Re: Install on RH 7.1

2001-07-28 Thread Adam Huffman

On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:

 On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 11:08:20PM +0200, Klaus Vink Slott wrote:
 
  Compiler? I'm sorry, but I dont have the time to fiddel around trying to
  compile software. When I try such things I alwais seem to end up with
  error messages that I dont understand. I do think that it is a must to
  have precompiled binaries for basic users like me not capable to review
  lot of compiler warnings. 
 
 this is means we need someone with RH7.1, who can build RPMs for it ...
 

 You can also build using rpm -bb from the src.rpm.
 
 Then it can be contributed pack to Kayvan's site ...
 

I can do that if there's demand for it.


Adam



Re: Install on RH 7.1

2001-07-28 Thread Adam Huffman

On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:

 On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 11:08:20PM +0200, Klaus Vink Slott wrote:
 
  Compiler? I'm sorry, but I dont have the time to fiddel around trying to
  compile software. When I try such things I alwais seem to end up with
  error messages that I dont understand. I do think that it is a must to
  have precompiled binaries for basic users like me not capable to review
  lot of compiler warnings. 
 
 this is means we need someone with RH7.1, who can build RPMs for it ...
 

 You can also build using rpm -bb from the src.rpm.
 
 Then it can be contributed pack to Kayvan's site ...
 

I can do that if there's demand for it.


Adam



Re: Install on RH 7.1

2001-07-28 Thread Adam Huffman

On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 11:08:20PM +0200, Klaus Vink Slott wrote:
> 
> > Compiler? I'm sorry, but I dont have the time to fiddel around trying to
> > compile software. When I try such things I alwais seem to end up with
> > error messages that I dont understand. I do think that it is a "must" to
> > have precompiled binaries for basic users like me not capable to review
> > lot of compiler warnings. 
> 
> this is means we need someone with RH7.1, who can build RPMs for it ...
> 

> You can also build using rpm -bb from the src.rpm.
> 
> Then it can be contributed pack to Kayvan's site ...
> 

I can do that if there's demand for it.


Adam



Re: installation help

2001-02-05 Thread Adam Huffman

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:

 On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
 
  You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs?  If so, I had a similar problem
  with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
  0.88-9
 
 This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include a file they don't
 need to, which breaks the compile. I've just sent a patch to document this
 in the INSTALL file :)
 

I filed a bug report about the xforms RPM, and today got a reply saying
that the problem is fixed in the 0.88-15 release, but that they wouldn't
be distributing xforms RPMs at all in 7.1 on account of it not being
GPL.

Adam



Re: installation help

2001-02-05 Thread Adam Huffman

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:

 On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
 
  You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs?  If so, I had a similar problem
  with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
  0.88-9
 
 This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include a file they don't
 need to, which breaks the compile. I've just sent a patch to document this
 in the INSTALL file :)
 

I filed a bug report about the xforms RPM, and today got a reply saying
that the problem is fixed in the 0.88-15 release, but that they wouldn't
be distributing xforms RPMs at all in 7.1 on account of it not being
GPL.

Adam



Re: installation help

2001-02-05 Thread Adam Huffman

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
> 
> > You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs?  If so, I had a similar problem
> > with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
> > 0.88-9
> 
> This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include a file they don't
> need to, which breaks the compile. I've just sent a patch to document this
> in the INSTALL file :)
> 

I filed a bug report about the xforms RPM, and today got a reply saying
that the problem is fixed in the 0.88-15 release, but that they wouldn't
be distributing xforms RPMs at all in 7.1 on account of it not being
GPL.

Adam



Re: installation help

2001-01-29 Thread Adam Huffman

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:

 Yes, I needed that and it got me past the configure step but now during 'make'
 I'm getting another error, something to do with 'Object'  ???
 Some of the text looks like this:
 
 In file included from formula.C:30:
 ../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive 'Object' introduced
 ambiguous type '_ObjectRec *'
 make[3]: *** [formula.lo] Error 1
 
 etc etc
 
 I have no clue what this means. Any thoughts?
 
 David
 

You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs?  If so, I had a similar problem
with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
0.88-9


Adam



Re: installation help

2001-01-29 Thread Adam Huffman

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:

 Yes, I needed that and it got me past the configure step but now during 'make'
 I'm getting another error, something to do with 'Object'  ???
 Some of the text looks like this:
 
 In file included from formula.C:30:
 ../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive 'Object' introduced
 ambiguous type '_ObjectRec *'
 make[3]: *** [formula.lo] Error 1
 
 etc etc
 
 I have no clue what this means. Any thoughts?
 
 David
 

You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs?  If so, I had a similar problem
with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
0.88-9


Adam



Re: installation help

2001-01-29 Thread Adam Huffman

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:

> Yes, I needed that and it got me past the configure step but now during 'make'
> I'm getting another error, something to do with 'Object'  ???
> Some of the text looks like this:
> 
> In file included from formula.C:30:
> ../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive 'Object' introduced
> ambiguous type '_ObjectRec *'
> make[3]: *** [formula.lo] Error 1
> 
> etc etc
> 
> I have no clue what this means. Any thoughts?
> 
> David
> 

You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs?  If so, I had a similar problem
with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
0.88-9


Adam



reLyX problem still with 1.0.3pre2

1999-05-09 Thread Adam Huffman

Just tried to import a latex file with the latest pre-release and I'm
still getting the same problem.  It starts to work but then the terminal
from which I called LyX is filled with the following message:

Got nothing when argument expected at
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/Text/TeX.pm line 838,
TeXOpenFile0007 chunk 330.

and I have to kill the process.

This is on a Red Hat 6.0 system with teTeX 0.9.


Adam Huffman



reLyX problem still with 1.0.3pre2

1999-05-09 Thread Adam Huffman

Just tried to import a latex file with the latest pre-release and I'm
still getting the same problem.  It starts to work but then the terminal
from which I called LyX is filled with the following message:

Got nothing when argument expected at
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/Text/TeX.pm line 838,
 chunk 330.

and I have to kill the process.

This is on a Red Hat 6.0 system with teTeX 0.9.


Adam Huffman



reLyX problem with LyX 1.0.2pre1

1999-04-22 Thread Adam Huffman

When trying to import a Latex file I get the following error message@

Can't locate RelyxFigure.pm in @INC (@INC contains: . /usr/local/bin/.
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX /usr/local/share/lyx/reLyX
/usr/lib/perl5/5.00502/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.00502
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005
.) at /usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/BasicLyX.pm line 13.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/BasicLyX.pm line 13.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/reLyXmain.pl line 42.

The named file doesn't exist on my system.

Is this something I am missing or a problem with the source?

My system is RedHat 5.2, teTeX 0.9.


Adam Huffman



reLyX problem with LyX 1.0.2pre1

1999-04-22 Thread Adam Huffman

When trying to import a Latex file I get the following error message@

Can't locate RelyxFigure.pm in @INC (@INC contains: . /usr/local/bin/.
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX /usr/local/share/lyx/reLyX
/usr/lib/perl5/5.00502/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.00502
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005
.) at /usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/BasicLyX.pm line 13.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/BasicLyX.pm line 13.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/reLyXmain.pl line 42.

The named file doesn't exist on my system.

Is this something I am missing or a problem with the source?

My system is RedHat 5.2, teTeX 0.9.


Adam Huffman



reLyX problem with LyX 1.0.2pre1

1999-04-22 Thread Adam Huffman

When trying to import a Latex file I get the following error message@

Can't locate RelyxFigure.pm in @INC (@INC contains: . /usr/local/bin/.
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX /usr/local/share/lyx/reLyX
/usr/lib/perl5/5.00502/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.00502
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005
.) at /usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/BasicLyX.pm line 13.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/BasicLyX.pm line 13.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/bin/../share/lyx/reLyX/reLyXmain.pl line 42.

The named file doesn't exist on my system.

Is this something I am missing or a problem with the source?

My system is RedHat 5.2, teTeX 0.9.


Adam Huffman