POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*
On June 25th 2017 the German newspaper, Welt, published the latest piece
by Seymour Hersh, countering the “mainstream” narrative around the April
4th 2017 Khan Sheikhoun chemical attack in Syria. The attack, where
Sarin was allegedly used against the local population, dropped in a bomb
by the Syrian Air Force, resulted in President Trump taking the decision
to launch cruise missiles at a Syrian airbase.
As with his other recent articles, Hersh presented another version of
events, claiming the established narrative was wrong. And, as with those
other recent articles, Hersh based his case on a tiny number of
anonymous sources, presented no other evidence to support his case, and
ignored or dismissed evidence that countered the alternative narrative
he was trying to build.
This isn’t the first chemical attack in Syria which Hersh has presented
a counter-narrative for, based on a handful of anonymous sources. In his
lengthy articles for the London Review of Books, “Whose sarin?” and “The
Red Line and the Rat Line”, Hersh made the case that the August 21st
2013 Sarin attack in Damascus was in fact a false flag attack intended
to draw the US into the conflict with Syria. This claim fell apart under
real scrutiny, and relied heavily on ignoring much of the evidence
around the attacks, an ignorance of the complexities of producing and
transporting Sarin, and a lack of understanding about facts firmly
established about the attacks.
full:
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena/2017/06/25/will-get-fooled-seymour-hersh-welt-khan-sheikhoun-chemical-attack/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at:
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com