Re: [Fwd: Re: memory leak with quick view]
Yury V. Zaytsev said: (by the date of Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:17:49 +0100) Hi! On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 14:59 +0300, Andrew Borodin wrote: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:30:48 +0100 Janek Kozicki wrote: Those problems are still present. Do I need to select some other skin? - gray directory names (not white) This works for me. Probably there's a problem with the color palette of your terminal emulator. I created a separate user account to be sure that there isn't any leftover configuration. And I can reproduce this bug in text console (not under X), and also under xterm launched without any extra arguments. Both under a fresh user account. - quick view on binary files breaks display It's known bug. The viewer in panel is created with wrong coordinates and sizes. I could reproduce it with LANG=C mc and quick view on the left panel. Care to post the ticket number? Sly Ilia didn't seem to be able to reproduce it yesterday??? In fact I'm unable to create a condition when those two bugs do not appear :) Otherwise I would be able to tell you how to fix it, and that would help you to identify the bug. best regards -- Janek Kozicki | ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
hu.po
Hello, I've polished the Hungarian translation after some testing. See hu.2.po attached to ticket #1370. Sorry for the last-minute change. Merry Christmas / С Рождеством / חנוכה שמח Gergely ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: testfarm
Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: This looks interesting. Am I correct that this is only a framework for build tests for different combinations of build options (builds / doesn't build) and doesn't have anything to do with functional tests (e.g. works / doesn't work)? Right. Actually it's just a bunch of scripts which do tests builds. As you might already know, I'm building nightlies for all currently supported RH distros (with the exception of EL3) for almost half a year. Great. What configurations do you use ? Perhaps you could add them to the testfarm ? This has proved to be of great help, but now that I spared some money for new hardware I might consider doing the same for Debian / Ubuntu and running some kind of functional / build testsuite on a daily basis with the results published on the web / mailed to the list in case of failures. Yep, that was my idea for the next step: some build-results list where the bots post their results. or perhaps even create tickets (in an own category, so they dont mix up with the regular ones ;-o) It would be nice if we could introduce some officially supported testing framework in /contrib to check for most prominent bugs / general build options coverage etc. Yep, that's a good idea. I've just created a new ticket for it: http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/1891 Maybe we should also have a closer look at tinderbox or xenofarm. cu -- -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ cellphone: +49 174 7066481 email: i...@metux.de skype: nekrad666 -- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme -- ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
