Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[John Hunter]

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Benjamin Root  wrote:

> Working through the checklist, I am wary of cutting an RC at this particular
> moment.  Why is just about a quarter of all the tests coming back as known
> fails?  Also, running unit/memleak_hawaii3.py is showing what seems to be a
> memory leak (GTKAgg, Python 2.7, Ubuntu, 32-bit) on my system.  The step ups
> are about 40-50 KB at about once every 10 seconds.


Hey Ben,

You haven't announced or posted an rc tarball for testing yet have
you?  Would you like me to do this?  Are we holding on anything before
putting out something for general testing?

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[Sandro Tosi]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:23, John Hunter  wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Benjamin Root  wrote:
>
>> Working through the checklist, I am wary of cutting an RC at this particular
>> moment.

It was announced here:

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28136691

I'm testing the debian package and I'll follow up with my thoughts on
it when done.

Cheers,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[John Hunter]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Sandro Tosi  wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:23, John Hunter  wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Benjamin Root  wrote:
>>
>>> Working through the checklist, I am wary of cutting an RC at this particular
>>> moment.
>
> It was announced here:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28136691
>
> I'm testing the debian package and I'll follow up with my thoughts on
> it when done.

Thanks, missed that.  Christoph and Russell, will you have a chance to
build some binaries we can upload for testing?   Once this is done, we
should announce to the user list.

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[Christoph Gohlke]

On 9/27/2011 9:32 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Sandro Tosi  wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:23, John Hunter  wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Benjamin Root  wrote:
>>>
 Working through the checklist, I am wary of cutting an RC at this 
 particular
 moment.
>>
>> It was announced here:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28136691
>>
>> I'm testing the debian package and I'll follow up with my thoughts on
>> it when done.
>
> Thanks, missed that.  Christoph and Russell, will you have a chance to
> build some binaries we can upload for testing?   Once this is done, we
> should announce to the user list.
>
>

matplotlib-1.1.0.win installers are at 
. They were built 
against numpy 1.6.1.

Christoph

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[John Hunter]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Christoph Gohlke  wrote:

> matplotlib-1.1.0.win installers are at
> . They were built
> against numpy 1.6.1.


Ahh, yes, I would have seen that if I had read Sandro's link to the
end.  Must read more carefully.  Thanks.

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[Sandro Tosi]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:30, Sandro Tosi  wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:23, John Hunter  wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Benjamin Root  wrote:
>>
>>> Working through the checklist, I am wary of cutting an RC at this particular
>>> moment.
>
> It was announced here:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28136691
>
> I'm testing the debian package and I'll follow up with my thoughts on
> it when done.

Ok, so here they are:

- what's the difference between examples/ and lib/mpl_examples/ dirs?
diff says they are identical, but maybe there's a reason there are 2
copies of them. If not, maybe you can remove one, so to reduce
confusion :)
- the tarball has grown a lot in size, ~3 times, but in the changelog
there's no mention of the reason of this growth (baseline images for
testing)
- the doc generation stops at thumbnails regen, it seems 'thumbnails'
dict is empty and so it stucks there.

If you want me to do any tests, just ask me.

Cheers,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[Benjamin Root]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Tosi  wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:30, Sandro Tosi  wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:23, John Hunter  wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Benjamin Root 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Working through the checklist, I am wary of cutting an RC at this
> particular
> >>> moment.
> >
> > It was announced here:
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28136691
> >
> > I'm testing the debian package and I'll follow up with my thoughts on
> > it when done.
>
> Ok, so here they are:
>
> - what's the difference between examples/ and lib/mpl_examples/ dirs?
> diff says they are identical, but maybe there's a reason there are 2
> copies of them. If not, maybe you can remove one, so to reduce
> confusion :)
>

lib/mpl_examples/ is a symbolic link to examples.  It is there because of
issues with sphinx doc generation.


> - the tarball has grown a lot in size, ~3 times, but in the changelog
> there's no mention of the reason of this growth (baseline images for
> testing)
>

Hmm, I tried my best to clean up the source tree after testing, but maybe I
missed something?


> - the doc generation stops at thumbnails regen, it seems 'thumbnails'
> dict is empty and so it stucks there.
>
>
And maybe I got rid of something I shouldn't have?

Ben Root
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.0 branch created

[Russell E. Owen]

In article 
,
 Benjamin Root  wrote:

> The source tarball for the rc can be found here:
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0/
> 
> binary builders can use this and upload the binaries there.  Please let me
> know when the windows and mac binaries are ready so that we can make an
> official call for testing.  I also tagged the v1.1.0-rc1 commit on github.

I put up a Mac installer for Python 2.7. It passed all unit tests but 
I've not done anything else with it. If you need an installer for 2.6 I 
can do that as well, but was hoping to wait for the final.

-- Russell


--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[Russell Owen]

I just uploaded a Mac binary for 32-bit Python 2.7. I propose to leave it at 
that unless the 2.6 version is required for the release candidate.

-- Russell

On Sep 27, 2011, at 9:32 AM, John Hunter wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Sandro Tosi  wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:23, John Hunter  wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Benjamin Root  wrote:
>>> 
 Working through the checklist, I am wary of cutting an RC at this 
 particular
 moment.
>> 
>> It was announced here:
>> 
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28136691
>> 
>> I'm testing the debian package and I'll follow up with my thoughts on
>> it when done.
> 
> Thanks, missed that.  Christoph and Russell, will you have a chance to
> build some binaries we can upload for testing?   Once this is done, we
> should announce to the user list.


--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[John Hunter]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Russell Owen  wrote:
> I just uploaded a Mac binary for 32-bit Python 2.7. I propose to leave it at 
> that unless the 2.6 version is required for the release candidate.

Great.

Ben, did you have any luck getting the 1.1.0 docs hosted in some temp location?

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[Benjamin Root]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:58 PM, John Hunter  wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Russell Owen  wrote:
> > I just uploaded a Mac binary for 32-bit Python 2.7. I propose to leave it
> at that unless the 2.6 version is required for the release candidate.
>
> Great.
>
> Ben, did you have any luck getting the 1.1.0 docs hosted in some temp
> location?
>

No, I couldn't figure out how to do that on sourceforge.

Ben Root
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

[John Hunter]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Benjamin Root  wrote:

> No, I couldn't figure out how to do that on sourceforge.

OK, I'm working on this and will send out the ANN when it is done.
Thanks everyone for their help, and Ben especially for herding the
cats and pushing us forward.

JDH

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel