Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
On Friday 29 August 2003 05:10, Jim Osborn wrote: Have I simply lost these documents? There's not much tabular material in them, and if I knew what to go after, maybe I could edit the offending stuff out of the .lyx files. Could anyone give advice on a way to salvage them? Would a very old (like how old?) version of LyX really know more about 1.1.6 than 1.1.5 does? That seems bizaare, but I'll try any suggestions. You will kill me for this but_ that is fixed in 1.3. ;-) TIA, Jim -- José Abílio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote: I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a box saying Tabular format 5 is not supported anymore/ Get an older version of LyX ( 1.1.x) for conversion! Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200 To: Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX... X-Spam-Score: -26.1 (--) On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote: I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a box saying Tabular format 5 is not supported anymore/ Get an older version of LyX ( 1.1.x) for conversion! Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? I understood that lyx2lyx should solve thses problems, bu you need lyx 1.3 ... and install python to get it to work (and, as far as tables are concerned, patch as indicated by Jean-Marc if you're with lyx-1.3.2 - this must be OK in 1.3.3cvs). http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg28226.html -- Jean-Pierre
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:27AM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote: From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200 To: Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX... X-Spam-Score: -26.1 (--) On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote: I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a box saying Tabular format 5 is not supported anymore/ Get an older version of LyX ( 1.1.x) for conversion! Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? I understood that lyx2lyx should solve thses problems, Only the 'upgrading' so far... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? Hi Andre', Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one; I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old. Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60. When I tried to install LyX 1.3.2 I got: rpm -U --test lyx-1.3.2-1suse81-qt.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libGLcore.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt liblcms.so is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libpng12.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt Checking my /usr/lib, I see: (no libGLcore, libgcc_s, or libpng12 at all) (liblcms.so@ and liblcms.so.1.0.7*) libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so* libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.a libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so* libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2* libstdc++.so.2.7.2* libstdc++.so.2.8* libstdc++.so.2.9* which sounds a long way from libstdc++.so.5 and friends. (I don't know why rpm didn't find the liblcms.so symlink to liblcms.so.1.0.7) I know it would be nice to upgrade to the latest, especially LyX, but I also know that upgrading gcc and the libs is not trivial without known-compatible versions of everything on a nice CD, so I hesitate, and decided to fall back to trusty old LyX 1.1.5 until I can download (over a tenuous 56K line) all the gcc/libs and verify their compatibility or spring for a new Linux CD. If I'm overlooking something that might make upgrading to LyX 1.3.2 easy, I'm open to suggestions. Thanks very much for asking :) Jim
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
Am Freitag, 29. August 2003 20:43 schrieb Jim Osborn: Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one; I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old. Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60. Hi Jim, if the only problem is missing RPMs for your system you should try these (qt and xforms for SuSE 7.2): http://hst33127.phys.uu.nl/LyX/index.html it's a german site but you should find the links. HTH, Juergen.
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
On Friday 29 August 2003 05:10, Jim Osborn wrote: Have I simply lost these documents? There's not much tabular material in them, and if I knew what to go after, maybe I could edit the offending stuff out of the .lyx files. Could anyone give advice on a way to salvage them? Would a very old (like how old?) version of LyX really know more about 1.1.6 than 1.1.5 does? That seems bizaare, but I'll try any suggestions. You will kill me for this but_ that is fixed in 1.3. ;-) TIA, Jim -- José Abílio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote: I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a box saying Tabular format 5 is not supported anymore/ Get an older version of LyX ( 1.1.x) for conversion! Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200 To: Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX... X-Spam-Score: -26.1 (--) On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote: I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a box saying Tabular format 5 is not supported anymore/ Get an older version of LyX ( 1.1.x) for conversion! Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? I understood that lyx2lyx should solve thses problems, bu you need lyx 1.3 ... and install python to get it to work (and, as far as tables are concerned, patch as indicated by Jean-Marc if you're with lyx-1.3.2 - this must be OK in 1.3.3cvs). http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg28226.html -- Jean-Pierre
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:27AM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote: From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200 To: Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX... X-Spam-Score: -26.1 (--) On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote: I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a box saying Tabular format 5 is not supported anymore/ Get an older version of LyX ( 1.1.x) for conversion! Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? I understood that lyx2lyx should solve thses problems, Only the 'upgrading' so far... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? Hi Andre', Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one; I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old. Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60. When I tried to install LyX 1.3.2 I got: rpm -U --test lyx-1.3.2-1suse81-qt.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libGLcore.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt liblcms.so is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libpng12.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt Checking my /usr/lib, I see: (no libGLcore, libgcc_s, or libpng12 at all) (liblcms.so@ and liblcms.so.1.0.7*) libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so* libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.a libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so* libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2* libstdc++.so.2.7.2* libstdc++.so.2.8* libstdc++.so.2.9* which sounds a long way from libstdc++.so.5 and friends. (I don't know why rpm didn't find the liblcms.so symlink to liblcms.so.1.0.7) I know it would be nice to upgrade to the latest, especially LyX, but I also know that upgrading gcc and the libs is not trivial without known-compatible versions of everything on a nice CD, so I hesitate, and decided to fall back to trusty old LyX 1.1.5 until I can download (over a tenuous 56K line) all the gcc/libs and verify their compatibility or spring for a new Linux CD. If I'm overlooking something that might make upgrading to LyX 1.3.2 easy, I'm open to suggestions. Thanks very much for asking :) Jim
Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
Am Freitag, 29. August 2003 20:43 schrieb Jim Osborn: Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one; I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old. Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60. Hi Jim, if the only problem is missing RPMs for your system you should try these (qt and xforms for SuSE 7.2): http://hst33127.phys.uu.nl/LyX/index.html it's a german site but you should find the links. HTH, Juergen.
