Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

2012-07-05 Thread Russell Owen
I just uploaded the Mac binaries.

Several minor concerns:
- Many unit tests failed on Mac OS X 10.4 (which is where I build the 10.3.9 
version) due to "too many files open", but the same binary looks fine on 10.5.
- The 64-bit version (10.6 and later) had one unexpected failure on 10.7 (I 
have not yet had time to test it on 10.6)

localhost$ python -c "import matplotlib as m ; m.test(verbosity=1)"
..K..KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK..KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KKK...KK...KK.KK....KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK..KK.KK.KK.F..KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK...KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK.KK..KK.KK
==
FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.mathfont_stix_14_test.test
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/case.py",
 line 197, in runTest
self.test(*self.arg)
  File 
"/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py",
 line 36, in failer
result = f(*args, **kwargs)
  File 
"/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py",
 line 140, in do_test
'(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close: 
/Users/rowen/result_images/test_mathtext/mathfont_stix_14.png vs. 
/Users/rowen/result_images/test_mathtext/expected-mathfont_stix_14.png (RMS 
3377.889)

--
Ran 1068 tests in 161.293s

-- Russell

On Jun 9, 2012, at 2:14 PM, John Hunter wrote:

> I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/
> 
> As soon as we get binaries, I'll send out another call for testing on
> the users list.  Russell and Christoph, easiest if you just upload the
> binaries directly.  You should both have permissions on the sf site.
> 
> A copy of the site docs are available at
> http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/rc/v1.1.1rc2/


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel


Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

2012-07-05 Thread Russell E. Owen
In article ,
 Russell Owen  wrote:

> I just uploaded the Mac binaries.
> 
> Several minor concerns:
> - Many unit tests failed on Mac OS X 10.4 (which is where I build the 10.3.9 
> version) due to "too many files open", but the same binary looks fine on 
> 10.5.
> - The 64-bit version (10.6 and later) had one unexpected failure on 10.7 (I 
> have not yet had time to test it on 10.6)...

When I tested on Mac OS X 10.6 I found that most unit tests were somehow 
missing. Rather than try to diagnose the problem, I built a new binary 
on 10.6, confirmed that it installed properly (with all unit tests) on 
10.6 and 10.7, then uploaded it to replace the earlier 10.6 binary.

The same test I mentioned in my previous post still fails using the new 
binary, on both 10.6 and 10.7.

-- Russell


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel


Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

2012-07-05 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Russell E. Owen  wrote:

>
> When I tested on Mac OS X 10.6 I found that most unit tests were somehow
> missing. Rather than try to diagnose the problem, I built a new binary
> on 10.6, confirmed that it installed properly (with all unit tests) on
> 10.6 and 10.7, then uploaded it to replace the earlier 10.6 binary.
>
> The same test I mentioned in my previous post still fails using the new
> binary, on both 10.6 and 10.7.
>
>
Almost all of the test failures you ported were 'K' ie KNOWNFAIL.  Usually
when you get a bunch of knownfails, it is because you don't have a prereq
installed, eg inkscape for converting SVG.

Are you sure you have the requirements on all of the platforms

http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/devel/coding_guide.html#requirements

Thanks,
JDH
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel


Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

2012-07-05 Thread Russell Owen
When I say "somehow missing" I'm not referring to the K (known fail). I'm 
referring to exceptions and tracebacks caused by trying to import test_X for 
various value of X: the modules were actually missing. I've never seen that 
before, so I was quite shocked. Normally I build on the oldest version of Mac 
OS X I can for the desired binary, but in this case I wanted to see what would 
happen if I built on 10.7 for a binary that works on 10.6 and 10.7. It resulted 
in this odd situation: the binary installed everything correctly on 10.7 but 
somehow failed to install some sub-packages on 10.6. Unfortunately I don't have 
time to look into it right now; I just took the simple way out of building 
again on 10.6. Unfortunately that meant a binary with known issues was up for a 
few hours. I do have the defective binary installer if anyone wants a look at 
it.

-- Russell

On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:47 PM, John Hunter wrote:

> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Russell E. Owen  wrote:
> 
> When I tested on Mac OS X 10.6 I found that most unit tests were somehow
> missing. Rather than try to diagnose the problem, I built a new binary
> on 10.6, confirmed that it installed properly (with all unit tests) on
> 10.6 and 10.7, then uploaded it to replace the earlier 10.6 binary.
> 
> The same test I mentioned in my previous post still fails using the new
> binary, on both 10.6 and 10.7.
> 
> 
> Almost all of the test failures you ported were 'K' ie KNOWNFAIL.  Usually 
> when you get a bunch of knownfails, it is because you don't have a prereq 
> installed, eg inkscape for converting SVG.
> 
> Are you sure you have the requirements on all of the platforms
> 
> http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/devel/coding_guide.html#requirements
> 
> Thanks,
> JDH  

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel


Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

2012-07-05 Thread Russell Owen
By the way: I installed ghostscript from source and Inkscape application from 
binary. More tests pass, but many still show K. My guess is that matplotlib can 
see ghostscript but not the Inkscape application (no surprise). Inkscape has 
too many dependencies for me to want to try to build it from source.

That leaves one unexpected failure with matplotlib 1.1.1 with the 64-bit 
10.6-and-later binary and no failures with the 32-bit 10.3.9-and-later binary.

Regards,

-- Russell

On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:47 PM, John Hunter wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Russell E. Owen  wrote:
> 
> When I tested on Mac OS X 10.6 I found that most unit tests were somehow
> missing. Rather than try to diagnose the problem, I built a new binary
> on 10.6, confirmed that it installed properly (with all unit tests) on
> 10.6 and 10.7, then uploaded it to replace the earlier 10.6 binary.
> 
> The same test I mentioned in my previous post still fails using the new
> binary, on both 10.6 and 10.7.
> 
> 
> Almost all of the test failures you ported were 'K' ie KNOWNFAIL.  Usually 
> when you get a bunch of knownfails, it is because you don't have a prereq 
> installed, eg inkscape for converting SVG.
> 
> Are you sure you have the requirements on all of the platforms
> 
> http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/devel/coding_guide.html#requirements
> 
> Thanks,
> JDH  

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel


Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

2012-07-05 Thread Eric Firing
On 07/05/2012 01:41 PM, Russell Owen wrote:
> By the way: I installed ghostscript from source and Inkscape application
> from binary. More tests pass, but many still show K. My guess is that
> matplotlib can see ghostscript but not the Inkscape application (no
> surprise). Inkscape has too many dependencies for me to want to try to
> build it from source.
>
> That leaves one unexpected failure with matplotlib 1.1.1 with the 64-bit
> 10.6-and-later binary and no failures with the 32-bit 10.3.9-and-later
> binary.

That one Stix failure is nothing to worry about; it seems there has been 
some subtle Stix change such that a baseline image that works on one 
machine fails on another.

Eric

>
> Regards,
>
> -- Russell
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:47 PM, John Hunter wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Russell E. Owen > > wrote:
>>
>>
>> When I tested on Mac OS X 10.6 I found that most unit tests were
>> somehow
>> missing. Rather than try to diagnose the problem, I built a new binary
>> on 10.6, confirmed that it installed properly (with all unit tests) on
>> 10.6 and 10.7, then uploaded it to replace the earlier 10.6 binary.
>>
>> The same test I mentioned in my previous post still fails using
>> the new
>> binary, on both 10.6 and 10.7.
>>
>>
>> Almost all of the test failures you ported were 'K' ie KNOWNFAIL.
>>  Usually when you get a bunch of knownfails, it is because you don't
>> have a prereq installed, eg inkscape for converting SVG.
>>
>> Are you sure you have the requirements on all of the platforms
>>
>> http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/devel/coding_guide.html#requirements
>>
>> Thanks,
>> JDH
>
>
>
> --
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>
>
>
> ___
> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
>



--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel


Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

2012-07-05 Thread Jouni K . Seppänen
Russell Owen  writes:

> By the way: I installed ghostscript from source and Inkscape
> application from binary. More tests pass, but many still show K. My
> guess is that matplotlib can see ghostscript but not the Inkscape
> application (no surprise). Inkscape has too many dependencies for me
> to want to try to build it from source.

The following should help matplotlib find Inkscape:

PATH=$PATH:/Applications/Inkscape.app/Contents/Resources/bin \
python -c 'import matplotlib; matplotlib.test(1)'

-- 
Jouni K. Seppänen
http://www.iki.fi/jks


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel