Re: Nokia netbook

2009-08-27 Thread Matan Ziv-Av
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Gary wrote:

 Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
 Almost all GPRS/UMTS/HSPA modems appear to
 the CPU as a serial device and need standard AT commands for connection
 management.

 Oh yeah -- I forgot about that. There's a way to use those modems with
 OS X that involve some configuration of PPP. Is that the same way a
 connection is initiated under Linux?

Yes. Exactly like an analog modem - a few AT commands for establishing 
the connection and then PPP.

Again, that is how most chipsets work. I know of one counterexample, but 
there may be other.


-- 
Matan.

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


forgot the netbook ...

2009-08-27 Thread Jonathan Greene
enjoy - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP5R-5NX1BE



-- 
http://jonathangreene.tel
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: forgot the netbook ...

2009-08-27 Thread Adilson Oliveira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Em 27-08-2009 09:09, Jonathan Greene escreveu:
 enjoy - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP5R-5NX1BE

/me is salivating over it!
I just hope I can buy one unlocked somewhere. As a matter of fact, won't
we have a developers discount like the other ones? Quim? ;)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkqWiS8ACgkQ2cB5Bt7H7YAxugCgy0WJpCdqsirpa4UDTzLbd+Q6
AgoAoJfbQnHdFLnRbWjUgCsFEzB8aP0p
=Uf/V
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 11:11 -0500 schrieb mathew:
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 15:56, Dr. Nicholas Shaw d...@docharley.com
 wrote:
 Nope.  Won't run and won't be available.
 
 Well, that's a shame for Nokia, 'cause I'm not about to buy a new
 device unless I can verify that the various deficiencies of the N800
 OS have been fixed.
 
 Also, I doubt if it's feasible for open source developers and software
 porters to keep buying new hardware every year for the privilege of
 doing unpaid work for Nokia.
 
 Hopefully it will at least be possible to run the new OS under some
 kind of emulator on a desktop machine.

For your interest the Mer project aims to provide a community backport
of Fremantle for N8x0 devices.
See http://wiki.maemo.org/Mer for more information.

andre

-- 
Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster)

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread mathew
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 15:56, Dr. Nicholas Shaw d...@docharley.com wrote:

 Nope.  Won't run and won't be available.


Well, that's a shame for Nokia, 'cause I'm not about to buy a new device
unless I can verify that the various deficiencies of the N800 OS have been
fixed.

Also, I doubt if it's feasible for open source developers and software
porters to keep buying new hardware every year for the privilege of doing
unpaid work for Nokia.

Hopefully it will at least be possible to run the new OS under some kind of
emulator on a desktop machine.


mathew
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread sean
Andre Klapper wrote:
  For your interest the Mer project aims to provide a community backport
 of Fremantle for N8x0 devices.
 See http://wiki.maemo.org/Mer for more information.
 
 andre
 

Is support for the 900 being considered in the development of Mer?
I did not see it mentioned anywhere.
Nokia will eventually toss it aside as well, like the previous models,
and Mer will be the only upgrade path available.
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Kevin T. Neely
I don't understand why that's such a big deal.  *all* hardware gets tossed
aside eventually.  Mobile just happens more often than others because the
development space is so fast.

If you want something that you can keep around for a while, get a big
desktop.  That probably has the longest shelf-life.  Still, the N900 will be
more-or-less open and hackable hardware just like the N800, so continued
development of other platforms will be based upon hobbyist interest, just
like everything else.

K



On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:35 AM, sean tech.j...@myfairpoint.net wrote:

 Andre Klapper wrote:
   For your interest the Mer project aims to provide a community backport
  of Fremantle for N8x0 devices.
  See http://wiki.maemo.org/Mer for more information.
 
  andre
 

 Is support for the 900 being considered in the development of Mer?
 I did not see it mentioned anywhere.
 Nokia will eventually toss it aside as well, like the previous models,
 and Mer will be the only upgrade path available.
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users




-- 
In Vino Veritas
http://rubbernecking.info
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Kevin T.
Neelyktne...@astroturfgarden.com wrote:
 I don't understand why that's such a big deal.  all hardware gets tossed
 aside eventually.

