Re: new milestone: Port Binaries
On 2009-04-04 02:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Do we really feel this is an appropriate use of a milestone?
That's exactly what #14909 is about :-)
I was on
the fence about it so I didn't say anything, hoping someone else
would chime in. It seems to me that any software issues like mpab and
any base modifications would go in the MacPorts ${version}
milestones,
MPAB is not part of base, so I don't see why it should go into MacPorts
${version} where we keep the tickets for the releases.
and any server-related issues would go in the ... well,
the nonexistent servers milestone. Whenever I have a servers issue, I
use the server/hosting component and leave the milestone blank. :-/
Which is probably fine; not everything needs a milestone...
The good thing is, the roadmap offers quick access to active tickets in
each milestone. If we switch to component/type instead, I would say we
need to add similar reports or create such a wiki page with Trac query
links.
Rainer
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: new milestone: Port Binaries
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:19:50AM +0200, Rainer Müller said:
On 2009-04-04 02:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[...]
I was on
the fence about it so I didn't say anything, hoping someone else
would chime in. It seems to me that any software issues like mpab and
any base modifications would go in the MacPorts ${version}
milestones,
MPAB is not part of base, so I don't see why it should go into MacPorts
${version} where we keep the tickets for the releases.
Note that everything in contrib/ doesn't really have a way of filing tickets
against them. Perhaps we instead need a Contrib/Other milestone for such
things?
Bryan
and any server-related issues would go in the ... well,
the nonexistent servers milestone. Whenever I have a servers issue, I
use the server/hosting component and leave the milestone blank. :-/
Which is probably fine; not everything needs a milestone...
The good thing is, the roadmap offers quick access to active tickets in
each milestone. If we switch to component/type instead, I would say we
need to add similar reports or create such a wiki page with Trac query
links.
Rainer
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: new milestone: Port Binaries
Bryan Blackburn wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:19:50AM +0200, Rainer Müller said:
On 2009-04-04 02:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[...]
I was on
the fence about it so I didn't say anything, hoping someone else
would chime in. It seems to me that any software issues like mpab and
any base modifications would go in the MacPorts ${version}
milestones,
MPAB is not part of base, so I don't see why it should go into MacPorts
${version} where we keep the tickets for the releases.
Note that everything in contrib/ doesn't really have a way of filing tickets
against them. Perhaps we instead need a Contrib/Other milestone for such
things?
Sounds like a component to me...
- Josh
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: new milestone: Port Binaries
On Apr 2, 2009, at 18:30, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2009-03-30 22:07, Darren Weber wrote:
How about a new milestone for trac: binary distributions? I guess
most
of this would focus on mpab and adaptations to port to enable binary
installations.
Nobody objected, so I created the new milestone.
Do we really feel this is an appropriate use of a milestone? I was on
the fence about it so I didn't say anything, hoping someone else
would chime in. It seems to me that any software issues like mpab and
any base modifications would go in the MacPorts ${version}
milestones, and any server-related issues would go in the ... well,
the nonexistent servers milestone. Whenever I have a servers issue, I
use the server/hosting component and leave the milestone blank. :-/
Which is probably fine; not everything needs a milestone...
PS:
Should really look into getting http://trac.macports.org/ticket/
14909
resolved...
Interesting. I hadn't seen that ticket before.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: new milestone: Port Binaries
On 2009-03-30 22:07, Darren Weber wrote: How about a new milestone for trac: binary distributions? I guess most of this would focus on mpab and adaptations to port to enable binary installations. Nobody objected, so I created the new milestone. Rainer PS: Should really look into getting http://trac.macports.org/ticket/14909 resolved... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
new milestone: Port Binaries
How about a new milestone for trac: binary distributions? I guess most of this would focus on mpab and adaptations to port to enable binary installations. Take care, Darren ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
