Mark Sapiro writes: > > I also found this post where this guy says you need to remove the > > DKIM headers: > > https://blog.dogan.ch/2016/11/24/making-mailman-dmarc-compatible/
> It says that, but gives no reason or rationale for doing so. I know several mail admins (small-scale, not any of the big freemail providers!) who have spam filters set to give spam points when signature verification or SPF fail, in outright nonconformance to the RFCs. if you have subscribers at such sites, the "remove broken signatures and Authentication-Results, then add your own" procedure can be useful. OTOH, I've had occasional cases (not even one a year) where it was useful to reconstruct originals (ie, by stripping forwarding decorations) and DKIM verify. (People wanting to claim they didn't send abusive mail. :-( ) Steve ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
