Alignment in tables, there width is been fixed and other strange things
I have a problem, somebody already asked in March, but I was not able to solve it anyway: If I fix the column width of a table, I´m no longer able to center the text in the table. Dekel did some suggestions and attached an example file, but unfortunatly I was not able to open it (msg10030.html). There was an error message: Tabular5 no longer supported, use an older version of Lyx and then Lyx crashed. Does anyone has a solution for this problem? Another question is: Do I have to enter each column after another and add the table width? Because, if I mark more than one to enter the same width for all of them, only one was affected. While doing this, I ran in another strange thing: If I want to change a width I already entered, the cursor leaves the field as soon as I delete are enter ONE charakter and I have to use the mouse to activate the field again before I can enter the next charakter. Are there some settings, I have to change (Lyx1.1.5fix)? Thanks in advance Andi
Alignment in tables, there width is been fixed and other strange things
I have a problem, somebody already asked in March, but I was not able to solve it anyway: If I fix the column width of a table, I´m no longer able to center the text in the table. Dekel did some suggestions and attached an example file, but unfortunatly I was not able to open it (msg10030.html). There was an error message: Tabular5 no longer supported, use an older version of Lyx and then Lyx crashed. Does anyone has a solution for this problem? Another question is: Do I have to enter each column after another and add the table width? Because, if I mark more than one to enter the same width for all of them, only one was affected. While doing this, I ran in another strange thing: If I want to change a width I already entered, the cursor leaves the field as soon as I delete are enter ONE charakter and I have to use the mouse to activate the field again before I can enter the next charakter. Are there some settings, I have to change (Lyx1.1.5fix)? Thanks in advance Andi
Alignment in tables, there width is been fixed and other strange things
I have a problem, somebody already asked in March, but I was not able to solve it anyway: If I fix the column width of a table, I´m no longer able to center the text in the table. Dekel did some suggestions and attached an example file, but unfortunatly I was not able to open it (msg10030.html). There was an error message: "Tabular<5 no longer supported, use an older version of Lyx" and then Lyx crashed. Does anyone has a solution for this problem? Another question is: Do I have to enter each column after another and add the table width? Because, if I mark more than one to enter the same width for all of them, only one was affected. While doing this, I ran in another strange thing: If I want to change a width I already entered, the cursor leaves the field as soon as I delete are enter ONE charakter and I have to use the mouse to activate the field again before I can enter the next charakter. Are there some settings, I have to change (Lyx1.1.5fix)? Thanks in advance Andi
Re: Different numbering for chemical reaction and numerical equation
During writing my thesis I ran into this problem:
I use chemical reactions and numerical equations in the text. The
problem is, to number the different equations in a different way, like:
1+1=2(2.1)
1+2=3(2.2)
but for chemical reaction something like
C+O2-CO2(R. 2.1)
The equations and reactions are written in math-mode and the automatic
numbering was done
by using M-m n.
1. Put the following line in the preamble
\newcounter{reaction}
\numberwithin{reaction}{chapter}
\newcommand{\reaction}{\addtocounter{reaction}{1}\tag{R. \thereaction}}
2. Select Use ams math in the document dialog (in extra tab in 1.1.6).
3. At each reaction, write \reaction at the end (inside the math inset).
Note that when you reference a reaction, you will get 'R. 2.1'.
I´m sorry, but I think I´m too dummy. I´m not able to insert a \reaction inside the
math
inset. The \ doesn´t work.But writing reaction in Tex-red works fine. That´s
exactly
what I needed.
Thanks a lot
Andi
Re: Different numbering for chemical reaction and numerical equation
During writing my thesis I ran into this problem:
I use chemical reactions and numerical equations in the text. The
problem is, to number the different equations in a different way, like:
1+1=2(2.1)
1+2=3(2.2)
but for chemical reaction something like
C+O2-CO2(R. 2.1)
The equations and reactions are written in math-mode and the automatic
numbering was done
by using M-m n.
1. Put the following line in the preamble
\newcounter{reaction}
\numberwithin{reaction}{chapter}
\newcommand{\reaction}{\addtocounter{reaction}{1}\tag{R. \thereaction}}
2. Select Use ams math in the document dialog (in extra tab in 1.1.6).
3. At each reaction, write \reaction at the end (inside the math inset).
Note that when you reference a reaction, you will get 'R. 2.1'.
I´m sorry, but I think I´m too dummy. I´m not able to insert a \reaction inside the
math
inset. The \ doesn´t work.But writing reaction in Tex-red works fine. That´s
exactly
what I needed.
Thanks a lot
Andi
Re: Different numbering for chemical reaction and numerical equation
>> During writing my thesis I ran into this problem:
>> I use chemical reactions and numerical equations in the text. The
>> problem is, to number the different equations in a different way, like:
>>>
>> 1+1=2(2.1)
>> 1+2=3(2.2)
>>
>> but for chemical reaction something like
>>
>> C+O2->CO2(R. 2.1)
>>
>> The equations and reactions are written in math-mode and the automatic
>> numbering was done
>> by using M-m n.
>1. Put the following line in the preamble
>\newcounter{reaction}
>\numberwithin{reaction}{chapter}
>\newcommand{\reaction}{\addtocounter{reaction}{1}\tag{R. \thereaction}}
>2. Select "Use ams math" in the document dialog (in "extra" tab in 1.1.6).
>3. At each reaction, write \reaction at the end (inside the math inset).
>Note that when you reference a reaction, you will get 'R. 2.1'.
I´m sorry, but I think I´m too dummy. I´m not able to insert a \reaction inside the
math
inset. The "\" doesn´t work.But writing "reaction" in Tex-red works fine. That´s
exactly
what I needed.
Thanks a lot
Andi
