Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
Where did you get it? I found lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which should be about the same thing, right? I think I've wandered into a distinction between SuSE and other versions. Suggestions? Anyone know of any other RPM versions of 1.1.6fix4 around? On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 02:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Has anyone gotten Lyx to work on RH 7.3? Please help... On Tuesday 29 October 2002 09:50 pm, Steve.Homolya wrote: YES!!! lyx 1.1.6fix4 and 1.2.0 installed just fine from the binary rpms. 1.2.1 I don't know about. I recommend you go with 1.1.6fix4, or the latest fix version of 1.1.5. TIAA - Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 15:43, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Where did you get it? I found lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which should be about the same thing, right? I think I've wandered into a distinction between SuSE and other versions. Suggestions? Anyone know of any other RPM versions of 1.1.6fix4 around? Now rpm -Uvh xxx.rpm --nodeps should do no harm. :-) -- José Abílio
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
Where did you get it? I found lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which should be about the same thing, right? I think I've wandered into a distinction between SuSE and other versions. Suggestions? Anyone know of any other RPM versions of 1.1.6fix4 around? On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 02:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Has anyone gotten Lyx to work on RH 7.3? Please help... On Tuesday 29 October 2002 09:50 pm, Steve.Homolya wrote: YES!!! lyx 1.1.6fix4 and 1.2.0 installed just fine from the binary rpms. 1.2.1 I don't know about. I recommend you go with 1.1.6fix4, or the latest fix version of 1.1.5. TIAA - Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 15:43, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Where did you get it? I found lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which should be about the same thing, right? I think I've wandered into a distinction between SuSE and other versions. Suggestions? Anyone know of any other RPM versions of 1.1.6fix4 around? Now rpm -Uvh xxx.rpm --nodeps should do no harm. :-) -- José Abílio
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
Where did you get it? I found "lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm" on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which should be about the same thing, right? I think I've wandered into a distinction between SuSE and other versions. Suggestions? Anyone know of any other RPM versions of 1.1.6fix4 around? > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 02:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > > > > Has anyone gotten Lyx to work on RH 7.3? Please help... On Tuesday 29 October 2002 09:50 pm, Steve.Homolya wrote: > > YES!!! lyx 1.1.6fix4 and 1.2.0 installed just fine from the binary > rpms. 1.2.1 I don't know about. I recommend you go with 1.1.6fix4, > or the latest fix version of 1.1.5. > TIAA - Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 15:43, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > Where did you get it? I found "lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm" on fr2 > [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 > mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already > have tetex-latex installed, which should be about the same thing, > right? I think I've wandered into a distinction between SuSE and > other versions. Suggestions? Anyone know of any other RPM versions > of 1.1.6fix4 around? Now rpm -Uvh xxx.rpm --nodeps should do no harm. :-) -- José Abílio
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. HAS ANYONE GOTTEN LYX TO WORK ON RH 7.3? Please help. TIA - Carole On Friday 25 October 2002 04:00 pm, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:16:53AM -0500, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. Have you tried to symlink the newer lib to the older name? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 15:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. Take the src.rpm version and compile it. rpm --rebuild ...src.rpm that will solve all your problems. HAS ANYONE GOTTEN LYX TO WORK ON RH 7.3? Please help. It is not nice to shout. TIA - Carole -- José Abílio
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. HAS ANYONE GOTTEN LYX TO WORK ON RH 7.3? Please help. TIA - Carole On Friday 25 October 2002 04:00 pm, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:16:53AM -0500, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. Have you tried to symlink the newer lib to the older name? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 15:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. Take the src.rpm version and compile it. rpm --rebuild ...src.rpm that will solve all your problems. HAS ANYONE GOTTEN LYX TO WORK ON RH 7.3? Please help. It is not nice to shout. TIA - Carole -- José Abílio
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: "xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm" However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. HAS ANYONE GOTTEN LYX TO WORK ON RH 7.3? Please help. TIA - Carole On Friday 25 October 2002 04:00 pm, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly > appropriate: > > A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm > B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm > C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm > > With each I get dependency errors - > > A) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 > libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 > libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 > Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 > B) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > C) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > > (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have > installed: > ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 > ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 > and > ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 > > So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the > lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. > AND use -nodeps. > > OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: > > ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 > ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 > > TIA Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:16:53AM -0500, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and > libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but > couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks > from my other computer: "xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm" > > However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently > RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND > installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts > with the newer version. Have you tried to symlink the newer lib to the older name? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 15:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and > libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but > couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks > from my other computer: "xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm" > > However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently > RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND > installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts > with the newer version. Take the src.rpm version and compile it. rpm --rebuild ...src.rpm that will solve all your problems. > HAS ANYONE GOTTEN LYX TO WORK ON RH 7.3? Please help. It is not nice to shout. > TIA - Carole -- José Abílio
Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
