Re: [mailop] Email System Testing Methodologies?
Hello, > >One item to be aware of is that the outgoing servers (which return the > >messages) do DANE validation, and thus will not deliver to any servers with > >failed DANE. > > pleaee, is no DANE considered as failed DANE? (Only to be sure...) No -- I just tested and I have no DANE on my mailserver 8-} -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
[mailop] nabble.com admin contact ?
Hi! I'm from the postmaster@ team of FreeBSD.org and look for some contacts from the nabble.com team. We have approx. 75 subscribers on our mailman instance, of the form lists+n-...@nn.nabble.com where the mail to those addresses fails (in a way that our mailman will not unsubscribe them). We would like to know if we can unsubscribe those addresses. Thanks for any contact to nabble. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Any chance that Microsoft would tell it's customer that the 'junk' folder creates complaints?
Hi! > Is there any chance such incidents could be avoided by Microsoft > showing a pop up or similar, that a complaint to the sending ISP is > being generated when moving an email to the 'junk' folder? We receive those mails as well. Many times the mails from Microsoft contain sensible personal information from the hotmail customer in question, so I guess, Microsoft will be in GDPR trouble in one way or another, sooner or later. > Or that Microsoft would CC his own customer in that complaint sent? It's a UI challenge, yes, but who if not a software company with deep pockets should be able to tackle it ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] [External] dcc down / dead?
Hi! > Vernon has emailed me that everything is renewed. Can you confirm it > looks good now? Yes, confirmed. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] [External] dcc down / dead?
Hi! > On 5/23/2020 7:23 AM, Stefan Bauer via mailop wrote: [...] > > seems like the main DCC servers are down (dcc1-6.dcc-servers.net), > > also the website. > Stefan, hi, I run a DCC mirror and not aware of anything. And > https://www.rhyolite.com/dcc/ is online for me. Forwarded your email to > Vernon for more troubleshooting. The DNS zone dcc-servers.net expired: Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2020-05-22T17:54:35Z -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
[mailop] contact to freenet.de mail admin here on the list ?
Hi! For a mailserver I'm operating we see rejections when the connecting IP is from IPv6, with the error message: 550-Inconsistent/Missing DNS PTR record (RFC 1912 2.1) I've checked forward/reverse/SPF records for that domain and set of IPs and everything checks out. Is there some freenet.de mailadmin at hand so that we can find the cause of that problem ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance
Hi! > What is the general opinion of the Certified Senders Alliance? I had one case with them in 2009, which ended *very* unpleasent. We had some spam case from one of their members, complaint by phone and a few minutes later one of our internal addresses got subscribed via some Tor relay to some spam lists. They are a project of ECO, and we complained as member company of ECO. Got nowhere. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Message Store on NFS in a high available setup
Hi! > is there anyone working in a larger/'more demanding' environment, using > NFS for his/her message store, where there is a business requirement of > High Availability? If so, what commercial or open source storage > solution is used? I have a similar requirement for a project and am > looking for suggestions/options for what storage to use. Ask the dovecot folks, their open-source imap server has a professional service team: https://www.open-xchange.com/portfolio/dovecot-pro/ Open-xchange recently pooled dovecot, powerdns and open-xchange in one company. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] SPF record
Hi! Steve wrote: > "~all" is the smart policy to use; ignore those who tell you to > use "-all" or "?all". Can you tell more about this ? Why is '-all' bad ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Is Yahoo! breaking the RFC 5321 for an Implicit MX?
Hi! > have an explicit null MX record in the DNS, e.g.: > > foo MX 0 . > > See RFC 7075. That's RFC 7505. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] 'abuse@' a hosting company - was this a valid response?
Hi! > We received spam from a leased/hosted server (195.154.62.181) to an > email address which has never been used legitimately (ie it was a > scraped email address) > > We reported it to abuse@ the hosting company with headers, message, etc. > > The response we got back was essentially "We're sorry about that - our > customer has removed you from their mailing list - case closed" > > Personally, I think that's a rubbish response. Yes, that's rubbish. > I'm extremely tempted to just block the entire ranges of this hosting > company based on the large amount of spam we've got from their hosted > services, and their useless response to the abuse@ email from us. The > problem is they're apparently a big ISP in France so while it's very > tempting, there's also the risk of collateral damage. Well, brexit's looming anyway, so what stops you 8-) ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Mails to microsoft
Hi! > There's what, 3 major providers? Hotmail, Gmail, Yahoo. > > That's not a lot to sign up for. baidu, web.de, gmx.de, t-online.de, the french players, . There's a lot out there... -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] SORBS help
Hi! To jump into the NetManager debate: > If a company/ISP is registered with us for NetManager, and have chosen > to receive reports, they get emails upon listing and by default they > will have access to additional (but heavily munged) information that any > good sysadmin should be able to use to cross-reference in their logs and > locate the problem. Now, we (AS12502) have applied for NetManager http://support.sorbs.net/SelfService/Display.html?id=1172291 and from how I understand the replies, we did not get it. What can we do to get it ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] domain research tools?
Hi! > Do you do any domain research in the course of your work? If so, what tools > do you use for research [...] http://www.domaintools.com/ has some services, for some EUR/$. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
[mailop] Delivery to A record if MX exists ?
Hello, I think I remember a rule that says that delivery to a domain's A record SHOULD NOT happen, if an MX exists. Does that kind of rule really exists ? Or do I mis-remember ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Delivery to A record if MX exists ?
Hello, I think I remember a rule that says that delivery to a domain's A record SHOULD NOT happen, if an MX exists. Does that kind of rule really exists ? Or do I mis-remember ? https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-5.1 5.1. Locating the Target Host can be read that MX records have preference, but it explizitly avoids mentioning A or records if no MX is found. The sentence: [...] If an empty list of MXs is returned, the address is treated as if it was associated with an implicit MX RR, with a preference of 0, pointing to that host. [...] implies a A/ DNS query, but does not explicitly state so. I had a case where lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net delivered to an A record where an MX existed. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