Re: "Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX..."
On Friday 29 August 2003 05:10, Jim Osborn wrote: > > Have I simply lost these documents? There's not much "tabular" > material in them, and if I knew what to go after, maybe I could edit > the offending stuff out of the .lyx files. Could anyone give advice > on a way to salvage them? Would a very old (like how old?) version > of LyX really know more about 1.1.6 than 1.1.5 does? That seems > bizaare, but I'll try any suggestions. You will kill me for this but_ that is fixed in 1.3. ;-) > TIA, > > Jim -- José Abílio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Re: "Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX..."
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote: > I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few > documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a > box saying "Tabular format < 5 is not supported anymore/ > Get an older version of LyX (< 1.1.x) for conversion!" Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: "Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX..."
>>From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200 >>To: Jim Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: "Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX..." >>X-Spam-Score: -26.1 (--) >> >>On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote: >>> I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few >>> documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a >>> box saying "Tabular format < 5 is not supported anymore/ >>> Get an older version of LyX (< 1.1.x) for conversion!" >> >>Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? I understood that lyx2lyx should solve thses problems, bu you need lyx >1.3 ... and install python to get it to work (and, as far as tables are concerned, patch as indicated by Jean-Marc if you're with lyx-1.3.2 - this must be OK in 1.3.3cvs). http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg28226.html -- Jean-Pierre
Re: "Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX..."
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:27AM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote: > > >>From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200 > >>To: Jim Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: "Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX..." > >>X-Spam-Score: -26.1 (--) > >> > >>On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote: > >>> I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few > >>> documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a > >>> box saying "Tabular format < 5 is not supported anymore/ > >>> Get an older version of LyX (< 1.1.x) for conversion!" > >> > >>Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? > > I understood that lyx2lyx should solve thses problems, Only the 'upgrading' so far... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: "Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX..."
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2? Hi Andre', Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one; I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old. Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60. When I tried to install LyX 1.3.2 I got: rpm -U --test lyx-1.3.2-1suse81-qt.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libGLcore.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt liblcms.so is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libpng12.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.3.2-1_qt Checking my /usr/lib, I see: (no libGLcore, libgcc_s, or libpng12 at all) (liblcms.so@ and liblcms.so.1.0.7*) libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so* libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.a libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so* libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2* libstdc++.so.2.7.2* libstdc++.so.2.8* libstdc++.so.2.9* which sounds a long way from libstdc++.so.5 and friends. (I don't know why rpm didn't find the liblcms.so symlink to liblcms.so.1.0.7) I know it would be nice to upgrade to the latest, especially LyX, but I also know that upgrading gcc and the libs is not trivial without known-compatible versions of everything on a nice CD, so I hesitate, and decided to fall back to trusty old LyX 1.1.5 until I can download (over a tenuous 56K line) all the gcc/libs and verify their compatibility or spring for a new Linux CD. If I'm overlooking something that might make upgrading to LyX 1.3.2 easy, I'm open to suggestions. Thanks very much for asking :) Jim
Re: "Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX..."
Am Freitag, 29. August 2003 20:43 schrieb Jim Osborn: > Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one; > I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old. > Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60. Hi Jim, if the only problem is missing RPMs for your system you should try these (qt and xforms for SuSE 7.2): http://hst33127.phys.uu.nl/LyX/index.html it's a german site but you should find the links. HTH, Juergen.
