Multiline and 1.2.0
Hi all,
Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0.
At the moment I tried
ERT[\begin{mutiline}]
enter formula
ERT[\end{multiline}]
I fall down at the point of entering \\ in mathed, to get a new line. I
seem to remember a similar post in the mailing list, but an hour searching
through has failed to reveal it.
Thanks,
Rod
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:58:30PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0.
Should work [well, if called 'multline' at least]
At the moment I tried
ERT[\begin{mutiline}]
enter formula
ERT[\end{multiline}]
I fall down at the point of entering \\ in mathed, to get a new line. I
seem to remember a similar post in the mailing list, but an hour searching
through has failed to reveal it.
M-m w i(_m_ath ro_w_ _i_nsert) should insert a row in gridded
structures. I think 1.2.0 has a bug which disables this in inlined
formulas, so you have to switch this to displayed (S-M-m) and back.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
M-m w i(_m_ath ro_w_ _i_nsert) should insert a row in gridded
structures. I think 1.2.0 has a bug which disables this in inlined
formulas, so you have to switch this to displayed (S-M-m) and back.
Andre'
Andre,
Thanks. Just compiling the doc now. M-m w i seems to work fine in 1.2.0 in
inline math.
However, doing this I now get an error compiling...the latex should be
\begin{multline} equation \end{multline}
Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which
seems to make latex fall over.
Rod
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which seems to make latex fall over. What exactly are you doing? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached.
Basically,
Type \begin{multline} as ert
enter inline formula
type \end{multline} as ert
Rod
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which
seems to make latex fall over.
What exactly are you doing?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 220
\textclass article
\language english
\inputencoding auto
\fontscheme default
\graphics default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single
\papersize Default
\paperpackage a4
\use_geometry 0
\use_amsmath 1
\use_natbib 0
\use_numerical_citations 0
\paperorientation portrait
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\layout Standard
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
\layout Standard
\backslash
begin{multline}
\end_inset
\begin_inset Formula $x=y+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+\int x^{2}dx+8+9\\
+10+11+12+13+14+15$
\end_inset
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
\layout Standard
end{multline}
\end_inset
\the_end
%% LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
\documentclass[english]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\makeatletter
%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
\providecommand{\LyX}{L\kern-.1667em\lower.25em\hbox{Y}\kern-.125emX\@}
\usepackage{babel}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\begin{multline}$x=y+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+\int x^{2}dx+8+9\\
+10+11+12+13+14+15$end{multline}
\end{document}
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:57:03PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached.
Basically,
Type \begin{multline} as ert
enter inline formula
type \end{multline} as ert
That translates to
\begin{multline}$...$\end{multline}
and LaTeX's choking is to be expected..
What about
Type \begin{multline}1 2 \\ 3 4\end{multline}
Mark it,
Press C-m?
[I know, this should be documented somewhere. In 1.3 it's at least
accessible through Insert-Math-AMS multline.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
What about
Type \begin{multline}1 2 \\ 3 4\end{multline}
Mark it,
Press C-m?
Yup, that does it.
BTW, looking throught the mail list, the was a reference to some docs for
math mode for 1.2.0, on Herbert Voss's hints tricks page. The link to
the doc is broken however.
Thanks,
Rod
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
Thanks,
My mistake was trying to enter the \begin{multline} and \end{multline} as
ert. It seems to stop the conversion when you use C-m.
Rod
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
What about
Type \begin{multline}1 2 \\ 3 4\end{multline}
Mark it,
Press C-m?
Or just type \begin{multline}\end{multline},
mark it, press C-m, and then use mathed to enter the text inside,
using ctrl+enter to add new rows (\\ in latex).
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Multiline and 1.2.0
Hi all,
Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0.
At the moment I tried
ERT[\begin{mutiline}]
enter formula
ERT[\end{multiline}]
I fall down at the point of entering \\ in mathed, to get a new line. I
seem to remember a similar post in the mailing list, but an hour searching
through has failed to reveal it.
Thanks,
Rod
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:58:30PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0.
Should work [well, if called 'multline' at least]
At the moment I tried
ERT[\begin{mutiline}]
enter formula
ERT[\end{multiline}]
I fall down at the point of entering \\ in mathed, to get a new line. I
seem to remember a similar post in the mailing list, but an hour searching
through has failed to reveal it.
M-m w i(_m_ath ro_w_ _i_nsert) should insert a row in gridded
structures. I think 1.2.0 has a bug which disables this in inlined
formulas, so you have to switch this to displayed (S-M-m) and back.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
M-m w i(_m_ath ro_w_ _i_nsert) should insert a row in gridded
structures. I think 1.2.0 has a bug which disables this in inlined
formulas, so you have to switch this to displayed (S-M-m) and back.
Andre'
Andre,
Thanks. Just compiling the doc now. M-m w i seems to work fine in 1.2.0 in
inline math.
However, doing this I now get an error compiling...the latex should be
\begin{multline} equation \end{multline}
Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which
seems to make latex fall over.
Rod
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which seems to make latex fall over. What exactly are you doing? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached.
Basically,
Type \begin{multline} as ert
enter inline formula
type \end{multline} as ert
Rod
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which
seems to make latex fall over.
