Re: labeling equation in tex style
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 11:52:26AM +0100, Davide Cavallari wrote:
\[
\pi (w_r|\vec{w}) =
\begin{cases}\frac{1}{\eta} f \left(
\frac{w_r'-(1-\eta)w_r}{\eta}\right) + C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r),
\alpha_r(\vec{w}) \le w_r' \le \beta_r(\vec{w}) \\
C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r), w_r' \alpha_r(\vec{w})
\vee w_r' \beta_r(\vec{w})
\end{cases}
\]
What is the best way to label it?
It was a silly question, sorry! I only need to substitute \[ \]
with begin/end{equation} and then i can simply insert a labal with
Insert-Label.
--
Cheers,
Davide Cavallari
If a thing's worth having, it's worth cheating for.
-- W.C. Fields
Re: labeling equation in tex style
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 11:52:26AM +0100, Davide Cavallari wrote:
\[
\pi (w_r|\vec{w}) =
\begin{cases}\frac{1}{\eta} f \left(
\frac{w_r'-(1-\eta)w_r}{\eta}\right) + C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r),
\alpha_r(\vec{w}) \le w_r' \le \beta_r(\vec{w}) \\
C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r), w_r' \alpha_r(\vec{w})
\vee w_r' \beta_r(\vec{w})
\end{cases}
\]
What is the best way to label it?
It was a silly question, sorry! I only need to substitute \[ \]
with begin/end{equation} and then i can simply insert a labal with
Insert-Label.
--
Cheers,
Davide Cavallari
If a thing's worth having, it's worth cheating for.
-- W.C. Fields
Re: labeling equation in tex style
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 11:52:26AM +0100, Davide Cavallari wrote:
> \[
> \pi (w_r|\vec{w}) =
> \begin{cases}\frac{1}{\eta} f \left(
> \frac{w_r'-(1-\eta)w_r}{\eta}\right) + C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r), &
> \alpha_r(\vec{w}) \le w_r' \le \beta_r(\vec{w}) \\
> C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r), & w_r' < \alpha_r(\vec{w})
> \vee w_r' > \beta_r(\vec{w})
> \end{cases}
> \]
>
> What is the best way to label it?
It was a silly question, sorry! I only need to substitute "\[" "\]"
with "begin/end{equation}" and then i can simply insert a labal with
Insert->Label.
--
Cheers,
Davide Cavallari
If a thing's worth having, it's worth cheating for.
-- W.C. Fields
labeling equation in tex style
I have some equations written using the cases environment in tex style,
e.g.:
\[
\pi (w_r|\vec{w}) =
\begin{cases}\frac{1}{\eta} f \left(
\frac{w_r'-(1-\eta)w_r}{\eta}\right) + C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r),
\alpha_r(\vec{w}) \le w_r' \le \beta_r(\vec{w}) \\
C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r), w_r' \alpha_r(\vec{w})
\vee w_r' \beta_r(\vec{w})
\end{cases}
\]
What is the best way to label it? It would be great if it was possible
having lyx recognize such a label, so I could reference it in the text
using the Insert-Cross Reference utility.
--
Cheers,
Davide Cavallari
An optimist believes we live in the best world possible;
a pessimist fears this is true.
labeling equation in tex style
I have some equations written using the cases environment in tex style,
e.g.:
\[
\pi (w_r|\vec{w}) =
\begin{cases}\frac{1}{\eta} f \left(
\frac{w_r'-(1-\eta)w_r}{\eta}\right) + C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r),
\alpha_r(\vec{w}) \le w_r' \le \beta_r(\vec{w}) \\
C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r), w_r' \alpha_r(\vec{w})
\vee w_r' \beta_r(\vec{w})
\end{cases}
\]
What is the best way to label it? It would be great if it was possible
having lyx recognize such a label, so I could reference it in the text
using the Insert-Cross Reference utility.
--
Cheers,
Davide Cavallari
An optimist believes we live in the best world possible;
a pessimist fears this is true.
labeling equation in tex style
I have some equations written using the cases environment in tex style,
e.g.:
\[
\pi (w_r|\vec{w}) =
\begin{cases}\frac{1}{\eta} f \left(
\frac{w_r'-(1-\eta)w_r}{\eta}\right) + C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r), &
\alpha_r(\vec{w}) \le w_r' \le \beta_r(\vec{w}) \\
C_r(\vec{w})\delta(w_r'-w_r), & w_r' < \alpha_r(\vec{w})
\vee w_r' > \beta_r(\vec{w})
\end{cases}
\]
What is the best way to label it? It would be great if it was possible
having lyx recognize such a label, so I could reference it in the text
using the Insert->Cross Reference utility.
--
Cheers,
Davide Cavallari
An optimist believes we live in the best world possible;
a pessimist fears this is true.
