Re: [MacRuby-devel] MacRuby app store guide

[rob ista]

I don't know if this is a xcode bug .. I'm still developing on SL with xcode 4.0.2 because Lion and 4.2 gives me too much trouble and crashes. The automated response in the review process about the codesigning  is quite new and I have not seen it before (on the same delvelopment machine with the same tools) until recently when submitting a new macruby app. It complaints about the macruby framework itself, all .rbo and .dylib files from the framework and all app-specific .rbo files from the deployment phase of the app. It worries me a bit because it seems to shut the door to macruby apps in the near future. It 's now only :
 

Dear Developer,
We have discovered one or more issues with your recent binary submission for "SMSReCall". Your app has proceeded to review, but the following issues should be corrected in your next submission: 
Invalid Signature - the nested app bundle Ruby (SMSReCall.app/Contents/Frameworks/MacRuby.framework) is not signed, the signature is invalid, or it is not signed with an Apple submission certificate. Refer to the Code Signing and Application Sandboxing Guide for more information. 
Invalid Signature - the executable SMSReCall.app/Contents/Frameworks/MacRuby.framework/Versions/Current/usr/lib/libmacruby.1.9.2dylib is not signed, the signature is invalid, or it is not signed with an Apple submission certificate. Refer to the Code Signing and Application Sandboxing Guide for more information. 
Invalid Signature - the executable etc etc etc  
Rob
 
- - - - 
 
Thanks for sharing Eliott, that seems to be a bug with Xcode and it shouldbe affecting all 3rd party frameworks, not just MacRuby.Quite strange, but thanks for showing how you worked around the signingproblem.- MattOn Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Elliot Temple  wrote:> http://curi.us/1538-macruby-and-the-mac-app-store>> Got my game in the app store. Hope these notes help others get things> working too.>> -- Elliot Temple> http://beginningofinfinity.com/> ___> MacRuby-devel mailing list> MacRuby-devel at lists.macosforge.org> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel>___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Re: [MacRuby-devel] brace yourselves, 0.11 is coming!

[Jordan K. Hubbard]

Radar #? :)

On Oct 23, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote:

> This message is a warning probably due to a small regression in Lion

___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Re: [MacRuby-devel] Advice for Total Tyro

[Jordan K. Hubbard]

On Oct 23, 2011, at 10:40 PM, David Frantz wrote:

> Well maybe the choice of words isn't great but we have yet to see a version 
> one released.  Maybe version one isn't that far off, but I think it is fair 
> to say most people approach version one of anything software related with 
> reservations.  

I'm not sure version numbers should be held in such high esteem.  OpenSSL, for 
example, has been in production for years and years now and they've not reached 
version 1.0 either. ;-)

___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Re: [MacRuby-devel] brace yourselves, 0.11 is coming!

[Matt Aimonetti]

fair... I didn't file a radar, my bad. Did anyone else file a rdr?

- Matt

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Jordan K. Hubbard  wrote:

> Radar #? :)
>
> On Oct 23, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote:
>
> This message is a warning probably due to a small regression in Lion
>
>
>
> ___
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>
>
___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Re: [MacRuby-devel] MacRuby app store guide

[Matt Aimonetti]

Rob, have you tried to use codesign as Eliott suggested in his blog post?

- Matt

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:19 AM, rob ista  wrote:

> I don't know if this is a xcode bug .. I'm still developing on SL with
> xcode 4.0.2 because Lion and 4.2 gives me too much trouble and crashes. The
> automated response in the review process about the codesigning  is quite new
> and I have not seen it before (on the same delvelopment machine with the
> same tools) until recently when submitting a new macruby app. It complaints
> about the macruby framework itself, all .rbo and .dylib files from the
> framework and all app-specific .rbo files from the deployment phase of the
> app. It worries me a bit because it seems to shut the door to macruby apps
> in the near future. It 's now only :
>
>
> Dear Developer,
>
> We have discovered one or more issues with your recent binary submission
> for "SMSReCall". Your app has proceeded to review, but the following issues
> should be corrected in your next submission:
>
> *Invalid Signature* - the nested app bundle Ruby
> (SMSReCall.app/Contents/Frameworks/MacRuby.framework) is not signed, the
> signature is invalid, or it is not signed with an Apple submission
> certificate. Refer to the Code Signing and Application Sandboxing 
> Guidefor
>  more information.
>
> *Invalid Signature* - the executable
> SMSReCall.app/Contents/Frameworks/MacRuby.framework/Versions/Current/usr/lib/libmacruby.1.9.2dylib
> is not signed, the signature is invalid, or it is not signed with an Apple
> submission certificate. Refer to the Code Signing and Application
> Sandboxing 
> Guidefor
>  more information.
>
> *Invalid Signature* - the executable etc etc etc
> Rob
>
> - - - -
>
> Thanks for sharing Eliott, that seems to be a bug with Xcode and it should
> be affecting all 3rd party frameworks, not just MacRuby.
> Quite strange, but thanks for showing how you worked around the signing
> problem.
>
> - Matt
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Elliot Temple  curi.us>
> wrote:
>
> >* http://curi.us/1538-macruby-and-the-mac-app-store
> *>*
> *>* Got my game in the app store. Hope these notes help others get things
> *>* working too.
> *>*
> *>* -- Elliot Temple
> *>* http://beginningofinfinity.com/
> *>*
> *>*
> *>*
> *>*
> *>* ___
> *>* MacRuby-devel mailing list
> *
> >* MacRuby-devel at 
> >lists.macosforge.org
> *>* 
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
> *>*
> *
>
> ___
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>
>
___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Re: [MacRuby-devel] Advice for Total Tyro

[Perry E. Metzger]

On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:44:42 -0700 "Jordan K. Hubbard"
 wrote:
> 
> On Oct 23, 2011, at 10:40 PM, David Frantz wrote:
> 
> > Well maybe the choice of words isn't great but we have yet to see
> > a version one released.  Maybe version one isn't that far off,
> > but I think it is fair to say most people approach version one of
> > anything software related with reservations.  
> 
> I'm not sure version numbers should be held in such high esteem.
> OpenSSL, for example, has been in production for years and years
> now and they've not reached version 1.0 either. ;-)
> 

No longer true, OpenSSL is now past 1.0

-- 
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Re: [MacRuby-devel] Advice for Total Tyro

[Jordan K. Hubbard]

On Oct 24, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:44:42 -0700 "Jordan K. Hubbard"
>  wrote:
>> 
>> On Oct 23, 2011, at 10:40 PM, David Frantz wrote:
>> 
>>> Well maybe the choice of words isn't great but we have yet to see
>>> a version one released.  Maybe version one isn't that far off,
>>> but I think it is fair to say most people approach version one of
>>> anything software related with reservations.  
>> 
>> I'm not sure version numbers should be held in such high esteem.
>> OpenSSL, for example, has been in production for years and years
>> now and they've not reached version 1.0 either. ;-)
>> 
> 
> No longer true, OpenSSL is now past 1.0

Well so it has.  I stand corrected!  I guess you can all START using OpenSSL 
now. ;-)

- Jordan


___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel