Re: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile

2017-12-04 Thread Trond Michelsen
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:55:34AM -0700, Richard Greenwood wrote:
>>> In theory, if I added easting and northing to the projection definition,
>>> like this:
>>   PROJECTION
>>> "+init=epsg:32633 +units=km +x_0=-75000 +y_0=645"
>>>   END
>>>
>>> It should position itself properly, but proj does not allow easting or
>> northing to the UTM projections.
> You can specify the full proj style definition instead of the
> "init=epsg:" format. So maybe something like:
> 
> PROJECTION
>   +proj=tmerc
>   +lat_0=0.0
>   +lon_0=15# not sure this is correct long0 is for zone 33
>   +x_0=-75000
>   +y_0=645
>   +a=6378137.0
>   +b=6356752.3141403
>   +datum=WGS84
>   +units=km
> END

Thanks! That did the trick. I had already tried "+proj=utm +zone=33
+ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +units=km +no_defs", without success, but 

I just needed a couple of minor changes. First of all, my example I
got my signs mixed up, so easting/northing should be 75000 and
-645. I also had to add the shifting UTM33 uses, so the correct
easting is 575000. Finally, by adding the scale factor of 0.9996, the
image positioned itself exactly where I want it.

So, my final projection block is:

  PROJECTION
+proj=tmerc
+lat_0=0.0
+lon_0=15
+x_0=575000
+y_0=-645
+a=6378137.0
+b=6356752.3141403
+datum=WGS84 
+k_0=0.9996
+units=km
  END


This is a workaround I can live with. Thank You.

-- 
Trond Michelsen
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Re: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile

2017-12-01 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi,

One alternative could be to read your png files through GDAL virtual raster 
http://www.gdal.org/gdal_vrttut.html

Problem that you should solve is how to inject the file name into the 
SourceFilename element
utm.tif

But the wms_extent metadata seems quite promising to me. You could then change 
the file with %variable% in DATA. How did you test that it has no effect?

-Jukka Rahkonen-

Lähettäjä: mapserver-users [mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] 
Puolesta Richard Greenwood
Lähetetty: 1. joulukuuta 2017 19:56
Vastaanottaja: Trond Michelsen <trondmm-mapserver+2...@crusaders.no>
Kopio: Mapserver <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
Aihe: Re: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile



On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Trond Michelsen 
<trondmm-mapserver+2...@crusaders.no<mailto:trondmm-mapserver+2...@crusaders.no>>
 wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, I forgot to mention that
they're png-files.

--
Trond Michelsen


On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:38:38PM +, Fawcett, David (MNIT) wrote:
> If these are .tif files, can you write the georeference info to internal 
> metadata as a way to avoid a .tfw file?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mapserver-users 
> [mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>]
>  On Behalf Of Trond Michelsen
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 10:19 AM
> To: Mapserver 
> <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>>
> Subject: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm using mapserver 7.0.0
>
> I have about 250.000 raster images that I want to serve through mapserver. 
> They are all 1195x1550 pixels, and they all cover the exact same area (UTM33N 
> -75000,645,112,800).  All images has a resolution of 1km per 
> pixel.
>
> I also have a worldfile that works:
> --8<--
> 1000
> 0.0
> 0.0
> -1000
> -75000
> 800
> --8<--
>
> What I want to avoid, is to have one worldfile for each of the 250.000 files.
>
> I have tried to use a processing directive, like the documentation says:
>
> --8<--
> WORLDFILE=
> Specifies an alternative world file (for georeferencing). If a
> path only is specified, the base name of the dataset will be
> appended. The suffix (.wld / .tfw / ...) can be omitted.
>
> Example:
>
> PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/"
>  or
> PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file.wld"
>  or
> PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file"
> --8<--
>
> But adding
>
> PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/to/my/worldfile.wld"
>
> to my mapfile has, as far as I can tell, absolutely no effect.
>
>
> The projection on the layer is defined like this:
>
>   PROJECTION
> "+init=epsg:32633"
>   END
>
>
> If I change that to
>
>   PROJECTION
> "+init=epsg:32633 +units=km"
>   END
>
> My layer will turn up at 0,0,1195000,155 in EPSG:32633
>
> In theory, if I added easting and northing to the projection definition, like 
> this:
>   PROJECTION
> "+init=epsg:32633 +units=km +x_0=-75000 +y_0=645"
>   END
>
> It should position itself properly, but proj does not allow easting or 
> northing to the UTM projections.


You can specify the full proj style definition instead of the "init=epsg:" 
format. So maybe something like:

PROJECTION
  +proj=tmerc
  +lat_0=0.0
  +lon_0=15# not sure this is correct long0 is for zone 33
  +x_0=-75000
  +y_0=645
  +a=6378137.0
  +b=6356752.3141403
  +datum=WGS84
  +units=km
END



> The documetation also states:
>
> --8<--
> wms_extent
>
> For Rasters served through WMS, MapServer can now use the
> wms_extent metadata parameter to register the image. If a .wld
> file cannot be found, MapServer will then look for the wms_extent
> metadata parameter and use the extents of the image and the size
> of the image for georegistration.
> --8<--
>
> However, if I add
>
>   METADATA
> "wms_extent" "-75000 645 112 800"
>   END
>
> to the layer, it has no effect.
>
>
> So... What am I doing wrong? How do I get my files to show up where they're 
> supposed to?
>
>
> --
> Trond Michelsen
> ___
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users



--
Richard W. Greenwood, PLS
www.greenwoodmap.com<http://www.greenwoodmap.com>
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Re: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile

2017-12-01 Thread Richard Greenwood
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Trond Michelsen <
trondmm-mapserver+2...@crusaders.no> wrote:

> Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, I forgot to mention that
> they're png-files.
>
> --
> Trond Michelsen
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:38:38PM +, Fawcett, David (MNIT) wrote:
> > If these are .tif files, can you write the georeference info to internal
> metadata as a way to avoid a .tfw file?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: mapserver-users [mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
> On Behalf Of Trond Michelsen
> > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 10:19 AM
> > To: Mapserver <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
> > Subject: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm using mapserver 7.0.0
> >
> > I have about 250.000 raster images that I want to serve through
> mapserver. They are all 1195x1550 pixels, and they all cover the exact same
> area (UTM33N -75000,645,112,800).  All images has a
> resolution of 1km per pixel.
> >
> > I also have a worldfile that works:
> > --8<--
> > 1000
> > 0.0
> > 0.0
> > -1000
> > -75000
> > 800
> > --8<--
> >
> > What I want to avoid, is to have one worldfile for each of the 250.000
> files.
> >
> > I have tried to use a processing directive, like the documentation says:
> >
> > --8<--
> > WORLDFILE=
> > Specifies an alternative world file (for georeferencing). If a
> > path only is specified, the base name of the dataset will be
> > appended. The suffix (.wld / .tfw / ...) can be omitted.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/"
> >  or
> > PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file.wld"
> >  or
> > PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file"
> > --8<--
> >
> > But adding
> >
> > PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/to/my/worldfile.wld"
> >
> > to my mapfile has, as far as I can tell, absolutely no effect.
> >
> >
> > The projection on the layer is defined like this:
> >
> >   PROJECTION
> > "+init=epsg:32633"
> >   END
> >
> >
> > If I change that to
> >
> >   PROJECTION
> > "+init=epsg:32633 +units=km"
> >   END
> >
> > My layer will turn up at 0,0,1195000,155 in EPSG:32633
> >
> > In theory, if I added easting and northing to the projection definition,
> like this:
>
>   PROJECTION
> > "+init=epsg:32633 +units=km +x_0=-75000 +y_0=645"
> >   END
> >
> > It should position itself properly, but proj does not allow easting or
> northing to the UTM projections.
>


You can specify the full proj style definition instead of the
"init=epsg:" format. So maybe something like:

PROJECTION
  +proj=tmerc
  +lat_0=0.0
  +lon_0=15# not sure this is correct long0 is for zone 33
  +x_0=-75000
  +y_0=645
  +a=6378137.0
  +b=6356752.3141403
  +datum=WGS84
  +units=km
END



> The documetation also states:
> >
> > --8<--
> > wms_extent
> >
> > For Rasters served through WMS, MapServer can now use the
> > wms_extent metadata parameter to register the image. If a .wld
> > file cannot be found, MapServer will then look for the wms_extent
> > metadata parameter and use the extents of the image and the size
> > of the image for georegistration.
> > --8<--
> >
> > However, if I add
> >
> >   METADATA
> > "wms_extent" "-75000 645 112 800"
> >   END
> >
> > to the layer, it has no effect.
> >
> >
> > So... What am I doing wrong? How do I get my files to show up where
> they're supposed to?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Trond Michelsen
> > ___
> > mapserver-users mailing list
> > mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> ___
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>



-- 
Richard W. Greenwood, PLS
www.greenwoodmap.com
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Re: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile

2017-12-01 Thread Trond Michelsen
Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, I forgot to mention that
they're png-files.

-- 
Trond Michelsen


On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:38:38PM +, Fawcett, David (MNIT) wrote:
> If these are .tif files, can you write the georeference info to internal 
> metadata as a way to avoid a .tfw file? 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: mapserver-users [mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On 
> Behalf Of Trond Michelsen
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 10:19 AM
> To: Mapserver <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I'm using mapserver 7.0.0
> 
> I have about 250.000 raster images that I want to serve through mapserver. 
> They are all 1195x1550 pixels, and they all cover the exact same area (UTM33N 
> -75000,645,112,800).  All images has a resolution of 1km per 
> pixel.
> 
> I also have a worldfile that works:
> --8<--
> 1000
> 0.0
> 0.0
> -1000
> -75000
> 800
> --8<--
> 
> What I want to avoid, is to have one worldfile for each of the 250.000 files. 
> 
> I have tried to use a processing directive, like the documentation says:
> 
> --8<--
> WORLDFILE=
> Specifies an alternative world file (for georeferencing). If a
> path only is specified, the base name of the dataset will be
> appended. The suffix (.wld / .tfw / ...) can be omitted.
> 
> Example:
> 
> PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/"
>  or
> PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file.wld"
>  or
> PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file"
> --8<--
> 
> But adding 
> 
> PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/to/my/worldfile.wld"
> 
> to my mapfile has, as far as I can tell, absolutely no effect.
> 
> 
> The projection on the layer is defined like this:
> 
>   PROJECTION
> "+init=epsg:32633"
>   END
> 
> 
> If I change that to 
> 
>   PROJECTION
> "+init=epsg:32633 +units=km"
>   END
> 
> My layer will turn up at 0,0,1195000,155 in EPSG:32633
> 
> In theory, if I added easting and northing to the projection definition, like 
> this:
> 
>   PROJECTION
> "+init=epsg:32633 +units=km +x_0=-75000 +y_0=645"
>   END
> 
> It should position itself properly, but proj does not allow easting or 
> northing to the UTM projections.
> 
> The documetation also states:
> 
> --8<--
> wms_extent
> 
> For Rasters served through WMS, MapServer can now use the
> wms_extent metadata parameter to register the image. If a .wld
> file cannot be found, MapServer will then look for the wms_extent
> metadata parameter and use the extents of the image and the size
> of the image for georegistration.
> --8<--
> 
> However, if I add 
> 
>   METADATA
> "wms_extent" "-75000 645 112 800"
>   END
> 
> to the layer, it has no effect.
> 
> 
> So... What am I doing wrong? How do I get my files to show up where they're 
> supposed to?
> 
> 
> --
> Trond Michelsen
> ___
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Re: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile

2017-12-01 Thread Fawcett, David (MNIT)
If these are .tif files, can you write the georeference info to internal 
metadata as a way to avoid a .tfw file? 

-Original Message-
From: mapserver-users [mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On 
Behalf Of Trond Michelsen
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 10:19 AM
To: Mapserver <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile

Hi.

I'm using mapserver 7.0.0

I have about 250.000 raster images that I want to serve through mapserver. They 
are all 1195x1550 pixels, and they all cover the exact same area (UTM33N 
-75000,645,112,800).  All images has a resolution of 1km per pixel.

I also have a worldfile that works:
--8<--
1000
0.0
0.0
-1000
-75000
800
--8<--

What I want to avoid, is to have one worldfile for each of the 250.000 files. 

I have tried to use a processing directive, like the documentation says:

--8<--
WORLDFILE=
Specifies an alternative world file (for georeferencing). If a
path only is specified, the base name of the dataset will be
appended. The suffix (.wld / .tfw / ...) can be omitted.

Example:

PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/"
 or
PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file.wld"
 or
PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file"
--8<--

But adding 

PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/to/my/worldfile.wld"

to my mapfile has, as far as I can tell, absolutely no effect.


The projection on the layer is defined like this:

  PROJECTION
"+init=epsg:32633"
  END


If I change that to 

  PROJECTION
"+init=epsg:32633 +units=km"
  END

My layer will turn up at 0,0,1195000,155 in EPSG:32633

In theory, if I added easting and northing to the projection definition, like 
this:

  PROJECTION
"+init=epsg:32633 +units=km +x_0=-75000 +y_0=645"
  END

It should position itself properly, but proj does not allow easting or northing 
to the UTM projections.

The documetation also states:

--8<--
wms_extent

For Rasters served through WMS, MapServer can now use the
wms_extent metadata parameter to register the image. If a .wld
file cannot be found, MapServer will then look for the wms_extent
metadata parameter and use the extents of the image and the size
of the image for georegistration.
--8<--

However, if I add 

  METADATA
"wms_extent" "-75000 645 112 800"
  END

to the layer, it has no effect.


So... What am I doing wrong? How do I get my files to show up where they're 
supposed to?


--
Trond Michelsen
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

[mapserver-users] Georeferencing a raster without worldfile

2017-12-01 Thread Trond Michelsen
Hi.

I'm using mapserver 7.0.0

I have about 250.000 raster images that I want to serve through
mapserver. They are all 1195x1550 pixels, and they all cover the exact
same area (UTM33N -75000,645,112,800).  All images has a
resolution of 1km per pixel.

I also have a worldfile that works:
--8<--
1000
0.0
0.0
-1000
-75000
800
--8<--

What I want to avoid, is to have one worldfile for each of the 250.000 files. 

I have tried to use a processing directive, like the documentation says:

--8<--
WORLDFILE=
Specifies an alternative world file (for georeferencing). If a
path only is specified, the base name of the dataset will be
appended. The suffix (.wld / .tfw / ...) can be omitted.

Example:

PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/"
 or
PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file.wld"
 or
PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/file"
--8<--

But adding 

PROCESSING "WORLDFILE=/path/to/my/worldfile.wld"

to my mapfile has, as far as I can tell, absolutely no effect.


The projection on the layer is defined like this:

  PROJECTION
"+init=epsg:32633"
  END


If I change that to 

  PROJECTION
"+init=epsg:32633 +units=km"
  END

My layer will turn up at 0,0,1195000,155 in EPSG:32633

In theory, if I added easting and northing to the projection definition, like 
this:

  PROJECTION
"+init=epsg:32633 +units=km +x_0=-75000 +y_0=645"
  END

It should position itself properly, but proj does not allow easting or
northing to the UTM projections.

The documetation also states:

--8<--
wms_extent

For Rasters served through WMS, MapServer can now use the
wms_extent metadata parameter to register the image. If a .wld
file cannot be found, MapServer will then look for the wms_extent
metadata parameter and use the extents of the image and the size
of the image for georegistration.
--8<--

However, if I add 

  METADATA
"wms_extent" "-75000 645 112 800"
  END

to the layer, it has no effect.


So... What am I doing wrong? How do I get my files to show up where
they're supposed to?


-- 
Trond Michelsen
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users