Re: iperf3 port coming?

[Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)]

Thanks all!

Cheers,
Smith
---

Smith Kennedy
Wireless Architect - Client Software - IPG-PPS
Standards - PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum
PWG Chair
HP Inc.

> On May 24, 2016, at 4:33 PM, David Evans  wrote:
> 
>> On 5/24/16 3:19 PM, Mike Savory wrote:
>> Hi Smith
>> 
>> I have a copy of the portfile in my local ports directory
>> https://guide.macports.org/#development.local-repositories
>> 
>> I can get rid of it now ;-)
>> 
>> Mike
> 
> Indeed. iperf3, iperf3-devel committed in 
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/149008.
> 
> In the future, don't be so patient!!  If you don't get a response to a ticket 
> in 3 days or
> so, please give a shout either here or on the macports-devel list.  It's easy 
> to lose track.
> 
> These ports should be available after you update your ports.
> 
> sudo port selfupdate
> 
> Enjoy!
> 
> Dave
> 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: iperf3 port coming?

[David Evans]

On 5/24/16 3:19 PM, Mike Savory wrote:
> Hi Smith
> 
> I have a copy of the portfile in my local ports directory
> https://guide.macports.org/#development.local-repositories
> 
> I can get rid of it now ;-)
> 
> Mike

Indeed. iperf3, iperf3-devel committed in 
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/149008.

In the future, don't be so patient!!  If you don't get a response to a ticket 
in 3 days or
so, please give a shout either here or on the macports-devel list.  It's easy 
to lose track.

These ports should be available after you update your ports.

sudo port selfupdate

Enjoy!

Dave

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: iperf3 port coming?

[Mike Savory]

Hi Smith

I have a copy of the portfile in my local ports directory
https://guide.macports.org/#development.local-repositories

I can get rid of it now ;-)

Mike

> On 25/05/2016, at 9:41 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) 
>  wrote:
> 
> Bad memory / losing my mind / too much going on - I'm the one that filed the 
> original ticket and commented 2 weeks ago with Comment #19.  That comment 
> went unanswered - I still don't see an "iperf3" port when I do a "port search 
> iperf" or "port search iperf3".  Why would that be?  
> 
> Mike, how is it that you are using it?
> 
> Smith
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: iperf3 port coming?

[Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)]

Bad memory / losing my mind / too much going on - I'm the one that filed the 
original ticket and commented 2 weeks ago with Comment #19.  That comment went 
unanswered - I still don't see an "iperf3" port when I do a "port search iperf" 
or "port search iperf3".  Why would that be?  

Mike, how is it that you are using it?

Smith



> On 2016-05-24, at 3:21 PM, Mike Savory  wrote:
> 
> There was lots of discussion on under the iperf2 port and a full port is 
> there for iperf3
> I have been using it all year.
>  https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44299
> Just needs to be committed for version 3.1.2
> 
> Mike
> 
>> On 25/05/2016, at 8:09 AM, David Evans  wrote:
>> 
>> On 5/24/16 12:57 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>> 
>>> Is the maintainer of the iperf port or anybody else planning a port for 
>>> iperf3 (https://github.com/esnet/iperf)?  The latter is not backward 
>>> compatible with iperf 2.x (2.0.5 is latest in MacPorts).  I can file a 
>>> ticket in Trac but thought I'd ask here first.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Smith
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Currently there is no maintainer for iperf so the answer is probably that no 
>> one has thought about this.  I'd encourage
>> you to submit a ticket, particularly if you can provide an updated Portfile 
>> for iperf3.  You can be the new maintainer! :-)
>> 
>> Thanks for inquiring
>> Dave
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> macports-users mailing list
>> macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: iperf3 port coming?

[Mike Savory]

There was lots of discussion on under the iperf2 port and a full port is there 
for iperf3
I have been using it all year.
  https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44299
Just needs to be committed for version 3.1.2

Mike

> On 25/05/2016, at 8:09 AM, David Evans  wrote:
> 
> On 5/24/16 12:57 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> Is the maintainer of the iperf port or anybody else planning a port for 
>> iperf3 (https://github.com/esnet/iperf)?  The latter is not backward 
>> compatible with iperf 2.x (2.0.5 is latest in MacPorts).  I can file a 
>> ticket in Trac but thought I'd ask here first.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Smith
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Currently there is no maintainer for iperf so the answer is probably that no 
> one has thought about this.  I'd encourage
> you to submit a ticket, particularly if you can provide an updated Portfile 
> for iperf3.  You can be the new maintainer! :-)
> 
> Thanks for inquiring
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> macports-users mailing list
> macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: iperf3 port coming?

[David Evans]

On 5/24/16 12:57 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> Is the maintainer of the iperf port or anybody else planning a port for 
> iperf3 (https://github.com/esnet/iperf)?  The latter is not backward 
> compatible with iperf 2.x (2.0.5 is latest in MacPorts).  I can file a ticket 
> in Trac but thought I'd ask here first.
> 
> Cheers,
> Smith
> 
> 
> 

Currently there is no maintainer for iperf so the answer is probably that no 
one has thought about this.  I'd encourage
you to submit a ticket, particularly if you can provide an updated Portfile for 
iperf3.  You can be the new maintainer! :-)

Thanks for inquiring
Dave



___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

iperf3 port coming?

[Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)]

Hi there,

Is the maintainer of the iperf port or anybody else planning a port for iperf3 
(https://github.com/esnet/iperf)?  The latter is not backward compatible with 
iperf 2.x (2.0.5 is latest in MacPorts).  I can file a ticket in Trac but 
thought I'd ask here first.

Cheers,
Smith



___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

[Murray Eisenberg]

But note that, if you have the more secure Java 8 installed, Java 6 and 8 
runtimes will conflict in recent versions of OS X, where only one Java runtime 
is allowed to be active.

One can still use java 8 yet “fool" some legacy apps into using Java 6, as 
instructed at:

 
https://oliverdowling.com.au/2015/10/09/oracles-jdk-8-on-mac-os-x-el-capitan/ 
 
  [for JDK]


https://oliverdowling.com.au/2015/10/09/oracles-jre-8-on-mac-os-x-el-capitan/ 
 
 [for just JRE]

Not sure whether octave with its default variant +java will be so fooled..

> On May 24, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Ryan Schmidt  wrote:
> 
> 
> On May 24, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Marius Schamschula wrote:
> 
>> Java SE 6 is apparently no longer on Apple’s servers (I looked for it a week 
>> or two ago).
> 
> Java SE 6 for OS X 10.7 Lion through OS X 10.11 El Capitan:
> 
> https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1572
> 
> For Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard:
> 
> https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1573
> 
> For Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard:
> 
> https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1359
> 

---
Murray Eisenbergmurrayeisenb...@gmail.com
503 King Farm Blvd #101 Home (240)-246-7240
Rockville, MD 20850-6667Mobile (413)-427-5334


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Imagick version?

[Bjarne D Mathiesen]

Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> 3) in my experience, I always have to force rebuild php\d{2}-imagick
>>   whenever ImageMagick is updated
> 
> Out of curiosity, what problems did you encounter, other than the warning 
> message, if you did not rebuild?

just got the error-message whenever I ran a script - and I've got some
php scripts that're running monthly / weekly / daily / 15 min ; but
should only send me an email if they encounter problems - and this was
regarded as a problem ;-) so I got a lot of un-necessary error reports

-- 
Bjarne D Mathiesen
Korsør ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i et totalt M$-frit miljø
MacOS X 10.11.5 El Capitan (15F34)
2 x 3,46 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon ; 48 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 ECC
ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

[Ryan Schmidt]

On May 24, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Marius Schamschula wrote:

> Java SE 6 is apparently no longer on Apple’s servers (I looked for it a week 
> or two ago).

Java SE 6 for OS X 10.7 Lion through OS X 10.11 El Capitan:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1572

For Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1573

For Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1359

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

[Murray Eisenberg]

I did the same, installing octave with -java variant. Finally, it’s working. 

Thanks to all who gave help in this thread.


> On May 24, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Marius Schamschula  
> wrote:
> 
> Murray,
> 
> On May 24, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Murray Eisenberg  
> wrote:
> 
>> Uh oh! Then how do I get octave to run at all, given that it requires the 
>> Java 6 runtime? (And I have Java 8 from Oracle as the active runtime.)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 24, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>>> 
 (I’m unsure why I installed with the +java variant in the first place!)
>>> 
>>> Looks like +java is in octave's default variants, so you'd get it, unless 
>>> you specifically disabled it.
>>> 
> 
> I’ve run into this issue as well. Java SE 6 is apparently no longer on 
> Apple’s servers (I looked for it a week or two ago). Java 8 and octave 
> currently don’t work very well with each other (lots of discussion on #octave 
> and the octave-dev mailing list over the last few weeks). I just have 
> accepted that I must forgo java for the moment and built octave with the 
> -java variant.
> 
> Marius
> --
> Marius Schamschula
> 
> 
> 
> 

---
Murray Eisenbergmurrayeisenb...@gmail.com
503 King Farm Blvd #101 Home (240)-246-7240
Rockville, MD 20850-6667Mobile (413)-427-5334


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Imagick version?

[Ryan Schmidt]

> On May 24, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen  
> wrote:
> 
> Joshua Root wrote:
>> Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>>> You'll just have to re-compile php55-imagick :
>>> 
>>> This will take care of all of your php\d{2}-imagick versions
>>> 
>>> port -q installed name:imagic \
>>> | while read -a port
>>>do port -n upgrade --force ${port[0]}
>>>  done
>>> 
>>> but more explicitly for just php55-imagick :
>>> 
>>> port -n upgrade --force php55-imagick
>> 
>> That doesn't necessarily recompile the port, it reinstalls it (quite
>> possibly from the same binary archive as before). If you really need to
>> force a build from source, you have to use -s.
>> 
>> But if there really is a problem that requires a rebuild, the maintainer
>> should bump the revision so everyone gets the rebuilt version.
>> 
> 
> OK - I can see where the problem is then :
> I'm always (implicitly) building from source, so this approach works for
> me ; but for people installing from binaries, it doesn't work.
> 
> So it'll have to be :
> 
> port -n -s upgrade --force php55-imagick
> 
> As to a rev-bump
> 1) there's no revision number in the portfile

In the absence of a revision line, the revision is 0. In that case, one can add 
a "revision 1" line to bump the revision. I've done this:

https://trac.macports.org/changeset/148985

And added a comment to remind myself to do this in the future:

https://trac.macports.org/changeset/148987

> 2) # $Id: Portfile 146488 2016-03-09 20:44:32Z ryandes...@macports.org $
> 3) in my experience, I always have to force rebuild php\d{2}-imagick
>   whenever ImageMagick is updated

Out of curiosity, what problems did you encounter, other than the warning 
message, if you did not rebuild?


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

[Marius Schamschula]

Murray,

On May 24, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Murray Eisenberg  
wrote:

> Uh oh! Then how do I get octave to run at all, given that it requires the 
> Java 6 runtime? (And I have Java 8 from Oracle as the active runtime.)
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 24, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>> 
>>> (I’m unsure why I installed with the +java variant in the first place!)
>> 
>> Looks like +java is in octave's default variants, so you'd get it, unless 
>> you specifically disabled it.
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---
> Murray Eisenberg  murrayeisenb...@gmail.com
> 503 King Farm Blvd #101   Home (240)-246-7240
> Rockville, MD 20850-6667  Mobile (413)-427-5334

I’ve run into this issue as well. Java SE 6 is apparently no longer on Apple’s 
servers (I looked for it a week or two ago). Java 8 and octave currently don’t 
work very well with each other (lots of discussion on #octave and the 
octave-dev mailing list over the last few weeks). I just have accepted that I 
must forgo java for the moment and built octave with the -java variant.

Marius
--
Marius Schamschula




___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

[Marius Schamschula]

Ryan,

On May 24, 2016, at 10:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt  wrote:

> 
> On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> 
>> (I’m unsure why I installed with the +java variant in the first place!)
> 
> Looks like +java is in octave's default variants, so you'd get it, unless you 
> specifically disabled it.

I think making the +java default might may have been a mistake, as this also 
prevents the build bots from successfully building any octave packages. The 
build bots apparently don’t have access to JRE. I ran into two of those 
failures yesterday, when updating octave-netcdf and octave-spline. I’ve built 
octave with -java, and thus the packages build normally on my local machines.

Marius
--
Marius Schamschula




___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

[Murray Eisenberg]

Uh oh! Then how do I get octave to run at all, given that it requires the Java 
6 runtime? (And I have Java 8 from Oracle as the active runtime.)



> On May 24, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt  wrote:
> 
> 
> On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> 
>> (I’m unsure why I installed with the +java variant in the first place!)
> 
> Looks like +java is in octave's default variants, so you'd get it, unless you 
> specifically disabled it.
> 
> 

---
Murray Eisenbergmurrayeisenb...@gmail.com
503 King Farm Blvd #101 Home (240)-246-7240
Rockville, MD 20850-6667Mobile (413)-427-5334


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Quartz vs x11: Inaccessible package meld

[Ryan Schmidt]

> On May 23, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Peter Brommer  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> somehow the quartz vs x11 has flared up on the list again, and I now have my 
> own problem to add. I’m running mostly quartz packages (mainly inkscape, 
> gimp…). This means I have gtk2 +quartz as the active installation:
> 
> $ port installed gtk2
> The following ports are currently installed:
>  gtk2 @2.24.30_0+quartz (active)
>  gtk2 @2.24.30_0+x11
> 
> Activating the +x11 variant causes a LOT of broken dependencies, that cannot 
> be resolved automatically, as e.g. gtk-osx-application-gtk2 depends on gtk2 
> +quartz:
> 
> --->  Configuring gtk-osx-application-gtk2
> Error: 
> gtk-osx-application-gtk2 is meant to be used only in a GTK quartz
> development environment but your version of GTK does not
> support quartz.  Please make sure that port gtk2 and all its
> dependencies are built with variants +quartz and try again.
> Error: org.macports.configure for port gtk-osx-application-gtk2 returned: 
> gtk2 +quartz not installed.

From the description of the gtk-osx-application-gtk2 port, its whole purpose is 
to allow GTK Quartz programs to use the Mac menubar. This wouldn't be possible 
with GTK built only for X11, so this restriction makes sense.


> However, I’ve recently found that I now cannot install meld, as meld somehow 
> depends on gtksourceview for which gtk2 needs to be installed in the +quartz 
> variant:
> $ sudo port install meld
> --->  Computing dependencies for meld
> --->  Dependencies to be installed: py27-pygtksourceview gtksourceview2 yelp 
> gnome-getting-started-docs gnome-user-docs webkit2-gtk geoclue2 json-glib 
> libsoup glib-networking gsettings-desktop-schemas libproxy gstreamer1 
> gstreamer1-gst-plugins-bad chromaprint fluidsynth jack db60 libsamplerate 
> portaudio gstreamer1-gst-plugins-base libdca libdvdnav libdvdread libdvdcss 
> libmms libmpcdec mpg123 neon openal-soft pulseaudio json-c rtmpdump 
> soundtouch spandsp-devel x265 gstreamer1-gst-plugins-good libdv libshout2 
> taglib hyphen libnotify libsecret libgcrypt libgpg-error yelp-xsl
> --->  Fetching archive for gtksourceview2
> Error: org.macports.archivefetch for port gtksourceview2 returned: gtk2 must 
> be installed with +x11.
> Error: Failed to install gtksourceview2
> …
> 
> Now: is there a workaround for this? Can I get meld installed somehow? Or do 
> I have to resign to the fact that unless I move everything back to x11, I 
> won’t be able to install meld?

gtksourceview2 has a quartz variant. If you have gtk2 installed with the quartz 
variant, you must install gtksourceview2 with the quartz variant.

If you want to use quartz variants, you should add "+quartz" to your 
variants.conf file so that it gets automatically selected for all ports that 
have them.


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

[Ryan Schmidt]

On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:

> (I’m unsure why I installed with the +java variant in the first place!)

Looks like +java is in octave's default variants, so you'd get it, unless you 
specifically disabled it.


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Going on holiday

[David Evans]

On 5/24/16 7:28 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
> On May 23, 2016, at 3:17 PM, David Evans  wrote:
> 
>> Later this week, I will be heading out of the country on holiday for about a 
>> month in exotic locations where the
>> internet may only be a rumor.  Not taking a computer either.  Should be back 
>> toward the end of June full of energy
>> with renewed vim and vigor ready to slay dragons and even maintain a few 
>> ports.
>>
>> So today is probably my last real day of work among you all for a while.
>>
>> Luckily, while I'm gone, two developers have stepped up to the challenge and 
>> will be taking up the slack for me.
>>
>> For issues concerning Perl, Perl modules and such, please refer my tickets 
>> to Mojca Miklavec.  For anything else, Jeremy
>> Huddleston will be answering my tickets.  Of course, most of my ports are 
>> openmaintainer so if you see something that
>> needs fixing, go for it.
>>
>> Many thanks to Jeremy and Mojca for their help and I promise to reciprocate 
>> as the need arises.
>>
>> See you all when I get back
> 
> Have a fantastic trip! 
> 
> 
Thanks, Ryan.  Looking forward to some R & R.  Talk to you when we return.

Dave
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Failed build of OpenBlas on El Capitan

[Michael Dickens]

Hi Comer - Looks like you're experiencing ticket #50950 <
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50950 >. Maybe some part of the
discussion on it will be useful? HTH! - MLD
 
On Tue, May 24, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Comer Duncan wrote:
> Yesterday I upgraded mac os to El Capitan. All went fine.  Later I
> went through the recommended process for macport changes when a new os
> is installed.  I am getting a crash on the build of OpenBlas.  I am
> attaching the log file and hope that someone has seen this problem
> before and can help.
 
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Failed build of OpenBlas on El Capitan

[Ryan Schmidt]

On May 24, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Comer Duncan wrote:

> Yesterday I upgraded mac os to El Capitan. All went fine.  Later I went 
> through the recommended process for macport changes when a new os is 
> installed.  I am getting a crash on the build of OpenBlas.  I am attaching 
> the log file and hope that someone has seen this problem before and can help. 
>  

Note that it's not a crash; just a build failure. It looks identical to the one 
reported here:

https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50950

That user was on Yosemite and using the gcc5 variant. You're using the gcc48 
variant. The latest stable version of gcc is now 6. Can you re-try and use the 
gcc6 variant this time? Or, if there is not a specific reason why you need 
openblas built with gcc, use the default variants.

Also, if you upgraded to El Capitan, did you upgrade Xcode and the command line 
developer tools too? Use the latest version of both, currently 7.3.1.


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

[Murray Eisenberg]

I have octave installed with variants:

octave 
@4.0.2_0+app+atlas+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+java+qt4gui+sound 

When I try to run octave from command line, I get pop-up window:

‘To open “this Java application” you need to
 install the legacy Java SE 6 runtime.”

Under OS X 10.11.5, I have Java JDK 1.8 (specifically, the current 1.8.0_91) 
and the corresponding Java runtime 1.8.

[While I know that I have Java 6 runtime actually present on my system, so it’s 
available to certain older apps that require it, the active Java runtime is 
Java 8 (1.8).]

Is the best course simply to remove the +java variant for octave, or will I 
lose some substantial functionality?

(I’m unsure why I installed with the +java variant in the first place!)
   
---
Murray Eisenbergmurrayeisenb...@gmail.com
503 King Farm Blvd #101 Home (240)-246-7240
Rockville, MD 20850-6667Mobile (413)-427-5334


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Going on holiday

[Ryan Schmidt]

On May 23, 2016, at 3:17 PM, David Evans  wrote:

> Later this week, I will be heading out of the country on holiday for about a 
> month in exotic locations where the
> internet may only be a rumor.  Not taking a computer either.  Should be back 
> toward the end of June full of energy
> with renewed vim and vigor ready to slay dragons and even maintain a few 
> ports.
> 
> So today is probably my last real day of work among you all for a while.
> 
> Luckily, while I'm gone, two developers have stepped up to the challenge and 
> will be taking up the slack for me.
> 
> For issues concerning Perl, Perl modules and such, please refer my tickets to 
> Mojca Miklavec.  For anything else, Jeremy
> Huddleston will be answering my tickets.  Of course, most of my ports are 
> openmaintainer so if you see something that
> needs fixing, go for it.
> 
> Many thanks to Jeremy and Mojca for their help and I promise to reciprocate 
> as the need arises.
> 
> See you all when I get back

Have a fantastic trip! 

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: How add variant when upgrading octave

[Murray Eisenberg]

That fixed things. Thanks.
> On May 23, 2016, at 9:04 PM, David Strubbe  wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure what you actually tried. Please do "sudo port clean qrupdate; 
> sudo port install qrupdate +atlas +gcc5".
> 
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Murray Eisenberg  > wrote:
> Alas,
> 
>sudo port upgrade qrupdate +atlas +gcc48
> 
> lgae error that variant +gcc5 conflicts with +gcc48 (previously installed was 
> older version of qrupdate +atlas +gcc48).
> 
> And then
> 
>  sudo port upgrade qrupdate +atlas +gcc48
> 
> gave error
> 
>   Error: org.macports.fetch for port qrupdate returned: must set at least one 
> Fortran variant
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 23, 2016, at 8:19 PM, David Strubbe > > wrote:
>> 
>> Try +gcc5. (There is no +gfortran variant since this port uses only Fortran.)
>> 
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Murray Eisenberg > > wrote:
>> Tried
>> 
>> sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants octave -gcc48 +gfortran
>> 
>> but following the automatic installation of fftw-3-single @3.3.4_1+gfortran
>> the fetch of qrupdate-1.1.2_4+atlas generated new error:
>> 
>> Error: org.macports.fetch for port qrupdate returned: must set at least 
>> one Fortran variant
>> 
>> How do I specify a Fortran variant for that?
>> 
>> (I’m getting the feeling of getting mired in some kind of infinite regress!)
>> 
>>> On May 23, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Richard L. Hamilton >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Perhaps you need to run
>>> sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants octave -gcc48 +gfortran
>>> 
>>> which seems to rebuild fftw-3 and hdf5 to match.
>>> 
 On May 20, 2016, at 17:59, Murray Eisenberg >>> > wrote:
 
 OK, tried 
 
 sudo port upgrade octave -gcc48 +gfortran
 
 but now I see warnings for dependencies fftw, hdf5, fftw-3-single, 
 qrupdate. , and the additional warning at the end.
 
 How should I proceed now (so that I do NOT have to run octave with 
 —no-gui-libs)?
 
 [user:~]$ sudo port upgrade octave -gcc48 +gfortran
 Warning: Skipping upgrade since fftw-3 3.3.4_1 >= fftw-3 3.3.4_1, even 
 though installed variants "" do not match "+gfortran". Use 'upgrade 
 --enforce-variants' to switch to the requested variants.
 Warning: Skipping upgrade since hdf5 1.10.0_0 >= hdf5 1.10.0_0, even 
 though installed variants "+cxx+gcc48+hl" do not match 
 "+cxx+fortran+gfortran+hl". Use 'upgrade --enforce-variants' to switch to 
 the requested variants.
 Warning: Skipping upgrade since fftw-3-single 3.3.4_1 >= fftw-3-single 
 3.3.4_1, even though installed variants "" do not match "+gfortran". Use 
 'upgrade --enforce-variants' to switch to the requested variants.
 Warning: Skipping upgrade since qrupdate 1.1.2_4 >= qrupdate 1.1.2_4, even 
 though installed variants "+atlas+gcc48" do not match "+atlas". Use 
 'upgrade --enforce-variants' to switch to the requested variants.
 Portfile changed since last build; discarding previous state.
 --->  Computing dependencies for octave
 --->  Fetching archive for octave
 --->  Attempting to fetch 
 octave-4.0.2_0+app+atlas+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+java+qt4gui+sound.darwin_15.x86_64.tbz2
  from https://packages.macports.org/octave 
 
 --->  Attempting to fetch 
 octave-4.0.2_0+app+atlas+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+java+qt4gui+sound.darwin_15.x86_64.tbz2
  from http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org/octave 
 
 --->  Attempting to fetch 
 octave-4.0.2_0+app+atlas+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+java+qt4gui+sound.darwin_15.x86_64.tbz2
  from 
 http://mse.uk.packages.macports.org/sites/packages.macports.org/octave 
 
 --->  Fetching distfiles for octave
 --->  Attempting to fetch octave-4.0.2.tar.gz from 
 ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/octave 
 --->  Verifying checksums for octave   

 --->  Extracting octave
 --->  Applying patches to octave
 --->  Configuring octave
 --->  Building octave
 --->  Staging octave into destroot
 --->  Installing octave 
 @4.0.2_0+app+atlas+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+java+qt4gui+sound
 --->  Cleaning octave
 --->  Computing dependencies for octave
 --->  Deactivating octave @3.8.2_18+atlas+gcc48+glgui
 --->  Cleaning octave
 --->  Activating octave 
 @4.0.2_0+app+atlas+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+java+qt4gui+sound
 
 unless octave is run with --no-gui-libs, graphics_toolkit("fltk") will 
 cause a
 crash
 
 --->  Cleaning octave
 
> On May 20, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Brandon Allbery  

Re: Imagick version?

[Bjarne D Mathiesen]

Joshua Root wrote:
> Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>> You'll just have to re-compile php55-imagick :
>>
>> This will take care of all of your php\d{2}-imagick versions
>>
>> port -q installed name:imagic \
>> | while read -a port
>> do port -n upgrade --force ${port[0]}
>>   done
>>
>> but more explicitly for just php55-imagick :
>>
>> port -n upgrade --force php55-imagick
> 
> That doesn't necessarily recompile the port, it reinstalls it (quite
> possibly from the same binary archive as before). If you really need to
> force a build from source, you have to use -s.
> 
> But if there really is a problem that requires a rebuild, the maintainer
> should bump the revision so everyone gets the rebuilt version.
> 

OK - I can see where the problem is then :
I'm always (implicitly) building from source, so this approach works for
me ; but for people installing from binaries, it doesn't work.

So it'll have to be :

port -n -s upgrade --force php55-imagick

As to a rev-bump
1) there's no revision number in the portfile
2) # $Id: Portfile 146488 2016-03-09 20:44:32Z ryandes...@macports.org $
3) in my experience, I always have to force rebuild php\d{2}-imagick
   whenever ImageMagick is updated

-- 
Bjarne D Mathiesen
Korsør ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i et totalt M$-frit miljø
MacOS X 10.11.5 El Capitan (15F34)
2 x 3,46 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon ; 48 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 ECC
ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Imagick version?

[Joshua Root]

Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:

You'll just have to re-compile php55-imagick :

This will take care of all of your php\d{2}-imagick versions

port -q installed name:imagic \
| while read -a port
do port -n upgrade --force ${port[0]}
  done

but more explicitly for just php55-imagick :

port -n upgrade --force php55-imagick


That doesn't necessarily recompile the port, it reinstalls it (quite 
possibly from the same binary archive as before). If you really need to 
force a build from source, you have to use -s.


But if there really is a problem that requires a rebuild, the maintainer 
should bump the revision so everyone gets the rebuilt version.


- Josh
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users