Re: package{mathrsfs}

2017-01-04 Thread Patrick Dupre 
OK,

Very good

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===


> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 at 9:33 PM
> From: "Guillaume Munch" 
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: package{mathrsfs}
>
> Le 04/01/2017 à 19:54, Patrick Dupre a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > If I use \mathscr
> > in a document, then lyx use the package
> > \usepackage{mathrsfs}
> > However, mathrsfs conflicts with
> >
> > \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathscr}{FMS}{futm}{m}{n}%
> > \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathcal}{OMS}{cmr}{m}{n}%
> >
> > while I do not need mathrsfs
> > I use fourier
> >
> > How can I prevent the loading of the package mathrsfs?
> >
> 
> Hello Patrick, try adding "Provides mathrsfs 1" to the local format.
> 
>

Re: package{mathrsfs}

2017-01-04 Thread Patrick Dupre 
I tried both ways

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===


> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 at 9:30 PM
> From: "Guenter Milde" 
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: package{mathrsfs}
>
> On 2017-01-04, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Hello,
> 
> > If I use \mathscr
> > in a document, then lyx use the package
> > \usepackage{mathrsfs}
> > However, mathrsfs conflicts with
> 
> > \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathscr}{FMS}{futm}{m}{n}%
> > \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathcal}{OMS}{cmr}{m}{n}%
> 
> > while I do not need mathrsfs
> > I use fourier
> 
> Do you use "fourier" via Document>Settings>Fonts>Math or
> the user preamble?
> 
> Günter
> 
>

Re: package{mathrsfs}

2017-01-04 Thread Guillaume Munch 

Le 04/01/2017 à 19:54, Patrick Dupre a écrit :

Hello,

If I use \mathscr
in a document, then lyx use the package
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
However, mathrsfs conflicts with

\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathscr}{FMS}{futm}{m}{n}%
\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathcal}{OMS}{cmr}{m}{n}%

while I do not need mathrsfs
I use fourier

How can I prevent the loading of the package mathrsfs?



Hello Patrick, try adding "Provides mathrsfs 1" to the local format.

Re: package{mathrsfs}

2017-01-04 Thread Guenter Milde 
On 2017-01-04, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,

> If I use \mathscr
> in a document, then lyx use the package
> \usepackage{mathrsfs}
> However, mathrsfs conflicts with

> \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathscr}{FMS}{futm}{m}{n}%
> \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathcal}{OMS}{cmr}{m}{n}%

> while I do not need mathrsfs
> I use fourier

Do you use "fourier" via Document>Settings>Fonts>Math or
the user preamble?

Günter

package{mathrsfs}

2017-01-04 Thread Patrick Dupre 
Hello,

If I use \mathscr
in a document, then lyx use the package
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
However, mathrsfs conflicts with

\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathscr}{FMS}{futm}{m}{n}%
\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathcal}{OMS}{cmr}{m}{n}%

while I do not need mathrsfs
I use fourier

How can I prevent the loading of the package mathrsfs?

Thank
===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===

Re: alpha dot

2017-01-04 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann 



On 03.01.2017 21:32, Scott Kostyshak wrote:

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 11:25:07AM +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:

How could I get a dot on an alpha by using the math function of lyx? Or do I
have to use a tex insert:

$\dot \alpha$

Click on the "frame decorations" icon in the math toolbar. See the
screenshot. Does that work for you?

In the LyX math preview (i.e. without instant preview), the "dot" looks
more like a small line. Do you agree or does it look correct to you?

Scott
Yes, Scott, in the instant preview it does look like a short line, but 
its correct in the pdf output.

Wolfgang