Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

[Ryan Schmidt]

On May 18, 2021, at 04:35, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

>>> That probably counts as a bug in the Tcl script that returns the list
>>> of subports to be built.
>> 
>> I'm not aware of a bug in that script.
> 
> Do you have any clue or any alternative explanation why llvm-9.0 would
> be missing on this list?
>https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_64-watcher/builds/9920
> 
> The port must have been built some time between 9907 and 9920:
>https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_64-watcher/builds/9907
> 
> The port grepcidr was built in
>https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_64-watcher/builds/9918
> and the timestamp of the binary from 10.6_x86_64 is 2020-09-07 07:55
> 
> The timestamp of llvm-9.0 is 2020-09-07 07:56.

mpbb was improved in January 2021 so that separate builds would be scheduled 
for any dependencies that had not yet been built:

https://github.com/macports/mpbb/commit/bb4a1f6089ee09fc20d00d3556311c3b0e7d2d99

Prior to that time, we would only schedule separate builds for the 
ports/subports that were modified in the commit (or were specified in the force 
build list) that had not already been built. Any unbuilt dependencies would be 
built coincidentally in the "install dependencies" step and uploaded in the 
"gather archives" step.

Re: [MacPorts] #59750: ffmpeg and ffmpeg-devel immediately crash with segfault 11 when input is mp4

[Ruben Di Battista]

I think so, yes!

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:09 PM MacPorts  wrote:

> #59750: ffmpeg and ffmpeg-devel immediately crash with segfault 11 when
> input is
> mp4
> -+--
>   Reporter:  fdik|  Owner:  dbevans
>   Type:  defect  | Status:  assigned
>   Priority:  Normal  |  Milestone:
>  Component:  ports   |Version:  2.6.2
> Resolution:  |   Keywords:
>   Port:  ffmpeg  |
> -+--
>
> Comment (by mascguy):
>
>  Replying to [comment:14 rubendibattista]:
>  > In [changeset:"ab2056ca1b07d1dbc159473994516909a33b451a/macports-ports"
>  ab2056ca1b07d1dbc159473994516909a33b451a/macports-ports] (dar, master,
>  py38-reproject, revert-6945-rust-1.43.0, wireshark):
>  > {{{
>  > #!ConfigurableCommitTicketReference repository="macports-ports"
>  revision="ab2056ca1b07d1dbc159473994516909a33b451a"
>  > x264: Update snapshot
>  >
>  > This fixes a segmentation fault on Catalina
>  > See: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/59750
>  > }}}
>
>  Ruben, given the fix you committed a year ago, is this issue fixed?
>
> --
> Ticket URL: 
> MacPorts 
> Ports system for macOS
>


-- 
  _
-. .´  |
  ',  ;|∞∞
˜˜ |∞ RdB
,.,|∞∞
  .'   '.  |
-'   `'
https://rdb.is
Book a meeting with me: https://calendly.com/rdbisme

Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

[Mojca Miklavec]

> > That probably counts as a bug in the Tcl script that returns the list
> > of subports to be built.
>
> I'm not aware of a bug in that script.

Do you have any clue or any alternative explanation why llvm-9.0 would
be missing on this list?
https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_64-watcher/builds/9920

The port must have been built some time between 9907 and 9920:
https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_64-watcher/builds/9907

The port grepcidr was built in
https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_64-watcher/builds/9918
and the timestamp of the binary from 10.6_x86_64 is 2020-09-07 07:55

The timestamp of llvm-9.0 is 2020-09-07 07:56.

python38 was probably the first port built in portwatcher 9920.
Its timestamp is 2020-09-07 08:14.

Ports from 9919 are probably not distributable, so we don't have any
timestamps there.

Mojca