Re: LaTeX/LyX math

2004-10-22 Thread Nicolas Ferré
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Nicolas" == Nicolas Ferré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Nicolas> Hi, A little wish about math. There are two ways for entering
Nicolas> math: open a math environment and type in it or write a latex
Nicolas> formula, select it and convert it in math using C-m for
Nicolas> instance. But the last needs to explicitely write the $
Nicolas> around the latex formula. If the $ are forgotten, lyx
Nicolas> converts the formula to text even if there is a math symbol
Nicolas> (beginning with \) in the formula. Could it be possible to
Nicolas> automatically add the $ around the latex formula when
Nicolas> transforming it in math and a \ is detected in it ? I know
Nicolas> the backslash is rather common in latex ;-) but we can assume
Nicolas> that each time a latex formula must be converted in math, all
Nicolas> latex symbols in the formula are math symbols.
Nicolas> But maybe I miss a good reason for always needing the $ ?
Probably because $ is only one of the possibilities, others being
\[..\] or eqnarray-like environments.
JMarc

Yes I agree. What I suggested was a sort of "hum ... silly, I forget the 
math delimiters" automatic correction, which action is to default to the 
$ delimiters when no delimiters are found. This way the user ... me ;-) 
avoids one error (actually I recently forget 3 or 4 times the math 
delimiters when writting some short titles, maybe because they are boxed 
in red).

--
 Dr. Nicolas Ferre'
 Laboratoire de Chimie Theorique et de Modelisation Moleculaire
 UMR 6517 - CNRS Universite' de Provence
 Case 521 - Faculte' de Saint-Jerome
 Av. Esc. Normandie Niemen
 13397 MARSEILLE Cedex 20 (FRANCE)
 Tel : (+33)4.91.28.27.33  Fax : (+33)4.91.28.87.58
 Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
 See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html


Re: LaTeX/LyX math

2004-10-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Ferré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Nicolas> Hi, A little wish about math. There are two ways for entering
Nicolas> math: open a math environment and type in it or write a latex
Nicolas> formula, select it and convert it in math using C-m for
Nicolas> instance. But the last needs to explicitely write the $
Nicolas> around the latex formula. If the $ are forgotten, lyx
Nicolas> converts the formula to text even if there is a math symbol
Nicolas> (beginning with \) in the formula. Could it be possible to
Nicolas> automatically add the $ around the latex formula when
Nicolas> transforming it in math and a \ is detected in it ? I know
Nicolas> the backslash is rather common in latex ;-) but we can assume
Nicolas> that each time a latex formula must be converted in math, all
Nicolas> latex symbols in the formula are math symbols.

Nicolas> But maybe I miss a good reason for always needing the $ ?

Probably because $ is only one of the possibilities, others being
\[..\] or eqnarray-like environments.

JMarc


Re: LaTeX/LyX math

2004-10-22 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 11:07:56AM +0200, Nicolas Ferré wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A little wish about math. There are two ways for entering math: open a 
> math environment and type in it or write a latex formula, select it and 
> convert it in math using C-m for instance.
> But the last needs to explicitely write the $ around the latex formula. 
> If the $ are forgotten, lyx converts the formula to text even if there 
> is a math symbol (beginning with \) in the formula.
> Could it be possible to automatically add the $ around the latex formula 
> when transforming it in math and a \ is detected in it ?
> I know the backslash is rather common in latex ;-) but we can assume 
> that each time a latex formula must be converted in math, all latex 
> symbols in the formula are math symbols.
> 
> But maybe I miss a good reason for always needing the $ ?

  Because that is the proper way to do it. ;-)
  
  What you can do is define a new bind that places the $'s for you there.
Not as difficult as it can be done for 1.3.5. :-)

> -- 
>  Dr. Nicolas Ferre'
>  Laboratoire de Chimie Theorique et de Modelisation Moleculaire
>  UMR 6517 - CNRS Universite' de Provence
>  Case 521 - Faculte' de Saint-Jerome
>  Av. Esc. Normandie Niemen
>  13397 MARSEILLE Cedex 20 (FRANCE)
>  Tel : (+33)4.91.28.27.33  Fax : (+33)4.91.28.87.58
> 
>  Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
>  See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

-- 
José Abílio Matos
LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)


LaTeX/LyX math

2004-10-22 Thread Nicolas Ferré
Hi,
A little wish about math. There are two ways for entering math: open a 
math environment and type in it or write a latex formula, select it and 
convert it in math using C-m for instance.
But the last needs to explicitely write the $ around the latex formula. 
If the $ are forgotten, lyx converts the formula to text even if there 
is a math symbol (beginning with \) in the formula.
Could it be possible to automatically add the $ around the latex formula 
when transforming it in math and a \ is detected in it ?
I know the backslash is rather common in latex ;-) but we can assume 
that each time a latex formula must be converted in math, all latex 
symbols in the formula are math symbols.

But maybe I miss a good reason for always needing the $ ?
--
 Dr. Nicolas Ferre'
 Laboratoire de Chimie Theorique et de Modelisation Moleculaire
 UMR 6517 - CNRS Universite' de Provence
 Case 521 - Faculte' de Saint-Jerome
 Av. Esc. Normandie Niemen
 13397 MARSEILLE Cedex 20 (FRANCE)
 Tel : (+33)4.91.28.27.33  Fax : (+33)4.91.28.87.58
 Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
 See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html