What exactly are you doing?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 220
\textclass article
\language english
\inputencoding auto
\fontscheme default
\graphics default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single
\papersize Default
\paperpackage a4
\use_geometry 0
\use_amsmath 1
\use_natbib 0
\use_numerical_citations 0
\paperorientation portrait
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\layout Standard
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
\layout Standard
\backslash
begin{multline}
\end_inset
\begin_inset Formula $x=y+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+\int x^{2}dx+8+9\\
+10+11+12+13+14+15$
\end_inset
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
\layout Standard
end{multline}
\end_inset
\the_end
%% LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
\documentclass[english]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\makeatletter
%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
\providecommand{\LyX}{L\kern-.1667em\lower.25em\hbox{Y}\kern-.125emX\@}
\usepackage{babel}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\begin{multline}$x=y+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+\int x^{2}dx+8+9\\
+10+11+12+13+14+15$end{multline}
\end{document}
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:57:03PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached.
Basically,
Type \begin{multline} as ert
enter inline formula
type \end{multline} as ert
That translates to
\begin{multline}$...$\end{multline}
and LaTeX's choking is to be expected..
What about
Type \begin{multline}1 2 \\ 3 4\end{multline}
Mark it,
Press C-m?
[I know, this should be documented somewhere. In 1.3 it's at least
accessible through Insert-Math-AMS multline.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
What about
Type \begin{multline}1 2 \\ 3 4\end{multline}
Mark it,
Press C-m?
Yup, that does it.
BTW, looking throught the mail list, the was a reference to some docs for
math mode for 1.2.0, on Herbert Voss's hints tricks page. The link to
the doc is broken however.
Thanks,
Rod
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
Thanks,
My mistake was trying to enter the \begin{multline} and \end{multline} as
ert. It seems to stop the conversion when you use C-m.
Rod
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
What about
Type \begin{multline}1 2 \\ 3 4\end{multline}
Mark it,
Press C-m?
Or just type \begin{multline}\end{multline},
mark it, press C-m, and then use mathed to enter the text inside,
using ctrl+enter to add new rows (\\ in latex).
_
rod | Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea.
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Multiline and 1.2.0
Hi all,
Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0.
At the moment I tried
ERT[\begin{mutiline}]
enter formula
ERT[\end{multiline}]
I fall down at the point of entering \\ in mathed, to get a new line. I
seem to remember a similar post in the mailing list, but an hour searching
through has failed to reveal it.
Thanks,
Rod
_
rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea."
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:58:30PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
> Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0.
Should work [well, if called 'multline' at least]
> At the moment I tried
>
> ERT[\begin{mutiline}]
> enter formula
> ERT[\end{multiline}]
>
> I fall down at the point of entering \\ in mathed, to get a new line. I
> seem to remember a similar post in the mailing list, but an hour searching
> through has failed to reveal it.
M-m w i(_m_ath ro_w_ _i_nsert) should insert a row in "gridded"
structures. I think 1.2.0 has a bug which disables this in inlined
formulas, so you have to switch this to "displayed" (S-M-m) and back.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> M-m w i(_m_ath ro_w_ _i_nsert) should insert a row in "gridded"
> structures. I think 1.2.0 has a bug which disables this in inlined
> formulas, so you have to switch this to "displayed" (S-M-m) and back.
>
> Andre'
Andre,
Thanks. Just compiling the doc now. M-m w i seems to work fine in 1.2.0 in
inline math.
However, doing this I now get an error compiling...the latex should be
\begin{multline} equation \end{multline}
Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which
seems to make latex fall over.
Rod
_
rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea."
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which > seems to make latex fall over. What exactly are you doing? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached.
Basically,
Type \begin{multline} as ert
enter inline formula
type \end{multline} as ert
Rod
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
> > Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which
> > seems to make latex fall over.
>
> What exactly are you doing?
>
> Andre'
>
> --
> Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
> will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
>
_
rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea."
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 220
\textclass article
\language english
\inputencoding auto
\fontscheme default
\graphics default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single
\papersize Default
\paperpackage a4
\use_geometry 0
\use_amsmath 1
\use_natbib 0
\use_numerical_citations 0
\paperorientation portrait
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\layout Standard
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
\layout Standard
\backslash
begin{multline}
\end_inset
\begin_inset Formula $x=y+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+\int x^{2}dx+8+9\\
+10+11+12+13+14+15$
\end_inset
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
\layout Standard
end{multline}
\end_inset
\the_end
%% LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
\documentclass[english]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\makeatletter
%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
\providecommand{\LyX}{L\kern-.1667em\lower.25em\hbox{Y}\kern-.125emX\@}
\usepackage{babel}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\begin{multline}$x=y+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+\int x^{2}dx+8+9\\
+10+11+12+13+14+15$end{multline}
\end{document}
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:57:03PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
> Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached.
>
> Basically,
>
> Type \begin{multline} as ert
> enter inline formula
> type \end{multline} as ert
That translates to
\begin{multline}$...$\end{multline}
and LaTeX's choking is to be expected..
What about
Type \begin{multline}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{multline}
Mark it,
Press C-m?
[I know, this should be documented somewhere. In 1.3 it's at least
accessible through Insert->Math->AMS multline.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
> What about
>
> Type \begin{multline}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{multline}
> Mark it,
> Press C-m?
>
Yup, that does it.
BTW, looking throught the mail list, the was a reference to some docs for
math mode for 1.2.0, on Herbert Voss's hints & tricks page. The link to
the doc is broken however.
Thanks,
Rod
_
rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea."
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
Re: Multiline and 1.2.0
Thanks,
My mistake was trying to enter the \begin{multline} and \end{multline} as
ert. It seems to stop the conversion when you use C-m.
Rod
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > What about
> >
> > Type \begin{multline}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{multline}
> > Mark it,
> > Press C-m?
>
> Or just type \begin{multline}\end{multline},
> mark it, press C-m, and then use mathed to enter the text inside,
> using ctrl+enter to add new rows (\\ in latex).
>
>
_
rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
| I'm going to see the cow beneath the sea."
| They Might Be Giants, Lincoln