You could not be more wrong. I'm still using my Handspring Visor
Deluxe every day because it does things that *no* other device can do,
even 10 years after it came out. I'm still using my 12-year-old Garmin
GPS III because it still works great, is totally waterproof, has
ultra-long battery life, the display is very plain and clear
regardless of lighting conditions and it does some things that some
newer devices don't. The devices that get tossed aside are the ones
that don't have any outstanding features and so the next thing that
comes along easily displaces them. The issue with the Nokia tablets is
that they have so much potential, but are only living up to a tiny
fraction of it because Nokia isn't giving them the attention they
deserve. If Nokia would get their heads out of their behinds and
*finish* the OS and software, they would blow the iPhone and all other
competition out of the water for years to come. But their half-hearted
attempts (and the obvious me-too OS features of Freemantle instead
of concentrating on the unique strengths of the tablets) just don't
cut it.

 Mobile just happens more often than others because the
 development space is so fast.


No, it's because most of the manufacturers are so busy trying to copy
each other instead of making truly awesome devices that the market is
flooded with mediocre, interchangeable devices instead of real
competition. It's become a competition of style rather than features,
so of course it's subject to fads and transient trends.

 If you want something that you can keep around for a while, get a big
 desktop.  That probably has the longest shelf-life.

Actually, desktops probably get replaced about as often as anything
else, even though they are easiest to upgrade. It's really not
economically sound to upgrade (or build your own) anymore because new
ones are so cheap.

  Still, the N900 will be
 more-or-less open and hackable hardware just like the N800, so continued
 development of other platforms will be based upon hobbyist interest, just
 like everything else.

 K


And, no offense to the hobbyist developers, but the fundamental
platform never gets finished, never mind the software feature set.
Hobbyists only have a certain amount of time and resources to
contribute, and they have far less access to the fundamental hardware
and OS features than the manufacturer. It's not reasonable, as either
a manufacturer or user, to expect hobbyists to finish the product for
you.

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Kevin T. Neely
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:


 You could not be more wrong. I'm still using my Handspring Visor
 Deluxe every day because it does things that *no* other device can do,



When is the last time you had a software update for these devices?


-- 
In Vino Veritas
http://rubbernecking.info
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Kevin T. Neely
Not at all.  The complaint I responded to was that Nokia would drop software
updates for the N900 as soon as the next hardware came out, which it may or
may not do.  But it doesn't really matter because the tech moves so fast,
older hardware just isn't useful anymore.  Maybe the Visor is fine for you,
but I no longer live in 1998 and require a bit more functionality from the
portable electronics I carry around.

This is yet another classic example of Mark taking one comment and then
turning it in a different direction to prove his point.  Which you didn't
because both my phone and my N800 can do everything the handspring visor can
do.

K

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Kevin T.
 Neelyktne...@astroturfgarden.com wrote:
  On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  You could not be more wrong. I'm still using my Handspring Visor
  Deluxe every day because it does things that *no* other device can do,
 
 
 
  When is the last time you had a software update for these devices?
 
 

 Ha ha, that's exactly my point: their software was *finished* - by the
 manufacturers - so current updates aren't necessary in order for them
 to still be useful at this late date.

 You walked right into that one...

 Mark
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users




-- 
In Vino Veritas
http://rubbernecking.info
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Kevin T.
Neelyktne...@astroturfgarden.com wrote:
 Not at all.  The complaint I responded to was that Nokia would drop software
 updates for the N900 as soon as the next hardware came out, which it may or
 may not do.  But it doesn't really matter because the tech moves so fast,
 older hardware just isn't useful anymore.  Maybe the Visor is fine for you,
 but I no longer live in 1998 and require a bit more functionality from the
 portable electronics I carry around.

That statement is patently untrue. The counterarguments are so obvious
and plentiful that I'm not even going to start listing them.


 This is yet another classic example of Mark taking one comment and then
 turning it in a different direction to prove his point.

Slinging mud is an obvious sign of someone who knows he's on the
losing end of an argument. You can't defeat the facts or the logic, so
you attack the character. Unfortunately, my character is irrelevant;
my logic holds.

  Which you didn't
 because both my phone and my N800 can do everything the handspring visor can
 do.

 K

Wrong. Neither your phone nor your N800 can be used as a consumer
learning IR remote, with unlimited devices and commands, completely
customizable screens, sophisticated macros and unlimited timers.
(Frankly, not even the commercially available $2500.00 remotes can do
any better.) Neither have the full PIM functionality, especially the
tablet. Neither can be nearly as easily read outdoors in direct
sunlight, or even in some artificial light. Neither has anything like
the battery life, or cheap, universally available and easily
replaceable batteries. Neither can be expanded with hardware modules.
Certainly there are lots of things that your phone and tablet can do
that the Visor can't, and their hardware's speed and power are much
greater (but not more flexible), but the point here is that neither
your phone nor your tablet has approached anything but a tiny portion
of their potential, whereas the Visor's capability has been exploited
to the nth degree. That's what makes your phone and tablet so easily
replaceable (which you even said yourself).

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread sean
Kevin T. Neely wrote:
 I don't understand why that's such a big deal.  /all/ hardware gets
 tossed aside eventually.  Mobile just happens more often than others
 because the development space is so fast.
 
 If you want something that you can keep around for a while, get a big
 desktop.  That probably has the longest shelf-life.  Still, the N900
 will be more-or-less open and hackable hardware just like the N800, so
 continued development of other platforms will be based upon hobbyist
 interest, just like everything else.
 
 K

True, all hardware gets tossed aside, eventually, but not as fast as
some recent items, like these tablets.

I bought my Palm Tungsten C, (to replace another very old Palm,) when it
first came out, back in 2003 I think, and it is still in heavy use by
me, because it had everything I needed right out of the box.
There are/were third party add-ons I found to to make things even more
useful, and later I wandered onto other things I originally had no plans
for it to fill.

The wireless/Internet stuff was weak, but as a PIM and more, it could be
used completely right out of the box. Palm put out updates for what
seemed like ages.

Only recently has my Palm C started to show some age, and that is what
brought me to purchasing a N800.
Out of the box, the N800 is severely software crippled. It can do many
things, but it does nothing really as well as it could, and should.
Don't get me wrong I think it could be an excellent mobile device, but
it is not, at least not like it is in its present state.
I am still trying to find applications so that it will work for me so
that it can ultimately replace my Palm. I had to do no such searching to
put my Palm right to useful work.

Also, for the price of these devices, especially if you bought them new,
which I did not, they should last and be supported better than they have
been.

Till Palm fell into a sad state, and now took a new direction with their
Pre, I would always look to them for a replacement. I would not look to
them any more, and so far Nokia has not really earned that support from
me either.

I see many potential Maemo apps that have started that now seem in
limbo. Many of these applications could have filled the holes on the
tablet, but they need to mature a bit more, if they are even still being
worked on.

I have tried out Mer, and early signs it has potential, though I am not
using it of late. Currently not enough useful apps, and far to many
bugs. But that is to be expected, it is still early in the life cycle.
Hopefully Mer will reach its potential, and bring software developers to
create the needed applications.



___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Adilson Oliveira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Em 27-08-2009 18:27, sean escreveu:

 
 The wireless/Internet stuff was weak, but as a PIM and more, it could be
 used completely right out of the box. Palm put out updates for what
 seemed like ages.
 

I truly hope Nokia adds a good PIN in it. Currently, my E71 is better
than the N devices for that.

[]s

Adilson.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkqW/GQACgkQ2cB5Bt7H7YCR/gCeM4muc75zcYK0wdSGriuWTNPy
fn4Anjkl2UGyVFfMmBPHvGIj+jvei4DG
=ZfEl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Nokia netbook

2009-08-27 Thread lakestevensdental
Gary wrote:
 lakestevensdental wrote:
   
 You appear to be ignoring the power of numbers.  Nokia's netbook, 
 bundled with Windows will sell far more units with than without.  The 
 larger quantity sold with Windows will allow Nokia to produce sell their 
 netbook for less than otherwise, perhaps more than $25 less.  Besides, 
 having to manage a smallish inventory for a Windowless version would be 
 a hassle (expense) for Nokia and sellers.  So get over the $25 cost of 
 Windows.  If you want an Ubuntu netbook, just install it when you get it.
   
 

 The hassle you speak of comes from dealing with an 800 pound gorilla
 that has historically only been reigned in by the Commission of the
 European Communities. ...
  The hassle has little to do with Microsoft, everything to do with 
production realities, mass markets and managing inventory.

  Asus plowed the road for everyone with their eee netbook which first 
came out with a Linux distro.  While the eee was popular new format, the 
eee-netbooks only really took off when Windows XP was offered as the OS 
of choice.  When bundled with Windows, the cost of netbooks actually 
dropped because production numbers increased allowing development costs 
to being shared amongst thousands more units. 

  Like many, I wish the market would embrace one of the Linux versions 
instead of Windoze.  MS (author of the world's largest computer virus) 
seems to be doing all it can do to promote the development of other OSs 
with it's Vista debacle, soon to be replaced by a W7 debacle (IMHO).

  Seems to me, the primary technical thing that is probably holding 
adoption of Linux back has more do with the lack of a strong 
gaming/video platform on Linux to fill the DirectX niche.

  Beyond that, Linux folks need to learn to better embrace the 
marketplace.  Freeware (like the 400 or so apps of varied utility and 
use populating the n810 and Maemo) is all fine and good, but average 
endusers are much more inclined to the comfort of marketplaces like the 
AppleStore where then can click and download 'almost' free games and 
apps for about the price of a latte or less.  Contrary to common Linux 
beliefs, there's nothing wrong with offering a simple cost effective 
marketplace for folks to buy software.  It helps pay developers to 
develop more and better software.  Linux is again way behind the curve 
in marketplace savy.  Witness how the n800 series came without (and 
still pretty much lacks) a decent PIM. Like what the reward for someone 
to port a PIM to this small market niche?



___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Nokia netbook

2009-08-27 Thread lakestevensdental
Mark Haury wrote:
 lakestevensdental wrote:
   
 Mark wrote:
   
 
 But $25 is nothing to sneeze at. I would still rather pay $25 less and
 install kubuntu on the entire drive than pay $25 more and end up with
 dual-boot. Either way, it's still Linux I'll be using, so why should I
 have to pay extra for something I neither want nor need?
  
 
   
 You appear to be ignoring the power of numbers.  Nokia's netbook, 
 bundled with Windows will sell far more units with than without.  The 
 larger quantity sold with Windows will allow Nokia to produce sell their 
 netbook for less than otherwise, perhaps more than $25 less.  Besides, 
 having to manage a smallish inventory for a Windowless version would be 
 a hassle (expense) for Nokia and sellers.  So get over the $25 cost of 
 Windows.  If you want an Ubuntu netbook, just install it when you get it.
   
 

 You're not making any sense whatsoever. It doesn't cost anything for 
 them to maintain a small inventory of OS-less machines - all they have 
 to do is skip a few steps in manufacturing - and the number of Windows 
 machines they sell just makes it that much easier for them to give a 
 discount for OS-less machines. After all, you don't actually think 
 they're making Windows available at cost, do you?
   
  Spoken like someone who's never produced anything, nor had to manage 
inventory.

  For those making and selling netbooks, the cost of the OS is probably 
some variation of a 'loss leader'.  Bundled with Windows one may sell a 
lot more product, which allows production, development and marketing 
costs per unit to be significantly reduced, more than the cost of adding 
Windows.

It costs plenty for everyone from Nokia to the computer store to create 
and maintain a small inventory of OS-less machines that might otherwise 
be sold bundled with Windows.  For one, banks (and/or 
production/outsource folks) don't sit around waiting for months for a 
small inventory of Linux units to be sold to get paid off.  If it were a 
hassle to install Ubuntu on a Windows netbook, you might have a point, 
but such isn't the case.  If you want Linux netbook, buy a Windows 
netbook, download Ubuntu and install (perhaps 3 clicks?).  It's not 
rocket science. 
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Peter Bart
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:23 -0700, Kevin T. Neely wrote:
 I don't understand why that's such a big deal.  all hardware gets
 tossed aside eventually.  Mobile just happens more often than others
 because the development space is so fast.
 
 If you want something that you can keep around for a while, get a big
 desktop.  That probably has the longest shelf-life.  Still, the N900
 will be more-or-less open and hackable hardware just like the N800, so
 continued development of other platforms will be based upon hobbyist
 interest, just like everything else.

I will have to second this. I still have a 770, two n800's along with
my n810. Each one has brought new and different things to the table,
apparently not possible with the previous hardware. Each upgrade has
made my life easier as well. While I use my n810 exclusively, all of the
others get used regularly for one use or another. In the case of the
770, it's loaded with games for the kids. One of the n800's is my backup
in case I break my n810. 
Best Regards,
-- 
Peter Bart pe...@petertheplumber.net
Peter The Plumber

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Duplicate contacts

2009-08-27 Thread Kahlil Johnson
hi I have an issue of duplicate contact on the maemo IM, is there a
way to fix this. I still use diablo and I havent applied the latest
update suite. I would love to hear this bug is fixed if I apply this
update.

Thanks


-- 
Kahlil Johnson
Ya tengo GMAIL!!
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users