Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSOC - Dashboard for Admins/Owners/Moderators

2015-03-16 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Yash Mehrotra yashmehrotr...@gmail.com wrote:

 6. One more cool feature would be to color code different types of things
 for visual ease. Eg. Subscription requests can be color A. Held messages
 can be color B. and so on. This will not only help the administrator but
 also would visually good to look at.

Make sure that if you DO do this, that it is accessible for those with
disabilities (visual impairments, cognitive disabilities, etc.)

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - carbo...@gmail.com
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
shouting What a great ride!
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Developers] HTML Headers

2006-08-03 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 8/2/06, Andrew Nielson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I have written some code to allow Mailman to add a header.html file (if it
 exists) to the top of each web page.

 Basically it checks a new option called WEB_HEADER_FILE which is set as
 follows in mm_cfg.py:
 WEB_HEADER_FILE = os.path.join(PREFIX, 'Mailman/header.html')

 I just wanted to know:
 1. Would you like me to submit this patch?
 2. Is $prefix/Mailman/header.html the correct place for a html file or
 should we add a html directory or put it in the Cgi one?
 3. Would people like me to move the footer stuff out into another footer
 file and do the same for it?

Just to let you know, I created a patch for 2.1.7 (and 2.1.8 but I
apparently haven't uploaded it to Sourceforge yet, oops) that does
both sitewide headers and footer, not to mention makes the HTML code
XHTML 1.1 compliant.

It's patch #1415956 at Sourceforge.

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
shouting What a great ride!
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Developers] Anyone have a pickle / mbox to spare?

2006-07-23 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 7/23/06, emf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It would sincerely help me if I could test my UI against actual mailman
 pickles to make sure I can deal with vagaries of configuration, etc.

 I'd be happy to provide a script to randomize all users passwords before
 you sent it over, but would prefer that the email addresses stay valid.

 I don't need generated archive files; just list pickles and mbox files,
 if you've been generating them.

I've got a 213MB mbox, and associated pickle although it's a public
list. Just let me know where to send it.

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
shouting What a great ride!
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Developers] Accessible DOM manipulations

2006-07-06 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 7/6/06, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ethan wrote:

  One example is keeping extraneous text hidden until it is selected; I
  imagine that someone using a screen reader/portable device would
  appreciate being able to read a overview page variant and then being
  able to expand as necessary.

 I would much prefer to do this without JavaScript.  Because you can't
 guarantee that you know the way that page would be rendered if you send
 all sorts of hidden text that isn't shown until such time as someone
 does something to make it appear, and you can't control what kinds of
 mailicious cross-scripting attacks people may throw at you, it's best to
 simply not send anything that the user cannot currently see.

I have to agree with Brad on this.

An option may be to give the site admin the ability to turn the JS
on/off site wide with a mm_cfg.py variable.

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
shouting What a great ride!
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Developers] Accessible DOM manipulations

2006-07-06 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 7/6/06, Laura Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  An option may be to give the site admin the ability to turn the JS
  on/off site wide with a mm_cfg.py variable.

 Default set to off?

That'd be my preference.

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
shouting What a great ride!
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Developers] Accessible DOM manipulations

2006-07-06 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 7/6/06, emf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Bryan Carbonnell wrote:

  I have to agree with Brad on this.
 
  An option may be to give the site admin the ability to turn the JS
  on/off site wide with a mm_cfg.py variable.

 I'm a little reluctant to add another bit flip to mm_cfg when you'll be
 able to delete the .js files or forbid access to the js directory in
 apache and get what you want.

 Or you could avoid subjecting all your users to your preference and use
 the no-JS variant that will always be available, or just turn JS off in
 your browser.

 Can you help me understand your opposition to Javascript in a webpage
 you serve? Something specific rather than in principle, if you would be
 so kind; I often have a hard time applying abstract concepts to code I'm
 in the process of writing.

Ethan,

For me it's nothing specific. It's more philosophical. I am a very
minimalist when it comes to the 'net. Plain text e-mail and no
scripting or embeded audio/video on web pages. I think the content of
the page should stand on its own legs and not rely on fancy tricks
to make it appealing.

I've seen WAY to much bad scripting (and I'm not implying that the
code you are going to write is going to be bad) to actually want to
implement and Javascript.

I also know that quite a few of my users are going to be up in arms if
scripting gets added to the pages. I just want to have the option to
NOT use in in MM. I realize that I can just delete the JS file or
disallow it with Apache, but I feel that since this is a MM endeavour
I should be able to control it within MM and not have to resort to
things like you mention to disable the JS.

I know this sounds negative, it's not. I'm really glad the UI is
getting overhauled. I have done what I could with the XHTML/CSS patch
that I wrote, but I know the UI could be a LOT better.

Just my $0.02

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
shouting What a great ride!
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.027.htp


[Mailman-Developers] Sitewide headers/footers XHTML Compliant Web UI

2006-01-26 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
I have just uploaded a patch to Sourforge that allows you to set
sitewide headers and footers for the Mailman 2.1.7 web UI,
[ 1415956 ] Sitewide headers/footers  XHTML Compliant Web UI

This patch was borne out of a request I received to
make the Mailman UI fit the look of the web site. This
patch allows you to set a site wide header and footer.
This allows you to pretty much make the MM UI look like
any other site. While I was at it I also made the web
UI XHTML compliant.

Once you patch your source and install it, all you need
to do is edit the html files in the templates/en
directory. Most of the pages will get the header and
footers from the site-header.html and site-footer.html
files, but some of the HTML files already contain theor
own header/footer so you will need ot edit some of
these files as well.

Since this also adds XHTML compliance, this superceeds
patch #116035

You can dowload it (and a separate version that works with the
ht://dig integration patches) from:

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1415956group_id=103atid=300103

You can see in use at http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo

--
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
shouting What a great ride!
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


[Mailman-Developers] XHTML Compliant Web UI - 2.1.6 Patch

2005-06-12 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
I have just uploaded an updated patch that will make the web UI for 
MM 2.1.6 XHTML 1.0 strict compliant. This patch allows for some CSS 
formatting as well.

I have tried to make all the pages compliant, but I may have missed
some combinations of pages and options, so if you find some that
aren't compliant, please let me know which page isn't compliant and
under which circumstances it's not.

It it patch 1160353 in the Sourceforge Mailman patch repository.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1160353group
_id=103atid=300103

If anyone has any feedback on it, I'd love to hear it,since this is 
my first attempt at creating a patch.

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The man who claims to be the boss in his own home will lie about 
other things as well.


___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Developers] XHTML Compliant Web UI - 2.1.6 Patch

2005-05-04 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 24 Apr 2005 at 8:31, Bryan Carbonnell wrote:

 I have just uploaded a patch that will make the web UI for MM 2.1.6rc1
 XHTML 1 strict compliant. This patch allows for some CSS formatting as
 well.
 
 I have tried to make all the pages compliant, but I may have missed
 some combinations of pages and options, so if you find some that
 aren't compliant, please let me know which page isn't compliant and
 under which circumstances it's not.
 
 It it patch 1160353 in the Sourceforge Mailman patch repository.
 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1160353group
 _id=103atid=300103
 
 If anyone has any feedback on it, I'd love to hear it,since this is my
 first attempt at something like this.

Now updated for MM 2.1.6rc3

It also makes the archives XHTML1.0 Strict compliant.

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Never let a computer see you hurry.


___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


[Mailman-Developers] XHTML Compliant Web UI - 2.1.6 Patch

2005-04-24 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
I have just uploaded a patch that will make the web UI for MM 2.1.6rc1
XHTML 1 strict compliant. This patch allows for some CSS formatting as well.

I have tried to make all the pages compliant, but I may have missed
some combinations of pages and options, so if you find some that
aren't compliant, please let me know which page isn't compliant and
under which circumstances it's not.

It it patch 1160353 in the Sourceforge Mailman patch repository.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1160353group
_id=103atid=300103

If anyone has any feedback on it, I'd love to hear it,since this is my
first attempt at something like this.

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
shouting What a great ride!
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;fileúq01.027.htp


[Mailman-Developers] XHTML Compliant Web UI 2.1.6b4 Patch

2005-03-09 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
I have just uploaded a patch that will make the web UI for MM 2.1.6b4 
XHTML 1 strict compliant.

Well, the start of a patch. Currently only the listinfo pages are 
xhtml 1 compliant and some minor CSS formating ability.

As time goes by, I'm going to update the patch to include more of the 
UI pages.

Since this is my first atempt at something like this I thought I'd 
post it incrementally in case anyone finds something terrible wrong 
with what I'm doing :)

It it patch 1160353 in the Sourceforge Mailman patch repository.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1160353group
_id=103atid=300103

If anyone has any feedback on it, I'd love to hear it.

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When they put 'unknown' at the end of a quote, that means they 
probably don't know how to spell 'anonymous'. 
~Author Unknown 


___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: (Fwd) Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: [Mailman-Developers] How to rem

2004-04-04 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 3 Apr 2004 at 21:51, Brad Knowles wrote:

 At 9:43 AM -0500 2004/04/03, Bryan Carbonnell wrote:
 
   Why not just have a list of UserDefined RegEx's of headers to
   strip?
 
  Because most people don't properly understand regular 
 expressions.  Since you can do the same thing in a different way and
 have Mailman build the proper regular expressions based on user input,
 it seems pretty obvious what the correct solution is.

Yes, it may be true that RegExs are foreign to most people (myself 
included to a certain degree), but wouldn't it make MM more flexible? 
And wouldn't it be easier for Barry to implement?

  If you have a keep-these-headers/strip-these-headers option, 
 then there shouldn't be any headers that either can't be stripped or
 kept, depending on your particular type of choice.

Well, would the X-Habeas headers be added as an option to strip, or 
the next X-Habeas type header that comes along? Or...

Do you see my point? If there are an absolutely fixed number of types 
of headers that could across, then I could see that going your way 
would work better, but since I can add any header to an outgoing mail 
that I want, with my e-mail client (like I did with this e-mail), 
then should the MM admins be given the opportunity to strip them with 
a RegEx?

   If you go with keep these/strip these, I'd vote for keeping
   everything and let the admin HAVE to make the change for
   themselves.
 
  IMO, we should default to safety.

Wouldn't safety be to not mess with the mail while passing through 
MM?

   Don't the RFCs say not to mess with the headers if possible? Or
   something like that?
 
  The RFCs regarding mail are intended primarily for MTAs and MUAs, not
 mailing list management systems.  Moreover, they make it clear that
 you can add headers, but you can't change them, and under certain
 circumstances you can remove them.  Since the MLM is a gateway system
 of sorts, there is more freedom with regards to what the authors are
 allowed to do.

I understand that the RFC are for MTA and MUAs, but shouldn't MM 
follow them as well? As well as we can anyway?

I'm not trying to argue, just trying to get thing straighened out in 
my mind.

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was difficult to code. So it damn well better be difficult to use.



___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org


Re: (Fwd) Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: [Mailman-Developers] How to rem

2004-04-04 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 5 Apr 2004 at 0:08, Brad Knowles wrote:

 At 12:05 PM -0400 2004/04/04, Bryan Carbonnell wrote:

   And wouldn't it be easier for Barry to implement?
 
  Maybe.  However, we have to consider more than just the 
 implementation cost -- there is also the support cost to consider. If
 it costs 10x or 100x as much to support the regex feature because it's
 too flexible and too confusing to too many people, then it's not worth
 the effort.

Fair enough. I never considered that.

   Do you see my point? If there are an absolutely fixed number of
   types of headers that could across, then I could see that going
   your way would work better, but since I can add any header to an
   outgoing mail that I want, with my e-mail client (like I did with
   this e-mail), then should the MM admins be given the opportunity to
   strip them with a RegEx?
 
  Okay, so a Keep-These-Headers option being restricted to just the
 following:
 
   From:
   Subject:
   To:
   Cc:
   Date:
 
  Is not capable of stripping all possible headers that could 
 potentially be generated?  Sorry, I don't buy it.

I think that we are talking about 2 different things. Or at least I 
misunderstood what you were talking about.

I was thinking from your description,

From: would be selectable to keep or strip
Subject: would be selectable to keep or strip
To: would be selectable to keep or strip
Cc: would be selectable to keep or strip
Date: would be selectable to keep or strip

etc. as SEPARATE individual choices to. Not as a group. Now that I 
understand your thinking, I think that this may be a very viable 
alternative. Maybe even less of a support issue.

Maybe both what you are thinking and the RegEx would work well 
together. The keep/strip for those that want simple and RegEx for 
those that want the extra control.

  I'm just not sure that it would be worth the effort to get this
 relatively small additional functionality, given the potential
 additional support cost that would result.

Neither do I. Unfortunately I'm just learning Python, so I don't know 
who hard or how easy any of these suggestions are.

  But only Barry could really answer this question.

Absolutely.

  No, safety would be to strip everything that is not known to be
 safe, such as the minimal list of headers shown above.

I can see that. I'm, personally, not convinced, but then I haven't 
been a mail admin as long as you have been.

   I'm not trying to argue, just trying to get thing straighened out
   in my mind.
 
  This is a point of deep discussion amongst the most experienced
 people in the field.  You are not expected to fully understand all the
 nuances involved.

I'm not worried about all the nuances involved. I was just trying to 
get what we, you and I were discussing, sorted out. And now I realize 
that we weren't quite talking about the same things. I was talking 
about controling individual headers, separately, and you are talking 
about controlling the basic headers as a group.

Whose idea is better? Not my call, I'm glad to say. I guess we just 
need to wait and see what Barry has in store for us :)

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My reality check bounced.



___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org


(Fwd) Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: [Mailman-Developers] How to rem

2004-04-03 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
OOPS, Should have gone to the list and not Brad directly. Sorry Brad.

--- Forwarded message follows ---
From:   Bryan Carbonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 3 Apr 2004 at 11:46, Brad Knowles wrote:

 At 2:24 AM -0500 2004/04/03, Terri Oda wrote:
 
   At least making this an option would make quite a few people
   happy, I imagine, although a more configurable
   strip-these-headers/ keep-these-headers might be better.
 
  Okay, add a strip-these-headers/keep-these-headers option, but by
 default select keep-these-headers, and pre-fill in the minimum.

Why not just have a list of UserDefined RegEx's of headers to strip? 
Kind of like the Spam Filtering Rules in Mailman. That way BArry 
won't get Well why can you strip header x, but not header y?  

If you go with keep these/strip these, I'd vote for keeping 
everything and let the admin HAVE to make the change for themselves.  

Don't the RFCs say not to mess with the headers if possible? Or 
something like that?  

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Out of my mind. Back in five minutes.


-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The man who claims to be the boss in his own home will lie about 
other things as well.



___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Developers] SQL in MM3 issues

2004-02-05 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 5 Feb 2004 at 23:08, Kevin McCann wrote:

 I want to do this same kind of thing with Mailman 3. And so I want, at
 the very least, to have those three aforementioned tables of data:
 
 lists
 members
 messages
 
 Can anyone think of any reason why we would not want to have these
 three tables in a SQL-enabled Mailman 3. What other tables might you
 want to see? Or fields that might not be found in the above three
 tables? May I suggest that you be creative, think ahead, and don't
 restrict yourself by notions of what an MLM is in the here-and-now. If
 we can first agree on tables, maybe we can move forward and work on
 the core field sets for each one. And this will in turn give us
 something to chew on at the sprint. Barry does this approach make
 sense?

Funny you should mention this Kevin. :)

I am a new Mailman admin and I was thinking about hacking something 
together to put my lists archives in a DB (MySQL more than likely).

My first question to you is how normalized do you want to get? The 
archives, my gut is telling me that the message should be split over 
several tables. I'm just not sure how at the moment.

I haven't really started planning anything, just rolling ideas around 
to myself., reading RFCs, Python Tutorials and the like.

--
Bryan Carbonnell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've learned
That one should keep his words both soft and tender, because tomorrow 
he may have to eat them.



___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org