Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-9.4 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

Packages are built for f34, f35, and f36/rawhide in Fedora Koji. They will
appear on the mirrors after a short testing period.

Packages for f33 are on download.gluster.org now.


On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:13 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/147/artifact/glusterfs-9.4.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/147/artifact/glusterfs-9.4.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-147___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>


-- 

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-9.3 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 1:29 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/144/artifact/glusterfs-9.3.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/144/artifact/glusterfs-9.3.sha512sum


Packages have been built in Fedora koji for rawhide/f35 and f34. Packages
for rawhide are available now. Packages for f34 will land in the Testing
repo shortly, and after a nominal testing period will be tagged into the
updates repo.

Packages for f33 are available at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/9/

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-9.2 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

Packages for various Fedora releases are either in Fedora on available on
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/9/9.2/Fedora/

Packages in Fedora go through a short testing period and then will be
generally available.

Packages for CentOS 7, CentOS 8, and CentOS 8 Stream are available in the
CentOS Storage SIG. They are tagged for testing. After someone tests them
and reports that they work they will be tagged for release.



On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 6:26 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/142/artifact/glusterfs-9.2.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/142/artifact/glusterfs-9.2.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-142___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-8.5 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

Packages for various Fedora releases are either in Fedora on available on
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/8/8.5/Fedora/

Packages in Fedora go through a short testing period and then will be
generally available.

Packages for CentOS 7, CentOS 8, and CentOS 8 Stream are available in the
CentOS Storage SIG. They are tagge for testing. After someone tests them
and reports that they work they will be tagged for release.


On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 6:32 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/143/artifact/glusterfs-8.5.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/143/artifact/glusterfs-8.5.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-143___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-9.1 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

glusterfs-9.1 is built in Fedora 35/rawhide and 34.

Packages for F34 will land in the Testing repository shortly, and will move
to the Stable repository after a short testing period.

Packages for F33 are on download.gluster.org now.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:59 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/141/artifact/glusterfs-9.1.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/141/artifact/glusterfs-9.1.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-141___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-9.0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

glusterfs-9.0-1 is in Fedora-34 (rawhide).  packages for fedora-33 and
fedora-32 are on download.gluster.org

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 2:11 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/137/artifact/glusterfs-9.0.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/137/artifact/glusterfs-9.0.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-137___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] ACTION REQUESTED: Migrate your glusterfs patches from Gerrit to GitHub

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM Kaleb Keithley  wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 7:33 AM Sunil Kumar Heggodu Gopala Acharya <
> shegg...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sunil kumar Acharya
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:54 PM Kaleb Keithley 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:46 AM Deepshikha Khandelwal <
>>> dkhan...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> - The "regression" tests would be triggered by a comment "/run
>>>> regression" from anyone in the gluster-maintainers[4] github group. To run
>>>> full regression, maintainers need to comment "/run full regression"
>>>>
>>>> [4] https://github.com/orgs/gluster/teams/gluster-maintainers
>>>>
>>>
>>> There are a lot of people in that group that haven't been involved with
>>> Gluster for a long time.
>>>
>> Also there are new contributors, time to update!
>>
>
> Who is going to do this? I don't have the necessary privs.
>

Anyone?

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] ACTION REQUESTED: Migrate your glusterfs patches from Gerrit to GitHub

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 7:33 AM Sunil Kumar Heggodu Gopala Acharya <
shegg...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> Regards,
>
> Sunil kumar Acharya
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:54 PM Kaleb Keithley  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:46 AM Deepshikha Khandelwal 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> - The "regression" tests would be triggered by a comment "/run
>>> regression" from anyone in the gluster-maintainers[4] github group. To run
>>> full regression, maintainers need to comment "/run full regression"
>>>
>>> [4] https://github.com/orgs/gluster/teams/gluster-maintainers
>>>
>>
>> There are a lot of people in that group that haven't been involved with
>> Gluster for a long time.
>>
> Also there are new contributors, time to update!
>

Who is going to do this? I don't have the necessary privs.

(I also note that Jeff Darcy has been removed. Perhaps he removed himself?)

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-infra] ACTION REQUESTED: Migrate your glusterfs patches from Gerrit to GitHub

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:46 AM Deepshikha Khandelwal 
wrote:

>
> - The "regression" tests would be triggered by a comment "/run
> regression" from anyone in the gluster-maintainers[4] github group. To run
> full regression, maintainers need to comment "/run full regression"
>
> [4] https://github.com/orgs/gluster/teams/gluster-maintainers
>

There are a lot of people in that group that haven't been involved with
Gluster for a long time.

Maybe some of them should be "retired."

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-8.2 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 2:41 PM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/125/artifact/glusterfs-8.2.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/125/artifact/glusterfs-8.2.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-125___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers


glusterfs-8.2 has been updated in Fedora-33 and Fedora Rawhide (F34)

packages for Fedora 32 and Fedora 31 are available from
https://download.gluster.org/

I have not updated the LATEST links yet. (waiting for Debian packages.)

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-8.0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 7:41 AM Kaleb Keithley  wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 7:07 AM Patrick Matthäi 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 06.07.2020 um 03:23 schrieb jenk...@build.gluster.org:
>> > SRC:
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/121/artifact/glusterfs-8.0.tar.gz
>> > HASH:
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/121/artifact/glusterfs-8.0.sha512sum
>> >
>> > This release is made off jenkins-release-121
>> >
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have got a problem with the new libglusterd library:
>>
>> W: libglusterd0: shared-library-lacks-prerequisites
>> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterd.so.0.0.1
>> N:
>> N:The listed shared library doesn't include information about the
>> other
>> N:libraries against which it was linked.
>> N:
>> N:More specifically, "ldd foo.so" should report such other libraries.
>> In
>> N:your case, it reports "statically linked".
>> N:
>> N:The fix is to specify the libraries. One way to do so is to add
>> N:something like "-lc" to the command-line options for "ld".
>> N:
>
>
> Is this a packaging problem or a build problem? Seems like a build problem.
>
> None of the other gluster shlibs on debian have this problem, and they
> aren't linked with -lc, so that seems like a red herring.
>
> And FWIW it doesn't occur on the Fedora libglusterd.so.0.0.1.
>

 I'm not convinced this is a problem.

I can easily contrive a shlib that has no external references. ldd on such
a shlib tells me it's "statically linked" on both Fedora and Ubuntu.

And that's what libglusterd is, a shlib with no external references.

I can add -lc, but if there are no references to libc functions, then why?
Please cite a reference that shows this is required?

Fedora's autoconf/automake/libtool has always behaved slightly differently
than Debian/Ubuntu. Fedora seems to cache and use things that Debian
doesn't. It's been a PITA sometimes figuring out why a Makefile.am that
works on Fedora doesn't work, or works differently on Debian.

I might even argue that Debian/Ubuntu is working correctly in this case and
it's Fedora that is broken.

Other libraries, e.g. libc, that don't have any external references, appear
to link with /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. Adding this makes the ldd output
look more "normal."

Again, please file an issue in the github issue tracker.

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-8.0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 7:07 AM Patrick Matthäi 
wrote:

>
>
> Am 06.07.2020 um 03:23 schrieb jenk...@build.gluster.org:
> > SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/121/artifact/glusterfs-8.0.tar.gz
> > HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/121/artifact/glusterfs-8.0.sha512sum
> >
> > This release is made off jenkins-release-121
> >
>
> Hi,
> I have got a problem with the new libglusterd library:
>
> W: libglusterd0: shared-library-lacks-prerequisites
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterd.so.0.0.1
> N:
> N:The listed shared library doesn't include information about the other
> N:libraries against which it was linked.
> N:
> N:More specifically, "ldd foo.so" should report such other libraries.
> In
> N:your case, it reports "statically linked".
> N:
> N:The fix is to specify the libraries. One way to do so is to add
> N:something like "-lc" to the command-line options for "ld".
> N:


Is this a packaging problem or a build problem? Seems like a build problem.

None of the other gluster shlibs on debian have this problem, and they
aren't linked with -lc, so that seems like a red herring.

And it doesn't occur on the Fedora libglusterd.so.0.0.1.

Please open an issue at https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.9 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

why no build for centos8 ?

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:45 AM Niels de Vos  wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:33:13AM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote:
> > SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/118/artifact/glusterfs-6.9.tar.gz
> > HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/118/artifact/glusterfs-6.9.sha512sum
>
> Packages for CentOS 6 & 7 are available for testing. Please let us know
> if they can be marked for release to the CentOS mirrors.
>
>   # yum install centos-release-gluster6
>   # yum --enablerepo=centos-gluster6-test install glusterfs-server
>
> Thanks,
> Niels
> ___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-7.4 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:13 PM Niels de Vos  wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:52:25PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote:
> > SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/115/artifact/glusterfs-7.4.tar.gz
> > HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/115/artifact/glusterfs-7.4.sha512sum
>
> Packages for CentOS 6 & 7 have been built and should become available in
> the testing repositories any time now. Please try them out and let us
> know if the packages can be published for our users.
>

CentOS 8 too, should be on buildlogs shortly.

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change gNFS status

[Kaleb Keithley]

Independent of anything else—

Maintain it. Send patches to gerrit. Get the requisite +2 reviews on the
patches. Amar still has commit privs AFAIK; he can merge anything that gets
two votes.

It's open source meritocracy.

If there's real support for it then it makes a stronger case for adding it
back to the community packages.

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:14 PM Kaleb Keithley  wrote:

> I personally wouldn't call three years ago — when we started to deprecate
> it, in glusterfs-3.9 — a recent change.
>
> As a community the decision was made to move to NFS-Ganesha as the
> preferred NFS solution, but it was agreed to keep the old code in the tree
> for those who wanted it. There have been plans to drop it from the
> community packages for most of those three years, but we didn't follow
> through across the board until fairly recently. Perhaps the most telling
> piece of data is that it's been gone from the packages in the CentOS
> Storage SIG in glusterfs-4.0, -4.1, -5, -6, and -7 with no complaints ever,
> that I can recall.
>
> Ganesha is a preferable solution because it supports NFSv4, NFSv4.1,
> NFSv4.2, and pNFS, in addition to legacy NFSv3. More importantly, it is
> actively developed, maintained, and supported, both in the community and
> commercially. There are several vendors selling it, or support for it; and
> there are community packages for it for all the same distributions that
> Gluster packages are available for.
>
> Out in the world, the default these days is NFSv4. Specifically v4.2 or
> v4.1 depending on how recent your linux kernel is. In the linux kernel,
> client mounts start negotiating for v4.2 and work down to v4.1, v4.0, and
> only as a last resort v3. NFSv3 client support in the linux kernel largely
> exists at this point only because of the large number of legacy servers
> still running that can't do anything higher than v3. The linux NFS
> developers would drop the v3 support in a heartbeat if they could.
>
> IMO, providing it, and calling it maintained, only encourages people to
> keep using a dead end solution. Anyone in favor of bringing back NFSv2,
> SSHv1, or X10R4? No? I didn't think so.
>
> The recent issue[1] where someone built gnfs in glusterfs-7.0 on CentOS7
> strongly suggests to me that gnfs is not actually working well. Three years
> of no maintenance seems to have taken its toll.
>
> Other people are more than welcome to build their own packages from the
> src.rpms and/or tarballs that are available from gluster — and support
> them. It's still in the source and there are no plans to remove it. (Unlike
> most of the other deprecated features which were recently removed in
> glusterfs-7.)
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/764
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:31 AM Amar Tumballi  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As per the discussion on https://review.gluster.org/23645, recently we
>> changed the status of gNFS (gluster's native NFSv3 support) feature to
>> 'Depricated / Orphan' state. (ref:
>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/MAINTAINERS#L185..L189).
>> With this email, I am proposing to change the status again to 'Odd Fixes'
>> (ref: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/MAINTAINERS#L22)
>>
>> TL;DR;
>>
>> I understand the current maintainers are not able to focus on maintaining
>> it as the focus of the project, as earlier described, is keeping
>> NFS-Ganesha based integration with glusterfs. But, I am volunteering along
>> with Xie Changlong (currently working at Chinamobile), to keep the feature
>> running as it used to in previous versions. Hence the status of 'Odd
>> Fixes'.
>>
>> Before sending the patch to make these changes, I am proposing it here
>> now, as gNFS is not even shipped with latest glusterfs-7.0 releases. I have
>> heard from some users that it was working great for them with earlier
>> releases, as all they wanted was NFS v3 support, and not much of features
>> from gNFS. Also note that, even though the packages are not built, none of
>> the regression tests using gNFS are stopped with latest master, so it is
>> working same from at least last 2 years.
>>
>> I request the package maintainers to please add '--with gnfs' (or
>> --enable-gnfs) back to their release script through this email, so those
>> users wanting to use gNFS happily can continue to use it. Also points to
>> users/admins is that, the status is 'Odd Fixes', so don't expect any
>> 'enhancements' on the features provided by gNFS.
>>
>> Happy to hear feedback, if any.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Amar
>>
>> ___
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers@gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change gNFS status

[Kaleb Keithley]

I personally wouldn't call three years ago — when we started to deprecate
it, in glusterfs-3.9 — a recent change.

As a community the decision was made to move to NFS-Ganesha as the
preferred NFS solution, but it was agreed to keep the old code in the tree
for those who wanted it. There have been plans to drop it from the
community packages for most of those three years, but we didn't follow
through across the board until fairly recently. Perhaps the most telling
piece of data is that it's been gone from the packages in the CentOS
Storage SIG in glusterfs-4.0, -4.1, -5, -6, and -7 with no complaints ever,
that I can recall.

Ganesha is a preferable solution because it supports NFSv4, NFSv4.1,
NFSv4.2, and pNFS, in addition to legacy NFSv3. More importantly, it is
actively developed, maintained, and supported, both in the community and
commercially. There are several vendors selling it, or support for it; and
there are community packages for it for all the same distributions that
Gluster packages are available for.

Out in the world, the default these days is NFSv4. Specifically v4.2 or
v4.1 depending on how recent your linux kernel is. In the linux kernel,
client mounts start negotiating for v4.2 and work down to v4.1, v4.0, and
only as a last resort v3. NFSv3 client support in the linux kernel largely
exists at this point only because of the large number of legacy servers
still running that can't do anything higher than v3. The linux NFS
developers would drop the v3 support in a heartbeat if they could.

IMO, providing it, and calling it maintained, only encourages people to
keep using a dead end solution. Anyone in favor of bringing back NFSv2,
SSHv1, or X10R4? No? I didn't think so.

The recent issue[1] where someone built gnfs in glusterfs-7.0 on CentOS7
strongly suggests to me that gnfs is not actually working well. Three years
of no maintenance seems to have taken its toll.

Other people are more than welcome to build their own packages from the
src.rpms and/or tarballs that are available from gluster — and support
them. It's still in the source and there are no plans to remove it. (Unlike
most of the other deprecated features which were recently removed in
glusterfs-7.)



[1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/764

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:31 AM Amar Tumballi  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> As per the discussion on https://review.gluster.org/23645, recently we
> changed the status of gNFS (gluster's native NFSv3 support) feature to
> 'Depricated / Orphan' state. (ref:
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/MAINTAINERS#L185..L189).
> With this email, I am proposing to change the status again to 'Odd Fixes'
> (ref: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/MAINTAINERS#L22)
>
> TL;DR;
>
> I understand the current maintainers are not able to focus on maintaining
> it as the focus of the project, as earlier described, is keeping
> NFS-Ganesha based integration with glusterfs. But, I am volunteering along
> with Xie Changlong (currently working at Chinamobile), to keep the feature
> running as it used to in previous versions. Hence the status of 'Odd
> Fixes'.
>
> Before sending the patch to make these changes, I am proposing it here
> now, as gNFS is not even shipped with latest glusterfs-7.0 releases. I have
> heard from some users that it was working great for them with earlier
> releases, as all they wanted was NFS v3 support, and not much of features
> from gNFS. Also note that, even though the packages are not built, none of
> the regression tests using gNFS are stopped with latest master, so it is
> working same from at least last 2 years.
>
> I request the package maintainers to please add '--with gnfs' (or
> --enable-gnfs) back to their release script through this email, so those
> users wanting to use gNFS happily can continue to use it. Also points to
> users/admins is that, the status is 'Odd Fixes', so don't expect any
> 'enhancements' on the features provided by gNFS.
>
> Happy to hear feedback, if any.
>
> Regards,
> Amar
>
> ___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.6 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

glusterfs-6.6 is in Fedora 30.  It will be in Updates-Testing shortly, and
will be in Updates following a nominal testing period.

packages for Fedora 29, 31, and 32/rawhide, and el-8 are on
download.gluster.org in the usual place.

The .../glusterfs/6/LATEST symlink has been moved to .../glusterfs/6/6.6

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:48 PM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/104/artifact/glusterfs-6.6.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/104/artifact/glusterfs-6.6.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-104___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-7.0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 1:44 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/103/artifact/glusterfs-7.0.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/103/artifact/glusterfs-7.0.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-103___
>

7.0 packagers are built in Fedora-31 and rawhide (f32). In f31 they are in
the -Testing repo for a nominal testing period, after which they will move
to the -Updates repo.

Packages for Fedora-30 and CentOS 8 and RHEL 8 are at [1].

Packages for Debian are landing at [1]. Packages for Ubuntu and SUSE are
landing in Launchpad and OBS. See the respective README files at [1] for
more details.

The top-level LATEST symlink has been moved to point at 7/7.0.

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/7/7.0/
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.10 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

packages for Fedora 29 are in Fedora 29.

Packages for Fedora 30, 31, and 32, and RHEL/CentOS 8 are at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.10/


On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 7:24 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/102/artifact/glusterfs-5.10.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/102/artifact/glusterfs-5.10.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-102___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-7.0rc3 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

glusterfs-7.0rc3 is in Fedora-31 and Fedora-32/Rawhide.

Packages for CentOS 7 are built and should be on
https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-7/  by
tomorrow.

Packages for Fedora-29, Fedora-30, and RHEL/CentOS 8 are on
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/7.0rc3/

Shwetha and/or Sheetal will advise when Debian packages are available.


On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 5:00 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/101/artifact/glusterfs-7.0rc3.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/101/artifact/glusterfs-7.0rc3.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-101___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-7.0rc1 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 1:51 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/100/artifact/glusterfs-7.0rc1.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/100/artifact/glusterfs-7.0rc1.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-100___


Packages are built in Fedora 32 (rawhide) and Fedora 31 (Branched).

Packages for Fedora 29 and 30, and RHEL 8 are available at [1].

Note: glusterfs-gnfs is no longer being built for _any_ glusterfs-7 package
set.  This has been the case already in the CentOS Storage SIG since at
least glusterfs-6.0.  glusterfs-gnfs was deprecated circa glusterfs-4.11,
and there have been various announcements that gnfs would no longer be
packaged starting with glusterfs-6.

glusterfs-gnfs packages were still being built by accident. This is finally
being fixed for glusterfs-7.

People who want NFS should use NFS-Ganesha. Source for the gnfs xlator is
still in the tree; anyone who really wants to use gnfs instead of
NFS-Ganesha is welcome to build their own packages from source, or from the
RPM src.rpm  and Debian .dsc files that can be found in the repos along
with the rest of the package files.

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/7.0rc1/
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.7 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 8:38 AM Niels de Vos  wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:15:53AM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote:
> > SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/93/artifact/glusterfs-5.7.tar.gz
> > HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/93/artifact/glusterfs-5.7.sha512sum
>
> glupy is not part of the tarball. Is it excluded intentionally?
>
> I thought that we would keep it in the current maintained releases and
> not drop any xlators...
>


The release jobs run on centos boxes. EPEL and python3 from EPEL were added
to the centos boxes in gluster's jenkins. The 5.7 configure.ac needs some
changes in order to handle this new state.

AFAICT, packages cannot be built for 5.7.

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.2 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:53 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/89/artifact/glusterfs-6.2.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/89/artifact/glusterfs-6.2.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-89___
>

Packages are available in the testing repository of the CentOS Storage
SIG. Please try them out and let us know if they are working as
expected.

  # yum install centos-release-gluster6
  # yum --enablerepo=centos-gluster6-test install glusterfs-server

Thanks,

>
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.6 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

glusterfs-5.6 packages for:

* Fedora 29 will be in the Fedora Updates-Testing repo soon. Use `dnf` to
install. Fedora packages will move to the Fedora Updates repo after a
nominal testing period. Fedora 28, Fedora 30, and Fedora 31/rawhide are at
[1].

* RHEL 8 Beta are at [1].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Debian buster/10 are at [1] (arm64 packages coming
soon.)

* Xenial/16.04, Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on
Launchpad at [2].

* SUSE SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, and Leap15 will be on OpenSUSE Build
Service at [3] soon.

I have updated the .../5/LATEST symlink.

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5
[2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-5
[3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 7:56 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/85/artifact/glusterfs-5.6.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/85/artifact/glusterfs-5.6.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-85___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:13 AM Shyam Ranganathan 
wrote:

> On 3/21/19 3:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > glusterfs-6.0 packages for:
> >
> > * CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing at [1]. Please try
> > them out and report test results on this list. After someone reports
> > that they have tested them then they will be tagged for release.
>
> Tested the CentOS bits, things work as expected and can be marked for a
> release.
>
> Also, can move the LATEST in d.g.o to point to 6.0, as relase notes and
> upgrade guides are in place, and release announcement would follow
> sometime later today.
>

CentOS packages have been tagged for release.

The top-level LATEST symlink has been moved to -> .../6/6.0

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:25 PM Shyam Ranganathan 
wrote:

> On 3/19/19 11:28 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > It seems I neglected to tag the packages for testing.
> >
> > I've fixed that. Hopefully the packages land on buildlogs.centos.org
> > <http://buildlogs.centos.org> soon.
>
> Tested, passed and can be released.
>

packages are tagged for release. IIRC they should be on the mirrors by
Monday.
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

glusterfs-6.0 packages for:

* CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing at [1]. Please try them
out and report test results on this list. After someone reports that they
have tested them then they will be tagged for release.

* Fedora 30 and Fedora 31/rawhide are in the Fedora Updates-Testing and
rawhide repos. Use `dnf` to install. Fedora packages will move to the
Fedora Updates repo after a nominal testing period. Fedora 28 and Fedora 29
are at [2].

* RHEL 8 Beta are at [2].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Debian buster/10 are at [2] (arm64 packages coming
soon.)

* Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on Launchpad at [3].

* SUSE SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, and Leap15.1 are on OpenSUSE Build
Service at [4].

I have _NOT_ updated the top-level LATEST symlink. I will wait for the
public announcement before changing it from 5 to 6.

[1]
https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/[67]/storage/{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64}/gluster-6
[2] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/6

[3] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-6

[4] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:38 PM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-83___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

preliminary status update––

glusterfs-6.0 packages for:

* CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing at [1] and [2].  Please
try them out and report test results on this list.

* Fedora 30 and 31 are in the Fedora Updates-Testing or rawhide repo. Use
`dnf` to install. Fedora packages will move to the Fedora Updates repo
after a nominal testing period. Fedora 28 and Fedora 29 are at [3].

* RHEL 8 Beta are at [3].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Debian buster/10 are at [3] (arm64 packages coming
soon.)

Ubuntu and SUSE packages are still in progress.

I have _NOT_ updated the .../LATEST symlinks yet.

[1] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-6/
[2] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/6/storage/x86_64/gluster-6/
[3] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/6



On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:38 PM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-83___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

debuginfo packages from the rebuild are at
https://build.opensuse.org/package/binaries/home:glusterfs:SLES15-5/GlusterFS-5.5/SLE_15
.

They're not yet in the repo at
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/glusterfs:/SLES15-5/SLE_15/x86_64/.
I guess we're waiting for OBS to "publish" them.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:15 AM Artem Russakovskii 
wrote:

> Hi Kaleb,
>
> Should we expect to see debuginfo packages here
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/glusterfs:/Leap15-5/openSUSE_Leap_15.0/x86_64/
> or somewhere else?
>
> Sincerely,
> Artem
>
> --
> Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
> <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
> beerpla.net | +ArtemRussakovskii
> <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
> <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:44 PM Kaleb Keithley 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:25 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
>> atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> How can we get debug info package for suse? This helps us to debug a
>>> crash on 5.5
>>>
>>
>> I have enabled debuginfo for the SUSE packages. Most seem to be
>> rebuilding. If you don't find the debuginfo for the SUSE you need ping me
>> and I'll kick it.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 19 Mar, 2019, 8:30 PM Shyam Ranganathan, 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>>>> > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>>>> > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>>>> >
>>>> >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>>>> >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>>>>
>>>> The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
>>>> try to go and use the build artifacts from
>>>> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
>>>> repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.
>>>>
>>>> Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
>>>> be tested and reported back for publishing?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shyam
>>>> ___
>>>> maintainers mailing list
>>>> maintainers@gluster.org
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>>
>>>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:25 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Team,
>
> How can we get debug info package for suse? This helps us to debug a crash
> on 5.5
>

I have enabled debuginfo for the SUSE packages. Most seem to be rebuilding.
If you don't find the debuginfo for the SUSE you need ping me and I'll kick
it.


>
>
> On Tue, 19 Mar, 2019, 8:30 PM Shyam Ranganathan, 
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>> > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>> > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>> >
>> >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>> >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>>
>> The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
>> try to go and use the build artifacts from
>> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
>> repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.
>>
>> Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
>> be tested and reported back for publishing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shyam
>> ___
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers@gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

It seems I neglected to tag the packages for testing.

I've fixed that. Hopefully the packages land on buildlogs.centos.org soon.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:58 AM Shyam Ranganathan 
wrote:

> On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> >
> >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
> >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>
> The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
> try to go and use the build artifacts from
> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
> repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.
>
> Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
> be tested and reported back for publishing?
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
Please try them out and report test results on this list.

  # yum install centos-release-gluster
  # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server

glusterfs-5.5 packages for:

* Fedora 29 are in the Fedora Updates-Testing repo. Use `dnf` to install.
Fedora packages will move to the Fedora Updates repo after a nominal
testing period. Fedora 28, Fedora 30, and Fedora 31/rawhide are at [1].

* RHEL 8 Beta are at [1].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Debian buster/10 are on download.gluster.org at [1]
(arm64 packages coming soon.)

* Xenial/16.04, Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on
Launchpad at [2].

* SUSE SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, and Leap15 will be on OpenSUSE Build
Service at [3] soon.

I have updated all the .../LATEST symlinks.

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5
[2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-5
[3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 9:24 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/82/artifact/glusterfs-5.5.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/82/artifact/glusterfs-5.5.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-82___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc1 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

GlusterFS 6.0rc1 is built in Fedora 30 and Fedora 31/rawhide.

Packages for Fedora 29, RHEL 8, and Debian 9/stretch and Debian 10/buster
are at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/6.0rc1/

Packages are signed. The public key is at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/6/rsa.pub


On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:25 PM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-81___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

The v5.4 tag was made and a release job was run which gave us
https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz.
If the v5.4 tag is moved then there's a logical disconnect between the tag
and _that_ tar file, or more accurately the files in that tar file.

Shyam and I discussed the merits of releasing v5.5 versus respinning builds
with patches.  Respinning builds with patches isn't uncommon. The
difference in the amount of work between one or the other is negligible. In
the end Shyam (mainly) decided to go with respinning with patches because a
full up "release" for him is a lot more work. (And we both have other
$dayjob things we need to be working on instead of endlessly spinning
releases and packages.)


On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:52 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:

> I am totally fine with v5.5, my suggestion for moving the tag was if we
> consider calling 5.4 with these two patches.
>
> Calling the release as 5.5 is totally OK, and we call it out specifically
> in our version numbering scheme, as if something is very serious, we can
> break 'release date' train.
>
> -Amar
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:13 PM Kaleb Keithley 
> wrote:
>
>> The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't move it.
>>
>> If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue that's fine.
>>
>> The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
>> atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4'
>>> points to the correct commit?
>>>
>>> On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Niels, Kaleb,
>>>>
>>>> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,
>>>>
>>>> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
>>>> core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
>>>>
>>>> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
>>>> dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
>>>>
>>>> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
>>>> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
>>>> respin 5.4.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
>>>> packaging.
>>>>
>>>> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
>>>> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
>>>> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing
>>>> content.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shyam
>>>>
>>>> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>>>> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>>> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> SRC:
>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>>>> >>> HASH:
>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>>>> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>>>> >>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>>>> >
>>>> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or
>>>> revert
>>>> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
>>>> >
>>>> > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
>>>> >
>>>> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
>>>> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Shyam
>>>> >
>>>> > [1] Patch causing regression:
>>>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
>>>> >
>>>> > [2] Proposed fix on master:
>>>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
>>>> > ___
>>>> > maintainers mailing list
>>>> > maintainers@gluster.org
>>>> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>> >
>>>> ___
>>>> maintainers mailing list
>>>> maintainers@gluster.org
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>>
>>> ___
>>> maintainers mailing list
>>> maintainers@gluster.org
>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Amar Tumballi (amarts)
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't move it.

If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue that's fine.

The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.


On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:

> We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points
> to the correct commit?
>
> On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, 
> wrote:
>
>> Niels, Kaleb,
>>
>> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,
>>
>> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
>> core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
>>
>> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
>> dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
>>
>> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
>> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
>> respin 5.4.
>>
>> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
>> packaging.
>>
>> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.
>>
>> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
>> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
>> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shyam
>>
>> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org
>> wrote:
>> >>> SRC:
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>> >>> HASH:
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>> >>
>> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>> >>
>> >>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>> >>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>> >
>> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
>> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
>> >
>> > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
>> >
>> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
>> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Shyam
>> >
>> > [1] Patch causing regression:
>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
>> >
>> > [2] Proposed fix on master:
>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
>> > ___
>> > maintainers mailing list
>> > maintainers@gluster.org
>> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>> >
>> ___
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers@gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
> ___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

glusterfs-5.4 packages for:

* Fedora 29 are in the Fedora Updates-Testing repo. Use `dnf` to install.
Fedora packages will move to the Fedora Updates repo after a nominal
testing period. Fedora 28 and Fedora 30 packages are at [1].

* RHEL 8 Beta are at [1].

* Debian Stretch/9 are on download.gluster.org at [1] (arm64 packages
coming soon.) Debian Buster/Sid/10 packages will land after an issue with
the Buster mirrors is resolved.

* Xenial/16.04, Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on
Launchpad at [2].

* SUSE SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, and Leap15 will be on OpenSUSE Build
Service at [3] soon.

I have updated all the .../LATEST symlinks.

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5
[2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-5
[3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs



On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:47 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-80___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

GlusterFS 6.0rc0 is built in Fedora 30 and Fedora 31/rawhide.

Packages for Fedora 29, RHEL 8, RHEL 7, and RHEL 6* and Debian 9/stretch
and Debian 10/buster are at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/6.0rc0/

Packages are signed. The public key is at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/6/rsa.pub

* RHEL 6 is client-side only. Fedora 29, RHEL 7, and RHEL 6 RPMs are Fedora
Koji scratch builds. RHEL 7 and RHEL 6 RPMs are provided here for
convenience only, and are independent of the RPMs in the CentOS Storage SIG.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:16 AM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/79/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc0.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/79/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc0.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-79___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.0rc0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

RCs have always landed at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/

RC0  is at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/6.0rc0/glusterfs-6.0rc0.tar.gz

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:52 AM Niels de Vos  wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 04:15:39AM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote:
> > SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/79/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc0.tar.gz
> > HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/79/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc0.sha512sum
>
> When will the tarball land under
> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/6 ?
>
> I'll try to get the builds done today or over the weekend. The CentOS
> team will need to setup the sync from the buildsystem to the standard
> repository locations once the builds are available. Once its done, I'll
> let everyone know.
>
> Niels
> ___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] Release 5.4: Earlier than Mar-10th

[Kaleb Keithley]

packages will get built one way or another. :-)

I've mentioned this on numerous occasions but it seems to largely fall on
deaf ears: we need other people to step up and take over some of the burden
of building community packages.  Or we need to cut back on the number of
community packages that we build.

Because $dayjob

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 9:55 AM Shyam Ranganathan 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There have been several crashes and issues reported by users on the
> latest 5.3 release. Around 10 patches have been merged since 5.3 and we
> have a few more addressing the blockers against 5.4 [1].
>
> The original date was March 10th, but we would like to accelerate a 5.4
> release to earlier this month, once all critical blockers are fixed.
>
> Hence there are 3 asks in this mail,
>
> 1) Packaging team, would it be possible to accommodate an 5.4 release
> around mid-next week (RC0 for rel-6 is also on the same week)? Assuming
> we get the required fixes by then.
>
> 2) Maintainers, what other issues need to be tracked as blockers? Please
> add them to [1].
>
> 3) Current blocker status reads as follows:
> - Bug 1651246 - Failed to dispatch handler
>   - This shows 2 patches that are merged, but there is no patch that
> claims this is "Fixed" hence bug is still in POST state. What other
> fixes are we expecting on this?
>   - @Milind request you to update the status
>
> - Bug 1671556 - glusterfs FUSE client crashing every few days with
> 'Failed to dispatch handler'
>   - Awaiting fixes for identified issues
>   - @Nithya what would be the target date?
>
> - Bug 1671603 - flooding of "dict is NULL" logging & crash of client
> process
>   - Awaiting a fix, what is the potential target date for the same?
>   - We also need the bug assigned to a person
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
> [1] Release 5.4 tracker:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-5.4
> ___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.3 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

glusterfs-5.3 packages for:

* Fedora 29 and 30/rawhide are in the Fedora Updates-Testing or Rawhide
repo. Use `dnf` to install. Fedora packages will move to the Fedora
Updates repo after a nominal testing period. Fedora 28 packages are at [1].

* RHEL 8 Beta are at [1].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Buster/10(Sid) are on download.gluster.org at [1]
(arm64 packages coming soon.)

* Xenial/16.04, Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on
Launchpad at [2].

* SUSE SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, and Leap15 are on OpenSUSE Build
Service at [3].

I have updated all the .../LATEST symlinks.

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5
[2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-5
[3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs


On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:48 PM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/77/artifact/glusterfs-5.3.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/77/artifact/glusterfs-5.3.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-77___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-4.1.7 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

glusterfs-4.1.7 packages for:

* Fedora 28 are in the Fedora Updates-Testing or Rawhide
repo. Use `dnf` to install. Fedora packages will move to the Fedora
Updates repo after a nominal testing period. Fedora 29 and 30 packages
are at [1].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Buster/10(Sid) are on download.gluster.org at [1]
(arm64 packages coming soon.)

* Xenial/16.04, Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on
Launchpad at [2].

* SUSE SLES12SP3, SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, Leap15, and Leap42.3
are on OpenSUSE Build
Service at [3].

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/
4.1
[2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-
4.1
[3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs


On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:50 PM  wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/78/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.7.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/78/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.7.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-78___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-4.0.0rc0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

- Original Message -
> From: jenk...@build.gluster.org
> 
> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/40/artifact/glusterfs-4.0.0rc0.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/40/artifact/glusterfs-4.0.0rc0.sha512sum

In addition to the CentOS packages in the CentOS Storage SIG, packages for 
Fedora 27 and Fedora 28/rawhide are at [1].

Packages for Debian stretch/9 and buster/10 are coming soon. They will also be 
at [1].

GlusterFS 4.0 packages, including these 4.0RC0 packages, are signed with a new 
signing key. The public key is at [2].

Packages for glusterd2 will be added later.


[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/4.0rc0/
[2] 
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/4.0rc0/rsa.pub
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.10.8 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

- Original Message -
> From: "Shyam Ranganathan" 
> To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" , packag...@gluster.org, 
> maintainers@gluster.org
> Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2017 2:09:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.10.8 released
> 
> On 11/30/2017 02:28 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> >> The .../LTM-3.10 -> .../3.10/3.10.8 and .../3.10/LATEST ->
> >> .../3.10/3.10.8 symlinks have been updated
> >>
> >> [1]https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.10
> >> [2]https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-3.10
> >> [3]https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs
> >> [4]https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/{6,7}/storage/$arch/gluster-3.10
> > [5]http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/packages/glusterfs/3.10.8/
> 
> 
> Tested CentOS 7 with the provided RPMs and ran posix-compliance tests.
> RPMs install fine and test cases pass. This is ready to be published, I
> will follow this by a release announcement.
> 

3.10.8 rpms have been tagged for release in the CentOS Storage SIG. Thanks for 
taking the time to test.

--

Kaleb
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.13.0 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

- Original Message -
> From: jenk...@build.gluster.org
> To: packag...@gluster.org, maintainers@gluster.org
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 7:21:14 PM
> Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.13.0 released
> 
> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/24/artifact/glusterfs-3.13.0.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/24/artifact/glusterfs-3.13.0.sha512sum
> 
> This release is made off jenkins-release-24


Packages for:

* Fedora 28 are in the Fedora Updates or Updates-Testing repo. Use `dnf` to 
install. Fedora 25, 26, and 27 are on download.gluster.org at [1]

* Debian amd64 Jessie/8, Stretch/9, and Buster(Sid)/10 are on 
download.gluster.org at [1] (arm64 are coming)

* Ubuntu Xenial/16.04, Zesty/17.04, Artful/17.10, and Bionic/18.04 are on 
Launchpad at [2]

* SuSE SLES12SP3, Leap42.3, and Tumbleweed are on OpenSuSE Build Service at [3].

* RHEL/CentOS el6 and el7 are in CentOS Storage built and tagged, but we are 
waiting for the 3.13. repos to be created. In the mean time you can download 
from [6]. Please test and give feedback on #gluster-devel on freenode or the 
gluster-devel mailing list so they can be moved to the staging area.

The .../LATEST -> .../3.13/3.13.0 symlink has been updated. The .../STM-3.13 -> 
.../3.13/3.13.0 and .../3.13/LATEST -> .../3.13/3.13.0 symlinks have been 
created.

Note: GlusterFS-3.13.x packages (.rpms and .debs) on download.gluster.org are 
signed with a new signing key, at [5].



[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.13/
[2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-3.13
[3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs
[4] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/{6,7}/storage/$arch/gluster-3.13
[5] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.13/rsa.pub
[6] https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=256842 and 
https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=256831


___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.10.5 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

- Original Message -
> From: "Kaleb Keithley" <kkeit...@redhat.com>
> To: packag...@gluster.org, maintainers@gluster.org
> Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2017 8:43:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.10.5 released
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> > 
> > 
> > SRC:
> > http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.10.5.tar.gz
> > 
> > This release is made off v3.10.5
> > 
> > -- Gluster Build System
> > ___
> 
> 
> Gluster Community Packages for:
> 
> * Fedora 25 & 26 are available in the Fedora Updates-Testing repos. After a
> nominal testing period they will move to the Fedora Updates repos. Use `dnf`
> to install.
> 
> * Fedora 27 (rawhide) are available at [1].
> 
> * Debian jessie/8, stretch/9, and buster/10 are available at [1].
> 
> * Ubuntu trusty/14.04, xenial/16.04, zesty/16.10, and artful/17.04 are in
> Launchpad at [2].

Correction: trusty/14.04, xenial/16.04, zesty/17.04, and artful/17.10...

> 
> * SuSE SLES12, Leap42.2, and Leap42.3 OpenSuSE Build Service at [3].
> 
> * RHEL and CentOS in CentOS Storage SIG staging area at [4]. After someone
> tests them and let's Niels know they will move to the mirror (at [5]) where
> you can install using `yum` after installing the Storage SIG package.
> 
> *** Reminder ***: Since GlusterFS 3.9 the Fedora RPM and Debian .deb public
> signing key is, e.g. for 3.9, at
> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.9/rsa.pub. If you have
> an old /etc/yum.repos.d/glusterfs-fedora.repo file with a link to
> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/rsa.pub then you
> need to fix your .repo file to point to the correct location. This is a
> safety feature to help prevent unintended updates, e.g., from 3.10 to 3.11.
> 
> [1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.10/3.10.5/
> [2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster
> [3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs
> [4] http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10
> [5]
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/storage/$basearch/gluster-3.10/
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
> 
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.10.5 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

- Original Message -
> 
> 
> SRC:
> http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.10.5.tar.gz
> 
> This release is made off v3.10.5
> 
> -- Gluster Build System
> ___


Gluster Community Packages for:

* Fedora 25 & 26 are available in the Fedora Updates-Testing repos. After a 
nominal testing period they will move to the Fedora Updates repos. Use `dnf` to 
install.

* Fedora 27 (rawhide) are available at [1].

* Debian jessie/8, stretch/9, and buster/10 are available at [1].

* Ubuntu trusty/14.04, xenial/16.04, zesty/16.10, and artful/17.04 are in 
Launchpad at [2].

* SuSE SLES12, Leap42.2, and Leap42.3 OpenSuSE Build Service at [3].

* RHEL and CentOS in CentOS Storage SIG staging area at [4]. After someone 
tests them and let's Niels know they will move to the mirror (at [5]) where you 
can install using `yum` after installing the Storage SIG package.

*** Reminder ***: Since GlusterFS 3.9 the Fedora RPM and Debian .deb public 
signing key is, e.g. for 3.9, at 
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.9/rsa.pub. If you have an 
old /etc/yum.repos.d/glusterfs-fedora.repo file with a link to 
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/rsa.pub then you need 
to fix your .repo file to point to the correct location. This is a safety 
feature to help prevent unintended updates, e.g., from 3.10 to 3.11.

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.10/3.10.5/
[2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster
[3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs
[4] http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10
[5] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/storage/$basearch/gluster-3.10/



___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.11.2 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

And all the symlinks:

  .../LATEST -> .../3.11/3.11.2
  .../STM-3.11 -> .../3.11/3.11.2
  .../3.11/LATEST -> .../3.11/3.11.2

have been updated



- Original Message -
> From: "Kaleb Keithley" <kkeit...@redhat.com>
> To: maintainers@gluster.org, packag...@gluster.org
> Cc: kaus...@redhat.com
> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 6:51:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.11.2 released
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Gluster Build System" <jenk...@build.gluster.org>
> > To: kaus...@redhat.com, maintainers@gluster.org, packag...@gluster.org
> > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 11:46:23 AM
> > Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.11.2 released
> > 
> 
> Packages for Fedora 27 (rawhide) are in the Updates repo now
> Packages for Fedora 26 and Fedora 25 are at [1]
> Packages for Debian Jessie/8, Stretch/9, and Buster/10 are at [1]
> Packages For SuSE SLES12 and Leap42.x are at [2]
> Packages for Ubuntu Xenial/16.04, Zesty/17.04, and Artful/17.10 are at [3].
> Yakkety/16.10 reached EOL recently and Launchpad no longer builds for
> Yakeety.
> 
> I'll initiate builds for CentOS if Niels hasn't already done so by the time I
> check.
> 
> [1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.11/3.11.2/
> [2] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs
> [3] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-3.11
> ___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
> 
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.11.2 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

- Original Message -
> From: "Gluster Build System" 
> To: kaus...@redhat.com, maintainers@gluster.org, packag...@gluster.org
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 11:46:23 AM
> Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.11.2 released
> 

Packages for Fedora 27 (rawhide) are in the Updates repo now
Packages for Fedora 26 and Fedora 25 are at [1]
Packages for Debian Jessie/8, Stretch/9, and Buster/10 are at [1]
Packages For SuSE SLES12 and Leap42.x are at [2]
Packages for Ubuntu Xenial/16.04, Zesty/17.04, and Artful/17.10 are at [3]. 
Yakkety/16.10 reached EOL recently and Launchpad no longer builds for Yakeety.

I'll initiate builds for CentOS if Niels hasn't already done so by the time I 
check.

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.11/3.11.2/
[2] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs
[3] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-3.11
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.8.12 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

> From: "Gluster Build System" 
> 
> 
> 
> SRC:
> http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.8.12.tar.gz
> 
> This release is made off jenkins-release-194
> 

Packages for Fedora-24 are in the Fedora-24 Updates-Testing repo and will move 
to Updates repo after a nominal testing period.

Packages for Fedora-25, 26, and 27 are on download.gluster.org.

Packages for Debian Jessie (8) and Stretch (9) are on download.gluster.org.

Packages for Ubuntu Trusty (14.04), Xenial (16.04), Yakkety (16.10), and Zesty 
(17.04) are in Launchpad PPA.

Packages for SuSE will land soon in the OpenSuSE Build Service repos.

.../LTM-3.8 and .../3.8/LATEST symlinks have been set to point to 
.../3.8/3.8.12 on download.gluster.org.

--

Kaleb


___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Moving release job off master

[Kaleb Keithley]

I have no issues with fetching the tar file from somewhere other than 
bits.gluster.org.

Remember though that besides the tar file there is also the SHA256sum that goes 
with the tar file.


- Original Message -
> From: "Nigel Babu" 
> 
> Hello folks,
> 
> I'd like to move the release job[1] off the master server. This is so that
> we're more resilient in case of Jenkins failures. I can make the tar file an
> artifact of the build and linked from the email. Is this an acceptable
> solution?
> 
> We're planning on moving the Jenkins server onto a new Centos 7 machine and
> upgrade to Jenkins 2. Solving this is important to the server move.
> 
> If there are security concerns around the build, I'm happy to have a specific
> node where builds are done.
> 
> Shyam, Kaushal, Niels, and Jiffin - as maintainers of a currently supported
> release, please chime in. I'll check in with you again if you haven't said
> anything.
> 
> Niels and Kaleb - as packagers, please let me know if this change will
> significantly impact your workflow at release time.
> 
> Please send in your thoughts by 7th April. I don't yet have a deadline on
> *when* this will be done. That will be shaped by how much this impacts
> everyone's workflow.
> 
> [1]: https://build.gluster.org/job/release/
> 
> --
> nigelb
> 
> ___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.7.18 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

Packages for Fedora 23 are queued for testing in Bodhi; will land soon in 
Updates-Testing and then Updates repos.
Packages for Fedora 24 and Fedora 25 are on download.gluster.org
Packages for Fedora 26 (rawhide) will be available soon on download.gluster.org 
pending resolution of a build issue.

Packages for RHEL/CentOS 5, 6, and 7 are on download.gluster.org, and will also 
be available soon in the CentOS Storage SIG.

Packages for Debian Wheezy/7, Jessie/8, and Stretch/9 are on 
download.gluster.org.

Packages for Ubuntu Trusty/14.04, Wily/15/10, and Xenial/16.04 are in the 
Ubuntu Launchpad PPA.

Packages for SuSE will be available soon.

The .../glusterfs/LTM-3.7 and .../glusterfs/3.7/LATEST symlinks on 
download.gluster.org have been set to 3.7.18




- Original Message -
> From: "Gluster Build System" 
> To: sbair...@redhat.com, maintainers@gluster.org, packag...@gluster.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 2:01:48 PM
> Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.7.18 released
> 
> 
> 
> SRC:
> http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.7.18.tar.gz
> 
> This release is made off jenkins-release-178
> 
> -- Gluster Build System
> ___
> packaging mailing list
> packag...@gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
> 
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.8.4 released

[Kaleb Keithley]

Fedora 23 RPMs on d.g.o.  Fedora 24, 25, 26 RPMs in Fedora 
Updates/Updates-Testing repo
Debian jessie and stretch dpkgs on d.g.o.
Ubuntu trusty, wily, and xenial dpkgs on Launchpad
SuSE RPMs coming soon to SuSE Build System

.../glusterfs/LATEST and .../glusterfs/3.8/LATEST symlinks updated on d.g.o


- Original Message -
> From: "Niels de Vos" 
> To: "Gluster Build System" 
> Cc: maintainers@gluster.org, packag...@gluster.org
> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 12:44:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.8.4 released
> 
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:40:11AM -0700, Gluster Build System wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > SRC:
> > http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.8.4.tar.gz
> 
> Release notes:
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.8/doc/release-notes/3.8.4.md
> 
> CentOS 6 and 7 packages are available from the Storage SIG:
> 
>   # yum install centos-release-gluster38
>   # yum --enablerepo=centos-gluster38-test install glusterfs-server
> 
> Please test check these for the components you maintain and care about.
> I'll announce the release later next week to the users.
> 
> Thanks,
> Niels
> 
> ___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release scheduling and lifecycle of versions

[Kaleb Keithley]

- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" 
> To: "Amye Scavarda" 
> Cc: maintainers@gluster.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:38:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release scheduling and lifecycle of 
> versions
> 
> hi,
> Some of our managers were cautioning us to use the term LTS with care as it
> means something else in ubuntu world where LTS is how they make money by
> providing support. I see that quite a few open source projects have similar
> release cadence but they don't call them LTS. They call them stable
> branches. May be it makes sense to call them stable branches and feature
> branches rather than LTS/non-LTS? Suggestions for other names is welcome. At
> least we need to clear any confusion that we are not looking to make money
> out of the LTS branches :-D. Different name for the branches is preferable.

I'm certainly not an authority, but Ubuntu.com (versus Canonical.com) says that 
even "regular releases" are _supported_ for nine months.

Versus the LTS releases, which are also _supported_, for five years.

It's reasonably clear to me that when Ubuntu.com says its releases are 
_supported_, they're talking about there being a steady stream of bug fixes and 
updates over the life of the release. And if someone wants real support – like 
the kind that Red Hat sells for RHEL and RHGS – they'd need to write a cheque 
to Canonical.
 
But we don't need to guess, we can just ask our resident legal counsel, who 
will tell us if there are any implications to calling our planned long life 
cycle release of Community GlusterFS an "LTS release."

Off hand I wouldn't expect there to be, but––

Richard (and Ric) what, if any, implications are there? Should we pick a 
different name?

--

Kaleb

___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.8.0 released

[Kaleb KEITHLEY]

On 06/14/2016 11:39 AM, Gluster Build System wrote:
> 
> 
> SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.8.0.tar.gz
> 
> This release is made off jenkins-release-161
> 

Packages for:

 + Fedora 23, 24, 25 are available on d.g.o, queued for testing in
Bodhi, and available from yum/dnf respectively

 + Debian Jessie (8) and Stretch (9) are on d.g.o.

 + Ubuntu trusty and wheezy are in the Launchpad PPA. (xenial packages
will land after resolving a build issue.


SuSE packages will be built tomorrow (15 June) and be available in the
SuSE Build System repositories.

RHEL and CentOS pkgs will be available in the CentOS Storage SIG repos soon.

I will change the top-level "LATEST" symlink before EOD EDT tomorrow.

--

Kaleb

___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release scheduling and lifecycle of versions

[Kaleb Keithley]

I vote for this.

How do we ensure that all following releases are made on schedule?



- Original Message -
> From: "Vijay Bellur" 
> To: "Niels de Vos" 
> Cc: "GlusterFS Maintainers" 
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:37:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release scheduling and lifecycle of
> versions
> 
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Niels de Vos  wrote:
> > ## Two stable/LTS versions, 1 year of bugfixes
> >
> > Looking at the diagram makes me wonder if this really is a sane approach
> > that we can promise to our users. When 3.13 (or 4.x) gets released, we
> > would have 4 active versions. At the moment we are already struggling
> > with three active versions, so I doubt we can really do that. So, here a
> > variation, and my suggestion to keep two stable releases instead of
> > three:
> >
> >  3.5: EOL when 3.8 goes GA (2016-06)
> >  3.6: EOL when 3.9 goes GA (2016-09)
> >  3.7: EOL when 3.10 goes GA (2016-12)
> >  3.8 [LTS]: EOL when 3.12 goes GA (2017-06)
> >  3.9: EOL when 3.10 goes GA (2016-12)
> >  3.10 [LTS]: EOL when 3.14 goes GA (2017-12)
> >  3.11: EOL when 3.12 goes GA (2017-06)
> >  3.12 [LTS]: EOL when 3.16 goes GA (2018-06)
> >  3.13: EOL when 3.13 goes GA
> >  3.14 [LTS]: EOL when 3.18 goes GA
> >
> 
> This seems like a good plan to me.
> 
> >
> > Providing bugfixes for a LTS release for a year seems like a suitable
> > middle road. If other projects/organizations want to support a certain
> > version longer, they can do so themselves or step up and contribute a
> > maintainer to our community.
> >
> >
> > I expect that the number of patches in the stable releases get reduced A
> > LOT compared to the current 3.7 version. With regular releases there
> > should not be a need to backport complex patches or features.
> > Maintainance of a stable release should be a very boring and simple
> > task.
> 
> +1
> 
> >
> > Any suggestions for modifications or clarification needed before this
> > can be transferred to a good looking webpage (by Amye?) on gluster.org?
> >
> 
> A post on -devel and -users explaining this release cadence/strategy
> and soliciting feedback would be necessary before we publish on
> gluster.org.
> 
> -Vijay
> ___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 
___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.5.7 released

[Kaleb KEITHLEY]

On 12/12/2015 11:10 AM, Gluster Build System wrote:
> 
> 
> SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.5.7.tar.gz
> 
> This release is made off jenkins-release-148
> 

Fedora, EPEL/CentOS, and Debian packages have landed on d.g.o. Packages
for Ubuntu have started to land in Launchpad.

I'd say go ahead and announce.

--

Kaleb


___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.7.5 released

[Kaleb KEITHLEY]

Fedora and EPEL RPMs are already there. Hari and Ashiq are working on
Debian and Ubuntu pkgs. We'll let you know when they're there.


On 10/08/2015 07:19 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> hey,
>This is my first time with the release. I am not sure what the
> procedure is after this. I am told I need to wait for the packages to be
> built. Could you let me know, how that is coming along. I will do the
> release notes, closing bugs after that and send the mail
> 
> Pranith
> 
> On 10/07/2015 06:49 PM, Gluster Build System wrote:
>>
>> SRC:
>> http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.7.5.tar.gz
>>
>> This release is made off jenkins-release-143
>>
>> -- Gluster Build System
> 
> ___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

___
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers