Re: Fwd: Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
On 19.04.2016 16:23, Helge Hafting wrote: Den 19. april 2016 14:54, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: Thanks, JMarc; so I should have called it e.g.. /configure --with-version-suffix=-2-2 or /configure --with-version-suffix=2-2 for a shorter name. Well, I can live with it. Wolfgang If you don't want to reconfigure & recompile just for the name change, then consider this: alias lyx22="lyx-latestdev" After that, the command lyx22 does what you want :-) Helge Hafting Good idea. Thanks Wolfgang
Re: Fwd: Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
Den 19. april 2016 14:54, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: Thanks, JMarc; so I should have called it e.g.. /configure --with-version-suffix=-2-2 or /configure --with-version-suffix=2-2 for a shorter name. Well, I can live with it. Wolfgang If you don't want to reconfigure & recompile just for the name change, then consider this: alias lyx22="lyx-latestdev" After that, the command lyx22 does what you want :-) Helge Hafting
Re: Fwd: Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
On 19.04.2016 11:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 19/04/2016 11:29, Wolfgang Engelmann a écrit : I have not done this, but removed the lyx2.2 stuff (I had not yet done make install). I did compile again by using this time $./configure --with-version-suffix=-latestdev did the $make and #make install. How do I start the new lyx2.2? using lyx gives me the old 2.1 version, but I need the 2.2 for running classicthesis It is named lyx-latestdev. JMarc Thanks, JMarc; so I should have called it e.g.. /configure --with-version-suffix=-2-2 or /configure --with-version-suffix=2-2 for a shorter name. Well, I can live with it. Wolfgang
Re: Fwd: Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
Le 19/04/2016 11:29, Wolfgang Engelmann a écrit : I have not done this, but removed the lyx2.2 stuff (I had not yet done make install). I did compile again by using this time $./configure --with-version-suffix=-latestdev did the $make and #make install. How do I start the new lyx2.2? using lyx gives me the old 2.1 version, but I need the 2.2 for running classicthesis It is named lyx-latestdev. JMarc
Fwd: Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:22:05 +0200 From: Wolfgang Engelmann To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org On 18.04.2016 18:15, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Montag, 18. April 2016 um 17:19:07, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann On 18.04.2016 15:42, Helge Hafting wrote: Den 18. april 2016 15:14, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I have installed the new Lyx 2.2(rc1) thanks to the help of several people of this list. I wanted to keep the 2.1 version. I have therefore started the new version by using src/lyx on the command line (produced by ./configure and make - but omitted the make install so far). However, starting the old lyx 2.1 with lyx & gives me [1] 3613 we@wolfgang-Mr-Whisper-Ultra-SSD-II:/mnt/sdb/we$ Warning: Die Konfigurationsdatei konnte nicht gelesen werden Fehler beim Lesen der Konfigurationsdatei preferences. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihre Installation. Does the new lyx use some of the resources and what could I do? Can I change the name of the new Lyx to e.g. Lyx2-2 at this stage (perhaps while doing make install) and get the resources back again? The "new" lyx has updated stuff in your .lyx/ directory - the "old" lyx does not understand and fails. You can get the old lyx working by removing any new files from .lyx/ that the new lyx has created there, or removing the entire .lyx directory. (That will also remove your preferences, so you may have to re-set anything in tools->preferences as well as any default document->settings. To avoid this sort of thing, when you compile a test version of LyX: ./configure --with-version-suffix (as well as any other parameters you may want) When you "make install", you will then get lyx-2.2dev which will store its settings in .lyx-2.2dev/ and there will be no conflict with your older lyx 2.1 Helge Hafting Thanks, Helge. I should have thought of this. Wolfgang You can always use your 'private' user dir to avoid clashes. # mkdir ~/.lyx2.1 # /lyx -usedir ~/.lyx2.1 Kornel That is probably the easiest way. Thanks, Kornel I have not done this, but removed the lyx2.2 stuff (I had not yet done make install). I did compile again by using this time $./configure --with-version-suffix=-latestdev did the $make and #make install. How do I start the new lyx2.2? using lyx gives me the old 2.1 version, but I need the 2.2 for running classicthesis Wolfgang
Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
On 18.04.2016 18:15, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Montag, 18. April 2016 um 17:19:07, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann On 18.04.2016 15:42, Helge Hafting wrote: Den 18. april 2016 15:14, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I have installed the new Lyx 2.2(rc1) thanks to the help of several people of this list. I wanted to keep the 2.1 version. I have therefore started the new version by using src/lyx on the command line (produced by ./configure and make - but omitted the make install so far). However, starting the old lyx 2.1 with lyx & gives me [1] 3613 we@wolfgang-Mr-Whisper-Ultra-SSD-II:/mnt/sdb/we$ Warning: Die Konfigurationsdatei konnte nicht gelesen werden Fehler beim Lesen der Konfigurationsdatei preferences. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihre Installation. Does the new lyx use some of the resources and what could I do? Can I change the name of the new Lyx to e.g. Lyx2-2 at this stage (perhaps while doing make install) and get the resources back again? The "new" lyx has updated stuff in your .lyx/ directory - the "old" lyx does not understand and fails. You can get the old lyx working by removing any new files from .lyx/ that the new lyx has created there, or removing the entire .lyx directory. (That will also remove your preferences, so you may have to re-set anything in tools->preferences as well as any default document->settings. To avoid this sort of thing, when you compile a test version of LyX: ./configure --with-version-suffix (as well as any other parameters you may want) When you "make install", you will then get lyx-2.2dev which will store its settings in .lyx-2.2dev/ and there will be no conflict with your older lyx 2.1 Helge Hafting Thanks, Helge. I should have thought of this. Wolfgang You can always use your 'private' user dir to avoid clashes. # mkdir ~/.lyx2.1 # /lyx -usedir ~/.lyx2.1 Kornel That is probably the easiest way. Thanks, Kornel
Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
Am Montag, 18. April 2016 um 17:19:07, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann > On 18.04.2016 15:42, Helge Hafting wrote: > > > > > > Den 18. april 2016 15:14, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: > >> I have installed the new Lyx 2.2(rc1) thanks to the help of several > >> people of this list. I wanted to keep the 2.1 version. I have > >> therefore started the new version by using src/lyx on the command > >> line (produced by ./configure and make - but omitted the make install > >> so far). > >> However, starting the old lyx 2.1 with > >> lyx & > >> gives me > >> [1] 3613 > >> we@wolfgang-Mr-Whisper-Ultra-SSD-II:/mnt/sdb/we$ Warning: Die > >> Konfigurationsdatei konnte nicht gelesen werden > >> > >> Fehler beim Lesen der Konfigurationsdatei preferences. > >> Bitte prüfen Sie Ihre Installation. > >> > >> Does the new lyx use some of the resources and what could I do? > >> Can I change the name of the new Lyx to e.g. Lyx2-2 at this stage > >> (perhaps while doing make install) and get the resources back again? > > The "new" lyx has updated stuff in your .lyx/ directory - the "old" > > lyx does not understand and fails. > > > > You can get the old lyx working by removing any new files from .lyx/ > > that the new lyx has created there, > > or removing the entire .lyx directory. (That will also remove your > > preferences, so you may have to re-set > > anything in tools->preferences as well as any default document->settings. > > > > To avoid this sort of thing, when you compile a test version of LyX: > > ./configure --with-version-suffix (as well as any other parameters > > you may want) > > When you "make install", you will then get lyx-2.2dev which will store > > its settings in .lyx-2.2dev/ and there will be no conflict with your > > older lyx 2.1 > > > > Helge Hafting > Thanks, Helge. I should have thought of this. Wolfgang You can always use your 'private' user dir to avoid clashes. # mkdir ~/.lyx2.1 # /lyx -usedir ~/.lyx2.1 Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
On 18.04.2016 15:42, Helge Hafting wrote: Den 18. april 2016 15:14, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I have installed the new Lyx 2.2(rc1) thanks to the help of several people of this list. I wanted to keep the 2.1 version. I have therefore started the new version by using src/lyx on the command line (produced by ./configure and make - but omitted the make install so far). However, starting the old lyx 2.1 with lyx & gives me [1] 3613 we@wolfgang-Mr-Whisper-Ultra-SSD-II:/mnt/sdb/we$ Warning: Die Konfigurationsdatei konnte nicht gelesen werden Fehler beim Lesen der Konfigurationsdatei preferences. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihre Installation. Does the new lyx use some of the resources and what could I do? Can I change the name of the new Lyx to e.g. Lyx2-2 at this stage (perhaps while doing make install) and get the resources back again? The "new" lyx has updated stuff in your .lyx/ directory - the "old" lyx does not understand and fails. You can get the old lyx working by removing any new files from .lyx/ that the new lyx has created there, or removing the entire .lyx directory. (That will also remove your preferences, so you may have to re-set anything in tools->preferences as well as any default document->settings. To avoid this sort of thing, when you compile a test version of LyX: ./configure --with-version-suffix (as well as any other parameters you may want) When you "make install", you will then get lyx-2.2dev which will store its settings in .lyx-2.2dev/ and there will be no conflict with your older lyx 2.1 Helge Hafting Thanks, Helge. I should have thought of this. Wolfgang
Re: Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
Den 18. april 2016 15:14, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I have installed the new Lyx 2.2(rc1) thanks to the help of several people of this list. I wanted to keep the 2.1 version. I have therefore started the new version by using src/lyx on the command line (produced by ./configure and make - but omitted the make install so far). However, starting the old lyx 2.1 with lyx & gives me [1] 3613 we@wolfgang-Mr-Whisper-Ultra-SSD-II:/mnt/sdb/we$ Warning: Die Konfigurationsdatei konnte nicht gelesen werden Fehler beim Lesen der Konfigurationsdatei preferences. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihre Installation. Does the new lyx use some of the resources and what could I do? Can I change the name of the new Lyx to e.g. Lyx2-2 at this stage (perhaps while doing make install) and get the resources back again? The "new" lyx has updated stuff in your .lyx/ directory - the "old" lyx does not understand and fails. You can get the old lyx working by removing any new files from .lyx/ that the new lyx has created there, or removing the entire .lyx directory. (That will also remove your preferences, so you may have to re-set anything in tools->preferences as well as any default document->settings. To avoid this sort of thing, when you compile a test version of LyX: ./configure --with-version-suffix (as well as any other parameters you may want) When you "make install", you will then get lyx-2.2dev which will store its settings in .lyx-2.2dev/ and there will be no conflict with your older lyx 2.1 Helge Hafting
Lyx 2.2 and 2.1 side by side
I have installed the new Lyx 2.2(rc1) thanks to the help of several people of this list. I wanted to keep the 2.1 version. I have therefore started the new version by using src/lyx on the command line (produced by ./configure and make - but omitted the make install so far). However, starting the old lyx 2.1 with lyx & gives me [1] 3613 we@wolfgang-Mr-Whisper-Ultra-SSD-II:/mnt/sdb/we$ Warning: Die Konfigurationsdatei konnte nicht gelesen werden Fehler beim Lesen der Konfigurationsdatei preferences. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihre Installation. Does the new lyx use some of the resources and what could I do? Can I change the name of the new Lyx to e.g. Lyx2-2 at this stage (perhaps while doing make install) and get the resources back again? Wolfgang