Re: [mailop] mailop Digest, Vol 27, Issue 21
On 10/19/22 9:01 AM, Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote: imho same problem as i reported here https://gitlab.com/fumail/fuglu/-/issues/262 There may be a legitimate bug in the DKIM implementation /if/ it's signing things without the knowledge of the operator. That being said, over-signing is a concept in DKIM to protect against bad actors prepending additional instances of the header in question. -- Grant. . . . unix || die smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] mailop Digest, Vol 27, Issue 21
mailop-requ...@mailop.org skrev den 2022-10-19 05:11: Including the resent-* headers is interesting to me, seeing as how they aren't included in the message. I don't know if this was an intentional over-sign or over zealous configuration. imho same problem as i reported here https://gitlab.com/fumail/fuglu/-/issues/262 End of mailop Digest, Vol 27, Issue 21 ** ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop