N800 as usb host

2007-07-18 Thread ツ Leandro Sales
Hi!
   I have N800 and since I need to use the kernel git version of
linux-omap and in this way it is not possible to compile the WLAN
driver against this kernel, I want to plug a usb hub on it (with a
mini-usb connector in both  of the cable) and use a usb wireless pen
drive to connect to a wlan network. Did someone already do this? If I
do this, will it work? Any suggestion/clue will be accepted. Thank
you.

-- 
Leandro Melo de Sales.
Pervasive and Embedded Computing Laboratory
http://embedded.ufcg.edu.br/
+55 083 3310-1404 (extension 208)

There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand
binary, those who don't
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Mozilla browser has problem with jalimo installation?

2007-07-18 Thread Wahlau -
Hallo everyone,

out of excitement i have installed the new browser, and it works
pretty well as far as i am concerned. But i noticed it might have
problem withe jalimo packages, since i got these errors after trying
to install jalimo packages after installing microb:



/home/user/bin # apt-get install cacao cacao-cldc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  classpath classpath-common libltdl3 midpath midpath-cldc
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  cacao cacao-cldc classpath classpath-common libltdl3 midpath midpath-cldc
0 upgraded, 7 newly installed, 0 to remove and 15 not upgraded.
Need to get 11.8MB of archives.
After unpacking 14.6MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  classpath-common classpath libltdl3 cacao midpath midpath-cldc cacao-cldc
Install these packages without verification [y/N]? y
Get:1 http://jalimo.tarent.de maemo3/user classpath-common
2:0.95+cvs20070530-1 [9190kB]
Get:2 http://jalimo.tarent.de maemo3/user classpath 2:0.95+cvs20070530-1 [202kB]
Get:3 http://jalimo.tarent.de maemo3/user libltdl3 1.5.22-4 [170kB]
Get:4 http://jalimo.tarent.de maemo3/user cacao 0.98-jalimo1 [561kB]
Get:5 http://jalimo.tarent.de maemo3/user midpath
0.0+svn20070705-jalimo2 [979kB]
Get:6 http://jalimo.tarent.de maemo3/user midpath-cldc
0.0+svn20070705-jalimo2 [107kB]
Get:7 http://jalimo.tarent.de maemo3/user cacao-cldc 0.98-jalimo1 [541kB]
Fetched 11.8MB in 55s (213kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package classpath-common.
(Reading database ... dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/classpath-common_2%3a0.95+cvs20070530-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
 unable to open files list file for package `microb-l10n': Input/output error
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/classpath-common_2%3a0.95+cvs20070530-1_all.deb
Processing was halted because there were too many errors.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
/home/user/bin #


can anyone confirm this before i try to file a bug at bugzilla?

thanks.

regards,
wahlau.

-- 
= : : : ---
normal reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
urgent reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- : : : ==
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Mozilla browser has problem with jalimo installation?

2007-07-18 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Wahlau - [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Selecting previously deselected package classpath-common.
 (Reading database ... dpkg: error processing
 /var/cache/apt/archives/classpath-common_2%3a0.95+cvs20070530-1_all.deb
 (--unpack):
  unable to open files list file for package `microb-l10n': Input/output error

This unfortunately looks like a filesystem corruption.  What happens
when you do the following?

# cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/microb-l10n.list
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Mozilla browser has problem with jalimo installation?

2007-07-18 Thread Wahlau -
Hi,

the file does not exist... is there anyway i can repair this?

regards,
wahlau

On 18/07/07, Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ext Wahlau - [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Selecting previously deselected package classpath-common.
  (Reading database ... dpkg: error processing
  /var/cache/apt/archives/classpath-common_2%3a0.95+cvs20070530-1_all.deb
  (--unpack):
   unable to open files list file for package `microb-l10n': Input/output 
  error

 This unfortunately looks like a filesystem corruption.  What happens
 when you do the following?

 # cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/microb-l10n.list



-- 
= : : : ---
normal reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
urgent reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- : : : ==
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Mozilla browser has problem with jalimo installation?

2007-07-18 Thread Wahlau -
Hi all,

i manage to fsck the rootfs and now it seemed to be working :) wonder
why my file system got screwed up :)

thanks for the quick help!

regards,
wahlau

On 18/07/07, Wahlau - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 the file does not exist... is there anyway i can repair this?

 regards,
 wahlau

 On 18/07/07, Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  ext Wahlau - [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
   Selecting previously deselected package classpath-common.
   (Reading database ... dpkg: error processing
   /var/cache/apt/archives/classpath-common_2%3a0.95+cvs20070530-1_all.deb
   (--unpack):
unable to open files list file for package `microb-l10n': Input/output 
   error
 
  This unfortunately looks like a filesystem corruption.  What happens
  when you do the following?
 
  # cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/microb-l10n.list
 


 --
 = : : : ---
 normal reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 urgent reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --- : : : ==



-- 
= : : : ---
normal reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
urgent reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- : : : ==
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Mozilla browser has problem with jalimo installation?

2007-07-18 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Wahlau - [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On 18/07/07, Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  This unfortunately looks like a filesystem corruption.  What
  happens when you do the following?
 
  # cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/microb-l10n.list

 the file does not exist...

Hmm, maybe my guess was wrong about which file got the I/O error.  Can
you nose around a bit in /var/lib/dpkg on your own?  Do things like

# cd /var/lib/dpkg/
# du -sh .
# tar cf - . | wc -c

and watch for any error messages.

 is there anyway i can repair this?

Once we figure out which file is corrupted, probably.  You might get
away by removing the offending file (so that the I/O error goes away)
and re-installing some packages.  But please ask here first when you
don't know what you are doing. ;)
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Mozilla browser has problem with jalimo installation?

2007-07-18 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Wahlau - [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 i manage to fsck the rootfs and now it seemed to be working :)

Ok, cool! :)

 wonder why my file system got screwed up :)

Where is your rootfs?  Internal flash or on the MMC?  What filesystem
format?

 thanks for the quick help!

You are welcome!
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Mozilla browser has problem with jalimo installation?

2007-07-18 Thread Wahlau -
HI,

  wonder why my file system got screwed up :)

 Where is your rootfs?  Internal flash or on the MMC?  What filesystem
 format?

great i have it on MMC using ext2. just a reboot back to flash,
fsck.ext2 then reboot. done :) NOw i have jalimo installed and can
proceed :)

however i still have no idea why the file can be corrupted since this
morning...

thanks again.

regards,
wahlau.
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


RTCom - SIP Service

2007-07-18 Thread Jonathan Hudson
Nokia rocks again. Following yesterday's mozilla based browser
announcement, today we get (beta) SIP integration into the N800 comms
stack. 

Works fine with my VOIP provider (including calls to PSTN).

Thanks Nokia, thanks very very much. After the disappointing message
viz-a-viz free software and open standards with the incorporation of
skype, you have done the right thing big time with this SIP
integration. You've restored my confidence in the platform and the
direction you're taking in. Too cool for words.

-jonathan

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: RTCom - SIP Service

2007-07-18 Thread David Rudder
Oh, I've been waiting on this! Can you post a link? I don't see it on 
the tableteer site.

Jonathan Hudson wrote:
 Nokia rocks again. Following yesterday's mozilla based browser
 announcement, today we get (beta) SIP integration into the N800 comms
 stack. 

 Works fine with my VOIP provider (including calls to PSTN).

 Thanks Nokia, thanks very very much. After the disappointing message
 viz-a-viz free software and open standards with the incorporation of
 skype, you have done the right thing big time with this SIP
 integration. You've restored my confidence in the platform and the
 direction you're taking in. Too cool for words.

 -jonathan

 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
   

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: RTCom - SIP Service

2007-07-18 Thread Jonathan Hudson
Sorry. My happiness overpowered my ability to provide anything coherent.

http://rtcomm.garage.maemo.org/

-jh

On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:06:45 -0600
David Rudder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Oh, I've been waiting on this! Can you post a link? I don't see it on 
 the tableteer site.
 
 Jonathan Hudson wrote:
  Nokia rocks again. Following yesterday's mozilla based browser
  announcement, today we get (beta) SIP integration into the N800 comms
  stack. 
 
  Works fine with my VOIP provider (including calls to PSTN).
 
  Thanks Nokia, thanks very very much. After the disappointing message
  viz-a-viz free software and open standards with the incorporation of
  skype, you have done the right thing big time with this SIP
  integration. You've restored my confidence in the platform and the
  direction you're taking in. Too cool for words.
 
  -jonathan
 
  ___
  maemo-users mailing list
  maemo-users@maemo.org
  https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

 
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: RTCom - SIP Service

2007-07-18 Thread David Rudder
Thanks so much!!!  I didn't bring my tablet to work today, but I'll 
definitely install tonight.  I see from the screenshots it supports both 
proxies and stun, so it should work w/ my VoIP provider!  YAY!

-Dave (who doesn't normally use so many exclamation points)

Jonathan Hudson wrote:
 Sorry. My happiness overpowered my ability to provide anything coherent.

 http://rtcomm.garage.maemo.org/

 -jh
   

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: RTCom - SIP Service

2007-07-18 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:22:54 -0600
David Rudder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks so much!!!  I didn't bring my tablet to work today, but I'll 
 definitely install tonight.  I see from the screenshots it supports both 
 proxies and stun, so it should work w/ my VoIP provider!  YAY!
 
 -Dave (who doesn't normally use so many exclamation points)
 
 Jonathan Hudson wrote:
  Sorry. My happiness overpowered my ability to provide anything coherent.
 
  http://rtcomm.garage.maemo.org/
 

I should also note that:

* It appears to have removed all osso-email stuff (which is a *bonus*
for claws-mail aficionados :)
* Installation was non-trivial, involving 
  - apt-get install --reinstall on evolution-data-server
  - dpkg -i --force-overwrite on some packages

But it is (a) beta (b) wonderful

-jh
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: mozilla browser

2007-07-18 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 11:00:12 Dan Dennedy wrote:
 FYI - a new browser using mozilla engine:

 http://browser.garage.maemo.org/
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

I've got it installed on my n800 and so far the only thing it's missing from 
minimo is that it doesn't do tabs (tabs are good please include tabs).  Other 
wise it's actually more stable than either minimo or opera.  Youtube keeps 
working etc.  Kudo's to the dev team on this one.

James

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: mozilla browser

2007-07-18 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 14:29:05 James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Tuesday 17 July 2007 11:00:12 Dan Dennedy wrote:
  FYI - a new browser using mozilla engine:
 
  http://browser.garage.maemo.org/
  ___
  maemo-users mailing list
  maemo-users@maemo.org
  https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

 I've got it installed on my n800 and so far the only thing it's missing
 from minimo is that it doesn't do tabs (tabs are good please include tabs).
  Other wise it's actually more stable than either minimo or opera.  Youtube
 keeps working etc.  Kudo's to the dev team on this one.

 James

 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

BTW I did file a feature request in Bugzilla for tab browsing to be included.  
If anyone agrees  and would like to vote for the bug it can be found here.

https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1695

I've run this new browser through some of the sticky points I've had with the 
opera version and so far things are looking pretty good.  Every site I go to 
recognizes the browser (Like banks) javascript is working much cleaner.  All 
in all I think it's a really good move to go with this browser.  

James
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Anyone (especially Nokia types) going to LinuxWorld SF?

2007-07-18 Thread James Sparenberg
With Linux World a couple of weeks away just wondering who's going

James
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


my two big fustrations with the N800 - please help me find a workaround!

2007-07-18 Thread andrei raevsky

Dear friends,

Let me begin my saying that I *love* by N800 and I wonder how I have ever
lived without it in the past.  I use it all day long, to check my emails,
get the news, listen to music, calculate my weekly spending, read ebooks,
etc.  I looked long and hard for something like a internet-capable,
ebook-reading handheld device and after careful consideration I choose the
N800 and it is way better than my expectations.

I love of OS, the interface, and I have found many truly excellent third
party software.  So please do not take offense at what follows, but I am
also really frustrated with the N800.  I want to tell you what bugs me so
much and ask you whether you found a way around the two issues which make me
grind my teeth and get gastric reflux.

1) OS updates and backups

I am totally appalled that an operating system based on Debian was
re-designed so much that the only way to update the OS is to download a
file, use a flasher, then loose all the data and configuration on the unit
and, even worse, use all the downloaded applications.  Not only that, but it
turns out that the backup application does not always work between the
backups and that when it works it does not really backup the configuration
at all.  Holy cow!  How does one take something as beautiful as apt-get
update  apt-get dist-upgrade and reduce it to such a total disaster?! To
cap it all, there are entire threads on the Internet Tablet
Forumshttp://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/which discuss all the
crashes, bugs, and other problems with new version of
the OS!  That is, in my mind, the single worst design flaw in the N800.

I have 15 third party applications (taken from 12 'application catalogs), I
have Xterm with such things as mc and wget installed, I have ssh installed
and configured to give me root access when needed, I have 12 RSS feeds I use
daily, I have a well-filled contacts list, a long internet radio list, etc.
IF I flash my unit it is going to take me hours to get all this back.  I
will need to backup and restore /etc/apt/source.list manually only to try to
remember where I got which app (but I still will not be able to apt-get).
It is going to take me hours...

2) Repositories:

Nokia followed a rather strange repo policy.  There are the basic Nokia
catalog and the Nokia 3rd party catalog.  And after that, you are on your
own.  For example, one of the most amazing application on the N800 is the
FBReader which has its own repo.  There is also a Maemo repo, and a
maemo-hackers repo.  And a bora-extras.  And claws-mail repo.  And many
more.  That's just crazy!  Why did Nokia not follow Ubuntu's policy of
having a Main, Restricted, Universe and
Multi-universehttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/Repositories/Ubunturepos
in one place.  Multiple repos are just an stability/security risk for
the unit, IMO.  It would take Nokia just a couple of employees to maintain
such a one-place repository and it would immensely improve the capability of
the unit.  Debian can boast that it now has 19000+ applications.  Of course,
having a different architecture the N800 could not do that, but would it not
be a good selling point to say, for example, the iPhone offers you 10
applications (or whatever, I made this number up), the N800 offers 127 (or
whatever number).

These two issues are, of course, linked and my best guess is that the folks
who designed the N800 either were not truly used to the GNU/Linux way of
doing things, or were overruled/micromanaged by a bunch of suits.  I just
cannot imagine anyone who has 'walked' the Debian way settling for this kind
of nightmarish updating scenario...

So here is my question to you:

Has anyone figured a safe and easy way around all this mess?  Has anyone
written an application which would *really* backup all the data,
applications, source list and settings from an N800 to a single file which
could then be used to restore?  Then the unit could be flashed, the OS
updated, this one script downloaded and a real one-step (if not one click)
backup would follow.

Is there another workaround hack which would make it possible to update the
OS safely, rapidly and painlessly?

How are you all handling this?

Last but not least, is there any hope at all to see an apt-get update 
apt-get dist-upgrade -capable N800 in the future?

Many thanks for any pointers,

Andrei
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: my two big fustrations with the N800 - please help me find a workaround!

2007-07-18 Thread Mike Klein
It was mentioned in list just a few days ago I think that next firmware
would provide for backup/restore functionality of apps.

I also believe apt-updates for all was in future roadmap too.


mike

andrei raevsky wrote:
 Dear friends,

 Let me begin my saying that I *love* by N800 and I wonder how I have
 ever lived without it in the past.  I use it all day long, to check my
 emails, get the news, listen to music, calculate my weekly spending,
 read ebooks, etc.  I looked long and hard for something like a
 internet-capable, ebook-reading handheld device and after careful
 consideration I choose the N800 and it is way better than my
 expectations.

 I love of OS, the interface, and I have found many truly excellent
 third party software.  So please do not take offense at what follows,
 but I am also really frustrated with the N800.  I want to tell you
 what bugs me so much and ask you whether you found a way around the
 two issues which make me grind my teeth and get gastric reflux.

 1) OS updates and backups

 I am totally appalled that an operating system based on Debian was
 re-designed so much that the only way to update the OS is to download
 a file, use a flasher, then loose all the data and configuration on
 the unit and, even worse, use all the downloaded applications.  Not
 only that, but it turns out that the backup application does not
 always work between the backups and that when it works it does not
 really backup the configuration at all.  Holy cow!  How does one take
 something as beautiful as  apt-get update  apt-get dist-upgrade
 and reduce it to such a total disaster?! To cap it all, there are
 entire threads on the Internet Tablet Forums
 http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/ which discuss all the
 crashes, bugs, and other problems with new version of the OS!  That
 is, in my mind, the single worst design flaw in the N800.

 I have 15 third party applications (taken from 12 'application
 catalogs), I have Xterm with such things as mc and wget installed, I
 have ssh installed and configured to give me root access when needed,
 I have 12 RSS feeds I use daily, I have a well-filled contacts list, a
 long internet radio list, etc.  IF I flash my unit it is going to take
 me hours to get all this back.  I will need to backup and restore
 /etc/apt/source.list manually only to try to remember where I got
 which app (but I still will not be able to apt-get).  It is going to
 take me hours...

 2) Repositories:

 Nokia followed a rather strange repo policy.  There are the basic
 Nokia catalog and the Nokia 3rd party catalog.  And after that, you
 are on your own.  For example, one of the most amazing application on
 the N800 is the FBReader which has its own repo.  There is also a
 Maemo repo, and a maemo-hackers repo.  And a bora-extras.  And
 claws-mail repo.  And many more.  That's just crazy!  Why did Nokia
 not follow Ubuntu's policy of having a Main, Restricted, Universe and
 Multi-universe https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Repositories/Ubuntu
 repos in one place.  Multiple repos are just an stability/security
 risk for the unit, IMO.  It would take Nokia just a couple of
 employees to maintain such a one-place repository and it would
 immensely improve the capability of the unit.  Debian can boast that
 it now has 19000+ applications.  Of course, having a different
 architecture the N800 could not do that, but would it not be a good
 selling point to say, for example, the iPhone offers you 10
 applications (or whatever, I made this number up), the N800 offers 127
 (or whatever number).

 These two issues are, of course, linked and my best guess is that the
 folks who designed the N800 either were not truly used to the
 GNU/Linux way of doing things, or were overruled/micromanaged by a
 bunch of suits.  I just cannot imagine anyone who has 'walked' the
 Debian way settling for this kind of nightmarish updating scenario...

 So here is my question to you:

 Has anyone figured a safe and easy way around all this mess?  Has
 anyone written an application which would *really* backup all the
 data, applications, source list and settings from an N800 to a single
 file which could then be used to restore?  Then the unit could be
 flashed, the OS updated, this one script downloaded and a real
 one-step (if not one click) backup would follow.

 Is there another workaround hack which would make it possible to
 update the OS safely, rapidly and painlessly?

 How are you all handling this?

 Last but not least, is there any hope at all to see an apt-get update
  apt-get dist-upgrade -capable N800 in the future?

 Many thanks for any pointers,

 Andrei
 

 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
   
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org

Re: my two big fustrations with the N800 - please help me find a workaround!

2007-07-18 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 17:41:23 Mike Klein wrote:
 It was mentioned in list just a few days ago I think that next firmware
 would provide for backup/restore functionality of apps.

 I also believe apt-updates for all was in future roadmap too.


 mike
   
  Note that the question on apt-get was why it was broken/avoided, not if it 
would be included, as to not use it required the greater effort.  On the 
other hand, the backup problem has been brought up since at least last 
summer...  

  I understand Andrei's frustration and could offer him two stop gaps.  1 is 
the rsync backup program in the garage, and the other is using dselect with 
dpkg and having it automate the install of all of your programs.  

  Beyond that I've always been curious as to why the default file manager 
can't see /usr/home/user, but can see /usr/home/user/Mydocs?  

  Part of the problem (I'm peering in, not in the know on this) I can surmise 
surrounding the lack of a single 3rd party repository comes with Nokia (the 
company not individuals) and their legal Dept still working on getting a 
handle on OSS and what people are used to.  I can see where legal may have 
problems with liability in relation to what people install, if they perceive 
that Nokia endorses it.  (which the company supplied repo would imply)  This 
is why RH Mandriva Ubuntu etc require you to submit 3rd party packages in 
source form for them to build/vet as well as often requiring some means of 
verification as to who you really are.  Nokia  really does need a Dag Wiers 
for this I think.  

   I too would like some formality around some of this.  Perhaps a consensus 
on package categories.  Since clicking all and then scrolling is the only 
practical way to find out what is installable it seems that every dev has a 
different type of category and a different way of spelling it. ;)  and a 
simpler way of retaining the all important /etc/apt/sources.list  (which btw 
does get retained on the n800 most of the time.) for the 770 

  I'm not pitching this to argue but discuss so please don't take offense to 
what I'm pointing out.

James


   

 andrei raevsky wrote:
  Dear friends,
 
  Let me begin my saying that I *love* by N800 and I wonder how I have
  ever lived without it in the past.  I use it all day long, to check my
  emails, get the news, listen to music, calculate my weekly spending,
  read ebooks, etc.  I looked long and hard for something like a
  internet-capable, ebook-reading handheld device and after careful
  consideration I choose the N800 and it is way better than my
  expectations.
 
  I love of OS, the interface, and I have found many truly excellent
  third party software.  So please do not take offense at what follows,
  but I am also really frustrated with the N800.  I want to tell you
  what bugs me so much and ask you whether you found a way around the
  two issues which make me grind my teeth and get gastric reflux.
 
  1) OS updates and backups
 
  I am totally appalled that an operating system based on Debian was
  re-designed so much that the only way to update the OS is to download
  a file, use a flasher, then loose all the data and configuration on
  the unit and, even worse, use all the downloaded applications.  Not
  only that, but it turns out that the backup application does not
  always work between the backups and that when it works it does not
  really backup the configuration at all.  Holy cow!  How does one take
  something as beautiful as  apt-get update  apt-get dist-upgrade
  and reduce it to such a total disaster?! To cap it all, there are
  entire threads on the Internet Tablet Forums
  http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/ which discuss all the
  crashes, bugs, and other problems with new version of the OS!  That
  is, in my mind, the single worst design flaw in the N800.
 
  I have 15 third party applications (taken from 12 'application
  catalogs), I have Xterm with such things as mc and wget installed, I
  have ssh installed and configured to give me root access when needed,
  I have 12 RSS feeds I use daily, I have a well-filled contacts list, a
  long internet radio list, etc.  IF I flash my unit it is going to take
  me hours to get all this back.  I will need to backup and restore
  /etc/apt/source.list manually only to try to remember where I got
  which app (but I still will not be able to apt-get).  It is going to
  take me hours...
 
  2) Repositories:
 
  Nokia followed a rather strange repo policy.  There are the basic
  Nokia catalog and the Nokia 3rd party catalog.  And after that, you
  are on your own.  For example, one of the most amazing application on
  the N800 is the FBReader which has its own repo.  There is also a
  Maemo repo, and a maemo-hackers repo.  And a bora-extras.  And
  claws-mail repo.  And many more.  That's just crazy!  Why did Nokia
  not follow Ubuntu's policy of having a Main, Restricted, Universe and
  Multi-universe 

RE: RTCom - SIP Service

2007-07-18 Thread quim.gil
 I don't see it on the tableteer site.

Tableteer is a site for end users and this software is under
development, intended to developers and power users knowing what are
they doing. 

Therefore http://maemo.org/ is the place. Please read the announcement
before installing this software. Thank you.

Quim 

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


RE: my two big fustrations with the N800 - please help me find aworkaround!

2007-07-18 Thread quim.gil
Hi Andrei, 

 How does one take something as beautiful as  apt-get update 
apt-get dist-upgrade and 
 reduce it to such a total disaster?! 

We can't compare Nokia with the Debian project just because both use
.deb packages. The software development process is different, the end
users are different, the guarantees are different, the deadlines are
different and etc.

 crashes, bugs, and other problems with new version of the OS!

One problem with the backups caused trouble to some users in the last
release, yes. The dist-upgrade is not exempt of risks and trouble
either. Since the times of Woody I have suffered some troublesome
upgrades, both with Debian and Ubuntu. Haven't you?  

So it's not that simple, specially if you are Nokia and you have to
provide perfect dist-upgrade's to your customers under guarantee.


 Nokia followed a rather strange repo policy.

We have to sort out our repositories in the maemo space (the packages
for developers) but the rest (that is what concerns you) is more or less
ok, although needs some improvement as well. 

You mention several repositories that don't belong to us. We don't
respond of them. We can't and won't stop developers from creating their
own repositories. We offer a single repository extras to the maemo
community. Perhaps we can do better, so some of them prefer to come to
extras instead of creating their own repos:
http://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1558


 Why did Nokia not follow Ubuntu's policy of having a Main, Restricted,
Universe and Multi-
 universe

Because the Internet Tablet OS and the maemo SDK are not formed by a
full distribution. In fact it's not that different (don't take this as
literal):

Main: more or less the Internet Tablet OS released as image, no
packages.
Restricted (+ Canonical Commercial?):
http://catalogue.tableteer.nokia.com/
Universe: http://repository.maemo.org/extras
Multiverse: probably something in the extras repositories could fall
here

Then we have the maemo repositories, for developers, that need a better
organization. We put them separate from tableteer or extras not to
confuse end users. 

And there are multiple 3rd party repositories, which might be confusing.
But well, Ubuntu users can also get lots of them i.e.
http://www.debianadmin.com/ubuntu-edgy-eft-complete-sourceslist-reposito
ry-list-file.html It depends on how far you want to go from what is
stable and officially supported. Your choice.


 the iPhone offers you 10 applications (or whatever, I made this number
up), the N800 offers
 127 (or whatever number). 

Playing evil's advocate we could say that Symbian or Windows CE have a
lot more without needing repositories.  ;)  Good tools for developers
and a stable and attractive platform are heavier factors to get a wide
collection of 3rd party applications. Imagine that we decide to put the
2 persons improving this instead of administrating a distro.

But yes, got your point and we share your view on the benefits a
distribution based on packages would bring. We probably have a more
accurate idea of the effort and risks it takes, though. 

 the folks who designed the N800 either were not truly used to the
GNU/Linux way of doing
 things

I must say that in our team there are several pharisees in the Debian 
APT doctrines, not to go in details about other corners of the GNU/Linux
spectrum.

 or were overruled/micromanaged by a bunch of suits.

Sorry, no suits involved. 

 Last but not least, is there any hope at all to see an apt-get update
 apt-get
 dist-upgrade -capable N800 in the future?

Yes:
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail//maemo-developers/2007-July/010860.html

Quim
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users