Re: [MlMt] Send Message button fails

2016-08-05 Thread Howard Wettstein
Several buttons were affected, but I fixed some of it by reloading from 
Customize Toolbar. But Reply All is not responding at all. Thanks.

Howie


On 5 Aug 2016, at 13:45, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:


On 5 Aug 2016, at 6:08, Howard Wettstein wrote:


My reply button has stopped functioning.
Howie

On 4 Aug 2016, at 19:47, Harvey Leff wrote:

In my Version 2.0BETA (6043), clicking on the Send Message button 
has no effect. Fortunately, using the menu bar, Message/Send works. 
So does the key command COMMAND-RETURN. Has anyone else experienced 
this?


I've been making a lot of toolbar related changes which means that 
there is the potential for the introduction of a bug, but I cannot 
reproduce what you describe. Could you also try the latest test 
release (hold down ⌥ when clicking “Check Now”) to make sure we 
are on the same page. Then try again.


Also, do all buttons fail or is it only some of them?

--
Benny
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] opening multiple mails

2016-08-05 Thread Benny Kjær Nielsen

On 4 Aug 2016, at 18:02, Robert Brenstein wrote:


On 04.08.2016 at 11:10 Uhr -0400 John D. Muccigrosso apparently wrote:


And, just this moment, I did some experimenting:

Try shift-cmd-O instead of just cmd-O and the messages will open in 
different windows.


Haven't found a way to make return open them in different windows 
though.


Yes, that is great! I checked only the combination on the message 
menu. Strange that the menu item remains the same with and without the 
shift key, but who cares.


It was just a quick hack to help out a user. The Shift-behavior should 
probably be the default behavior. (The single message window still has 
quite a few shortcomings.)


Is they a way to have the oldest messages show on top? MM seems to 
insist that newer messages are on top, but 95% of the time, I want to 
read them in the order they went sent.


No, there's no way to do that.

--
Benny
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Why Is Source Code Pro An Unknown Font?

2016-08-05 Thread Benny Kjær Nielsen

On 1 Aug 2016, at 22:51, Hans Trygve Jensen wrote:

However, something did show up. Every time I select a message, both 
read and unread, the following kind of warning appears in the command 
line:


MailMate[29971:472156] Warning: Unknown font “SourceCodePro”


I don't think that's from my code which means it's likely generated by 
an Apple framework.


[...]


My questions are these:

1. Why is “SourceCodePro” considered an unknown font?


I'm afraid I don't know.


2. Why is it labeled as one word (not as “Source Code Pro”)?


That's probably just an implementation detail.


Nice if anyone can clarify the matter. Thanks!


If you can somehow narrow down the issue then let me know. In 
particular, if you think it is somehow caused by a MailMate bug.


--
Benny
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] A "Show only unread" toggle

2016-08-05 Thread Benny Kjær Nielsen

On 3 Aug 2016, at 8:48, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:

In most reading mail cases only unread is relevant but once I see a 
pos that are interesting I often want to remind myself what other 
topics I've discussed with this person. The fastest way for that is to 
have the mailbox include read mails too. This is much much faster than 
replicating the search in this folder - hence why I suggest having s 
way to toggle show all/unread to quickly filter/unfilter without 
breaking the flow of what next/previous mail shortcut will go to.


Hope that explains it better.


I believe I understand the request. Individual mailboxes allow 
conditions to be specified and you might get something like you request 
if this was easily toggled on/off, but if I understand correctly then 
this wouldn't be sufficient since you need this to work on any mailbox 
(which would be cumbersome to setup).


I guess you need some kind of temporary filtering easily toggled on/off. 
You might even need it on a per mailbox basis although it seems your use 
case could also be a global filter. It's not straightforward how that 
should/could work, but I'll keep it in mind.


--
Benny
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] composer window placement

2016-08-05 Thread Benny Kjær Nielsen

On 4 Aug 2016, at 16:17, John Muccigrosso wrote:

PS My message Windows now open up in the far right bottom. Not sure 
why.


What happens if you move it, close it, and then reopen it? (MailMate 
should remember the most recent position of the window.)


--
Benny
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] A couple of things about the inbox window(?)

2016-08-05 Thread Paul Sture

On 5 Aug 2016, at 19:17, Bill Cole wrote:



Option-shift-arrow appears to do what you want. This is a standard 
behavior in list views.


Works in Finder too.  I didn't know that one, so thanks very much.

Surprisingly, despite having used every MacOS version since System 
3.2/Finder 5.3, this is the first I've heard of the cmd-shift-arrow 
combination selecting "all the way" up or down, although it does 
indeed seem to have been standard behavior in text views forever. I 
guess I've met my minimum quota of new facts for the day...


I just learned that one the other day when I revisited the BBEdit 
tutorial. Which means I should have come across it before... Hopefully 
it'll stick this time.

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] A couple of things about the inbox window(?)

2016-08-05 Thread Bill Cole

On 5 Aug 2016, at 12:42, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:


On 5 Aug 2016, at 11:51, Randall Meadows wrote:


On 5 Aug 2016, at 7:07, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:

First, I’m not sure that’s what it’s called, but I mean the 
main window with the list of messages.


Highlight a message in the list. Do a shift-up/down arrow. The 
message above/below the one you’re on gets added to the selection. 
Perfect. Now cmd-shift-arrow. The same thing happens. What I would 
expect to happen is that the whole set of messages above/below gets 
added to the selection. Mail.app doesn’t do this either, FWIW. I 
guess this is because I expect cmd-arrow to move me to the top or 
bottom of a list of items, which it doesn’t here, just like it 
moves me to the top or bottom of a body of text. (In the Finder, 
cmd-arrow moves you to the enclos-ing/-ed folder.)


Just a SWAG, but when selecting, ⌘ takes on a different meaning, 
typically allowing a disjoint selection.  No idea if that's what 
going on here, but might be an explanation for your expectation.


Yes, when clicking, ⌘ enables discrete selection while shift does 
continuous, but with arrows, shift enables select and ⌘ makes the 
movement go “all the way” in whatever direction you’re going. 
This works with text and I guess my expectation is that it would work 
here in the same way.


Option-shift-arrow appears to do what you want. This is a standard 
behavior in list views.


Surprisingly, despite having used every MacOS version since System 
3.2/Finder 5.3, this is the first I've heard of the cmd-shift-arrow 
combination selecting "all the way" up or down, although it does indeed 
seem to have been standard behavior in text views forever. I guess I've 
met my minimum quota of new facts for the day...

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] A couple of things about the inbox window(?)

2016-08-05 Thread John D. Muccigrosso

On 5 Aug 2016, at 11:51, Randall Meadows wrote:


On 5 Aug 2016, at 7:07, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:

First, I’m not sure that’s what it’s called, but I mean the 
main window with the list of messages.


Highlight a message in the list. Do a shift-up/down arrow. The 
message above/below the one you’re on gets added to the selection. 
Perfect. Now cmd-shift-arrow. The same thing happens. What I would 
expect to happen is that the whole set of messages above/below gets 
added to the selection. Mail.app doesn’t do this either, FWIW. I 
guess this is because I expect cmd-arrow to move me to the top or 
bottom of a list of items, which it doesn’t here, just like it 
moves me to the top or bottom of a body of text. (In the Finder, 
cmd-arrow moves you to the enclos-ing/-ed folder.)


Just a SWAG, but when selecting, ⌘ takes on a different meaning, 
typically allowing a disjoint selection.  No idea if that's what going 
on here, but might be an explanation for your expectation.


Yes, when clicking, ⌘ enables discrete selection while shift does 
continuous, but with arrows, shift enables select and ⌘ makes the 
movement go “all the way” in whatever direction you’re going. This 
works with text and I guess my expectation is that it would work here in 
the same way.


John
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] statistics

2016-08-05 Thread Robert Brenstein
Title: Re: [MlMt] statistics


I'll send you the stats from Eudora off the list.

Robert

On 05.08.2016 at 11:12 Uhr -0400 Sherif Soliman apparently
wrote:

Visualize is a MailMate bundle that you have to install before you can
use it. You can install it from Preferences
ð Bundles. Find Visualize and check the box, and MailMate
will install it for you.

I am the author of the bundle, so if you let me know what global
statistics you were given by Eudora (I never used it), I could plan on
including it in Visualize. No promises, especially on the
"when", but I am motivated enough to add features to it, and
I've already been considering adding a "summary statistics"
command.

Another caveat is that, from the sounds of it, Eudora's statistics
gave you numbers/plots about your entire inbox or entire message
database. Due to the way bundles work in MailMate, Visualize won't
have access to that. You will have to select messages before you can
invoke Visualize commands.

I have tested Visualize with up to 100,000 messages, and while it
takes a few seconds to generate the plots, it does work eventually. A
lot of that could be the plotting library working, and it might be a
lot faster if what you want are just text-based summaries.

Tip to all Visualize users: if you will be selecting 10s or 100 of
thousands of messages, things run a lot faster if you choose a layout
that doesn't show message preview or thread arcs. The selection itself
happens faster because MailMate doesn't try to render message previews
and thread arcs for a large number of messages.

Sherif
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate



___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] A couple of things about the inbox window(?)

2016-08-05 Thread Randall Meadows

On 5 Aug 2016, at 7:07, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:

First, I’m not sure that’s what it’s called, but I mean the main 
window with the list of messages.


Highlight a message in the list. Do a shift-up/down arrow. The message 
above/below the one you’re on gets added to the selection. Perfect. 
Now cmd-shift-arrow. The same thing happens. What I would expect to 
happen is that the whole set of messages above/below gets added to the 
selection. Mail.app doesn’t do this either, FWIW. I guess this is 
because I expect cmd-arrow to move me to the top or bottom of a list 
of items, which it doesn’t here, just like it moves me to the top or 
bottom of a body of text. (In the Finder, cmd-arrow moves you to the 
enclos-ing/-ed folder.)


Just a SWAG, but when selecting, ⌘ takes on a different meaning, 
typically allowing a disjoint selection.  No idea if that's what going 
on here, but might be an explanation for your expectation.

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] read msg marking

2016-08-05 Thread Robert Brenstein
Title: Re: [MlMt] read msg marking


Thanks Sherif. Hopefully, this makes it into the documentation
one of these days.

Robert

On 05.08.2016 at 10:57 Uhr -0400 Sherif Soliman apparently
wrote:
On 4 Aug 2016, at 19:23, Robert Brenstein
wrote:

The column "unread" in the list
view shows a circle if the message is unread or is empty. I see those
circles in at least 3 colors: blue, red, gray. However, I can't seem
to find their explanation in the manual.

Hi Robert,

The blue and grey are simple to
explain:



Blue: indicates a single unread message.
Grey: You should only see grey next to a thread, not a single
message. Grey means that the thread has a mix of unread and read
messages. A thread that contains messages that are all unread should
have blue next to it, and a thread of all read messages should have
neither blue nor grey next to it.

The red one requires a more detailed
explanation, and I will quote Bill Cole from this previous message on
the list:

http://www.mail-archive.com/mailmate%40lists.freron.com/msg05861.html

On 18 Mar 2016, at 10:44, Bill Cole
wrote:

It means that you use another client in
addition to MailMate with that source account and that the other
client handles message deletion in a classical IMAP mode. This means
that messages get marked with the "\Deleted" flag when the
user deletes them, but do not REALLY get deleted until the mailbox or
(if the server & client support the UIDPLUS extension) the
individual message is purged. Some servers auto-purge mailboxes or
individual \Deleted messages based on various criteria and some
clients do as well, although some client+server combinations will
never purge anything unless the user explicitly commands
it.
So: a red dot in the "Read"
column means that something other than MailMate marked the message for
deletion but has not yet told the server to purge it.
The mechanics of handling message
deletion and presentation of recoverable "deleted" messages
vary broadly between IMAP clients. MailMate uses a very conservative
approach of not purging messages it did not flag \Deleted, although I
don't know how it manages that on servers without UIDPLUS support
(which was a requirement for early versions of MailMate.)

Sherif


___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate



___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Modifying bundle key shortcuts

2016-08-05 Thread Sherif Soliman


On 4 Aug 2016, at 0:16, Jon Nall wrote:


Hi,
For the bundles shipped with Mailmate, what's the best practice to 
customize them? I'd like to modify the keyboard shortcut and (maybe) 
tweak the action as well.


Should I just edit them in place? Copy them somewhere user-specific?

Thanks,
nall.


Re: modifying keyboard shortcuts.

I think the best way to do that is to use OS X's built-in feature to 
override the keyboard shortcut for any menu item.


http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/create-keyboard-shortcut-mac-menu-item/

I tested it with one of the bundle commands that already had a shortcut, 
and the change worked.


The benefit of this solution is that it avoids the hassle of having to 
make copies of bundles and edit their internals, and that you won't have 
to do this every time a bundle gets updated.


As for modifying their actions, I can't advise on that - you could edit 
them in place, and my guess is that MailMate will write over the old 
files when the bundle is updated, but I'm not sure.


Sherif
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] statistics

2016-08-05 Thread Sherif Soliman


On 4 Aug 2016, at 22:40, Robert Brenstein wrote:


I found View->Layout->Statistics
I don’t see Command->Visualize

The histograms are impressive but I mean simple global statistics like 
what Eudora shows.




Visualize is a MailMate bundle that you have to install before you can 
use it. You can install it from Preferences ➝ Bundles. Find Visualize 
and check the box, and MailMate will install it for you.


I am the author of the bundle, so if you let me know what global 
statistics you were given by Eudora (I never used it), I could plan on 
including it in Visualize. No promises, especially on the "when", but I 
am motivated enough to add features to it, and I've already been 
considering adding a "summary statistics" command.


Another caveat is that, from the sounds of it, Eudora's statistics gave 
you numbers/plots about your entire inbox or entire message database. 
Due to the way bundles work in MailMate, Visualize won't have access to 
that. You will have to select messages before you can invoke Visualize 
commands.


I have tested Visualize with up to 100,000 messages, and while it takes 
a few seconds to generate the plots, it does work eventually. A lot of 
that could be the plotting library working, and it might be a lot faster 
if what you want are just text-based summaries.


Tip to all Visualize users: if you will be selecting 10s or 100 of 
thousands of messages, things run a lot faster if you choose a layout 
that doesn't show message preview or thread arcs. The selection itself 
happens faster because MailMate doesn't try to render message previews 
and thread arcs for a large number of messages.


Sherif
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] read msg marking

2016-08-05 Thread Sherif Soliman


On 4 Aug 2016, at 19:23, Robert Brenstein wrote:

The column "unread" in the list view shows a circle if the message is 
unread or is empty. I see those circles in at least 3 colors: blue, 
red, gray. However, I can't seem to find their explanation in the 
manual.




Hi Robert,

The blue and grey are simple to explain:

- Blue: indicates a single unread message.
- Grey: You should only see grey next to a thread, not a single message. 
Grey means that the thread has a mix of unread and read messages. A 
thread that contains messages that are all unread should have blue next 
to it, and a thread of all read messages should have neither blue nor 
grey next to it.


The red one requires a more detailed explanation, and I will quote Bill 
Cole from this previous message on the list:


http://www.mail-archive.com/mailmate%40lists.freron.com/msg05861.html

On 18 Mar 2016, at 10:44, Bill Cole wrote:

It means that you use another client in addition to MailMate with that 
source account and that the other client handles message deletion in a 
classical IMAP mode. This means that messages get marked with the 
"\Deleted" flag when the user deletes them, but do not REALLY get 
deleted until the mailbox or (if the server & client support the 
UIDPLUS extension) the individual message is purged. Some servers 
auto-purge mailboxes or individual \Deleted messages based on various 
criteria and some clients do as well, although some client+server 
combinations will never purge anything unless the user explicitly 
commands it.


So: a red dot in the "Read" column means that something other than 
MailMate marked the message for deletion but has not yet told the 
server to purge it.


The mechanics of handling message deletion and presentation of 
recoverable "deleted" messages vary broadly between IMAP clients. 
MailMate uses a very conservative approach of not purging messages it 
did not flag \Deleted, although I don't know how it manages that on 
servers without UIDPLUS support (which was a requirement for early 
versions of MailMate.)


Sherif___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate