Re: utf8 patch for mc, slang 2 version

2006-06-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Hi,

  BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
 
  I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it. Maintaining two backends
  IMHO just causes headaches while it doesn't make mc better. I still can't
  see why developers do not decide which one to use and drop the other one.
 
 Maybe compatibility with older UN*Xes with curses but no slang?

Asking these sysadmins to install slang (or compile mc to its bundled slang)
is IMHO easier than to do double work in mc.

 Last time I played with it ncursesw (but not plain ncurses) handled UTF-8 
 just fine.
 
 e.g. you can pass a UTF-8 encoded string to addstr(), and provided the
 locale is set correctly, ncursesw will compute its width correctly. It is 
 *also* possible to use addwstr() with UCS-4, but not compulsory.

It's clear now, thanks!

Anyway, there are plenty of apps (e.g. vim, joe) that perfectly support
UTF-8 and use ncurses (not the w version). I wonder how it is possible...


-- 
Egmont
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel


[bug #16762] Cannot compile mc-2006-06-05-20

2006-06-15 Thread Pavel Tsekov

Follow-up Comment #19, bug #16762 (project mc):

purportex,

have you tried to fix the problem by applying the suggested patch ?


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=16762

___
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/

___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel