set, which is
described here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/TicketKeywords

I also categorized the bug as "dialogs".

By the way, do you have any experience programming and could perhaps
propose a patch if we decide what direction we want to go on this?

Thanks for making the ticket.

Scott


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Sectioned and multiple references in the same document

[John Kane]

And what did you do---in LyX terms.   We can probably do the stubbornness
ourselves, well some of us anyway.

On 2 September 2016 at 06:52, Michael Berger  wrote:

> Just managed to resolve the issue myself.
>
> Applied method: stubbornness mixed with trial and errors.
>
> cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>
> On 09/01/2016 05:08 PM, Michael Berger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to set up multiple references in a classicthesis 4.1 document
>> (applying the master/child concept).
>>
>> The document works well with an existing sectioned bibliography. However,
>> I fail to add another small
>>
>> bibliography in a separate chapter using the bibtoc package.
>>
>> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Michael Berger
>>
>> PS. I did study what I found - ideally would be somebody with empirical
>> cognition :-D
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada

Re: spellchecker keybindings {Find next, Ignore & aDd} conflict with {File, Insert & Document}

[Joe Philbrook]

It would appear that on Aug 31, Scott Kostyshak did say:

> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:39:34PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote:
> 
> > Please tell me that I'm not looking at (3 x 3 = 9) nine trac tickets here...
> 
> Good point. I don't have general advice on what topics should be
> grouped. If they are topics that shoudl be addressed all at once and it
> would be silly to address one and not the other, then I think such a
> group of issues should be in one ticket. Just make your best guess.

 Ticket #10357 (new enhancement) 

 How did I do?

 -- 
 Joe

Re: Sectioned and multiple references in the same document

[Michael Berger]

Just managed to resolve the issue myself.

Applied method: stubbornness mixed with trial and errors.

cheers,

Michael


On 09/01/2016 05:08 PM, Michael Berger wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to set up multiple references in a classicthesis 4.1 
document (applying the master/child concept).


The document works well with an existing sectioned bibliography. 
However, I fail to add another small


bibliography in a separate chapter using the bibtoc package.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Michael Berger

PS. I did study what I found - ideally would be somebody with 
empirical cognition :-D