[les...@osuosl.org: [Hosting] Help with signups for the Communities mailing list]

2011-03-22 Thread Olav Vitters
Anyone interested?
-- 
Regards,
Olav
--- Begin Message ---
Hello everyone,

We've created a new mailing list for the folks at your projects who care
about community management, outreach and news. We're asking that the right
points of contact join this list for a few reasons:

- We've heard from many people that they'd like to hear more about the
projects hosted at the OSL: what they're doing, how they're doing it and how
the OSL enables their success
- We need to know who to contact when we'd like to ask for help from our
hosted projects on creating a news story or spreading the word about an OSL
campaign

For example, many of our hosted communities are not participating in Google
Summer of Code this year, and we'd love to have your help in getting the
word out that the OSL is a mentoring organization this year. This new
mailing list is meant to allow us to ask for that help most easily, while
not bogging down the inboxes of your developer and infrastructure teams.

Please take a moment to point your community folks to our new Communities
mailing list [0] and ask them to subscribe. We promise the list will be
low-traffic and the communications well targeted and useful.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me off-list. Chances
are that you'll also see me in your project's IRC channel over the next few
weeks, following up to get the right people from your project on board.

[0] - http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/communities

Cheers,
LH

-- 
Leslie Hawthorn
Open Source Outreach Manager
Oregon State University Open Source Lab
les...@osuosl.org


http://identi.ca/lh
http://twitter.com/lhawthorn
___
Hosting mailing list
host...@osuosl.org
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/hosting
--- End Message ---
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: New GNOME.Asia Summit website launched

2011-03-22 Thread Richard Stallman
I looked at the home page.

The sponsors get more screen area than GNOME.  This seems like an event
to promote them more than an event to promote GNOME.

The top line uses the word "monetize" -- a word that carries the worst
fashion of today's usual mercenary attitude -- but says nothing about
freedom.  It does say "free software", but in that context people are
likely to suppose that "free" means "gratis", and there is nothing on
the home page to tell them otherwise.

There needs to be something on the home page that clearly refers
to freedom and shows that "free" means "freedom".

The way that I can think of is to have a graphic with various words
for free: ziyou, jiyuu-na, tu do, swatantra, mukt, etc., as well as
"free" itself.  (This method is somewhat trite, so it would be nice to
think of something more creative.)


I looked at Who Should Attend page.  It mentions 5 goals, and all
those goals are good, but the most important goal -- freedom on your
computer -- is missing.

The page says "FLOSS" a few times, and "free and open source" once.
To fully promote free software, it should always say "free/libre" or
"free/swatantra".  Mentioning open source is a distraction here,
so that term shouldn't be present.


I looked at the speakers page.  I was glad to see that you're giving a
talk about software freedom.  However, for each person who attends your
talk, a thousand will view the home page.  We need to get the message
of freedom into the home page so that thousands will see it.


-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org
Skype: Don't use Skype, it's proprietary software!
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Next GNOME User Day (31 March) needs 2 more co-hosts

2011-03-22 Thread Luis Medinas
2011/3/22 Allan Day :
> Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
>> I'm planning another GNOME User Day --
>> http://live.gnome.org/ThreePointZero/UserDays -- for Thursday, 31 March
>> 2011. We'll answer user questions, especially about GNOME 3, via IRC. I
>> need about six people to each help host a session for an hour -- we'll
>> have about three sessions, each hosted by two people.  I have a few
>> people signed up, so I just need two or three more.
>>
>> Would you like to help host a session?  If so, please mark all the times
>> you're available on this Doodle poll. I'll only ask you to do one of them.
>>
>> http://www.doodle.com/a72fpheh7cb4gp6a
>
> This is shaping up nicely. We could do with one more person to cover the
> 15:00-16:00 (UTC) slot though. Any volunteers?!
>

I can do that time.

Cheers
Luis
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Fallback / Classic Mode

2011-03-22 Thread Dave Neary
Hi,

Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 13:16, Dave Neary  wrote:
>> It appears you're happy telling people what to concentrate on, all I'm
>> saying is that I'm not.
> 
> I would appreciate it if you would avoid ascribing me to certain
> positions that I am not taking.

I shouldn't have reacted provocatively. I took your initial response to
mean "don't waste your time on this". Which, obviously, is telling me
what I should spend time on.

>> But I bet that this will be an issue, and it's
>> one we can handle easily with a tiny bit of foresight.
> 
> There is no issue because we planned for a Fallback Mode in 3.0 from
> the beginning and it is implemented (modulo some bugs that need to be
> squashed before release.)

Surely you can accept that there is an image formed in the mind of
people about GNOME 3, and we need to handle the expectations people have
about the release?

> GNOME 3 is *not* GNOME Shell. I'm disheartened that you are this
> misinformed as a regular reader of this mailing list and a blogger on
> Planet GNOME. Frankly, I don't know what else we could have done to
> better inform you but if you have a suggestion as to how it is that
> you came to be so misguided and what we could have done to reach out
> to you earlier, that would certainly help this marketing process.

Thank you for the lesson. As a "misinformed", "misguided" contributor,
I'm trying hard not to get too upset with your reaction. I hope you will
react differentlyt post-release with misinformed & misguided users & press.


In the minds of a lot of people (press and GNOME hackers, and by proxy,
future users), GNOME 3 is very much the user experience defined by GNOME
Shell. And, while I don't have any data to back this up, I'd bet that
people are expecting "GNOME 3 fall-back mode" to be more or less
equivalent to GNOME 2.

So since (a) in some situations using GNOME 3 in "normal" mode (with
GNOME Shell) is not appropriate, and (b) GNOME fall-back does not
provide the same user experience as GNOME 2, we risk disappointing some
people doubly, if we do not prepare ourselves to manage these expectations.

That means, IMHO, figuring out some situations when it's inappropriate
to run GNOME Shell, documenting how to manually switch to fall-back mode
if, for example, your card is detected as being Shell capable, but runs
slowly (I had this experience on one SiS chipset on a netbook), and also
managing people's expectations about GNOME Fallback's feature set.

I hope I've managed to clear up any confusion about my position, and my
interests in holding that position.


The sad thing is that we've spent longer arguing about this than it
would have taken to document the few situations where using Shell is not
appropriate, and making recommendations to users as to what we suggest
they do in these situations.

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
Dave Neary
GNOME Foundation member
dne...@gnome.org
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Next GNOME User Day (31 March) needs 2 more co-hosts

2011-03-22 Thread Allan Day
Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> I'm planning another GNOME User Day -- 
> http://live.gnome.org/ThreePointZero/UserDays -- for Thursday, 31 March 
> 2011. We'll answer user questions, especially about GNOME 3, via IRC. I 
> need about six people to each help host a session for an hour -- we'll 
> have about three sessions, each hosted by two people.  I have a few 
> people signed up, so I just need two or three more.
> 
> Would you like to help host a session?  If so, please mark all the times 
> you're available on this Doodle poll. I'll only ask you to do one of them.
> 
> http://www.doodle.com/a72fpheh7cb4gp6a

This is shaping up nicely. We could do with one more person to cover the
15:00-16:00 (UTC) slot though. Any volunteers?!

Allan
-- 
Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/
IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org

-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: GNOME 3.0 parties - photo gallery and Photo competition ?

2011-03-22 Thread Allan Day
Emily Chen wrote:
> 2011/3/18 Allan Day 
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 12:31 +0800, Emily Chen wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2011/3/12 Frederic Crozat 
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Emily Chen
> >  wrote:
> > > For Best Photo Competition, in my mind, it is easy
> to do if
> > we choose one
> > > photo tools, like picasa or flickr.
> > >
> > > For example, let's say we will have a photo set
> called
> > "GNOME 3.0 Launch
> > > Party" , everyone can view and vote on each
> photos.
> > >
> > > Is there better tools for Best Photo Competition?
> Anyone can
> > suggest ?
> >
> >
> > I have to agree regarding Flickr 'group' as a tool
> to do photo
> > contest. We used it several time for "Photographic
> background
> > contest"
> > when I was working at Mdv.
> > I also have a small C program to download all photo
> from a
> > set, which
> > can help to do selection locally.
> >
> > Thanks for offering. People will be interested to use your
> tool to
> > download all photos locally.
> >
> > For the best photo, I am thinking the best way should be
> on-line.  The
> > most visited photo ? Do we officially create a set for Best
> photo, can
> > we share the account to upload photos ?
> 
> 
> I've started a page with rules for the competition. Please
> check it over
> and let me know what you think. :)
> 
> http://live.gnome.org/ThreePointZero/LaunchParty/PhotoCompetition
> 
> Hi Allan, 
> 
> That's great. 
> 
> I edit the wiki to add a table, for people to update their photo links
> on wiki. They also need to send us by email as well. 
> 
> After we finalized the draft, can we announce it on www.gnome.org or
> www.gnome3.org sometime?

Yes, of course! I'm happy to announce. Fancy writing a blog post about
it?! (Tell me if you're not - I can announce anyway.)

Allan

-- 
Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/
IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org

-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Fallback / Classic Mode

2011-03-22 Thread Allan Day
Hey John,

John Stowers wrote:
> Fine. Here is my suggestion;
> 
> 
>  * PRETTY LIST OF FEATURES
>  * I MAKE LIFE EASY
>  * SHINY SCREENSHOTS
> 
> 
> 
> Known Issues:
>  * The GNOME 3 shell experience does not work over VNC or when the
> desktop is run in a virtualised environment. In this situation you will
> receive the GNOME 3 fallback experience*
> 
> 
> 
> * assuming that GNOME 3 fallback has been explained or defined earlier
> in the release notes. If it has not, then perhaps that needs to be
> fixed

Thanks for the suggestion. :)

I have to say, I'm extremely hesitant to have anything like 'known
issues' or 'not recommend' in the release notes. This document will be
quoted by the press and will seed many of the articles and news stories
about the release. Those in the press could (and probably would) pick up
these kind of statements and make stories out of them. That's not
something we want.

What we do have in the release notes is a statement which points out the
hardware acceleration requirement for 'the full GNOME 3 experience',
however. That mentions fallback mode.

Fallback and hardware acceleration also feature in the gnome3.org FAQ,
and we can add entries there for the virtual machine/VNC issues.

What is the potential damage of not mentioning VNC or virtual machines
in the release notes? I don't foresee a 'what no VNC?' uproar on the
horizon (I'm not saying we should or shouldn't have VNC support - I'm
just thinking about the marketing). Am I missing something?

Best,

Allan
-- 
Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/
IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org

-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list