Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-25 Thread Nicolas Boos
Le Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:42:31 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :

Hello,

 Public release of LyX version 1.3.1
 ===
 
 We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.3.1.

I've updated my Debian package for Woody. See :

   http://dpt.tuxfamily.org/paquets-woody.html

(sources are also available via deb-src)

Cheers,
Nicolas


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-25 Thread Nicolas Boos
Le Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:42:31 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :

Hello,

 Public release of LyX version 1.3.1
 ===
 
 We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.3.1.

I've updated my Debian package for Woody. See :

   http://dpt.tuxfamily.org/paquets-woody.html

(sources are also available via deb-src)

Cheers,
Nicolas


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-25 Thread Nicolas Boos
Le Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:42:31 +0100
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :

Hello,

> Public release of LyX version 1.3.1
> ===
> 
> We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.3.1.

I've updated my Debian package for Woody. See :

   http://dpt.tuxfamily.org/paquets-woody.html

(sources are also available via deb-src)

Cheers,
Nicolas


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Henrik Edlund
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Max Bian wrote:

MB I am impressed by the time required to compile LyX.  Gcc is slow, but I
MB felt it took much shorter time to build linux kernel with all the
MB modules.
MB
MB Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
MB off -O2?

Take about the same time to compile LyX as it takes Mozilla for
me. Compiling the Linux kernel is about 10-20 times faster than
both.

-- 
There is no emotion; there is peace. There is no ignorance; there
is knowledge. There is no passion; there is serenity. There is no
death; there is the Force. -- Core of the Jedi Code


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Henrik Edlund wrote:

 Take about the same time to compile LyX as it takes Mozilla for
 me. Compiling the Linux kernel is about 10-20 times faster than
 both.
 

C++ has always been a lot slower to compile than C.

Regards, Alfredo




Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Sam Zeini
Hi,
i am interested on deb´s.
Sam.



Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Max Bian
It is probably related to the extensive use of libtool.  It runs every
time a source file is compiled.

Max
--- Henrik Edlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Take about the same time to compile LyX as it takes Mozilla for
 me. Compiling the Linux kernel is about 10-20 times faster than
 both.



Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:52:03AM -0800, Max Bian wrote:

 It is probably related to the extensive use of libtool.  It runs every
 time a source file is compiled.

It has absolutely nothing to do with libtool.

john


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Reed Loefgren

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Max Bian wrote:

 I am impressed by the time required to compile LyX.  Gcc is slow, but I
 felt it took much shorter time to build linux kernel with all the
 modules.

 Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
 off -O2?

 Max


I lurk the list and thought I'd mention my experiences. 1) 1.3.1 compiled
without problems on my Slack system, perhaps because I point out the misc
libs it might need. (This is my way of saying that I think RPMs stink
because you're semi-beholden to a script that might not be what you need.
Try using the raw source; it might be what you need (it was back in my
LinuxPPC days.))

And 2) Who cares how long it takes to compile? Why turn off any
optimizations? You compile once. You use it many times; _that's_ where the
benefits are.

Finally, here's my config string for raw source on Slackware. God knows
Slack's different from RH, so it might not work, but enjoy my largesse ;)

configure --with-extra-lib=/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib
--with-extra-inc=/usr/include:/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/include

This is all given in the sourcecode tarball the lyx people have been kind
enough to prepare. You may enjoy their largesse too...

rl


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Henrik Edlund
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Max Bian wrote:

MB I am impressed by the time required to compile LyX.  Gcc is slow, but I
MB felt it took much shorter time to build linux kernel with all the
MB modules.
MB
MB Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
MB off -O2?

Take about the same time to compile LyX as it takes Mozilla for
me. Compiling the Linux kernel is about 10-20 times faster than
both.

-- 
There is no emotion; there is peace. There is no ignorance; there
is knowledge. There is no passion; there is serenity. There is no
death; there is the Force. -- Core of the Jedi Code


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Henrik Edlund wrote:

 Take about the same time to compile LyX as it takes Mozilla for
 me. Compiling the Linux kernel is about 10-20 times faster than
 both.
 

C++ has always been a lot slower to compile than C.

Regards, Alfredo




Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Sam Zeini
Hi,
i am interested on deb´s.
Sam.



Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Max Bian
It is probably related to the extensive use of libtool.  It runs every
time a source file is compiled.

Max
--- Henrik Edlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Take about the same time to compile LyX as it takes Mozilla for
 me. Compiling the Linux kernel is about 10-20 times faster than
 both.



Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:52:03AM -0800, Max Bian wrote:

 It is probably related to the extensive use of libtool.  It runs every
 time a source file is compiled.

It has absolutely nothing to do with libtool.

john


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Reed Loefgren

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Max Bian wrote:

 I am impressed by the time required to compile LyX.  Gcc is slow, but I
 felt it took much shorter time to build linux kernel with all the
 modules.

 Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
 off -O2?

 Max


I lurk the list and thought I'd mention my experiences. 1) 1.3.1 compiled
without problems on my Slack system, perhaps because I point out the misc
libs it might need. (This is my way of saying that I think RPMs stink
because you're semi-beholden to a script that might not be what you need.
Try using the raw source; it might be what you need (it was back in my
LinuxPPC days.))

And 2) Who cares how long it takes to compile? Why turn off any
optimizations? You compile once. You use it many times; _that's_ where the
benefits are.

Finally, here's my config string for raw source on Slackware. God knows
Slack's different from RH, so it might not work, but enjoy my largesse ;)

configure --with-extra-lib=/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib
--with-extra-inc=/usr/include:/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/include

This is all given in the sourcecode tarball the lyx people have been kind
enough to prepare. You may enjoy their largesse too...

rl


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Henrik Edlund
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Max Bian wrote:

MB> I am impressed by the time required to compile LyX.  Gcc is slow, but I
MB> felt it took much shorter time to build linux kernel with all the
MB> modules.
MB>
MB> Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
MB> off -O2?

Take about the same time to compile LyX as it takes Mozilla for
me. Compiling the Linux kernel is about 10-20 times faster than
both.

-- 
"There is no emotion; there is peace. There is no ignorance; there
is knowledge. There is no passion; there is serenity. There is no
death; there is the Force." -- Core of the Jedi Code


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Henrik Edlund wrote:

> Take about the same time to compile LyX as it takes Mozilla for
> me. Compiling the Linux kernel is about 10-20 times faster than
> both.
> 

C++ has always been a lot slower to compile than C.

Regards, Alfredo




Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Sam Zeini
Hi,
i am interested on deb´s.
Sam.



Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Max Bian
It is probably related to the extensive use of libtool.  It runs every
time a source file is compiled.

Max
--- Henrik Edlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Take about the same time to compile LyX as it takes Mozilla for
> me. Compiling the Linux kernel is about 10-20 times faster than
> both.



Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:52:03AM -0800, Max Bian wrote:

> It is probably related to the extensive use of libtool.  It runs every
> time a source file is compiled.

It has absolutely nothing to do with libtool.

john


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-20 Thread Reed Loefgren

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Max Bian wrote:

> I am impressed by the time required to compile LyX.  Gcc is slow, but I
> felt it took much shorter time to build linux kernel with all the
> modules.
>
> Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
> off -O2?
>
> Max
>

I lurk the list and thought I'd mention my experiences. 1) 1.3.1 compiled
without problems on my Slack system, perhaps because I point out the misc
libs it might need. (This is my way of saying that I think RPMs stink
because you're semi-beholden to a script that might not be what you need.
Try using the raw source; it might be what you need (it was back in my
LinuxPPC days.))

And 2) Who cares how long it takes to compile? Why turn off any
optimizations? You compile once. You use it many times; _that's_ where the
benefits are.

Finally, here's my config string for raw source on Slackware. God knows
Slack's different from RH, so it might not work, but enjoy my largesse ;)

configure --with-extra-lib=/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib
--with-extra-inc=/usr/include:/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/include

This is all given in the sourcecode tarball the lyx people have been kind
enough to prepare. You may enjoy their largesse too...

rl


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-19 Thread robin
If anyone compiles a Mandrake RPM, please let me know! If no one wants 
to do it, I'll have a go, but last time I got bogged down in 
dependencies, got fed up, and made myself a simple tar.gz binary 
instead.  Don't trust me on this one!

Robin

--
The raisins may be the best part of a cake, but that doesn't
mean that a bag of raisins is better than a cake.
- Wittgenstein
Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey
www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin




Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-19 Thread Max Bian
I am impressed by the time required to compile LyX.  Gcc is slow, but I
felt it took much shorter time to build linux kernel with all the
modules.

Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
off -O2?

Max


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-19 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:49:04PM -0800, Max Bian wrote:

 Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
 off -O2?

You didn't state what compiler you're using. I suspect recent gcc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-01/msg01336.html

regards
john


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-19 Thread robin
If anyone compiles a Mandrake RPM, please let me know! If no one wants 
to do it, I'll have a go, but last time I got bogged down in 
dependencies, got fed up, and made myself a simple tar.gz binary 
instead.  Don't trust me on this one!

Robin

--
The raisins may be the best part of a cake, but that doesn't
mean that a bag of raisins is better than a cake.
- Wittgenstein
Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey
www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin




Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-19 Thread Max Bian
I am impressed by the time required to compile LyX.  Gcc is slow, but I
felt it took much shorter time to build linux kernel with all the
modules.

Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
off -O2?

Max


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-19 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:49:04PM -0800, Max Bian wrote:

 Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
 off -O2?

You didn't state what compiler you're using. I suspect recent gcc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-01/msg01336.html

regards
john


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-19 Thread robin
If anyone compiles a Mandrake RPM, please let me know! If no one wants 
to do it, I'll have a go, but last time I got bogged down in 
dependencies, got fed up, and made myself a simple tar.gz binary 
instead.  Don't trust me on this one!

Robin

--
"The raisins may be the best part of a cake, but that doesn't
mean that a bag of raisins is better than a cake."
- Wittgenstein
Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey
www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin




Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-19 Thread Max Bian
I am impressed by the time required to compile LyX.  Gcc is slow, but I
felt it took much shorter time to build linux kernel with all the
modules.

Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
off -O2?

Max


Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.1 is released

2003-03-19 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:49:04PM -0800, Max Bian wrote:

> Any config time option to speed up the build process besides turning
> off -O2?

You didn't state what compiler you're using. I suspect recent gcc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-01/msg01336.html

regards
john