Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Riddle of the Self

2010-04-01 Thread CeJ
This is the exchange at Slate between Dennett and Hubert Dreyfus, who
follows M-P in phenomenological approaches to mind-body, etc. You have
to click on the little numbers after each piece to get to the next
one.



http://www.slate.com/id/3650/entry/23905/




CJ
-- 
Japan Higher Education Outlook
http://japanheo.blogspot.com/

ELT in Japan
http://eltinjapan.blogspot.com/

We are Feral Cats
http://wearechikineko.blogspot.com/

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


[Marxism-Thaxis] The Riddle of the Self: Antagonism:

2010-04-01 Thread Waistline2
Antagonism: 
 
Antagonism means "the mutual resistance or active opposition of two  
opposing forces, physical or mental; active opposition to a force." 
 
Antagonism is a form of change resolution by annihilation and  
nullification. Antagonism as destruction, and nullification is a form of   
society 
transition to a new mode of production. It is a form of resolution  of  
relations 
of production relations that have entered collision with  qualitatively 
changing productive forces. (see  productive forces).  Qualitatively new 
productive forces nullify and annihilate a previously existing  development of  
means of production as a basis for the growth and expansion  of the new 
productive forces. 
 
In class society, the collision between qualitatively new productive forces 
 and old relations of production - (the old classes connected to these  
relations), cannot be resolved based on the struggle of the two classes  
constituting the old relations of production. 
 
Resolution takes place outside - external, the contradiction that is the  
two classes constituting the system. The struggle between serf and nobility  
cannot be resolved by the serf overthrowing the nobility and establishing a  
new  society of serfs. Resolution takes place by destruction of both serf  
and  nobility at the hands of new classes; bourgeoisie and proletariat. 
 
Antagonism, resolution by nullification or destruction of a previously  
existing unity of classes, (in this case serf and nobility) requires the  
emergence and development of a new unity of classes external to the old unity  
that was serf and nobility. The new classes, (bourgeoisie and proletariat)  
connected to the new means of production, appear as the external agent of  
destruction and nullification.  Resolution is negation by destruction  of  the 
two old classes and their property form. 
 
Antagonism is not contradiction or a form of contradiction, but rather a  
form of resolution. Contradiction -(the struggle of old classes against  
themselves) is replaced (superseded) by antagonism. 
 
"The bourgeois mode of production is the last antagonistic form of the  
social process of production – antagonistic not in the sense of individual  
antagonism but of an antagonism that emanates from the individuals' social  
conditions of existence – but the productive forces developing within bourgeois 
 society create also the material conditions for a solution of this  
antagonism.(Marx).  (see Dialectics: quantity, quality, the   antagonistic 
element.)

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


[Marxism-Thaxis] The Riddle of Antagonism: (still at work)

2010-04-01 Thread Waistline2
Antagonism: 
 
Antagonism means "the mutual resistance or active opposition of two  
opposing forces, physical or mental; active opposition to a force." 
 
Antagonism is a form of change resolution by annihilation and  
nullification. Antagonism as destruction, and nullification is a form of  
society 
transition to a new mode of production. It is a form of resolution of  
relations 
of production relations that have entered collision with qualitatively  
changing productive forces. (see  productive forces). Qualitatively new  
productive forces nullify and annihilate a previously existing development of  
means 
of production as a basis for the growth and expansion of the new  
productive forces. 
 
In class society, the collision between qualitatively new productive forces 
 and old relations of production - (the old classes connected to these  
relations), cannot be resolved based on the struggle of the two classes  
constituting the old relations of production. 
 
Resolution takes place outside - external, the contradiction that is the  
two classes constituting the system. The struggle between serf and nobility  
cannot be resolved by the serf overthrowing the nobility and establishing a 
new  society of serfs. Resolution takes place by destruction of both serf 
and  nobility at the hands of new classes; bourgeoisie and proletariat. 
 
Antagonism, resolution by nullification or destruction of a previously  
existing unity of classes, (in this case serf and nobility) requires the  
emergence and development of a new unity of classes external to the old unity  
that was serf and nobility. The new classes, (bourgeoisie and proletariat)  
connected to the new means of production, appear as the external agent of  
destruction and nullification.  Resolution is negation by destruction of  the 
two old classes and their property form. 
 
Antagonism is not contradiction or a form of contradiction, but rather a  
form of resolution. Contradiction -(the struggle of old classes against  
themselves) is replaced (superseded) by antagonism.
 
"The bourgeois mode of production is the last antagonistic form of the  
social process of production – antagonistic not in the sense of individual  
antagonism but of an antagonism that emanates from the individuals' social  
conditions of existence – but the productive forces developing within bourgeois 
 society create also the material conditions for a solution of this  
antagonism.(Marx).  (see Dialectics: quantity, quality, the  antagonistic 
element.)
 
 

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Riddle of the Self

2010-04-01 Thread CeJ
Dennett runs smack into M-P, but I can't remember if he actually
discusses him (I do remember the quick rendering of Husserl in order
to dismiss him in an earlier work). But this blog explains some more:

http://mikejohnduff.blogspot.com/2007/12/merleau-ponty-and-physicalism.html

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


[Marxism-Thaxis] test

2010-04-01 Thread Waistline2
test  


___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Riddle of the Self

2010-04-01 Thread farmela...@juno.com


As I recall, Merleau-Ponty
was one of the few continental
philosophers that A.J. Ayer
had any time for.  As I recall,
Ayer gave a respectful account
of Merleau-Ponty in his book,
"Philosophy in the Twentieth
Century."


http://books.google.com/books?id=ouELk-xPkGQC&pg=PA433&lpg=PA433&dq=%22+a.j.+ayer%22+%22merleau-ponty%22&source=bl&ots=deIyHCRQ4K&sig=8Cj8r9TyjCP4OSCbRGNrDHgvr-Q&hl=en&ei=RJm0S_mOGsOblgfIm9hT&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22%20a.j.%20ayer%22%20%22merleau-ponty%22&f=false

Jim Farmelant
http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant

-- Original Message --
From: CeJ 
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Riddle of the Self
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:57:33 +0900

http://www.philosophos.com/philosophical_connections/profile_115.html


' ' ' 


CRITICAL SUMMARY

For many years Merleau-Ponty's writings were undeservedly neglected
outside France. More recently, however, his merits as a philosopher
have been increasingly recognised — not least by many philosophers
working in the 'analytic' tradition (despite the complexity and
prolixity of his style — characteristic of much twentieth century
continental philosophy). Of particular significance are his rejection
of both rationlism/ idealism and positivistic and reductionist
empiricism, his concept of the 'body-subject' and a 'holistic' account
of perception and action as operating within the domain of
intersubjectivity, and his dialectical 'ontology of flesh'. 


Penny Stock Jumping 2000%
Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4bb499b9d50d7606a5st02vuc

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis