obsessive opposition to Obama
Fred Feldman 

Walter quotes the Militant:
A March 18 speech on race relations by Barack Obama
helped convince a broader layer of the U.S. ruling class that he is
competent to be president for the next four years. It also opened a
discussion on racism in the United States in the big-business media,
on factory floors, and college campuses.

In the days following the talk, the Democratic Party leadership
quickened its process of lining up behind Obama. The Florida and
Michigan parties ruled out the possibility of redoing the primaries
in those states, a maneuver that could have helped rival Hillary
Clinton.

Fred replies:

I think this is wrongly presented as an example of "obsessive
opposition to
Obama." The statements are factual.  In the end, THE WRIGHT STUFF HAS
NOT
BROKEN THE BASIC MOMENTUM OF THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN, which is reviving with
the
resilience it has shown from the beginning. Obama's speech did wun him
more
support than he had had before in the ruling class, I estimate. Clearly
the
Democratic Party is more and more, not less and less, accepting that he
will
be their nominee. The break of a dedicated anti-abortion Clintonite,
Sen. 
Casey of Pennsylvania, and the latter's descriptions of the support he
finds
among his family members, indicate clearly that Obama is gaining, not
losing, traction in Pennsylvania right now.

The general tone of the Militant article is not obsessive about Obama.
They
do not treat him as the main candidate who must be fought tooth and
nail
because of the illusions he can create. They do not treat him, as
Black
Agenda does, as the greater evil who can single-handedly destroy the
Black
liberation struggle and suppress all discussion of Black oppression.
(Has
his candidacy really done that. As the Militant suggests, not really
at
all.)

There is real "obsessive opposition" in the article.  Not about Obama
but
Rev. Wright. 

Newton writes: 
Obama presented Wright as someone marred by "the anger and bitterness
of
those years" of legal segregation in this country. Obama's explanation
belittled not only Wright but other demagogues like him who have built
their
careers on race-baiting and conspiracy theories. "For the men and women
of
Reverend Wright's generation," Obama said, "the memories of humiliation
and
doubt and fear have not gone away"

Newton seems to be suggesting that Wright must be regarded not as
someone
motivated by anti-racism in any way, shape, or form, but, at least in
an
incipiently incipient way, an incipient fascism. His denunciation of
Zionism
and the oppression of Palestinians is place in this context,
suggesting
without proof that he is really an anti-Semite.

Around the time of the discussions over the neoconservative trend, the
Militant argued that criticism of them was "Jew hatred." And to
demonstrate
this beyond the possibility of denial, the Militant explained that all
--
every last one -- middle-class liberals and middle class radicals were
Jew
haters by nature. Yes, that includes the thousands and even millions of
Jews
who fall into these designations. Obviously if they are all Jew
haters,
Wright must be a virtual Hitler.

It is a fact that Hilary Clinton is still losing ground. It is a fact
that
John McCain is a candidate who stands on the record of the Bush
administration, blames homeowners (but not banks) for their reckless
investments, and promises to stay in Iraq for 100 years. And why not
1,000,
by God! And this at a time when the United States may be unusually
isolated
in Iraq, as the only force fighting the Mahdi movement headed by Sadr.

The economy has experienced a crash like 1929. The big question is
whether
the combination of the fed and the government, printing money like
there was
no tomorrow can prevent a 1931. And nobody knows the answer.

The war in Iraq is stalemated at best. None of the original goals have
been
achieved. None of the substitute goals have been achieved either.  The
Iraq
policy has failed. The Cuba policy has failed. The administration is
too
weak to take effective advantage of China's vulnerability on the Tibet
issue. The Cuba policy is in shreds, with the successful transition
from
Fidel to Raul Castro.

In addition to all his other survivals, Obama has survived the most
devastating blow of all: Comrade Ruthless C.O.A.T. Exists' proclamation
that
"Obama is toast" because of his association with Rev. Wright.

In all these circumstances, both the rulers and the masses have good
reason
to grope for something new. I think we are headed for an Obama
presidency.

Enjoy your trip, Walter.




_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to