Re: listings package problem

2009-03-02 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-28, Nikos Alexandris wrote:

 Solution:
 % copy-paste from the listing package documentation
 upquote= true|false
 determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
 key requires the textcomp package if true.

 LyX-problem(?):
 I get an error-message that I should load the textcomp package although
 I already have done this. Looking at the source code, the upquote
 listing-setting is before the \usepackage{textcomp}.

 Is this a LyX-bug? 

Yes. (Or an unsupported feature: missing support for the upquote listings
setting.)

This should at least be documented, so please file a bug report.

 I guess the solution is to manually put the usepackage command before
 the listing-settings.

Or to set the upquote listings setting in the LaTeX preamble (no need
to move all other settings there too).

Günter



Re: listings package problem

2009-03-02 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-28, Nikos Alexandris wrote:

 Solution:
 % copy-paste from the listing package documentation
 upquote= true|false
 determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
 key requires the textcomp package if true.

 LyX-problem(?):
 I get an error-message that I should load the textcomp package although
 I already have done this. Looking at the source code, the upquote
 listing-setting is before the \usepackage{textcomp}.

 Is this a LyX-bug? 

Yes. (Or an unsupported feature: missing support for the upquote listings
setting.)

This should at least be documented, so please file a bug report.

 I guess the solution is to manually put the usepackage command before
 the listing-settings.

Or to set the upquote listings setting in the LaTeX preamble (no need
to move all other settings there too).

Günter



Re: listings package problem

2009-03-02 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-28, Nikos Alexandris wrote:

> Solution:
>> % copy-paste from the listing package documentation
>> upquote= true|false
>> determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
>> key requires the textcomp package if true.

> LyX-problem(?):
> I get an error-message that I should load the textcomp package although
> I already have done this. Looking at the source code, the "upquote"
> listing-setting is before the \usepackage{textcomp}.

> Is this a LyX-bug? 

Yes. (Or an unsupported feature: missing support for the "upquote" listings
setting.)

This should at least be documented, so please file a bug report.

> I guess the solution is to manually put the "usepackage" command before
> the listing-settings.

Or to set the "upquote" listings setting in the LaTeX preamble (no need
to move all other settings there too).

Günter



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris
Nikos:
   [ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
   thread. ]

   There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
   (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
   another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
   With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
   set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
   _ticks_!
  
   I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
  
   Any other recommendation?

I think I've found it (didn't tried it out yet though):

% copy-paste from the listing package documentation
upquote= true|false
determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
key requires the textcomp package if true.

The default setting is false (since it takes an extra-step to load the
textcomp package).

Kind regards, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris

Problem:
There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
(used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
_ticks_!
   
I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.


Solution:
 % copy-paste from the listing package documentation
 upquote= true|false
 determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
 key requires the textcomp package if true.


LyX-problem(?):
I get an error-message that I should load the textcomp package although
I already have done this. Looking at the source code, the upquote
listing-setting is before the \usepackage{textcomp}.

Is this a LyX-bug? I guess the solution is to manually put the
usepackage command before the listing-settings.

Kind regards, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 17:49 +0100, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
 Problem:
 There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
 (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
 another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right 
 direction.
 With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
 set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
 _ticks_!

 I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
 
 
 Solution:
  % copy-paste from the listing package documentation
  upquote= true|false
  determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
  key requires the textcomp package if true.
 
 
 LyX-problem(?):
 I get an error-message that I should load the textcomp package although
 I already have done this. Looking at the source code, the upquote
 listing-setting is before the \usepackage{textcomp}.
 
 Is this a LyX-bug? I guess the solution is to manually put the
 usepackage command before the listing-settings.


OK,
I am confused or LyX is confusing me :-)


# 1 #
# The preview source within from LyX begins with:

% Preview source code

%% LyX 1.6.1 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.

[...]

\usepackage{listings}
\lstset{alsoletter={*()'0123456789.},
basicstyle={\small},
breaklines=true,
keywordstyle={\color{marineblue}},
prebreak={\textbackslash},
upquote=true}

[...]

% the textcomp package is loaded after listings
\usepackage{textcomp}

[...]


# 2 
# If I open with a text-editor the .lyx file it begins with the
Preamble:

#LyX 1.6.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 345
\begin_document
\begin_header
\textclass scrbook
\begin_preamble

[...]

# In addition, I can't find anywhere the \usepackage{listings} command.


Question:
So, what's the deal? Where are the missing lines from the .lyx file?
How can I force the textcomp packge to be loaded before the listings
package?

Thanks for any hint.
Kind regards, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn



Question:
So, what's the deal? Where are the missing lines from the .lyx file?
How can I force the textcomp packge to be loaded before the listings
package?
  


There are no missing lines. If there is a listing in the .lyx file, LyX 
adds the usepackage automatically when generating the latex code.


I'm afraid you can't force this, but maybe somebody knows a work-around.

see bugs:

http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5031
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366

Vincent


Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 18:20 +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
  Question:
  So, what's the deal? Where are the missing lines from the .lyx file?
  How can I force the textcomp packge to be loaded before the listings
  package?

 
 There are no missing lines. If there is a listing in the .lyx file, LyX 
 adds the usepackage automatically when generating the latex code.
 
 I'm afraid you can't force this, but maybe somebody knows a work-around.
 
 see bugs:
 
 http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5031
 http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366
 
 Vincent

Hi Vincent!

I know there are no real missing lines (this is why I used the quotes).
But where is this pre-preabmle lying? Why can't I see it in my
text-editor?

Nonetheless, I think I've just hit a work-around :-)


Move all listing-settings from the Document  Settings  Text layout 
Listing settings (right windows) into the Preabmle. So my Listing
settings is empty now and my preabmle has:

\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{listings}
\lstset{alsoletter={*()'0123456789.},
basicstyle={\small},
breaklines=true,
keywordstyle={\color{marineblue}},
prebreak={\textbackslash},
upquote=true}


And... voila! It works :D

Cheers, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris
Nikos:
   [ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
   thread. ]

   There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
   (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
   another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
   With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
   set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
   _ticks_!
  
   I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
  
   Any other recommendation?

I think I've found it (didn't tried it out yet though):

% copy-paste from the listing package documentation
upquote= true|false
determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
key requires the textcomp package if true.

The default setting is false (since it takes an extra-step to load the
textcomp package).

Kind regards, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris

Problem:
There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
(used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
_ticks_!
   
I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.


Solution:
 % copy-paste from the listing package documentation
 upquote= true|false
 determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
 key requires the textcomp package if true.


LyX-problem(?):
I get an error-message that I should load the textcomp package although
I already have done this. Looking at the source code, the upquote
listing-setting is before the \usepackage{textcomp}.

Is this a LyX-bug? I guess the solution is to manually put the
usepackage command before the listing-settings.

Kind regards, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 17:49 +0100, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
 Problem:
 There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
 (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
 another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right 
 direction.
 With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
 set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
 _ticks_!

 I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
 
 
 Solution:
  % copy-paste from the listing package documentation
  upquote= true|false
  determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
  key requires the textcomp package if true.
 
 
 LyX-problem(?):
 I get an error-message that I should load the textcomp package although
 I already have done this. Looking at the source code, the upquote
 listing-setting is before the \usepackage{textcomp}.
 
 Is this a LyX-bug? I guess the solution is to manually put the
 usepackage command before the listing-settings.


OK,
I am confused or LyX is confusing me :-)


# 1 #
# The preview source within from LyX begins with:

% Preview source code

%% LyX 1.6.1 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.

[...]

\usepackage{listings}
\lstset{alsoletter={*()'0123456789.},
basicstyle={\small},
breaklines=true,
keywordstyle={\color{marineblue}},
prebreak={\textbackslash},
upquote=true}

[...]

% the textcomp package is loaded after listings
\usepackage{textcomp}

[...]


# 2 
# If I open with a text-editor the .lyx file it begins with the
Preamble:

#LyX 1.6.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 345
\begin_document
\begin_header
\textclass scrbook
\begin_preamble

[...]

# In addition, I can't find anywhere the \usepackage{listings} command.


Question:
So, what's the deal? Where are the missing lines from the .lyx file?
How can I force the textcomp packge to be loaded before the listings
package?

Thanks for any hint.
Kind regards, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn



Question:
So, what's the deal? Where are the missing lines from the .lyx file?
How can I force the textcomp packge to be loaded before the listings
package?
  


There are no missing lines. If there is a listing in the .lyx file, LyX 
adds the usepackage automatically when generating the latex code.


I'm afraid you can't force this, but maybe somebody knows a work-around.

see bugs:

http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5031
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366

Vincent


Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 18:20 +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
  Question:
  So, what's the deal? Where are the missing lines from the .lyx file?
  How can I force the textcomp packge to be loaded before the listings
  package?

 
 There are no missing lines. If there is a listing in the .lyx file, LyX 
 adds the usepackage automatically when generating the latex code.
 
 I'm afraid you can't force this, but maybe somebody knows a work-around.
 
 see bugs:
 
 http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5031
 http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366
 
 Vincent

Hi Vincent!

I know there are no real missing lines (this is why I used the quotes).
But where is this pre-preabmle lying? Why can't I see it in my
text-editor?

Nonetheless, I think I've just hit a work-around :-)


Move all listing-settings from the Document  Settings  Text layout 
Listing settings (right windows) into the Preabmle. So my Listing
settings is empty now and my preabmle has:

\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{listings}
\lstset{alsoletter={*()'0123456789.},
basicstyle={\small},
breaklines=true,
keywordstyle={\color{marineblue}},
prebreak={\textbackslash},
upquote=true}


And... voila! It works :D

Cheers, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris
Nikos:
> > > [ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
> > > thread. ]

> > > There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
> > > (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
> > > another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
> > > With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
> > > set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
> > > _ticks_!
> > >
> > > I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
> > >
> > > Any other recommendation?

I think I've found it (didn't tried it out yet though):

% copy-paste from the listing package documentation
upquote= true|false
determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
key requires the textcomp package if true.

The default setting is false (since it takes an extra-step to load the
textcomp package).

Kind regards, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris

Problem:
> > > > There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
> > > > (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
> > > > another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
> > > > With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
> > > > set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
> > > > _ticks_!
> > > >
> > > > I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.


Solution:
> % copy-paste from the listing package documentation
> upquote= true|false
> determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
> key requires the textcomp package if true.


LyX-problem(?):
I get an error-message that I should load the textcomp package although
I already have done this. Looking at the source code, the "upquote"
listing-setting is before the \usepackage{textcomp}.

Is this a LyX-bug? I guess the solution is to manually put the
"usepackage" command before the listing-settings.

Kind regards, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 17:49 +0100, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> Problem:
> > > > > There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
> > > > > (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
> > > > > another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right 
> > > > > direction.
> > > > > With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
> > > > > set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
> > > > > _ticks_!
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
> 
> 
> Solution:
> > % copy-paste from the listing package documentation
> > upquote= true|false
> > determines whether the left and right quote are printed ‘’ or `'. This
> > key requires the textcomp package if true.
> 
> 
> LyX-problem(?):
> I get an error-message that I should load the textcomp package although
> I already have done this. Looking at the source code, the "upquote"
> listing-setting is before the \usepackage{textcomp}.
> 
> Is this a LyX-bug? I guess the solution is to manually put the
> "usepackage" command before the listing-settings.


OK,
I am confused or LyX is confusing me :-)


# 1 #
# The preview source within from LyX begins with:

% Preview source code

%% LyX 1.6.1 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.

[...]

\usepackage{listings}
\lstset{alsoletter={*()"'0123456789.},
basicstyle={\small},
breaklines=true,
keywordstyle={\color{marineblue}},
prebreak={\textbackslash},
upquote=true}

[...]

% the "textcomp" package is loaded after "listings"
\usepackage{textcomp}

[...]


# 2 
# If I open with a text-editor the .lyx file it begins with the
Preamble:

#LyX 1.6.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 345
\begin_document
\begin_header
\textclass scrbook
\begin_preamble

[...]

# In addition, I can't find anywhere the \usepackage{listings} command.


Question:
So, what's the deal? Where are the "missing" lines from the .lyx file?
How can I force the "textcomp" packge to be loaded before the "listings"
package?

Thanks for any hint.
Kind regards, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn



Question:
So, what's the deal? Where are the "missing" lines from the .lyx file?
How can I force the "textcomp" packge to be loaded before the "listings"
package?
  


There are no missing lines. If there is a listing in the .lyx file, LyX 
adds the usepackage automatically when generating the latex code.


I'm afraid you can't force this, but maybe somebody knows a work-around.

see bugs:

http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5031
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366

Vincent


Re: listings package problem

2009-02-28 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 18:20 +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > Question:
> > So, what's the deal? Where are the "missing" lines from the .lyx file?
> > How can I force the "textcomp" packge to be loaded before the "listings"
> > package?
> >   
> 
> There are no missing lines. If there is a listing in the .lyx file, LyX 
> adds the usepackage automatically when generating the latex code.
> 
> I'm afraid you can't force this, but maybe somebody knows a work-around.
> 
> see bugs:
> 
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5031
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366
> 
> Vincent

Hi Vincent!

I know there are no real missing lines (this is why I used the quotes).
But where is this pre-preabmle lying? Why can't I see it in my
text-editor?

Nonetheless, I think I've just hit a work-around :-)


Move all listing-settings from the "Document > Settings > Text layout >
Listing settings" (right windows) into the Preabmle. So my Listing
settings is empty now and my preabmle has:

\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{listings}
\lstset{alsoletter={*()"'0123456789.},
basicstyle={\small},
breaklines=true,
keywordstyle={\color{marineblue}},
prebreak={\textbackslash},
upquote=true}


And... voila! It works :D

Cheers, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-24 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-23, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
 On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 08:12 +, Guenter Milde wrote:
 On 2009-02-22, Nikos Alexandris wrote:

  I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

 Txtt:
 Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble
 \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}

 Not bad (the font in general). Yet:

 i. the backticks still look like ticks

How do they look like in the first place? A minimal example file might help.

 ii. I loose the scale option which is there in the gui (I suppose I
 can scale all typewriter fonts through the preamble as well)

Yes and No, 

* you can scale all fonts, if you read and understand fntguide.pdf and write
  the cumbersome medium-level latex code in the preamble.
  
* you can only scale fonts with a simple option if the font package supports
  this (in the LyX GUI, the scale box will grey out if the package does not
  support scaling).  

Günter



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-24 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:20 +0100, Manveru wrote:
 2009/2/22 Nikos Alexandris nikos.alexand...@felis.uni-freiburg.de:
  [ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
  thread. ]
 
  I now realise how powerful is the listing package. I used some R code
  and setting the fonts to BeraMono gives a very nice and highlighted code
  in the output.
 
  There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
  (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
  another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
  With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
  set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
  _ticks_!
 
  I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
 
  Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos
 
 If you use bash, there is another form of commands substitution other
 than `backticks`. It is $(command) form. It may solve problems with
 formatting and become more recognizable in your code examples.
 

Manveru, thanks for the tip. However, I insist in using the backticks.
It's easy and gives a bettwe overview in a command like...

NEWNAME=MOD${YEAR}_${RESOLUTION}_`echo ${i} | cut -d':' -f5
   | cut -d_ -f1,2,3 | sed 's+\_1++g' | sed 's+\_250m++g' |
sed 's+\_500m++g'`

Cheers, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-24 Thread Nikos Alexandris


Nikos:
I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.


Guenter:
  Txtt:
  Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble
  \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}


Nikos:
  Not bad (the font in general). Yet:
  i. the backticks still look like ticks


Guenter:
 How do they look like in the first place? A minimal example file might help.


Nikos:
No need for an example here I think. It' simple: a backtick is _`_, a
tick (or a single-quote!?) is _'_. The backtick is usually below the Esc
key in most keyboards. The single wuote is well, usually in the same key
where the double quote lies. They should appear in the pdf like here in
this e-mail. Instead one cannot tell their difference in the output when
I use Bera as a typewriter font. Courier shows them better but, again, I
can't scale the font (I think...).

[ Sorry if I messed-up the terms a bit (tick ~ single-quote) ]

Any experiences for using long bash-like commands with LyX, KOMA-Script?
Kind regards, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-24 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-23, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
 On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 08:12 +, Guenter Milde wrote:
 On 2009-02-22, Nikos Alexandris wrote:

  I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

 Txtt:
 Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble
 \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}

 Not bad (the font in general). Yet:

 i. the backticks still look like ticks

How do they look like in the first place? A minimal example file might help.

 ii. I loose the scale option which is there in the gui (I suppose I
 can scale all typewriter fonts through the preamble as well)

Yes and No, 

* you can scale all fonts, if you read and understand fntguide.pdf and write
  the cumbersome medium-level latex code in the preamble.
  
* you can only scale fonts with a simple option if the font package supports
  this (in the LyX GUI, the scale box will grey out if the package does not
  support scaling).  

Günter



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-24 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:20 +0100, Manveru wrote:
 2009/2/22 Nikos Alexandris nikos.alexand...@felis.uni-freiburg.de:
  [ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
  thread. ]
 
  I now realise how powerful is the listing package. I used some R code
  and setting the fonts to BeraMono gives a very nice and highlighted code
  in the output.
 
  There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
  (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
  another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
  With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
  set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
  _ticks_!
 
  I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
 
  Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos
 
 If you use bash, there is another form of commands substitution other
 than `backticks`. It is $(command) form. It may solve problems with
 formatting and become more recognizable in your code examples.
 

Manveru, thanks for the tip. However, I insist in using the backticks.
It's easy and gives a bettwe overview in a command like...

NEWNAME=MOD${YEAR}_${RESOLUTION}_`echo ${i} | cut -d':' -f5
   | cut -d_ -f1,2,3 | sed 's+\_1++g' | sed 's+\_250m++g' |
sed 's+\_500m++g'`

Cheers, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-24 Thread Nikos Alexandris


Nikos:
I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.


Guenter:
  Txtt:
  Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble
  \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}


Nikos:
  Not bad (the font in general). Yet:
  i. the backticks still look like ticks


Guenter:
 How do they look like in the first place? A minimal example file might help.


Nikos:
No need for an example here I think. It' simple: a backtick is _`_, a
tick (or a single-quote!?) is _'_. The backtick is usually below the Esc
key in most keyboards. The single wuote is well, usually in the same key
where the double quote lies. They should appear in the pdf like here in
this e-mail. Instead one cannot tell their difference in the output when
I use Bera as a typewriter font. Courier shows them better but, again, I
can't scale the font (I think...).

[ Sorry if I messed-up the terms a bit (tick ~ single-quote) ]

Any experiences for using long bash-like commands with LyX, KOMA-Script?
Kind regards, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-24 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-23, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 08:12 +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2009-02-22, Nikos Alexandris wrote:

>> > I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

>> Txtt:
>> Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble
>> \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}

> Not bad (the font in general). Yet:

> i. the backticks still look like ticks

How do they look like in the first place? A minimal example file might help.

> ii. I loose the "scale" option which is there in the gui (I suppose I
> can scale all typewriter fonts through the preamble as well)

Yes and No, 

* you can scale all fonts, if you read and understand fntguide.pdf and write
  the cumbersome medium-level latex code in the preamble.
  
* you can only scale fonts with a simple option if the font package supports
  this (in the LyX GUI, the scale box will grey out if the package does not
  support scaling).  

Günter



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-24 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:20 +0100, Manveru wrote:
> 2009/2/22 Nikos Alexandris :
> > [ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
> > thread. ]
> >
> > I now realise how powerful is the listing package. I used some R code
> > and setting the fonts to BeraMono gives a very nice and highlighted code
> > in the output.
> >
> > There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
> > (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
> > another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
> > With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
> > set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
> > _ticks_!
> >
> > I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
> >
> > Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos
> 
> If you use bash, there is another form of commands substitution other
> than `backticks`. It is $(command) form. It may solve problems with
> formatting and become more recognizable in your code examples.
> 

Manveru, thanks for the tip. However, I insist in using the backticks.
It's easy and gives a bettwe overview in a command like...

NEWNAME="MOD${YEAR}_${RESOLUTION}_`echo ${i} | cut -d':' -f5
   | cut -d"_" -f1,2,3 | sed 's+\_1++g' | sed 's+\_250m++g' |
sed 's+\_500m++g'`"

Cheers, Nikos




Re: listings package problem

2009-02-24 Thread Nikos Alexandris


Nikos:
I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.


Guenter:
> >> Txtt:
> >> Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble
> >> \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}


Nikos:
> > Not bad (the font in general). Yet:
> > i. the backticks still look like ticks


Guenter:
> How do they look like in the first place? A minimal example file might help.


Nikos:
No need for an example here I think. It' simple: a backtick is _`_, a
tick (or a single-quote!?) is _'_. The backtick is usually below the Esc
key in most keyboards. The single wuote is well, usually in the same key
where the double quote lies. They should appear in the pdf like here in
this e-mail. Instead one cannot tell their difference in the output when
I use Bera as a typewriter font. Courier shows them better but, again, I
can't scale the font (I think...).

[ Sorry if I messed-up the terms a bit (tick ~ single-quote) ]

Any experiences for using long bash-like commands with LyX, KOMA-Script?
Kind regards, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-23 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-22, Nikos Alexandris wrote:

 I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

 Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos

Txtt:

Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble

\renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}


Günter



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-23 Thread Manveru
2009/2/22 Nikos Alexandris nikos.alexand...@felis.uni-freiburg.de:
 [ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
 thread. ]

 I now realise how powerful is the listing package. I used some R code
 and setting the fonts to BeraMono gives a very nice and highlighted code
 in the output.

 There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
 (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
 another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
 With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
 set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
 _ticks_!

 I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

 Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos

If you use bash, there is another form of commands substitution other
than `backticks`. It is $(command) form. It may solve problems with
formatting and become more recognizable in your code examples.

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
 gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl


Re: listings package problem

2009-02-23 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 08:12 +, Guenter Milde wrote:
 On 2009-02-22, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
 
  I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
 
  Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos
 
 Txtt:
 
 Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble
 
 \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}
 
 
 Günter
 

Not bad (the font in general). Yet:

i. the backticks still look like ticks
ii. I loose the scale option which is there in the gui (I suppose I
can scale all typewriter fonts through the preamble as well)

Thanks, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-23 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-22, Nikos Alexandris wrote:

 I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

 Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos

Txtt:

Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble

\renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}


Günter



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-23 Thread Manveru
2009/2/22 Nikos Alexandris nikos.alexand...@felis.uni-freiburg.de:
 [ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
 thread. ]

 I now realise how powerful is the listing package. I used some R code
 and setting the fonts to BeraMono gives a very nice and highlighted code
 in the output.

 There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
 (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
 another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
 With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
 set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
 _ticks_!

 I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

 Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos

If you use bash, there is another form of commands substitution other
than `backticks`. It is $(command) form. It may solve problems with
formatting and become more recognizable in your code examples.

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
 gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl


Re: listings package problem

2009-02-23 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 08:12 +, Guenter Milde wrote:
 On 2009-02-22, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
 
  I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
 
  Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos
 
 Txtt:
 
 Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble
 
 \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}
 
 
 Günter
 

Not bad (the font in general). Yet:

i. the backticks still look like ticks
ii. I loose the scale option which is there in the gui (I suppose I
can scale all typewriter fonts through the preamble as well)

Thanks, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-23 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-22, Nikos Alexandris wrote:

> I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

> Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos

Txtt:

Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble

\renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}


Günter



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-23 Thread Manveru
2009/2/22 Nikos Alexandris :
> [ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
> thread. ]
>
> I now realise how powerful is the listing package. I used some R code
> and setting the fonts to BeraMono gives a very nice and highlighted code
> in the output.
>
> There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
> (used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
> another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
> With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
> set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
> _ticks_!
>
> I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
>
> Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos

If you use bash, there is another form of commands substitution other
than `backticks`. It is $(command) form. It may solve problems with
formatting and become more recognizable in your code examples.

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
 gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl


Re: listings package problem

2009-02-23 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 08:12 +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-02-22, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> 
> > I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.
> 
> > Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos
> 
> Txtt:
> 
> Set the typewriter font to Default in the GUI and write in the preamble
> 
> \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{txtt}
> 
> 
> Günter
> 

Not bad (the font in general). Yet:

i. the backticks still look like ticks
ii. I loose the "scale" option which is there in the gui (I suppose I
can scale all typewriter fonts through the preamble as well)

Thanks, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-21 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 21:19 +0100, David Weenink wrote:
 L.S.,
 
 I have found the solution to my problem. The following listings configuration 
 solves my space injection problem:
 
 alsoletter={*()'0123456789.}
 basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
 extendedchars=false
 frame=L
 upquote=false
 
 (only the first line matters for this specific problem, I think)
 
 Thanks for your responses.
 
 David
 

Thanks David, your alsoletter line helped me.
Kind regards, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-21 Thread Nikos Alexandris
[ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
thread. ]

I now realise how powerful is the listing package. I used some R code
and setting the fonts to BeraMono gives a very nice and highlighted code
in the output.

There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
(used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
_ticks_!

I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos





Re: listings package problem

2009-02-21 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 21:19 +0100, David Weenink wrote:
 L.S.,
 
 I have found the solution to my problem. The following listings configuration 
 solves my space injection problem:
 
 alsoletter={*()'0123456789.}
 basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
 extendedchars=false
 frame=L
 upquote=false
 
 (only the first line matters for this specific problem, I think)
 
 Thanks for your responses.
 
 David
 

Thanks David, your alsoletter line helped me.
Kind regards, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-21 Thread Nikos Alexandris
[ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
thread. ]

I now realise how powerful is the listing package. I used some R code
and setting the fonts to BeraMono gives a very nice and highlighted code
in the output.

There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
(used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
_ticks_!

I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos





Re: listings package problem

2009-02-21 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 21:19 +0100, David Weenink wrote:
> L.S.,
> 
> I have found the solution to my problem. The following listings configuration 
> solves my space injection problem:
> 
> alsoletter={*()"'0123456789.}
> basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
> extendedchars=false
> frame=L
> upquote=false
> 
> (only the first line matters for this specific problem, I think)
> 
> Thanks for your responses.
> 
> David
> 

Thanks David, your "alsoletter" line helped me.
Kind regards, Nikos



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-21 Thread Nikos Alexandris
[ I am posting a listing-related problem here instead of starting a new
thread. ]

I now realise how powerful is the listing package. I used some R code
and setting the fonts to BeraMono gives a very nice and highlighted code
in the output.

There is only one *important* problem though: usually the _backticks_
(used in *nix-like OSes to execute a command within, let's say, from
another command) appear as to have a top-left to bottom-right direction.
With my current setting (Typewriter font set to BeraMono and language
set to _bash_) the _backticks_ look very similar to the... well, the
_ticks_!

I guess it's a font-specific issue. Too bad because Bera looks great.

Any other recommendation? Kind regards, Nikos





listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread David Weenink
L.S.,

I'm having the following problem with the listings package. I would like to 
use the listings package in lyx to show code parts in pdf output. User should 
be able to just copy the code from the pdf and paste it in their editor and 
run the code without modification.

However,
if I put the following line in a listing:
Create KlattGrid... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
then it will show allright in the pdf but if the user copies this line from 
the pdf then a space is included in his copy just before the three dots. 
Hist copy will be:
Create KlattGrid ... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
The three dots should not be separated from the Create KlattGrid part.
How can I arrange this?

The parameters for listings that I use are the following 

alsoletter={'}
basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
extendedchars=false
frame=L
upquote=false

The alsoletter={'} is to prevent spaces being added after  starting single 
and double quotes and before the ending quotes.

It did not help to include the dot in the alsoletter list because then the 
number 0.3 will be split in two parts as 0 .3.

I'm using Debian unstable/experimental with lyx 1.6.1.

Could anyone please help me how to make listings do somewhat less formatting.

David


-- 
David Weenink
Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam
Spuistraat 210, room 340
1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/david



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 12:13 +0100, David Weenink wrote:
 L.S.,
 
 I'm having the following problem with the listings package. I would like to 
 use the listings package in lyx to show code parts in pdf output. User should 
 be able to just copy the code from the pdf and paste it in their editor and 
 run the code without modification.
 
 However,
 if I put the following line in a listing:
 Create KlattGrid... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
 then it will show allright in the pdf but if the user copies this line from 
 the pdf then a space is included in his copy just before the three dots. 
 Hist copy will be:
 Create KlattGrid ... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
 The three dots should not be separated from the Create KlattGrid part.
 How can I arrange this?
 
 The parameters for listings that I use are the following 
 
 alsoletter={'}
 basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
 extendedchars=false
 frame=L
 upquote=false
 
 The alsoletter={'} is to prevent spaces being added after  starting single 
 and double quotes and before the ending quotes.
 
 It did not help to include the dot in the alsoletter list because then the 
 number 0.3 will be split in two parts as 0 .3.
 
 I'm using Debian unstable/experimental with lyx 1.6.1.
 
 Could anyone please help me how to make listings do somewhat less formatting.
 
 David
 
 

Actually, I do need exactly what you need. Hopefully someone has already
fixed this.

(@Uwe: we forgot to check that).

Nikos



RE: listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
It did not help to include the dot in the alsoletter list 
because then the number 0.3 will be split in two parts as 0 .3.

I don't see this. Everything works fine for me when I add the dot to
alsoletter.

Vincent


Re: listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread David Weenink
L.S.,

I have found the solution to my problem. The following listings configuration 
solves my space injection problem:

alsoletter={*()'0123456789.}
basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
extendedchars=false
frame=L
upquote=false

(only the first line matters for this specific problem, I think)

Thanks for your responses.

David

-- 
David Weenink
Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam
Spuistraat 210, room 340
1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/david



listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread David Weenink
L.S.,

I'm having the following problem with the listings package. I would like to 
use the listings package in lyx to show code parts in pdf output. User should 
be able to just copy the code from the pdf and paste it in their editor and 
run the code without modification.

However,
if I put the following line in a listing:
Create KlattGrid... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
then it will show allright in the pdf but if the user copies this line from 
the pdf then a space is included in his copy just before the three dots. 
Hist copy will be:
Create KlattGrid ... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
The three dots should not be separated from the Create KlattGrid part.
How can I arrange this?

The parameters for listings that I use are the following 

alsoletter={'}
basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
extendedchars=false
frame=L
upquote=false

The alsoletter={'} is to prevent spaces being added after  starting single 
and double quotes and before the ending quotes.

It did not help to include the dot in the alsoletter list because then the 
number 0.3 will be split in two parts as 0 .3.

I'm using Debian unstable/experimental with lyx 1.6.1.

Could anyone please help me how to make listings do somewhat less formatting.

David


-- 
David Weenink
Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam
Spuistraat 210, room 340
1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/david



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 12:13 +0100, David Weenink wrote:
 L.S.,
 
 I'm having the following problem with the listings package. I would like to 
 use the listings package in lyx to show code parts in pdf output. User should 
 be able to just copy the code from the pdf and paste it in their editor and 
 run the code without modification.
 
 However,
 if I put the following line in a listing:
 Create KlattGrid... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
 then it will show allright in the pdf but if the user copies this line from 
 the pdf then a space is included in his copy just before the three dots. 
 Hist copy will be:
 Create KlattGrid ... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
 The three dots should not be separated from the Create KlattGrid part.
 How can I arrange this?
 
 The parameters for listings that I use are the following 
 
 alsoletter={'}
 basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
 extendedchars=false
 frame=L
 upquote=false
 
 The alsoletter={'} is to prevent spaces being added after  starting single 
 and double quotes and before the ending quotes.
 
 It did not help to include the dot in the alsoletter list because then the 
 number 0.3 will be split in two parts as 0 .3.
 
 I'm using Debian unstable/experimental with lyx 1.6.1.
 
 Could anyone please help me how to make listings do somewhat less formatting.
 
 David
 
 

Actually, I do need exactly what you need. Hopefully someone has already
fixed this.

(@Uwe: we forgot to check that).

Nikos



RE: listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
It did not help to include the dot in the alsoletter list 
because then the number 0.3 will be split in two parts as 0 .3.

I don't see this. Everything works fine for me when I add the dot to
alsoletter.

Vincent


Re: listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread David Weenink
L.S.,

I have found the solution to my problem. The following listings configuration 
solves my space injection problem:

alsoletter={*()'0123456789.}
basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
extendedchars=false
frame=L
upquote=false

(only the first line matters for this specific problem, I think)

Thanks for your responses.

David

-- 
David Weenink
Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam
Spuistraat 210, room 340
1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/david



listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread David Weenink
L.S.,

I'm having the following problem with the listings package. I would like to 
use the listings package in lyx to show code parts in pdf output. User should 
be able to just copy the code from the pdf and paste it in their editor and 
run the code without modification.

However,
if I put the following line in a listing:
Create KlattGrid... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
then it will show allright in the pdf but if the user copies this line from 
the pdf then a space is included in his copy just before the three dots. 
Hist copy will be:
Create KlattGrid ... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
The three dots should not be separated from the "Create KlattGrid" part.
How can I arrange this?

The parameters for listings that I use are the following 

alsoletter={"'}
basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
extendedchars=false
frame=L
upquote=false

The alsoletter={"'} is to prevent spaces being added after  starting single 
and double quotes and before the ending quotes.

It did not help to include the dot in the alsoletter list because then the 
number 0.3 will be split in two parts as 0 .3.

I'm using Debian unstable/experimental with lyx 1.6.1.

Could anyone please help me how to make listings do somewhat less formatting.

David


-- 
David Weenink
Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam
Spuistraat 210, room 340
1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/david



Re: listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread Nikos Alexandris
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 12:13 +0100, David Weenink wrote:
> L.S.,
> 
> I'm having the following problem with the listings package. I would like to 
> use the listings package in lyx to show code parts in pdf output. User should 
> be able to just copy the code from the pdf and paste it in their editor and 
> run the code without modification.
> 
> However,
> if I put the following line in a listing:
> Create KlattGrid... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
> then it will show allright in the pdf but if the user copies this line from 
> the pdf then a space is included in his copy just before the three dots. 
> Hist copy will be:
> Create KlattGrid ... kg 0 0.3 6 1 1 6  1 1 1
> The three dots should not be separated from the "Create KlattGrid" part.
> How can I arrange this?
> 
> The parameters for listings that I use are the following 
> 
> alsoletter={"'}
> basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
> extendedchars=false
> frame=L
> upquote=false
> 
> The alsoletter={"'} is to prevent spaces being added after  starting single 
> and double quotes and before the ending quotes.
> 
> It did not help to include the dot in the alsoletter list because then the 
> number 0.3 will be split in two parts as 0 .3.
> 
> I'm using Debian unstable/experimental with lyx 1.6.1.
> 
> Could anyone please help me how to make listings do somewhat less formatting.
> 
> David
> 
> 

Actually, I do need exactly what you need. Hopefully someone has already
"fixed" this.

(@Uwe: we forgot to check that).

Nikos



RE: listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>It did not help to include the dot in the alsoletter list 
>because then the number 0.3 will be split in two parts as 0 .3.

I don't see this. Everything works fine for me when I add the dot to
alsoletter.

Vincent


Re: listings package problem

2009-02-20 Thread David Weenink
L.S.,

I have found the solution to my problem. The following listings configuration 
solves my space injection problem:

alsoletter={*()"'0123456789.}
basicstyle={\footnotesize\ttfamily}
extendedchars=false
frame=L
upquote=false

(only the first line matters for this specific problem, I think)

Thanks for your responses.

David

-- 
David Weenink
Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam
Spuistraat 210, room 340
1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/david