Re: Macports failed to update
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:12 AM, YH Tan asty...@gmail.com wrote: rsync: getaddrinfo: rsync.macports.org 873: nodename nor servname provided, or not known Check your DNS configuration. I can resolve that hostname locally. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonadhttp://sinenomine.net ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Macports failed to update
Hi, Brandon, After you resolved the hostname, 'port selfupdate' was successful. But tesseract and ghostscript still failed to install. I posted the issues on two separate bug tickets but was advised to switch to macports-users for help. sudo port install ghostscript --- Computing dependencies for ghostscript --- Dependencies to be installed: xorg-libXext xorg-libX11 xorg-xextproto xorg-libXt xorg-libsm xorg-libice --- Configuring xorg-libX11 Error: Failed to configure xorg-libX11, consult /opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_x11_xorg-libX11/xorg-libX11/work/libX11-1.6.2/config.log Error: org.macports.configure for port xorg-libX11 returned: configure failure: command execution failed Error: Failed to install xorg-libX11 Please see the log file for port xorg-libX11 for details: /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_x11_xorg-libX11/xorg-libX11/main.log Error: The following dependencies were not installed: xorg-libXext xorg-libX11 xorg-xextproto xorg-libXt xorg-libsm xorg-libice To report a bug, follow the instructions in the guide: http://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets Error: Processing of port ghostscript failed sudo port install tesseract --- Computing dependencies for tesseract --- Dependencies to be installed: leptonica giflib xorg-libX11 xorg-libsm xorg-libice openjpeg jbigkit lcms2 webp --- Configuring xorg-libX11 Error: Failed to configure xorg-libX11, consult /opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_x11_xorg-libX11/xorg-libX11/work/libX11-1.6.2/config.log Error: org.macports.configure for port xorg-libX11 returned: configure failure: command execution failed Error: Failed to install xorg-libX11 Please see the log file for port xorg-libX11 for details: /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_x11_xorg-libX11/xorg-libX11/main.log Error: The following dependencies were not installed: leptonica giflib xorg-libX11 xorg-libsm xorg-libice openjpeg jbigkit lcms2 webp To report a bug, follow the instructions in the guide: http://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets Error: Processing of port tesseract failed How should I resolve these issues? Thanks! Regards, Sati On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:31 AM, YH Tan asty...@gmail.com wrote: DNS server: 192.168.1.254 On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:12 AM, YH Tan asty...@gmail.com wrote: rsync: getaddrinfo: rsync.macports.org 873: nodename nor servname provided, or not known Check your DNS configuration. I can resolve that hostname locally. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:31 AM, YH Tan asty...@gmail.com wrote: DNS server: 192.168.1.254 On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:12 AM, YH Tan asty...@gmail.com wrote: rsync: getaddrinfo: rsync.macports.org 873: nodename nor servname provided, or not known Check your DNS configuration. I can resolve that hostname locally. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Macports failed to update
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:52 AM, YH Tan asty...@gmail.com wrote: After you resolved the hostname, 'port selfupdate' was successful. But tesseract and ghostscript Erm, I didn't do anything. hostname resolution is the process of a client looking up a hostname and converting it to a network address. I must conclude that you had a temporary name service outage of some kind. Please see the log file for port xorg-libX11 for details: /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_x11_xorg-libX11/xorg-libX11/main.log Without the contents of this logfile, nobody can even guess what the problem is. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonadhttp://sinenomine.net ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: How long to expect a new port submission to be processed?
On Monday February 16 2015 10:01:22 Mojca Miklavec wrote: There is long_description in the Portfile and there is an extensive description on homepage (https://github.com/StackExchange/blackbox). I was thinking of describing the port and its interest in the ticket text. Try to incite people to keep on clicking. To be honest, it didn't even occur to me to check the portfile description fields when I saw the empty space where I was thinking to read what that submission was all about ... R. ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: How long to expect a new port submission to be processed?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:41 AM, René J.V. wrote: On Sunday February 15 2015 23:55:15 Tom Limoncelli wrote: Hi folks! I submitted a new port 12 days ago and it hasn't gotten any attention. Did I do something wrong? The problem is that there is a small number of people actively following new submissions. So if you don't see any response, the best thing to do is to drop an email on the mailing list (which is exactly what you did now). https://trac.macports.org/ticket/46743 There is no guaranteed processing delay or something of the sort that I know of. I do think it depends on how useful/interesting your port is judged to be, so even if it may not be wrong, it doesn't seems productive to omit any form of description and/or argumentation from your submission. There is long_description in the Portfile and there is an extensive description on homepage (https://github.com/StackExchange/blackbox). But true, the description of the field could at least repeat what's in long_description. (However I don't believe that this would make the process much faster if there is no person with commit rights and sufficient time and interest to review the submission checking the ticket submissions.) Mojca ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Is it generally okay to uninstall all inactive leaves?
On Feb 15, 2015, at 15:19, Carlo Tambuatco wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Marko Käning wrote: Last June Clemens hinted out cut_leaves [1], which you might find interesting. [1] https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2014-June/035731.html That's interesting...but no mention of it in the man pages. cut_leaves is a contributed script, installable as a port. It is not part of MacPorts base which is why it is not mentioned in the MacPorts base manpages. ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
