Re: Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Aniello Del Sorbo ani...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/1/26 Ryan Abel rabe...@gmail.com: On Jan 26, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Henrik Hedberg wrote: Jeremiah Foster wrote: Bug #7505 asks if mauku is open or closed. According to the bug report, it looks pretty closed. ... What should we do here? Move this to non-free? I am very aware of the meaning free here. Mauku was uploaded into the free section because there was (is) no non-free repository in Extras. However, the community insisted to close all external repositories and use Extras instead (done that). In addition, Ovi Store was not (is not, it is still beta) available for distribution channel. http://repository.maemo.org/extras/pool/fremantle/non-free/ Thus Mauku should go here, how? The microfeed engine should stay in the free section. Back in the days when Canola source code was not available I used to generate the binary packages using -b option of dpkg-buildpackage(1). It will then generate only binary files (.deb) and the proper .changes file. To upload to extras non-free, you must use dput and edit /etc/dput.cf accordingly, as described in http://wiki.maemo.org/Uploading_to_Extras#.22non-free.22_packages. Don't know the current status of the non-free queue for Fremantle. It used to work back in the days of Gregale/Bora/Chinook/Diablo. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia ebl...@gmail.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Can Canola run under python 2.6
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Zhou, Jianchun (周建春) jianchun.z...@asianux.com wrote: Hi, all: Does anyone who tried to run Canola under python 2.6? This discussion is taking place in canola-devel mailing list. If you're interested, please join us: https://garage.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/canola-devel Cheers, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia ebl...@gmail.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Canola is free!
[This text has been posted to http://etrunko.blogspot.com/2009/03/canola-is-free.html] I'm pleased to announce that I've just closed bug #3881, which means that from now on Canola and all its components are licensed under the GNU General Public License version 3. The source code of the former closed-source packages, Atabake, Download Manager, Terra and Canola, has been uploaded to our gitorious server a few hours ago. The canola-devel mailing list for developers is already set up and working on garage. Everyone is very welcome to join us in the development of the project. For documentation, such as installation instructions, build dependency, and so on, I'm setting up a wiki that should go online by the end of this week under the openbossa.org domain. With all this, Canola officially leaves the beta status. The packages of for the final 2.0.0 version will be uploaded soon, together with brand new Maemo-EFL. Last, I'd like to thank everyone for supporting the project even before the very first release and especially for providing feedback on the various releases we had since December 2007. If today we were able to release Canola as Free Software, consider yourself responsible for it as well. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia ebl...@gmail.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Email addresses in debian/changelog
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com wrote: Hello, My understanding is that the line in the maemopad changelog, Maemo Integration integrat...@maemo.org is an email address that ends up at Nokia. Can an email address connected to a human be put there instead? (Cross posting to maemo-developers) I have a slightly different use case that pretty much resembles the described above. I've been maintaining quite a few packages for a while where the maintainer email is the address of a mailing list @garage.maemo.org. Would it be ok to leave it like that or it goes somehow against the debian best practices manual. In the end, it is connected to not only one, but all the people who are subscribed to the list. Best regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia ebl...@gmail.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Email addresses in debian/changelog
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com wrote: On Feb 17, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: I have a slightly different use case that pretty much resembles the described above. I've been maintaining quite a few packages for a while where the maintainer email is the address of a mailing list @garage.maemo.org. Would it be ok to leave it like that or it goes somehow against the debian best practices manual. In the end, it is connected to not only one, but all the people who are subscribed to the list. I can see how this would be a good idea, but can we add a group list in addition to have an individual packager's email? For example, I work with the debian-perl team and we co-maintain about 1,000 packages. So when a bug comes in we track it and we all can act on it since we all get notified. But in the changelog we have both the name of the person who changed things in the package and in the control file we have the group email address, like this; --- changelog --- libtest-file-perl (1.25-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial Release. (Closes: #512774) -- Jeremiah C. Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:09:18 +0100 --- control --- Source: libtest-file-perl Section: perl Priority: optional Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7) Build-Depends-Indep: perl (= 5.6.0-12), libtest-manifest-perl (= 1.14), libtest-pod-perl, libtest-pod-coverage-perl Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Jeremiah C. Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com This shows that bug reports will go to the _maintainer_ of the package, i.e. Debian Perl Group but the person that physically made changes to the package is listed in the changelog. This is good because if there is a bug we can find out why it was introduced, or who fixed it, or when it was added and by whom. This increases accountability and transparency, both good things I feel. So, if we want to be closer to debian and to increase transparency, I think we should make sure the person who last touched the package put their name in the changelog. We can always add the group email address to the control log. How does this sound? Yeah, except for the Uploaders field in debian/control, we've been doing exactly what you said. The debian/changelog file includes the name of the person who changed the package while in control we have the mailing list. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia ebl...@gmail.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Email addresses in debian/changelog
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com wrote: Except that there is a generic email address in the changelog for maemopad for example. i.e. integra...@maemo.org. That should get changed to a real person's email address. Ah sorry, I forgot to mention that the packages I help to maintain are not related to the ones mentioned before which include the generic @maemo.org email. Take for example the evas package, part of maemo-efl project: debian/control: evas (0.9.9.050+svn38845-maemo1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. -- Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) eduardo.l...@indt.org.br Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:36:21 -0300 debian/changelog: Source: evas Section: libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Maemo-EFL Team maemo-efl-de...@garage.maemo.org Cheers. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia ebl...@gmail.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Repository issues ...
Forgot to reply all.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
ebl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a quick update on this issue:
* Uploads to extras-devel non-free work for both chinook and diablo
* Chinook promoter is broken
* Diablo promoter is working
* Uploads to extras non-free is broken for diablo (haven't tested
chinook as I was not able to promote the free packages) with the
following error:
Uploading to diablo-extras-nonfree (via scp to garage):
Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive).
lost connection
Warning: The execution of '/usr/bin/scp' as
'scp -p all/atabake_0.1.7-maemo1_all.deb
all/atabake_0.1.7-maemo1_i386.changes
etru...@garage:/var/www/extras/incoming-nonfree/diablo'
returned a nonzero exit code.
Error while uploading.
Is it a problem with my ssh key? If so, why was I able to upload to
extras-devel and not to extras??
Didn't test other use cases, such as autobuilder for chinook and diablo.
Best Regards, Etrunko.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Till Harbaum / Lists li...@harbaum.org
wrote:
Hi,
i got e.g. this kind of error:
[2009-02-11 03:30:04] Processing package osm2go 0.6.12-maemo1. Uploader:
harbaum, builder: builder2
[2009-02-11 03:30:11] Unexpected error:
ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpack
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/buildlib/app.py, line 81, in run
mainfunc(argv, options, self._logger, self.conf)
File /usr/bin/buildme, line 616, in main
params = {
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/buildlib/fsm.py, line 72, in run
code = handler(self)
File /usr/bin/buildme, line 374, in check_sources
client.update()
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/minideblib/AptRepoClient.py, line
318, in load_repos
self.__load_repos(self._repos, ignore_errors)
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/minideblib/AptRepoClient.py, line
534, in __load_repos
self.__parse_one_repo(*args)
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/minideblib/AptRepoClient.py, line
560, in __parse_one_repo
dest.load(fls, base_url)
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/minideblib/AptRepoClient.py, line
271, in load
para = self.__load_one(inf, base_url)
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/minideblib/AptRepoClient.py, line
263, in __load_one
para.load( in_file )
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/minideblib/DpkgControl.py, line 66,
in load
key, value = string.split( line, :, 1 )
ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpack
Am Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009 schrieb Antonio Aloisio:
Hi Till,
I uploaded several packages yesterday and this afternoon on Diablo and it
worked fine for me.
BR,
Antonio
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Till Harbaum / Lists
li...@harbaum.orgwrote:
Hi,
hmm, the repository problems are really causing headaches ...
- Sometimes i can't even scp as my login is rejected
- Yesterday the entire build process was broken
- Today chinook i386 autobuild is still broken
- The chinook promotion interface isn't working
And if that's not enough, the svn on garage is outdated
and messing with my attempts to merge maemo/debian/trunk
trees.
And this while a severe bug in osm2go needs to be fixed
that may mess around with the main osm database.
Till
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
--
Eduardo de Barros Lima
INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
ebl...@gmail.com
--
Eduardo de Barros Lima
INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
ebl...@gmail.com
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Repository issues ...
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Antonio Aloisio antonio.aloi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Till, I uploaded several packages yesterday and this afternoon on Diablo and it worked fine for me. I can confirm that the repositories/autobuilder were broken yesterday during the almost all afternoon/evening. The issue seemed to got fixed by 3:00 UTC, and today morning I was able to upload packages to the autobuilder and it worked fine. Haven't used the promotion interface, but at least it looks like extras-devel is back to normal state by now... Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia ebl...@gmail.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Python logging.config missing
Hi Jeffrey, I'm forwarding this to the pymaemo developers list, maybe the can answer us better. Best Regards, Etrunko. On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Jeffrey Barish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone using the logging package? logging.config is missing, so how do you specify the location of a configuration file? -- Jeffrey Barish ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: New features in autobuilder and Extras Assistant
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Niels Breet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This week we've added some new features to the autobuilder and Extras Assistant. I hope developers will like these changes: Rejecting packages when the exact version is uploaded for the second time. The autobuilder has been modified to reject a package when the same version is already available in the extras-devel repository. This change will force developers to increase their package version number after each successful upload and build. In the past we've had problems in the repository where a package was uploaded twice and caused 'Size Mismatch' errors[1]. Yay! This is specially interesting for newcomers not used to debian packaging. Making this error explicit helps both developers/packagers (who won't be able to break the repository with this kind of mistake) and users (who will be happy being able to install their favourite packages). Package signing no longer required. The autobuilder and Extras Assistant no longer require packages to be GPG signed. It seemed to cause a lot of grief for developers without any real benefits. This change is targetted to making uploading packages easier. Every uploader has to be authenticated to upload a package, so we can already trace back the uploader. The autobuilder signs packages which are moved into the repository. Ok, so you don't need to sign the packages anymore, but it won't hurt if you upload a signed package, isn't it? My question here is concerning dput uploads. Is it still possible to upload packages using dput?? If this is the case, is GPG signing still required? Upload to multiple repositories at the same time. You can now use the Extras Assistant[2] to upload a source package to chinook and diablo at the same time. No need to do two separate uploads anymore. This feature has been requested for quite some time, let's hope it helps. Another big improvement here. Thank you guys very much! -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Maemo SDK VMware Appliance 0.7
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will somebody carry a copy of it (compressed) for Maemo Summit?? I'll write it on a DVD... Bring yours to get a copy! Best Regards, Etrunko -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Does Debian OpenSSL problem affect Maemo ?
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the tablets, I'll take MoRpHeUz'S wOrD. For maemo.org's infrastructure, garage was taken offline earlier today and cleaned - server keys were regenerated, etc. I don't know if any of the user keys are vulnerable on there, but I assume Ferenc's got it under control. My key seems to be on the blacklist. I've uploaded some packages earlier today, but at this very moment I can't do it anymore. Considering that I must regenerate my key, how should I proceed to get it working again? I remember of a page somewhere in maemo website where we were able to submit our public keys, but I can't find it anywhere Best Regars, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Does Debian OpenSSL problem affect Maemo ?
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My key seems to be on the blacklist. I've uploaded some packages earlier today, but at this very moment I can't do it anymore. Considering that I must regenerate my key, how should I proceed to get it working again? I remember of a page somewhere in maemo website where we were able to submit our public keys, but I can't find it anywhere Got the address: https://garage.maemo.org/account/index2.php Best Regars, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [pymaemo] Python Launcher released
On 3/27/08, Luciano Miguel Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a GUI to configure startup behavior. Selecting at startup the daemon will be load automatically at boot time. first py app will force daemon to be loaded just after the first py app is loaded. This saves memory, but first py app doesn't have any speedup. disabled will keep PyLauncher disabled :). Great news indeed! Would it be hard to port this GUI to an applet for the control panel? IMHO, that's the appropriate place for it. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [pymaemo] Python Launcher released
On 3/28/08, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great news indeed! Would it be hard to port this GUI to an applet for the control panel? IMHO, that's the appropriate place for it. Forgot to add the link for the tutorial: http://maemo.org/development/documentation/tutorials/maemo_4-0_tutorial.html#cpa Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Build Evince on Maemo
Hi, On Jan 9, 2008 4:48 PM, Albert Hosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all The patch is in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324644 . Even i applied the patch it still gives the error of No package 'gnome-icon-theme' found when I run ./configure --without-libgnome. I just remembered this patch was built under Ubuntu Mobile environment, which ships gnome-icon-theme, gnome-keyring, etc. We still need some adjustments in configure.ac. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Build Evince on Maemo
On Jan 10, 2008 5:49 AM, Ed Bartosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I had it and solved it and some other issues as well. Thank you Eduardo for the patch. You're welcome. :) Yesterday I built evince package with all backends included(djvu,ps,dvi,tiff,cb[r,z],impress) except of PDF. PDF backend requires newer poppler, which I'm going to build today. Great news! I already created project on garage and I'm going to put sources there today or tomorrow. You and everybody who is interested are welcome to join. Actually I think that Eduardo should be the one who should lead this project, so Eduardo, you're exteamely welcome to join as an admin :) Thank you for the invitation, I'll join the project as soon as garage helps. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Build Evince on Maemo
On Jan 8, 2008 2:19 PM, Albert Hosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run ./configure --without-libgnome, but it still gave the following dependency: checking for SHELL_CORE... configure: error: Package requirements (libxml-2.0 = 2.5.0 gtk+-2.0 = 2.10.0 gnome-icon-theme = 2.17.1 gnome-vfs-2.0 libglade-2.0 gconf-2.0 gnome-keyring-1 = 0.4.0) were not met: No package 'gnome-icon-theme' found Yeah, there are still some bits to adjust in configure.ac. I have a somewhat updated Maemo patch for evince. It's from November 9th and was not tested at all. If you want to try it out it is attached. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Build Evince on Maemo
Hi, On Jan 4, 2008 7:10 PM, Albert Hosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to build latest Evince on Maemo. Much appreciated if any one can point me somewhere. Or if you have already built it, would you share the process that you did and the difficulities that you met. Thanks. It will depend on your needs. If you're aiming to read PDF files only, you'll need to build poppler[1] as well. For PS it was just introduced the libspectre[2] dependency for Evince instead of the gs binary. To build Evince itself you need to adjust the configure flags: --without-libgnome will definitely be necessary. Best Regards, Etrunko. [1] http://poppler.freedesktop.org [2] http://libspectre.freedesktop.org -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Build Evince on Maemo
On Jan 7, 2008 8:41 AM, Ed Bartosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should we open a project for it on garage? I don't think it is necessary to do so. There is already a bug[1] in GNOME bugzilla regarding the Maemo/Hildon patch. Unfortunately it is quite outdated, but I think we should host it there. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Build Evince on Maemo
On Jan 7, 2008 11:20 AM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it is necessary to do so. There is already a bug[1] in GNOME bugzilla regarding the Maemo/Hildon patch. Unfortunately it is quite outdated, but I think we should host it there. Best Regards, Etrunko. And the link: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324644 -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Build Evince on Maemo
Hi, On Jan 7, 2008 1:47 PM, Ed Bartosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 11:20 -0300, ext Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: Are you suggesting to just maintain a patch in GNOME bugzilla instead of open a project on garage? Kind of... The goal is to integrate the Maemo/Hildon patch to Evince source tree, just as it was done before for Abiword and Gnumeric for instance. So, GNOME bugzilla is the right place for that. From my point of view having project on garage is a bit more than just that. It's also the place for history of your changes, request tracker, news and so on, so it's more convenient for users. What do you think about this? What I wouldn't want was to maintain a separate source tree for Evince. Once the patch is officially integrated to the tree it would become useless. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: chinook, python, libglade and toolbars
Hi, On Dec 11, 2007 3:14 PM, Luca Ognibene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yep, this is my problem. With libglade 2.4 (provided by nokia sdk) it doesn't work but with libglade 2.6 (provided by indt) it works fine. The problem is: which version will be in user's devices? Why there are two different versions? When Nokia released the first OS2008 Beta SDK, it didn't include the libglade package. People started to complain about it and then I simply built it from the same sources of OS2007 and uploaded to extras repository. They fixed this issue in the final version of the SDK, where libglade in the official repository. With this, we now have two versions of the package in the system. This shouldn't be an issue, but there is a new feature implemented in the latest version of application manager that won't let you upgrade libglade package because it it considered a system package, something that was possible with older versions of the program. This way, packages built depending on 2.6 won't be installable. Nokia guys are discouraging users of enabling the official SDK repository in your application manager, but in this case there are divergent and imcompatible (at least in the app manger point of view) versions available. I'm really interested in solving this issue, which has been generating some headaches for a while. Any Ideas please?? Does Nokia guy can help us?? Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Error building libxslt for chinook beta
Hi, I noticed maemo chinook beta sdk includes the libxslt package but the respective -dev package is missing. So I fetched the sources with apt-get souce and tried to build it myself but got a strange error I haven't seen yet while building other packages for chinook. Making all in xsltproc make[2]: Entering directory `/home/edulima/projects/libxslt/chinook/libxslt-1.1.19/xsltproc' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -o xsltproc xsltproc.o ../libxslt/libxslt.la ../libexslt/libexslt.la -L/scratchbox/devkits/doctools/lib -lxml2 -L/scratchbox/devkits/doctools/lib -lxml2 -lm gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -o .libs/xsltproc xsltproc.o ../libxslt/.libs/libxslt.so ../libexslt/.libs/libexslt.so -L/scratchbox/devkits/doctools/lib -lxml2 -lm //scratchbox/host_shared/lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' //scratchbox/host_shared/lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [xsltproc] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/edulima/projects/libxslt/chinook/libxslt-1.1.19/xsltproc' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/edulima/projects/libxslt/chinook/libxslt-1.1.19' make: *** [all] Error 2 [sbox-4.0beta-i386: ~/projects/libxslt/chinook/libxslt-1.1.19] Something with scratchbox libs seems to be screwed up. I'm not sure what it is t and why is this happening. Any ideas? Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Status of libglade in chinook
Hi, On 10/29/07, Lauro Moura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it would be good to release a version before the launch, to give developers some time to port their applications. This is a good idea. If I understood correctly libglade won't be anymore supported officially by Maemo. Unfortunately lots of applications still depend on it, for the most various reasons. And until GtkBuilder can't fully replace glade, it would be nice to have the python bindings working, even if they were part of an not official python package. I uploaded libglade 2.6.2 to chinook extras, which would happen sooner or later anyway. So it would be great if anyone could provide the package for the glade bindings. Currently it is part of the pygtk2 package in Debian/Ubuntu and I really don't know how much effort would be needed to provide it as an completely separate package. I would be great if someone could help us here. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Python startup desktop icon
Hi, You need to call osso.Context() somewhere in your code, preferably in the beginning of main function. You'll also need to call osso.close() in the end of your code. Something like this: import osso if __name__ == __main__: osso_ctx = osso.Context(thummim, version, False) ... some code ... osso_ctx.close() Best Regards, Etrunko. On 8/9/07, Tony Maro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to follow the instructions at http://maemo.org/development/documentation/how-tos/3-x/python_maemo_3.x_howto.html I have the icon launching my app just fine, but when I use the X-Osso-Service and a .service dbus file, I get something odd. It tells me Starting app in the top right, and the application starts just fine. Then, after about 20 seconds, the app closes. If I launch it without using X-Osso-service, it of course gives no notification that the app is opening, but it opens and stays open. Here's my thummim.desktop file: [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Thummim Reader Comment=Thummim Scripture Reader Exec=/home/user/Thummim/Thummim Type=Application Icon=gpe-todo X-Osso-Service=thummim X-Osso-Type=application/x-executable Here's my thummim.service file: [D-BUS Service] Name=com.nokia.thummim Exec=/home/user/Thummim/Thummim ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: New release of Python2.5 for Maemo (r0.4-11)
On 6/28/07, Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) pymaemo needs clicks on two install files base repo and pymaemo why? That's because some libraries that python needs are available in the base repository which is the official distribution where Nokia people can upload packages. Python for Maemo is available in extras repository, as many others applications and libraries developed by people outside Nokia. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: New release of Python2.5 for Maemo (r0.4-10)
On 5/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Eduardo, I had a problem while uploading i386 packages to the extras repository. Today it will be fixed. It works now. Thanks! Regards, Luciano -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: New release of Python2.5 for Maemo (r0.4-10)
Hi, I'm having problems while trying to upgrade the python packages in the scratchbox environment: [sbox-3.1-i386: ~] apt-get dist-upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Calculating Upgrade... Done The following packages have been kept back: python2.5-dbus-dev python2.5-gobject-dev python2.5-gtk2-dev python2.5-hildon-dev python2.5-osso-dev python2.5-pyrex python2.5-xml-dev 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 7 not upgraded. [sbox-3.1-i386: ~] And trying to install those packages manually won't solve: The following packages have unmet dependencies: python2.5-dbus-dev: Depends: python2.5-dbus (= 0.71-1osso5) but 0.71-1osso4 is to be installed python2.5-gobject-dev: Depends: python2.5-gobject (= 2.12.2-1osso3) but 2.12.2-1osso2 is to be installed python2.5-gtk2-dev: Depends: python2.5-gtk2 (= 2.10.3-1osso5) but 2.10.3-1osso4 is to be installed python2.5-hildon-dev: Depends: python2.5-hildon (= 0.8.7-1osso3) but 0.8.7-1osso1 is to be installed python2.5-osso-dev: Depends: python2.5-osso (= 0.2-1osso3) but 0.2-1osso2 is to be installed python2.5-pyrex: Depends: python2.5 (= 2.5.1-1osso2) but 2.5.0-1osso11 is to be installed python2.5-xml-dev: Depends: python2.5-xml (= 0.8.4-1osso9) but 0.8.4-1osso8 is to be installed E: Broken packages Any idea?? -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 5/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John, If you're using python2.5 you can click on check for updates in Application Manager and proceed with installation. Python2.4 users have to uninstall it first. People installing for the first time can use automatic install files available at PyMaemo website: pymaemo.garage.maemo.org Ah, I forgot to say in the previous email: now we have support to gconf/gnomevfs. To use it: from gnome import gconf from gnome import gnomevfs Regards, Luciano Wolf -Original Message- From: ext Acadia Secure Networks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 15-May-07 21:50 To: Wolf Luciano (EXT-INdT/Recife) Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org Subject: Re: New release of Python2.5 for Maemo (r0.4-10) Luciano, thanks for the heads up. Can we simply install over the old version or must the old version be first un-installed before installing the new version? Best Regards, John Holmblad Acadia Secure Networks * * *would** you like to know where is Darren on his thru-hike? you can find out at:www.whereisdarren.com*** Luciano Miguel Wolf wrote: Hi Maemo Developers! It took us some time but now we have a new version of Python2.5 for Maemo ready for download. We have tried to cover requests from community as much as possible. Highlights are: -New modules (libconic, libid3tag, osso-mime, libjpeg -thanks to Matt Croydon) -Bugfixes -Ipython (thanks to Ed Bartosh) -Python2.5.1 Since the last release we have received a lot of feedback from the community. Let's continue the good work and bring more and more applications to the PyMaemo universe. Regards, Luciano Wolf -INdT- ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: New release of Python2.5 for Maemo (r0.4-10)
I've now tried to install all python packages, again with no success, because of broken dependencies: The following packages have unmet dependencies: python2.5-conic-dev: Depends: python2.5-conic (= 0.1-1osso1) but it is not installable python2.5-dbus-dev: Depends: python2.5-dbus (= 0.71-1osso5) but 0.71-1osso4 is to be installed python2.5-gnome-dev: Depends: python2.5-gnome (= 2.18.0-1osso1) but it is not installable python2.5-gobject-dev: Depends: python2.5-gobject (= 2.12.2-1osso3) but 2.12.2-1osso2 is to be installed python2.5-gtk2-dev: Depends: python2.5-gtk2 (= 2.10.3-1osso5) but 2.10.3-1osso4 is to be installed python2.5-hildon-dev: Depends: python2.5-hildon (= 0.8.7-1osso3) but 0.8.7-1osso1 is to be installed python2.5-osso-dev: Depends: python2.5-osso (= 0.2-1osso3) but 0.2-1osso2 is to be installed python2.5-pyrex: Depends: python2.5 (= 2.5.1-1osso2) but 2.5.0-1osso11 is to be installed python2.5-xml-dev: Depends: python2.5-xml (= 0.8.4-1osso9) but 0.8.4-1osso8 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 5/15/07, Eduardo Lima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm having problems while trying to upgrade the python packages in the scratchbox environment: [sbox-3.1-i386: ~] apt-get dist-upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Calculating Upgrade... Done The following packages have been kept back: python2.5-dbus-dev python2.5-gobject-dev python2.5-gtk2-dev python2.5-hildon-dev python2.5-osso-dev python2.5-pyrex python2.5-xml-dev 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 7 not upgraded. [sbox-3.1-i386: ~] And trying to install those packages manually won't solve: The following packages have unmet dependencies: python2.5-dbus-dev: Depends: python2.5-dbus (= 0.71-1osso5) but 0.71-1osso4 is to be installed python2.5-gobject-dev: Depends: python2.5-gobject (= 2.12.2-1osso3) but 2.12.2-1osso2 is to be installed python2.5-gtk2-dev: Depends: python2.5-gtk2 (= 2.10.3-1osso5) but 2.10.3-1osso4 is to be installed python2.5-hildon-dev: Depends: python2.5-hildon (= 0.8.7-1osso3) but 0.8.7-1osso1 is to be installed python2.5-osso-dev: Depends: python2.5-osso (= 0.2-1osso3) but 0.2-1osso2 is to be installed python2.5-pyrex: Depends: python2.5 (= 2.5.1-1osso2) but 2.5.0-1osso11 is to be installed python2.5-xml-dev: Depends: python2.5-xml (= 0.8.4-1osso9) but 0.8.4-1osso8 is to be installed E: Broken packages Any idea?? -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: libcairo 1.4.4 and poppler 0.5.4 available
On 4/24/07, Daniel Amelang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [1] http://cairro.freedesktop.org [2] http://poppler.freedesktop.org That's http://cairo.freedesktop.org, not 'cairro', obviously. http://cairographics.org works too. Dan Indeed. Thanks for the correct link. :) -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Fwd: libcairo 1.4.4 and poppler 0.5.4 available
Hi all, The packages for libcairo[1] and poppler[2] are available in the extras repository for both OS2007 (bora) and and OS2006 (gregale). If you find any bugs, please mail me. More to come soon. :) Best regards, Etrunko. [1] http://cairro.freedesktop.org [2] http://poppler.freedesktop.org -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Python-Glade-Nokia770 creating debian packages
There seems to be some other people in the with similar problems. Please install the Xterm package and try calling your program from there. This procedure should provide more useful information. A direct link to the xterm package follows: http://repository.maemo.org/pool/scirocco/free/o/osso-xterm/osso-xterm_0.13_armel.deb Best Regards, Etrunko On 3/23/07, Admir Saric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've created an application using python and glade and I've tried to get it running on the Nokia770. I was able to install the .deb package but when I tried to run it the loading window appeared and closed after a while. The application never started. What seams to be the problem is that .glade file can't be found by the executable file. Did anyone had a same problem?? Solution?? Admir -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: How to get application icons in task navigator
Hi Alessandro, Try something like this, if you're using C: setenv (SDL_VIDEO_X11_WMCLASS, your-app, 1); Or in python: os.environ[SDL_VIDEO_X11_WMCLASS] = carman-sdl Best Regards, Etrunko. On 3/23/07, Alessandro Pasotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem: pressing the Home key when in fullscreen mode from a SDL app brings to the desktop but the app icon does not appear, hence there is no way to go back to the app. An year is passed and this problem still affects almost all games and other SDL apps ported to maemo without integrating libosso. I tried several times (with OS2005, 2006, 2007 and 2007 hackers edition) to get rid of this without success. This howto don't work: http://maemo.org/maemowiki/GameDevelopment#head-c91f345718121fbd009c639728f9de0104308789 Is there a way to make the icon of a pure SDL app (without osso) appear in the Task Navigator ? -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: How to get application icons in task navigator
On 3/23/07, Alessandro Pasotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I tested also putenv(SDL_VIDEO_X11_WMCLASS=tuxpaint); after main() You should place the setenv/putenv call before sdl_init() call and add the StartupWMClass=tuxpaint entry in your .desktop file. As examples, canola and carman are SDL applications which show the icons in the task navigator. Best Regards, Etrunko. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Re: Developer Device Program Request
I have built cairo 1.2.6 packages for maemo 2.1 some time ago, but I have not been able to test it yet. If there's anyone interested, its available at: http://www.maemo.org.br/platform/etrunko/libcairo1.2.6_maemo2.1.tar.gz Best Regards, Etrunko. On 1/24/07, Tommi Komulainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 09:13 +0200, ext Kalle Vahlman wrote: (and that someone at Nokia would upgrade the svn to 1.3.x ASAP in preparation for the imminent 1.4 release, though I guess it is all the same to wait for that...) Yes, yes, yes.. It's in the process (probably fell between the cracks while the process was changed etc.) -- Tommi Komulainen[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] GnomeCanvas?
Hi Erik, I've built GnomeCanvas 2.10 for the Nokia 770 device as a dependency for libgnomeprint and xournal for both i386 and armel targets. It's not the latest version but works fine. If you're interested, just add the following repository to your /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://www.maemo.org.br/platform/apt mistral user deb-src http://www.maemo.org.br/platform/apt mistral user Then run apt-get update apt-get install libgnomecanvas2-0. Hope this helps. Best Regards, Etrunko. On 11/11/06, Erik Walthinsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm working on a control panel interface (770 permanently mounted on the wall) that cries out for GnomeCanvas to build the UI. Of course, that's not available on the 770, and there's nothing comparable that I can find either. I know the Canvas currently depends on Cairo, but is there any hope of getting some form of the Canvas working? I don't need any kind of performance out of it, I'm only redrawing small chunks of the screen *very* infrequently. TIA, Omega aka Erik Walthinsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
