[Mailman-Developers] Re: [ext] Re: before next release: disable backscatter indefault installation
Ralf Hildebrandt via Mailman-Developers writes: > This is probably due to an error in local_recipient_maps in Postfix. > https://www.postfix.org/LOCAL_RECIPIENT_README.html Reading the documentation for Exim4 and Postfix these days, I have to wonder if there isn't room for a new MTA with a sane configuration language. Feels like regressing to sendmail.cf levels of obfuscation. ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
[Mailman-Developers] Re: [ext] Re: before next release: disable backscatter indefault installation
* Mark Sapiro : > Why in your example did Postfix treat the RCPT TO that was not a valid list > address differently than any other invalid address in RCPT TO? I.e. Postfix > should be rejecting that RCPT TO at SMTP time with "unknown user" or some > similar error. What did Postfix do in your case. This is probably due to an error in local_recipient_maps in Postfix. https://www.postfix.org/LOCAL_RECIPIENT_README.html -- Ralf Hildebrandt Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF) Haus I | 1. OG | Raum 105 Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de https://www.charite.de ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9