Re: [Mailman-Users] Yum install of mailman on CentOS 5

2008-07-14 Thread Timm Stamer

Hi Duncan,

is SELinux enabled?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# getenforce

If SELinux is enforcing set it temporary into permissive mode by

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# setenforce 0

and check your webinterface again.


Timm


Mark Sapiro schrieb:

Duncan Drury wrote:


After bringing the RedirectMatch ^/mailman[/]*$
http://www.example.com/mailman/listinfo directive into my vhost directive
block, listinfo also started working.  I think that the mailman.conf file
created by the rpm might work fine on a server where there is only a single
domain, but not for those hosting other websites.



It shouldn't matter. In my installation, I have

RedirectMatch ^/mailman[/]*$  /mailman/listinfo

in the main configuration prior to any VirtualHost blocks, and it works
just fine for the main server and all virtual hosts. I don't specify a
scheme or a host in my redirect target which just defaults them to the
scheme and host of the original URL which is more appropriate in a
virtual host environment - you don't want to redirect
http://virt1.example.com/mailman to
http://virt2.example.com/mailman/listinfo - but I don't think that
difference should cause the problem you see. (I have reported this
latter situation at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455185).

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Re: [Mailman-Users] Deleting Mailman Mbox

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Sapiro
Carlos Williams wrote:

I have no idea what happened to my mailman installation. As far as I
can tell from a very basic administrative and user level, it works
perfect with my Postifx install. Only only noticed this was a problem
when I started to migrate my mailman data to a new email server I am
building to replace this old hardware.

When I go to /var/lib/mailman/archives/private - I then see the
mailman.mbox directory. This directory repeats over and over:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailman.mbox]# pwd
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox


I have never seen anything like this and so far this is the only one I
have seen so far with this problem. My only solution to fix it is to
delete everything recursive from
/var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox. I don't know if this is going
to break anything or what. I notice in my other *.mbox directories,
there is always a file that ends in *.mbox.


Someone else reported a similar symptom a month or two ago. (I just
tried to find this in the archive, and I see it was you, not someone
else.)

I have no idea how this happened. I suspect somehow instead of
mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox being a file, it somehow became a link back
to its parent. If this is the case, even rm -rf
/var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox may not succeed because it may
loop indefinitely, but it's worth a try.

At worst, you might be able to mv
/var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox junk. Then you could create a
new /var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox directory and empty
/var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox file with the same
ownership and permissions as the good ones.


-- 
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] Deleting Mailman Mbox

2008-07-14 Thread Carlos Williams
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Someone else reported a similar symptom a month or two ago. (I just
 tried to find this in the archive, and I see it was you, not someone
 else.)

Yes - I reported this during my migration help email. It was me...

 I have no idea how this happened. I suspect somehow instead of
 mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox being a file, it somehow became a link back
 to its parent. If this is the case, even rm -rf
 /var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox may not succeed because it may
 loop indefinitely, but it's worth a try.

 At worst, you might be able to mv
 /var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox junk. Then you could create a
 new /var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox directory and empty
 /var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox file with the same
 ownership and permissions as the good ones.

So I think I am simply going to just rm -rf
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/mailman.mbox/mailman.box

This will retain the first mailman.box directory which is expected to
be there and then remove everything beyond that.
I will then assume at some point Mailman will attempt to re-generate a
mailbox.mbox file in that directory. Do you think this is a bad idea?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


[Mailman-Users] Runaway python process

2008-07-14 Thread Andy Cravens
I'm running Mailman 2.1.9 on Solaris 10.  Sometime this weekend we had a 
mail loop which pounded our list server.  The mail loop has been fixed 
but there is a python process that is consuming an entire cpu.  Further 
inspection of this process reveals:


qrunner --runner=ArchRunner:0:1 -s

I'm assuming that ArchRunner is a process that archives incoming 
messages and that mailman is in the process of archiving all those 
thousands of messages that were received due to the mail loop. 

I've been searching the mailman site and also googling to find a way to 
discard all those bogus messages.  I'm getting pressure to fix this  
fast because people cannot log in to the web interface because the 
server is pegged due to this process.


So, 1)  I'd like to know if I'm going down the right path assuming 
mailman is busy archiving all those messages and 2)  How can I get it to 
stop?


I'm going to log into the web interface even though it will forever to 
get the page to come up and I will try disabling archiving fir the 
affected list.  Not sure if that will stop the archiving that is already 
happening or not but I'm going to give it a try.


--
Andy
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] Runaway python process

2008-07-14 Thread Dragon

Andy Cravens wrote:
I'm running Mailman 2.1.9 on Solaris 10.  Sometime this weekend we 
had a mail loop which pounded our list server.  The mail loop has 
been fixed but there is a python process that is consuming an entire 
cpu.  Further inspection of this process reveals:


qrunner --runner=ArchRunner:0:1 -s

I'm assuming that ArchRunner is a process that archives incoming 
messages and that mailman is in the process of archiving all those 
thousands of messages that were received due to the mail loop.
I've been searching the mailman site and also googling to find a way 
to discard all those bogus messages.  I'm getting pressure to fix this
fast because people cannot log in to the web interface because the 
server is pegged due to this process.


So, 1)  I'd like to know if I'm going down the right path assuming 
mailman is busy archiving all those messages and 2)  How can I get it to stop?


I'm going to log into the web interface even though it will forever 
to get the page to come up and I will try disabling archiving fir 
the affected list.  Not sure if that will stop the archiving that is 
already happening or not but I'm going to give it a try.

 End original message. -

I'd suggest killing the archive runner process. And then disabling 
archiving in the web interface. Then you can go in and remove the 
offending files from qfiles/archive (though exactly what needs to be 
done there I am not certain).


You probably also want to remove the offending messages from the mbox 
files for the lists and then rebuild the archives without them, 
though there are issues with possibly breaking links to messages in 
the archives.


Once you have things cleaned up, you can restart mailman and 
re-enable archiving.


Dragon

~~~
 Venimus, Saltavimus, Bibimus (et naribus canium capti sumus)
~~~


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] Runaway python process

2008-07-14 Thread Andy Cravens

Dragon wrote:

Andy Cravens wrote:
I'm running Mailman 2.1.9 on Solaris 10.  Sometime this weekend we 
had a mail loop which pounded our list server.  The mail loop has 
been fixed but there is a python process that is consuming an entire 
cpu.  Further inspection of this process reveals:


qrunner --runner=ArchRunner:0:1 -s

I'm assuming that ArchRunner is a process that archives incoming 
messages and that mailman is in the process of archiving all those 
thousands of messages that were received due to the mail loop.
I've been searching the mailman site and also googling to find a way 
to discard all those bogus messages.  I'm getting pressure to fix this
fast because people cannot log in to the web interface because the 
server is pegged due to this process.


So, 1)  I'd like to know if I'm going down the right path assuming 
mailman is busy archiving all those messages and 2)  How can I get it 
to stop?


I'm going to log into the web interface even though it will forever 
to get the page to come up and I will try disabling archiving fir the 
affected list.  Not sure if that will stop the archiving that is 
already happening or not but I'm going to give it a try.

 End original message. -

I'd suggest killing the archive runner process. And then disabling 
archiving in the web interface. Then you can go in and remove the 
offending files from qfiles/archive (though exactly what needs to be 
done there I am not certain).


You probably also want to remove the offending messages from the mbox 
files for the lists and then rebuild the archives without them, though 
there are issues with possibly breaking links to messages in the 
archives.


Once you have things cleaned up, you can restart mailman and re-enable 
archiving.


Dragon

~~~
 Venimus, Saltavimus, Bibimus (et naribus canium capti sumus)
~~~


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/acravens%40uen.org


Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Problem solved.   I already killed that qrunner process so that I could 
edit the archive options via the web interface.  The key was deleting 
the 25,000 files from qfiles/archive.  and then restarting mailman.  I 
probably deleted some other legit archives to other lists in the process 
but at least we're back up.   Probably should have done a selective 
delete by grepping for the list name within the file but oh well...


Thanks for pointing me to qfiles/archive.  I learned something.

--
Andy

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't create list

2008-07-14 Thread Mike Brown
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 03:03:41PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:

 Because those host names are not in the VIRTUAL_HOSTS dictionary. You
 could put something like
 
 add_virtualhost('192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.1')
 
 in mm_cfg.py and then create a list in the '192.168.1.1' domain, but
 don't do that because the domain '192.168.1.1' will appear everywhere
 in that list's links and addresses and it won't work from outside your
 LAN.

I tried it from work and got the same problem, virtual host unknown: vidiot.com

MB
-- 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/~\ The ASCII
[I've been to Earth.  I know where it is. ]  \ / Ribbon Campaign
[And I'm gonna take us there.Starbuck  3/25/07]   X  Against
Visit - URL: http://vidiot.com/  / \ HTML Email
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature Request: Selective Mass Subscription

2008-07-14 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Zbigniew Szalbot writes:

  1/ Mailman as a discussion list - like the one we're having here. I 
  don't imagine spammers would be setting up their lists as discussion 
  list, would they? I don't actually imagine big time spammers using 
  mailman. They're all about botnets.

Big time spammers won't use Mailman, true, but we can't predict how
they will format their messages.  If formatting messages like Mailman
discussion lists makes it more likely they'll be delivered to end
users, they'll do that.  They avoid getting return mail simply by not
running MTA servers!

  I'd love to see Mailman giving me an option to create either
  discussion or announcement list with pre-set features for each of
  them. One of these pre-sets could be in fact the presence or
  absence of mass-subscribe feature defined per list during list
  creation.

Barry for Mailman 3 has been talking about making Mailman easier to
configure, and I'm sure Mark would consider adding improved config
tools to 2.2.  But (my impression is that) all of the developers have
Usenet/devel list backgrounds.  Clear and detailed lists of needed
features, eg, what currently unconfigurable behavior needs to be
configurable, and how.  So the mass subscribe feature is a good
example of a configuration need, and it needs not only to be on/off,
but some kind of rate limit seems to be desirable.  (Even though
Cyndi's ISP decided not to allow it, it was attractive enough that
they considered it seriously.)

I think these features would be best described on the wiki (but there
doesn't seem to be an obvious place for the community's wishlist as
opposed to developer proposals), and discussed on mailman-developers.

  However, if I understand the current trends, discussion lists are
  dropped in favour of online forums and newsletter/marketing tools
  are more and more sought after.

On the other hand, the people who can actually contribute code to
Mailman are so far more versed in the discussion lists.

  This is a market to gain for Mailman but it currently lacks a few
  features to do that. Well, my post is slowly getting off topic

But IMO it would be quite on-topic for mailman-developers.  This kind
of post would be more effective in inciting dev activity if more
focused.  Eg, rather than talking about markets to gain, which
sounds good but generally doesn't attract a lot of dev effort, talk
about specific tasks and their needs, and the specific features that
could be extended or added to satisfy them.  Remember, AIUI at least,
the devs have little experience with these usages so concrete details
of requirements would be very helpful.



--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


[Mailman-Users] mailman servers coordination: find spammers

2008-07-14 Thread Gadi Evron
I often see addresses popping up and subscribing to all visible lists on 
my servers.


Sometimes they're a curious individual, and most times they are spammers 
harversting addresses (as these are open only to admin).


I wonder what the coding price would be, if it can even work with 
mailman, to create a central trusted DB which watched subscription trends?


1. It could be used for security.
2. It could fight spammers on the mailman front.
3. If we deal with the security and privacy implications of the first 
two, or want a constructive cause--collect cool trends and provide with a 
mailing lists index by tag words and activity. Think technorati..


This of course, is just a neat idea. Thoughts?

Thanks,

Gadi.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman servers coordination: find spammers

2008-07-14 Thread Jason Pruim
First, I think it would have better luck on the developers mailing  
list :)


But as for the idea, I think it could work, but someone would have to  
provide the hosting for the database that would hold all the info. And  
we would have to figure out who would be a trusted source to report  
the spam My spam might be your ham... I need lunch hehe


In general though I like the idea and would love to hear from others  
on it as well :)



On Jul 14, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:

I often see addresses popping up and subscribing to all visible  
lists on my servers.


Sometimes they're a curious individual, and most times they are  
spammers harversting addresses (as these are open only to admin).


I wonder what the coding price would be, if it can even work with  
mailman, to create a central trusted DB which watched subscription  
trends?


1. It could be used for security.
2. It could fight spammers on the mailman front.
3. If we deal with the security and privacy implications of the  
first two, or want a constructive cause--collect cool trends and  
provide with a mailing lists index by tag words and activity. Think  
technorati..


This of course, is just a neat idea. Thoughts?

Thanks,

Gadi.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/japruim%40raoset.com

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9



--

Jason Pruim
Raoset Inc.
Technology Manager
MQC Specialist
11287 James St
Holland, MI 49424
www.raoset.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman servers coordination: find spammers

2008-07-14 Thread Krystal Zipfel
The problem I see with this is much like the DNSBLs and Block lists 
(spamhaus?).


As Jason put it, one person's spam could very much be another person's 
ham, so mail starts getting rejected by those who outright trust such a 
database and it is hell trying to get removed from those said lists.


Not to mention, there is so much forgery and many changes to spam tricks 
that even SA has to keep up with it. :-(


Personally, I think spam filtering/watching/fighting should be done per 
server, per user, etc. Would be real nice if the ISP's would start doing 
that...


My opinion. :-)

Jason Pruim wrote:
First, I think it would have better luck on the developers mailing 
list :)


But as for the idea, I think it could work, but someone would have to 
provide the hosting for the database that would hold all the info. And 
we would have to figure out who would be a trusted source to report 
the spam My spam might be your ham... I need lunch hehe


In general though I like the idea and would love to hear from others 
on it as well :)



On Jul 14, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:

I often see addresses popping up and subscribing to all visible lists 
on my servers.


Sometimes they're a curious individual, and most times they are 
spammers harversting addresses (as these are open only to admin).


I wonder what the coding price would be, if it can even work with 
mailman, to create a central trusted DB which watched subscription 
trends?


1. It could be used for security.
2. It could fight spammers on the mailman front.
3. If we deal with the security and privacy implications of the first 
two, or want a constructive cause--collect cool trends and provide 
with a mailing lists index by tag words and activity. Think technorati..


This of course, is just a neat idea. Thoughts?

Thanks,

Gadi.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/japruim%40raoset.com 



Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9



--

Jason Pruim
Raoset Inc.
Technology Manager
MQC Specialist
11287 James St
Holland, MI 49424
www.raoset.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/zipfel%40greenacrestechnology.com 



Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9



--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


[Mailman-Users] Updated mmfold.py

2008-07-14 Thread skip
A long time ago I wrote a small Python script to allow me to easily manage
held messages for a number of Mailman-managed mailing lists.  It worked well
for me, but was still a bit cumbersome because it required me to enter the
admin or moderator password for each list.  I fixed that a few days ago,
allowing urls to include the admpw parameter, e.g.:

http://mail.python.org/mailman/admindb/list1?admpw=XYZABC

This makes it *much* easier to use.  I can now run through the held messages
in 11 Python-related lists in less than a minute (most lists don't actually
have any held messages) with a shell function like this:

function mmcheck {
for url in \
http://mail.python.org/mailman/admindb/list1?admpw=XYZABC \
http://mail.python.org/mailman/admindb/list2?admpw=ABCXYZ \
http://mail.python.org/mailman/admindb/list3?admpw=FOOBAR \
http://mail.python.org/mailman/admindb/list4?admpw=BARFOOD \
...
; do
python ~/tmp/py/mmfold.py $url
done
}

The output looks like this:

% mmcheck
no messages await review for spambayes
no messages await review for spambayes-dev
2 items sent to browser for review
no messages await review for python-3000
no messages await review for python-mode
no messages await review for pydotorg
no messages await review for python-dev
1 items sent to browser for review
1 items sent to browser for review
no messages await review for csv
1 items sent to browser for review

Only those lists with pending messages generate pages in my web browser.
Just wait for the function to finish and then visit the resulting pages
(generally each will pop up in a separate tab, though I suspect that depends
on your default browser).

Unless you're running this on a shared machine there should be little risk
in recording list passwords in a file.  (If you manage several lists you
probably have them recorded online somewhere anyway.)

The updated mmfold.py script is here:

http://www.webfast.com/~skip/python/mmfold.py

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

-- 
Skip Montanaro - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.webfast.com/~skip/
--
ELON MUSK: If fuel cells were good, don't think you'd see them somewhere, like
maybe in a laptop or a cell phone or a $200 million military satellite maybe?
And yet, where do you see them?
SPENCER MICHELS: You don't.
ELON MUSK: Exactly.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman servers coordination: find spammers

2008-07-14 Thread Brad Knowles

Gadi,

I think we could certainly do this, but we would need to carefully  
vette the subscriptions to try to keep the more advanced spammers from  
sneaking in.


Feel free to discuss this with me offline, if you like.

--
Brad Knowles

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I often see addresses popping up and subscribing to all visible  
lists on my servers.


Sometimes they're a curious individual, and most times they are  
spammers harversting addresses (as these are open only to admin).


I wonder what the coding price would be, if it can even work with  
mailman, to create a central trusted DB which watched subscription  
trends?


1. It could be used for security.
2. It could fight spammers on the mailman front.
3. If we deal with the security and privacy implications of the  
first two, or want a constructive cause--collect cool trends and  
provide with a mailing lists index by tag words and activity. Think  
technorati..


This of course, is just a neat idea. Thoughts?

Thanks,

   Gadi.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/brad%40shub-internet.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature Request: Selective Mass Subscription

2008-07-14 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot

Hi there,

Stephen J. Turnbull:


  This is a market to gain for Mailman but it currently lacks a few
  features to do that. Well, my post is slowly getting off topic

But IMO it would be quite on-topic for mailman-developers.  This kind
of post would be more effective in inciting dev activity if more
focused.  Eg, rather than talking about markets to gain, which
sounds good but generally doesn't attract a lot of dev effort, talk
about specific tasks and their needs, and the specific features that
could be extended or added to satisfy them.  Remember, AIUI at least,
the devs have little experience with these usages so concrete details
of requirements would be very helpful.


You're absolutely right, but given that I cannot really sponsor new 
Mailman features I felt not quite an appropriate person to suggest them. 
I am trying to give some of my time to handle Polish translation of 
Mailman but this is about all I can give to this project.


If there's a space to do so and people willing to discuss what it would 
take to make Mailman more marketing-wise friendly tool, I'd be happy to 
contribute. :)


Kind regards,

--
Zbigniew Szalbot
www.LCWords.com
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Re: [Mailman-Users] Deleting Mailman Mbox

2008-07-14 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Mark Sapiro writes:

  I have no idea how this happened. I suspect somehow instead of
  mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox being a file, it somehow became a link back
  to its parent. If this is the case, even rm -rf
  /var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox may not succeed because it may
  loop indefinitely, but it's worth a try.

Also try rm -f /var/lib/mailman/archives/mailman.mbox/mailman.mbox
(no -r option), which should work if the target is a symlink.

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't create list

2008-07-14 Thread Mike Brown
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 07:04:46PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:

 Put the following in mm_cfg.py
 
 DEFAULT_URL_HOST = 'vidiot.com'
 DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'vidiot.com'

Those two lines were there.

 VIRTUAL_HOSTS.clear()

Don't see this mentioned in the Defaults.py file.

 add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)

Missed this being described in the Defaults.py file.

Thanks for pointing it out.  We'll see how far I get tomorrow.

MB
-- 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/~\ The ASCII
[I've been to Earth.  I know where it is. ]  \ / Ribbon Campaign
[And I'm gonna take us there.Starbuck  3/25/07]   X  Against
Visit - URL: http://vidiot.com/  / \ HTML Email
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


[Mailman-Users] honeypot lists Re: mailman servers coordination: find spammers

2008-07-14 Thread Gadi Evron

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Krystal Zipfel wrote:
The problem I see with this is much like the DNSBLs and Block lists 
(spamhaus?).


As Jason put it, one person's spam could very much be another person's ham, 
so mail starts getting rejected by those who outright trust such a database 
and it is hell trying to get removed from those said lists.


Not to mention, there is so much forgery and many changes to spam tricks that 
even SA has to keep up with it. :-(


Personally, I think spam filtering/watching/fighting should be done per 
server, per user, etc. Would be real nice if the ISP's would start doing 
that...


My opinion. :-)


Well, one immediate solution that helps is starting another list or two, 
as a honeypot, and seeing who subscribes.


Gadi.



Jason Pruim wrote:

First, I think it would have better luck on the developers mailing list :)

But as for the idea, I think it could work, but someone would have to 
provide the hosting for the database that would hold all the info. And we 
would have to figure out who would be a trusted source to report the 
spam My spam might be your ham... I need lunch hehe


In general though I like the idea and would love to hear from others on it 
as well :)



On Jul 14, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:

I often see addresses popping up and subscribing to all visible lists on 
my servers.


Sometimes they're a curious individual, and most times they are spammers 
harversting addresses (as these are open only to admin).


I wonder what the coding price would be, if it can even work with 
mailman, to create a central trusted DB which watched subscription trends?


1. It could be used for security.
2. It could fight spammers on the mailman front.
3. If we deal with the security and privacy implications of the first two, 
or want a constructive cause--collect cool trends and provide with a 
mailing lists index by tag words and activity. Think technorati..


This of course, is just a neat idea. Thoughts?

Thanks,

Gadi.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/japruim%40raoset.com 


Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9



--

Jason Pruim
Raoset Inc.
Technology Manager
MQC Specialist
11287 James St
Holland, MI 49424
www.raoset.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/zipfel%40greenacrestechnology.com 


Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9



--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/ge%40linuxbox.org


Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't create list

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Sapiro

Mike Brown wrote:

I tried it from work and got the same problem, virtual host unknown:
vidiot.com


Then vidiot.com is not a url host in the VIRTUAL_HOSTS dictionary.

Put the following in mm_cfg.py

DEFAULT_URL_HOST = 'vidiot.com'
DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'vidiot.com'
VIRTUAL_HOSTS.clear()
add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)


--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9


Re: [Mailman-Users] Deleting Mailman Mbox

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Sapiro

Carlos Williams wrote:

So I think I am simply going to just rm -rf
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/mailman.mbox/mailman.box

This will retain the first mailman.box directory which is expected to
be there and then remove everything beyond that.
I will then assume at some point Mailman will attempt to re-generate a
mailbox.mbox file in that directory. Do you think this is a bad idea?

No. I think it is a good idea.

--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9