Re: [MlMt] Stop automatic download of incoming messages
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote (at 11:18 on 8 Sep 2016): On 8 Sep 2016, at 18:54, John Cooper wrote: So you want to stay online, but not check for messages. What about setting **Mailbox > Synchronization Schedule** to **Manually**? does not work - mailmate will fetch when putting folder in focus. That's surprising. When this option is set, the intuitive result would be only to fetch when using **Mailbox > Synchronize ""** or its associated shortcut.___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Stop automatic download of incoming messages
On 8 Sep 2016, at 18:54, John Cooper wrote: Esteban Umerez Argaia wrote (at 9:14 on 8 Sep 2016): Hello everybody, This is what I would like to do: I want to be able to launch MailMate in order to draft or send a message, but not have my incoming messages be downloaded to my Inbox. I want to turn off my email for a few hours, so I can concentrate in a difficult task, but I still want to be able to send a message every once in a while. So you want to stay online, but not check for messages. What about setting **Mailbox > Synchronization Schedule** to **Manually**? does not work - mailmate will fetch when putting folder in focus. /max http://about.me/maxandersen ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Stop automatic download of incoming messages
Esteban Umerez Argaia wrote (at 9:14 on 8 Sep 2016): Hello everybody, This is what I would like to do: I want to be able to launch MailMate in order to draft or send a message, but not have my incoming messages be downloaded to my Inbox. I want to turn off my email for a few hours, so I can concentrate in a difficult task, but I still want to be able to send a message every once in a while. So you want to stay online, but not check for messages. What about setting **Mailbox > Synchronization Schedule** to **Manually**?___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Stop automatic download of incoming messages
Hello everybody, This is what I would like to do: I want to be able to launch MailMate in order to draft or send a message, but not have my incoming messages be downloaded to my Inbox. I want to turn off my email for a few hours, so I can concentrate in a difficult task, but I still want to be able to send a message every once in a while. Or even draft an idea for a future message, without having my Inbox remind me that there are many emails incoming that I need to attend. So far, I have turned off every notification in MailMate, and I keep it running in the background without bothering me, but it does not seem the solution I need. I still go and look at my Inbox. Is there any way to stop automatic downloading of the incoming messages. Thanks in advance, and forgive my poor English. Esteban Umerez ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Feature Request: BCC warning/intro
On 8 Sep 2016, at 10:43, John D. Muccigrosso wrote: On 8 Sep 2016, at 3:51, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: On 8 Sep 2016, at 1:05, John D. Muccigrosso wrote: My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail, the bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d prefer they were back in the bcc on the new message. I believe this was (recently) fixed when I fixed an issue with editing drafts with customized Bcc headers. Am I wrong? Yes. It still doesn’t work for me. Version 2.0BETA (6054) FWIW, it does seem to work for me on version 1.9.5 (5260), although I've only done a quick test so far. Shoshanna Green shoshan...@gmail.com ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Feature Request: BCC warning/intro
On 8 Sep 2016, at 3:51, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: On 8 Sep 2016, at 1:05, John D. Muccigrosso wrote: My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail, the bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d prefer they were back in the bcc on the new message. I believe this was (recently) fixed when I fixed an issue with editing drafts with customized Bcc headers. Am I wrong? Yes. It still doesn’t work for me. Version 2.0BETA (6054) John ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] HTML Signature don't always work.
Agreed, not at all a high priority. At least we know what’s causing it ;) Cheers, Pedro On 8 Sep 2016, at 8:16, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: On 7 Sep 2016, at 18:48, Pedro Lobo wrote: OK, I think I nailed the issue. When I have: _Message View: Theme for plain text emails is Standard_ **AND** _Apply to HTML emails when possible_ MailMate ignores the signatures HTML variant and uses the markdown one instead. Ah, yes, that would result in this behavior. It doesn't actually affect what is sent by MailMate. An HTML body part is still generated with your HTML signature. But the setting makes MailMate take the plain text body part and convert it using the Markdown converter when displaying the message. This allows your own display stylesheet to be used, but the HTML signature is “lost” in this process. It's a bit tricky how this is best solved, but it's not (currently) a high priority :) -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] HTML Signature don't always work.
On 7 Sep 2016, at 18:48, Pedro Lobo wrote: OK, I think I nailed the issue. When I have: _Message View: Theme for plain text emails is Standard_ **AND** _Apply to HTML emails when possible_ MailMate ignores the signatures HTML variant and uses the markdown one instead. Ah, yes, that would result in this behavior. It doesn't actually affect what is sent by MailMate. An HTML body part is still generated with your HTML signature. But the setting makes MailMate take the plain text body part and convert it using the Markdown converter when displaying the message. This allows your own display stylesheet to be used, but the HTML signature is “lost” in this process. It's a bit tricky how this is best solved, but it's not (currently) a high priority :) -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Contacts, VIPs as Mailbox Conditions
On 7 Sep 2016, at 17:06, Jamie Phelps wrote: I want to set up a mailbox whose Conditions require that the from email address be found in my Contacts. Bonus points for being able to filter by VIPs. As an extension of this, being able to group submailboxes by the contact person (regardless of what email address or name is attached to the mail message itself) would be aces. I didn't quite get the last part. Do you mean if the contact has multiple email addresses then it should still be grouped in one mailbox per Contact? In Mail.app, I have a few Smart Mailboxes set up that I use to triage my email. If I only have a moment, I check my VIP Inbox. If I have a little more time, I look at what's in my Contacts Inbox. (The Contacts Inbox is keyed to a Smart Group in Contacts whose only criterion is that the email address contains an @ symbol. MailMate could remove this step.) Then, I look for important domains like my work domain. Finally, I check a last bucket that has everything else. This last bucket gets processed a couple times per week only but my others get processed at least once per day. I know there have been other requests for Contacts and Groups related things, but to me, this is one of the simple ways that MailMate is still slightly deficient for how I triage my email and being able to set Contacts presence as a Condition for a mailbox would be fantastic. When (hopefully) I get around to adding better integration with Contacts then I'll keep the above in mind. I'll also note to contact you for testing that the integration works for you. -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Changing labels in gmail does not reflect in mailmate
On 8 Sep 2016, at 2:58, Vincent Danen wrote: I've removed some labels in the gmail web interface and those show up fine in mailmate, and one that I've added shows up fine. I used to have a bunch of "context" labels like @ACTION and @WAITINGFOR and realized the other day that only half of them are showing up. When I go to edit subscriptions, I see them in the list and they're checked off but they're not showing in my folder list. So I changed the labels in gmail hoping to encourage mailmate to pick them up (changed them from @SOMETHING to _SOMETHING) and now all (but one) of my @ labels are gone, but none of the new ones are showing up. Have you mapped tag names to any of these Gmail labels (in the Tags preferences pane)? That would trigger MailMate to hide the Gmail label mailboxes. I've since upgraded to r5261 and now the edit subscriptions button throws an error (Error: "") so I can't see if they're listed there or not. That's bad and probably related to my recent changes to OAuth2 authentication. I would very much like to debug that. I'll contact you off list. Any ideas what's happening? Not sure why half of the "@" labels would show up and the other half wouldn't; they're all set to show in IMAP. I suspect it might be related to tags as described above, but you can also try relaunching MailMate to make 100% it detects changes in the reported IMAP mailboxes. -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Feature Request: BCC warning/intro
On 7 Sep 2016, at 23:20, Patrik Fältström wrote: On 7 Sep 2016, at 17:05, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: That's what I do, too, which suggests an even more stringent mechanism: put the original To/Cc lines into the body of the bcc copy. Yes, it's an extra SMTP, but so is doing it manually. FWIW, I do not use BCC either (some people use to too much, like instead of mailing lists or alias expansion on server side), but WHEN I do it, I would like it to be more clear. Sure, in some cases I send the first mail, and then forward the sent mail to the "bcc" recipient like "FYI, look what I did send". But then maybe THAT should be the feature (which seems to be similar to what you suggest as well)? Both of the above are interesting ideas. The latter might be less confusing for recipients since it'll just automate what several of you already do instead of using `Bcc:`. It's also closer to what MailMate can already do. In fact, I think it might be possible to create a bundle command which offered some kind of “Send and Forward” command, but to really work well then it would probably also require me to add a bit of functionality. I'll give it some thought. -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Feature Request: BCC warning/intro
On 8 Sep 2016, at 1:05, John D. Muccigrosso wrote: My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail, the bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d prefer they were back in the bcc on the new message. I believe this was (recently) fixed when I fixed an issue with editing drafts with customized Bcc headers. Am I wrong? -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
