Re: Talking points/spotlight features

2010-08-12 Thread Mel Chua
 I agree with the idea of putting forward alternate spins under their
 branding to attract that attention.  They feel buried under Spins, in
 that people may not go there unless they already know what a spin is.

+1 to this.

btw, I plan on doing an upstream marketing (how to market stuff you 
work on!) session at FUDCon Tempe so that developers et al can start 
thinking about marketing strategy, making feature profiles, etc. for 
their own projects without waiting for the marketing team to do the 
work. It'll also be good motivation for me to work on better templates 
and SOPs for that sort of thing. :)

I envision our team here as a center of excellence/advice/help for folks 
who want to make things happen for their own projects, similar to how 
Infrastructure operates. So this may be something we can point people 
towards for F15, looking down the road, if we get some why doesn't my 
thing have marketing-shiny in F14? comments.

--Mel
-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing


Re: Talking points/spotlight features

2010-08-09 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com [2010-07-29 11:58]:
 * Roll-up of programming tools (D, Eclipse Helios, GNUstep, debugging tools)
 ^^
Let me know if you need more information on the new versions of Eclipse
stuff.  The upstream new and noteworthy sets are pretty good.

Andrew
-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing


Re: Talking points/spotlight features

2010-08-09 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 10:41:17AM -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
 * Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com [2010-07-29 11:58]:
  * Roll-up of programming tools (D, Eclipse Helios, GNUstep, debugging tools)
  ^^
 Let me know if you need more information on the new versions of Eclipse
 stuff.  The upstream new and noteworthy sets are pretty good.

If you want to stick some links to those in the feature page(s), that
would help quite a bit I think!

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing


Re: Talking points/spotlight features

2010-07-30 Thread Nicu Buculei
On 07/29/2010 06:58 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FeatureList

 Off the top of my head, I see some very compelling stuff to which we
 might call people's attention:

 * systemd
 * EC2
 * MeeGo
 * Roll-up of programming tools (D, Eclipse Helios, GNUstep, debugging tools)

Can we have at least 1-2 talking points end-users (i.e. not developers 
and sysadmins) would actually care? You know, *desktop features*.

Also, since it was delayed, should not we take GNOME 3 out of the 
features list?

-- 
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing


Re: Talking points/spotlight features

2010-07-30 Thread Ryan Rix
On Fri 30 July 2010 10:20:15 Nicu Buculei wrote:
 On 07/29/2010 06:58 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FeatureList
  
  Off the top of my head, I see some very compelling stuff to which we
  might call people's attention:
  
  * systemd
  * EC2
  * MeeGo
  * Roll-up of programming tools (D, Eclipse Helios, GNUstep, debugging
  tools)
 
 Can we have at least 1-2 talking points end-users (i.e. not developers
 and sysadmins) would actually care? You know, *desktop features*.

Hi Nicu,

The current feature list is indeed a little bit .. ahem... lacking on the end-
user front, you're right, honestly.

The creation of Fedora's marketing talking points is mostly an ad-hoc process 
done by, well, anyone who is interested at all, marketing, or ambassadors, or 
infra, or design or... :)

So, I guess the question then, what do *you* want to see that attracts end-
users? :) Granted, Fedora 14 won't ship Firefox 4 (your biggest 
disappointment I'd guess, based on your blog post[1]), but there has to be 
*something* that users will care about? Anything new in microblogging on the 
GNOME end? What about in evolution or gnome-games or ...? (I'm just listing 
off random ideas... I'm not a GNOME Desktop Edition user, and probably dont 
have much to give to the end-user experience discussion outside of the KDE 
Plasma Desktop Edition release.)

 Also, since it was delayed, should not we take GNOME 3 out of the
 features list?
I think that's more of a FESCo decision, correct? I'd assume that it'd be 
taken out, and the fallback provisions (shipping GNOME 2, basically, with 
GNOME 3 still labelled as experimental) would be followed...

All the best,
Ryan

[1]: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/2010/07/no-video-for-you.html


-- 
Ryan Rix
== http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ ==
== http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word ==


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

Re: Talking points/spotlight features

2010-07-30 Thread Robyn Bergeron
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Ryan Rix r...@n.rix.si wrote:
 On Fri 30 July 2010 10:20:15 Nicu Buculei wrote:
 On 07/29/2010 06:58 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FeatureList
 
  Off the top of my head, I see some very compelling stuff to which we
  might call people's attention:
 
  * systemd
  * EC2
  * MeeGo
  * Roll-up of programming tools (D, Eclipse Helios, GNUstep, debugging
  tools)

 Can we have at least 1-2 talking points end-users (i.e. not developers
 and sysadmins) would actually care? You know, *desktop features*.

 Hi Nicu,

 The current feature list is indeed a little bit .. ahem... lacking on the end-
 user front, you're right, honestly.

 The creation of Fedora's marketing talking points is mostly an ad-hoc process
 done by, well, anyone who is interested at all, marketing, or ambassadors, or
 infra, or design or... :)

Well, I wouldn't say -entirely- ad-hoc; traditionally, as well as per
the now-existing SOP
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talking_points_SOP), Talking Points are
derived from the current release's Feature List, with the exception of
the Spins listed in talking points.

So, Feature List for F14 looks like this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FeatureList:

 which pretty much leaves us with a few options:

#1) We take things like MeeGo and KDE and forego putting them in a
Spins category on the Talking Points, move them up to End User
talking points instead, and just add some blurbs about and this will
be a spin.

#2) We break with tradition, and pull some stuff out of our hats that
we can find that are End-User Talking Point worthy.  I won't call it
policy (perhaps someone else will, but I'm a happy little
rulebreaker!!) - but Talking Points coming from Feature List it is a
guideline we've had for some time.  However, this point for Talking
Point Criteria may be interesting - Talking points should be about
brand new features, or a very significant follow-on to early
groundwork from a previous release. The latter isn't the same as
adding support for additional hardware models or regular expansion of
an existing feature.  I'd say that if we can find something that
maybe was an significant upgrade / brand new feature, but perhaps just
wasn't called out on Feature List for whatever reason, we could
consider it - but keeping in mind that once we bend the rules a little
bit, it will be very hard in the future to go back to being more
strict about what can / cannot be a Talking Point.

(And as I said, if someone feels differently about #2 here, please pipe up.)

#3) We acknowledge that End-User Features are... not abundant this
cycle, and mostly limited to Spins.

Aside from these possibilities, just as a point maybe in the
future we (Marketing, FESCo, Fedora in general) should think about
saying, oh hai, Feature List is due in 1 month, 3 weeks, one week, and
we're not seeing any end-user Feature List items, and now would be a
great time for someone to have one. :) While marketing certainly can't
and doesn't dictate what needs to be made/accomplished, we can
certainly help in pointing out gaps that could be great opportunities
for new contributors.

-Robyn







 So, I guess the question then, what do *you* want to see that attracts end-
 users? :) Granted, Fedora 14 won't ship Firefox 4 (your biggest
 disappointment I'd guess, based on your blog post[1]), but there has to be
 *something* that users will care about? Anything new in microblogging on the
 GNOME end? What about in evolution or gnome-games or ...? (I'm just listing
 off random ideas... I'm not a GNOME Desktop Edition user, and probably dont
 have much to give to the end-user experience discussion outside of the KDE
 Plasma Desktop Edition release.)

 Also, since it was delayed, should not we take GNOME 3 out of the
 features list?
 I think that's more of a FESCo decision, correct? I'd assume that it'd be
 taken out, and the fallback provisions (shipping GNOME 2, basically, with
 GNOME 3 still labelled as experimental) would be followed...

 All the best,
 Ryan

 [1]: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/2010/07/no-video-for-you.html


 --
 Ryan Rix
 == http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ ==
 == http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word         ==

 --
 marketing mailing list
 marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing


Re: Talking points/spotlight features

2010-07-29 Thread Robyn Bergeron
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
 It's that time again -- time for us to figure out the features that
 we want to spend a little extra effort calling out in the next Fedora
 release because they're particularly innovative or interesting.  The
 full explanation of talking points is found here:

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talking_points_SOP

 Note that talking points are *not* a comprehensive list.  The list is
 meant to be short and effective at sparking the interest of many
 different groups.  This helps show that there is something for lots of
 people in Fedora.  The main source for the talking points is in the
 feature list:

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FeatureList

 Off the top of my head, I see some very compelling stuff to which we
 might call people's attention:

 * systemd
 * EC2
 * MeeGo
 * Roll-up of programming tools (D, Eclipse Helios, GNUstep, debugging tools)

 Things not on that list which might merit inclusion include the new
 website design, underway and hopefully rolling out for F14.

 I've been working on a PR schedule to assist Jared in his FPL duties,
 and next week he is supposed to meet with Red Hat's Creative team.
 In the near future, the team will shoot videos to help show off
 spotlight features in Fedora 14.  So the sooner we have talking points
 included, the easier we will make their job too.

 Can we start this process slightly early?

I have no issues with this - in fact,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Talking_Points is already
being filled out.

-robyn


 --
 Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
          Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
 --
 marketing mailing list
 marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing


Re: Talking points/spotlight features

2010-07-29 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 09:12:30AM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Robyn Bergeron
 robyn.berge...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com 
  wrote:
  It's that time again -- time for us to figure out the features that
  we want to spend a little extra effort calling out in the next Fedora
  release because they're particularly innovative or interesting.  The
  full explanation of talking points is found here:
 
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talking_points_SOP
 
  Note that talking points are *not* a comprehensive list.  The list is
  meant to be short and effective at sparking the interest of many
  different groups.  This helps show that there is something for lots of
  people in Fedora.  The main source for the talking points is in the
  feature list:
 
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FeatureList
 
  Off the top of my head, I see some very compelling stuff to which we
  might call people's attention:
 
  * systemd
  * EC2
  * MeeGo
  * Roll-up of programming tools (D, Eclipse Helios, GNUstep, debugging 
  tools)
 
  Things not on that list which might merit inclusion include the new
  website design, underway and hopefully rolling out for F14.
 
  I've been working on a PR schedule to assist Jared in his FPL duties,
  and next week he is supposed to meet with Red Hat's Creative team.
  In the near future, the team will shoot videos to help show off
  spotlight features in Fedora 14.  So the sooner we have talking points
  included, the easier we will make their job too.
 
  Can we start this process slightly early?
 
  I have no issues with this - in fact,
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Talking_Points is already
  being filled out.
 
 And if we want to - we could do an impromptu meeting around this
 tomorrow - I know rrix had planned on kicking off the process on
 Tuesday at the next marketing meeting (I'll be driving somewhere in
 Wyoming, although I hope to have arrived and be in my hotel by this
 point, but I am perpetually not on time to my hotel when driving with
 childrenz). Or we could do it Monday, but at that point, I'd almost
 say we could just wait till Tuesday during our regularly scheduled
 time.
 
 I'm not sure that we've done a meeting around it at the beginning,
 other than to say, let's send out email to a few lists and get some
 people involved in helping round out the list on the wiki - usually,
 IIRC, we've just had the meeting at the tail end to go through what
 people have already populated.
 
 Thoughts?

Right you are about just kicking it off -- in fact, there's a form
email in the SOP.  Perhaps Ryan would like to send that out, to kick
off the process?

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing