[media-dakwah] Hate Crime : Rage over anti-Islam rally, And CAIR-CAN - Windsor Muslims Respons
http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/ bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful === News Update === Hate Crime - Rage over anti-Islam rally Dalson Chen - Windsor Star Friday, January 12, 2007 Controversy filled a west Windsor church where the lecture of a purported former Muslim terrorist warned that Islam is a religion of war being brought to Canadian soil. In a speech at Campbell Baptist Church on Thursday night, 49-year-old Zachariah Anani said that Islamic doctrine teaches nothing less than the "ambushing, seizing and slaying" of non-believers -- especially Jews and Christians. "Violence keeps going on," said Anani, a Lebanese-born convert to Christianity who came to Windsor in 1997. 'No Prisoners' The hour-long talk, entitled The Deadly Threat of Islam, described the religion as worshipping a god who "fights and kills" and "strikes with terror," and allows no prisoners in battles against non-believers. "That's how Islamic doctrine obliges its followers to conduct in war time," Anani said. More than 120 people packed the church to hear Anani's speech. Many came to contest his views in a question period that often grew heated with raised voices talking over each other. "You're inciting hatred by the title of tonight's topic," argued Gary Roberts while waving a hand with emotion. Roberts, a 50-year-old Windsor resident, said he's not a member of the church, but decided to come to the meeting as soon as he learned of it. "I just couldn't sit back and not say nothing," he said. "I had to vent." Windsor police said two officers in plain clothes attended the lecture at the church's request. Donald McKay, senior pastor at the church, said the event was organized simply to propagate what the church believes to be "absolute truth." "We have no desire to be offensive. We have no desire to polarize people unnecessarily," McKay said. But in asking Anani to clarify points of his speech, McKay described the Islamic faith as "oppressive" and "vicious." "The Muslims are coming over here to Windsor, Canada, for the purpose of advancing this faith," McKay said. A group of seven male Muslims who attended the meeting shook their heads at Anani's speech. At the start of the event, the men declined to stand for the church's hymn as a sign of protest. Tarik Mohammed, 32, said that Anani took quotes from the Qur'an "out of context," and demonstrated he could do the same with the Bible's Old Testament. "If I want to go through this, I can find a lot about killing," Mohammed said to Anani. "What you did tonight, you preached hate. You did not preach Christianity What you did right now is causing instability in our community and throughout the world." Gabriel Keresztes, who converted to Islam from Christianity three years ago, agreed with Mohammed. "You cannot sweep and generalize everything and you cannot put everyone in a box," said the 23-year-old Windsor resident. "We stepped a step back tonight in history, in the community of Windsor." McKay said he finds it interesting that advocates of Islam would argue for tolerance. "Islam is the most intolerant religion in the world today." McKay said Anani killed "hundreds of people in the name of Allah" before converting to Christianity, and Anani has brought his perspective to such media outlets as CNN and Fox News. Anani said he was responsible for deaths while engaged in the Lebanese civil war before a missionary showed him the Christian path in 1975. According to Anani, his goal is "awakening people to the truth." "We've been bombarded all the time about how good and nice is Islam," Anani said. During the question period, 46-year-old church member Bruno Franciskovic yelled that Muslims were responsible for the suicide attacks on the World Trade Center. "This day and age, you don't hear about Christians doing things like that," Franciskovic shouted. Fatimah Abdullah, a 46-year-old Windsor Muslim, responded by shouting "Timothy McVeigh" -- the U.S. citizen responsible for the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. Abdullah said she found Anani's views "misinformed and ignorant." "I can't see this as hate-mongering. I see this as ignorance," she said. "This is an effort to push Christianity at the victimization of the truth." The lecture was the first in a series of four this month. Anani said he's not intimidated by the reaction to his first lecture, and the series will continue as planned. "It's always like that." source: http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/news/story.html?id=8f12e622-3aa5-47c8-86ac-6eecddd92b07&k=71255 === CAIR-CAN and Windsor Muslims Ask Police to Investigate Possible Hate Speech - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - (Ottawa, Canada Jan 13, 2007) The Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-CAN), Muslim Association of Canada (MAC), Windsor Islamic Association, Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), and Al Hijra Mosque and School, ar
[media-dakwah] Reading Bush : “If you are afraid to speak out, you are not in America any more” - ‘unknown’
http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/ bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful === News Update === Reading Bush “If you are afraid to speak out, you are not in America any more” - ‘unknown’ By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich 01/13/07 "Information Clearing House" -- - The United States, once known as the beacon of democracy, finds itself in a dilemma. It is faced with a President that is deaf to the people. In his address to the nation on January 10, 2007 he left little doubt that he means to rule over the people he was ‘elected’ to serve. In tune with everything else he does, he has devalued the meaning of the word democracy and eroded its ideals; which explains why he is ‘dictating’ democracy to other nations. “But victory in Iraq will bring something new in the Arab world - a functioning democracy that polices its territory, upholds the rule of law, respects fundamental human liberties, and answers to its people.” Even if one were to allow for the fact that he is no longer in touch with his faculties, one would think that his speech writers would not make such a slip. Wasn’t there a clear indication from the people that in our so-called democracy the people to whom he is answerable, told him to deescalate the American presence in Iraq? He is obliterating the rule of the law, disrespecting fundamental human liberties and yet he is demanding that the Arab world exercise democracy. Clearly the Arab world fare far better not following his suit for at least hundreds of thousands of lives would be spared. Much like the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, Mr. Bush is misleading the American people about what the mission in Iraq is and will continue to be. He had this to say: “A democratic Iraq will not be perfect. But it will be a country that fights terrorists instead of harboring them - and it will help bring a future of peace and security for our children and grandchildren.” He forgets that in a digital age, history, especially recent history, is recorded. It was Mr. Bush’s White House that offered sanctuary to terrorists in Iraq. Even the US Department Personnel as well as non-US personnel were taken aback when Mr. Bush ordered MEK terrorists to be granted ‘special persons status’ under the Geneva Conventions . Yet here he is, at the height of hypocrisy, relying on our short memories, asking for American soldiers to ‘sacrifice’ so that Iraqis will not harbor terrorists. “Countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and the Gulf States need to understand that an American defeat in Iraq would create a new sanctuary for extremists - and a strategic threat to their survival.” Mr. Bush is calling to his friends in the region, all of whom happen to be ruled by dictators, to cooperate in the war against Iran, the next war he has planned for the region. The stability of Iraq has never been his concern, nor the death of the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Did he have these thoughts as the Mother Of All Bombs (MOAB) were sent to Iraq as part of the arsenal? Iraqis are irrelevant. Mr. Bush now needs the cooperation of Saudi Arabia. A country which due to its authoritarian rule and relationship with the United States gave birth to al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden’s hatred of the West. Is Mr. Bush’s love of Saudi Arabia simply the oil or is it the fact that the Sunni insurgents killing American soldiers, the al- Qaeda network that is spread over 60 countries, stemmed from Saudi Arabia and need to be controlled by Mr. Bush’s Saudi allies? Maybe it is their hatred of and rivalry with Iranians or simply it’s their fondness of democracy! After all, there is no limit to this President’s love for ‘democracy’. While his aim is to uproot the Tehran regime with bombs, he appeals to the Saudi regime to understand that Iraq’s stability is paramount to their survival – the survival of their despotism. Not long ago, a $47 billion arms deal between America’s close ally the British and the Saudis was concluded and cleverly concealed from the public. There were two chilling stipulations to this deal: first, that the Brits would freeze their ongoing investigation into certain royal family members; and the second far more important stipulation was that they would expel from England two Moslem, Saudi progressive thinkers who were pro- democracy ; reducing the risk of contaminating the Saudis with the ideals of democracy. Those who believe Mr. Bush has a Wilsonian agenda may want to re-evaluate their supposition. Clearly 20,000 soldiers will not be enough to confront Iran militarily. There are only two scenarios. The draft will be instituted early in 2007 and soldiers will be asked to serve a mad man – or worse still, there will be weapons of mass destruction deployed, the plans of which were drawn up in 2003. In an August 1, 2005 i
[media-dakwah] ZIONIST RACIST : ISRAELI ARABS (PALESTINIANS) RACIALLY PROFILED
http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/ bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful === News Update === ZIONIST RACIST : ISRAELI ARABS (PALESTINIANS) RACIALLY PROFILED DesertPeace January 13, 2007 Israel constantly denies that its Arab citizens are treated any differently than its Jewish ones. In plain, simple English... that is nothing but a lie. The following report that I have linked HERE is from the Electronic Intifada, it is true... I have seen it happen at the airport, I travelled with Palestinians and witnessed their harassment while I was allowed through security without a problem... simply because I am a Jew. The Palestinians I speak of are Israeli citizens, carrying Israeli passports. Yet, the State of Israel denies these antics makes one wonder what else they might be lying about. source: http://desertpeace.blogspot.com/2007/01/israeli-arabs-palestinians- racially.html === Suspected Citizens: Racial Profiling against Arab Passengers by Israeli Airports and Airlines Report, Arab Association for Human Rights and Center Against Racism, 12 January 2007 The following is the introduction to the report "Suspected Citizens: Racial Profiling against Arab Passengers by Israeli Airports and Airlines", issued in December 2006 Salah Ya'aqubi is an Arab citizen of Israel who lives in the village of Reineh, close to Nazareth. He is a cum laude student in the Department of Nursing in Tel Aviv University. In 2005, Tel Aviv University chose Ya'aqubi as one of its representatives at an international conference held in London. Three other students from the institution were also selected to participate in the conference. The four students served as representatives of the State of Israel at the event. On the day of their flight, Ya'aqubi and the three Jewish students arrived together at Ben Gurion Airport. The four were due to fly with the Israeli air carrier Israir. During the routine security inspection, the security staff inspected the baggage of all four students using x- ray scanners. The Jewish students then moved on and their passports were stamped, while Ya'aqubi was obliged to undergo a special security inspection. The security personnel stated that they intended to undertake a manual search of his baggage. During the course of the manual inspection, the security personnel overturned Ya'aqubi's bag with all his belongings in it, and then asked him to accompany them to a side room so that they could ask him some questions. When Ya'aqubi attempted to ascertain the reason for this special interrogation, which his Jewish friends were not required to undergo, one security guard replied that "these are our instructions, and they come from high up." The security personnel asked Ya'aqubi numerous questions: where he was going, what the purpose of his visit was, and so on. After completing the questioning, the security personnel ordered Ya'aqubi to accompany them to another room, where he was again asked the same questions. When he commented that he had already answered these questions, and that his baggage had already been examined, one of the security personnel told him that these were their instructions, adding, "I don't care what they asked you before." The security guards did not claim that there were any specific suspicions against Ya'aqubi or that he presented any danger. Eventually, after the additional security inspections were completed, Ya'aqubi got on the airplane and flew to the conference. His feeling was that he had been required to undergo a special security inspection because of his national origin, i.e. because he is an Arab. At the end of the conference, as the students headed back to Israel, the phenomenon repeated itself. Ya'aqubi and the Jewish members of the delegation went through the routine inspections at the inspection points of the British authorities. Their baggage was examined and they were politely asked a number of questions. After this inspection was completed, Ya'aqubi was again asked to undergo an additional inspection by Israeli security personnel. After his baggage was examined in an x-ray scanner, the Israeli security personnel demanded to perform a manual search, claiming that there was suspicion that his case contained "molecules of explosives." Ya'aqubi stated that he had no doubt that his baggage contained nothing other than his personal belongings. The security personnel also insisted on carrying out a manual search of Ya'aqubi's hand baggage. After the inspections were completed, the Israeli security personnel informed Ya'aqubi that his large bag would be held at the airport for several days and then sent to Reineh, his home village. Ya'aqubi was then take
[media-dakwah] Instead of “al-Qaeda,” U.S. Kills Nomads in Somalia
http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/ bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful === News Update === Instead of “al-Qaeda,” U.S. Kills Nomads in Somalia Kurt Nimmo, Another Day in the Empire January 13, 2006 As usual, it takes a few days for the truth to emerge, not that the corporate media here in America notices. Instead of killing Fazul Abdullah Moham-med, Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan and Abu Taha al-Sudani, supposedly "al-Qaeda" operatives responsible for the 1998 US embassy bombings in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, the Pentagon killed "herdsmen … gathered with their animals around large fires at night to ward off mosquitoes" in Somalia, according to the Independent. "Oxfam yesterday confirmed at least 70 nomads in the Afmadow district near the border with Kenya had been killed. The nomads were bombed at night and during the day while searching for water sources. Meanwhile, the US ambassador to Kenya has acknowledged that the onslaught on Islamist fighters failed to kill any of the three prime targets," described as "backfir[ing] spectacularly" by the British newspaper. All of this runs counter to the assertions of U.S. ambassador, Michael Ranneberger, who said "that no civilians had been killed or injured and that only one attack had taken place. The UN’s refugee agency, UNHCR, reported that an estimated 100 people were wounded in Monday’s air strikes on the small fishing village of Ras Kamboni launched from the US military base in Djibouti after a mobile phone intercept." It is not explained why impoverished nomads, in search of water, would be in possession of cell phones (or, for that matter, why there are cell phone towers in a remote area of one of the world’s poorest countries). As should be expected, the operations against innocent Somalis serve but one purpose only, that is beyond satiating the blood lust of Muslim hating neocons—it was an excuse to get "boots on the ground for the first time since a 1993 mission backfired and led to a humiliating withdrawal from Somalia," a mission mythologized in violent Hollywood fashion in the film Black Hawk Down. "Under international law, there is a duty to distinguish between military and civilian targets," said Paul Smith-Lomas, Oxfam’s regional director. "We are deeply concerned that this principle is not being adhered to, and that innocent people in Somalia are paying the price," as innocent people have since the neocons captured the Oval Office and large swaths of the Pentagon. It is of no concern to the Pentagon that above mentioned "terrorists" were not killed and innocent nomads suffered instead. In fact, such reckless behavior will serve as a "blueprint" for future operations against Muslim enemies. "U.S. commandos’ military operations in Somalia and the use of the Ethiopian army as a surrogate force to root out al Qaeda operatives there provide a blueprint for counterterrorism missions across the globe, Pentagon strategists say," reports the neocon propaganda syndicate, the New York Times. "U.S. officials said the recent military efforts in Somalia have been led by the Pentagon’s joint Special Operations Command, which directs the military’s most secretive and elite units, including the Army’s Delta Force." The Pentagon’s Special Operations Command runs P2OG, or the Proactive and Preemptive Operations Group, a black budgeted psyop designed to "stimulate reactions" among "terrorists," or maybe that should be nomadic animal herding Muslims careless enough to light fires as AC-130 gunships roam the night skies. Unfortunately, many Somalis live in the Pentagon’s "battlespace" where we are told "al-Qaeda" operates, thus putting "their sovereignty … at risk," as an August 16, 2002, Power Point presentation held at the Defense Science Board made abundantly clear. "Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told members of Congress on Friday that a U.S. airstrike by an AC-130 gunship early this week in Somalia was executed under the Pentagon’s authority to hunt down and kill terrorism suspects around the world, a power given to it by the White House shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks." Bush and crew believe the non-declaration of war against Iraq—that is to say, a "war" not declared by Congress, as required by Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution—gives them the right to attack anybody, anywhere, without regard to Article 51 of the First Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, stating that parties "shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives." But then neocons don’t do the Geneva Conventions—or the Constitution for that matter. Democrat members of Congress complained, if slightly, that the Pentagon is "using U.S. forces outside declared combat zones," thus gi
[media-dakwah] Iraq Cry : An urgent plea from the people of Haditha
http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/ bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful === News Update === An urgent plea from the people of Haditha Mr. Zaid Mahdi Janury 12, 2007 Peace be upon you, I am one of the residents of Haditha, a city under siege for two months now, by the American and Iraqi forces. We have serious shortages of food stuffs and medical supplies. Movements within the city itself is restricted and there are many isolated communities running out of food and fuel. The situation is dire, I beg you, help us make our voice heard by the good people of the world, Alert your representatives and government officials. Help us avert a humanitarian disaster and put an end to the harassment and humiliation we are currently suffering. Sender Mr. Zaid Mahdi Date 11/1/2007 source: http://www.iraq4allnews.dk/index.php?sec=news&act=view_news&id=14932 === -muslim voice- __ BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[media-dakwah] NGOs to sue US over WMD claims - Iraq War Criminal
http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/ bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful === News Update === NGOs to sue US over WMD claims From correspondents in Niamey January 14, 2007 SOME 30 non-governmental organisations in Niger said overnight they are going to sue the United States for nearly two billion dollars for "unfairly accusing" Niger of selling uranium to the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. "Our lawyers are about to file a lawsuit against the US calling for damages of about 1000 billion CFA francs ($2.42 billion dollars) for the harm suffered" by the country, Moustapha Kadi, president of the Collective of organisations in Niger defending the right to energy (CODDAE). The lawsuit by the collective will be filed at either French or Belgian courts, Kadi added. In January 2003, US President George W. Bush accused Saddam of having bought uranium from Niger to make weapons of mass destruction. The Niger collective said in a statement that investigations by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), world media and US officials, all concluded that it was a "false accusation" against Niger. That false information was used by Bush "to invade Iraq," said the collective's statement, which also called for support from Niger's President Mamadou Tandja, who back in 2003 said the US allegations were "harming Niger's image". Niger is the world's third-largest producer of uranium with about nine percent of the global market, according to 2003 figures. The country's two uranium deposits have been mined for 40 years by the French group Areva, number one in civil nuclear energy. source: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21057247-1702,00.html === -muslim voice- __ BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[media-dakwah] US Terrorize The World - 24 Dhul-Hijjah 1427 H (14.1.07)
ivil war. The insurgency movement in Iraq is growing, making nation building on the part of America and its allies ineffective. The U.S. military finds itself stretched excessively thin, with many members serving unprecedented two and three tours of duty in Iraq. Casualty counts, both civilian and military, are on the rise and expensive, but delicate, military hardware is grinding to a halt under the stress of combat in such a rugged environment. America has poured vast sums of its fortune into Iraq, hoping to kick-start a new nation. On the home front and throughout the world, support for the war is waning. Moreover, in Iraq itself, the very people America purports to have liberated from Saddam Hussein now clamor for liberation from what they believe is an occupation by meddling Westerners. http://www.ivaw.org/node/423 === An urgent plea from the people of Haditha. Peace be upon you, I am one of the residents of Haditha, a city under siege for two months now, by the American and Iraqi forces. We have serious shortages of food stuffs and medical supplies. Movements within the city itself is restricted and there are many isolated communities running out of food and fuel. The situation is dire, I beg you, help us make our voice heard by the good people of the world, Alert your representatives and government officials. Help us avert a humanitarian disaster and put an end to the harassment and humiliation we are currently suffering. http://www.iraq4allnews.dk/index.php?sec=news&act=view_news&id=14932 === NGOs to sue US over WMD claims 30 non-governmental organisations in Niger said overnight they are going to sue the United States for nearly two billion dollars for "unfairly accusing" Niger of selling uranium to the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21057247-1702,00.html === Why Do War Attacks Suddenly Stop for Three Days Following Announcement of Every New Bush Policy on Iraq? For the third consecutive day, the main corporate media units in the US- EU have not published news about the US war in Iraq, no attacks on US forces, no so-called Shi'i-Sunni sectarian violence or civil war. Readers can check the main media units of the Zionist Empire (AP, Reuters, CNN, Fox, BBC, etc.) to see that they are abiding by this total absence of war coverage. What's going on? In fact, it has become a pattern for observers to record and analyze. Everytime President Bush announces a new policy or plan in Iraq, news coverage of the war would not include any attacks for two or three days following the announcement. Al-Jazeerah has documented that before in red headlines, attracting readers' attention to this fact. http://www.aljazeerah.info/Editorials/2007%20Editorials/Why%20Do%20War% 20Attacks%20Suddenly%20Stop%20for%20Three%20Days%20Following% 20Announcement%20of%20Every%20New%20Bush%20Policy%20on%20Iraq%20By% 20Hassan%20El-Najjar.htm === U.S. warplanes bomb Baghdad as street battles rage U.S. troops are deploying massive air and ground fire power against heavily populated residential areas in Baghdad as a prelude to the start of the campaign to retake the city they invaded nearly four years ago. "The sky is burning," one witness refusing to be named said of the aerial bombing of mainly Sunni-dominated districts of Haifa, Sheikh Omar and Alawi. http://www.azzaman.com/english/index.asp?fname=news%5C2007-01-12% 5Ckurd.htm === Why the US Is Not Leaving Iraq: The Booming Business of War Profiteers The military-industrial-complex [would] cause military spending to be driven not by national security needs but by a network of weapons makers, lobbyists and elected officials. - Dwight D. Eisenhower There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket. - General Smedley D. Butler http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? context=viewArticle&code=HOS20070112&articleId=4423 === Puppet Govt Parrot : Al-Maliki reacts to new Bush plan Nouri al-Maliki, the Iraqi prime minister, issued his first comment on the new US plan outlined on Wednesday, calling it "identical to our strategy and intentions". http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/2ADA34D4- E729-4938-98F5-5572BA45F4C4.htm === Iraq oil city rocked by attacks KIRKUK, Iraq (AFP) - Iraq's northern oil hub of Kirkuk has been rocked by attacks as insurgents shot dead two contractors and blew up a Shiite mosque under construction. Gunmen planted explosives in the mosque in the Ni
[media-dakwah] Seri 761. Terjemahan S Al-Balad Ayat 5 dan 7
BISMILLA-HIRRAHMA-NIRRAHIYM [Kolom Tetap Harian Fajar] WAHYU DAN AKAL - IMAN DAN ILMU 761. Terjemahan S Al-Balad Ayat 5 dan 7 S. ALBLD (90) AYhSB AN LN YQDR 'ALYH AhD 5 AYhSB AN LM YRH AhD 7 dibaca (tanda - dipanjangkan membacanya): 5. ayahsabu allam yaqdira 'alaihi ahad 6. ayahsabu allam yarahu- ahad Terjemahan Departemen Agama RI 5. Apakah manusia itu menyangka bahwa sekali-kali tiada seorangpun yang berkuasa atasnya? 7. Apakah dia menyangka bahwa tiada seorangpun yang melihatnya? Terjemahan H.Mahmud Yunus: 5. Adakah ia mengira, bahwa seseorang tak akan berkuasa terhadapnya? 7. Adakah ia mengira, bahwa seseorang tak ada yang melihatnya? Terjemahan Muhammad Marmaduke Pikthall 5. Thinketh he that none has power over him? 7. Thinketh he that none beholdeth him? Terjemahan Soedewo Denkt hij, dat niemand macht heeft over hem? Denkt hij, dat niemand hem zit? Mari kita terjemahkan kata demi kata: A = apakah YhSB = ia memperhitungkan AN LM = tidak ada YQDR = berkuasa 'ALYH = atasnya AhD = (ada, yaitu) SATU AhD dalam ayat (90:5) itu bukan manusia, tetapi Allah Yang berkuasa (YQDR), demikian pula dalam ayat (90:7) AhD bukan manusia melainkan Allah yang melihat (YRH). Maksudnya kedua ayat itu, tidak ada yang luput dari kuasa dan penglihatan Allah. Terjemahan AhD yang menunjuk kepada manusia (seseorang, niemand) dalam kedua ayat itu tidak punya pemaknaan sama sekali. Seorang Fir'aun tentu bersikap tidak seseorang manusiapun yang bisa berkuasa atas dirinya. Anak bengal yang dipaksa puasa tentu akan bersikap tidak seseorang manusiapun yang bisa melihatnya, kalau masuk sendiri ke dalam ruang yang tertutup dan gelap, lalu makan minum di dalamnya. Maka terjemahan Muhammad Marmaduke Pikthall yang benar, yaitu none (SATUpun tiada). Jadi terjemahan itu semestinya demikian: 5. Apakah manusia itu menyangka bahwa sekali-kali tiada SATUpun Yang berkuasa atasnya? 7. Apakah dia menyangka bahwa tiada SATUpun Yang melihatnya? *** Sebuah kisah nyata sebagai ilustrasi. Jamil Azzaini yang Inspirator, Senior Trainer bercerita: Saya pernah diundang oleh perusahaan ternama untuk memberikan "pencerahan." Dalam kesempatan itu saya menyampaikan: "Korupsi adalah perbuatan negatif, maka di dunia para pelakunya pasti akan mendapat balasan berupa keburukan pula. Keburukan dapat berupa musibah, penyakit, kehilangan harta benda, ketidakharmonisan rumah tangga, mendekam di penjara, tercoreng nama baiknya, kegelisahan dan hal-hal negatif lainnya," jelas saya. Ketika sesi tanya jawab, salah seorang pimpinan di perusahaan itu mengkritik pedas pernyataan saya itu. Walau saya sudah menjelaskan dengan argumen-argumen ilmiah dan contoh-contoh dalam kehidupan, dia tetap tidak yakin. Sampai kami berpisah, kami masih pada pendapat masing-masing. Tujuh bulan berlalu, pimpinan itu tiba-tiba menelpon saya. -- "Pak Jamil, saya ingin bertemu anda," ujarnya singkat. Karena penasaran, undangan dari beliau saya prioritaskan. Singkat kata, pada waktu dan tempat yang telah disepakati kami bertemu. Rupanya beliau tiba lebih dulu di tempat kami janjian. Begitu saya datang, beliau segera menyambut dengan sebuah pelukan erat. Cukup lama beliau memeluk saya. -- "Maafkan saya pak Jamil. Maafkan saya," ucapnya, sambil terisak dan terus memeluk saya. Karena masih bingung dengan kejadian ini saya diam saja. Setelah kami duduk, beliau membuka percakapan. -- "Saya sekarang yakin dengan apa yang pak Jamil dulu katakan. Kalau kita berbuat energi positif maka kita akan mendapat kebaikan dan bila kita berbuat energi negatif maka pasti kita akan mendapat keburukan," ujarnya. -- "Bagaimana ceritanya sekarang kok bapak jadi yakin?" tanya saya. -- "Selama saya menjabat pimpinan di perusahaan itu, saya menerima uang yang bukan menjadi hak saya. Semuanya saya catat. Jumlahnya lima ratus dua puluh enam juta rupiah," katanya. Sembari menarik napas panjang beliau melanjutkan bercerita. Kali ini tentang anaknya. -- "Anak saya sekolah di Australia. Karena pengaruh pergaulan, dia terkena narkoba. Sudah saya obati dan sembuh. Ketika liburan, dia ke Amerika dan Kanada. Tidak disangka, di sana dia bertemu dengan teman pengguna narkobanya ketika di Australia. Anak saya sebenarnya menolak menggunakan lagi. Namun dia dipaksa dan akhirnya anak saya kambuh lagi, bahkan makin parah, pak." Selama bercerita, beliau tak henti mengusap pipinya yang basah dengan air mata yang terus meleleh seperti tak mau berhenti. -- "Pak Jamil tahu berapa biaya pengobatan narkoba dan penyakit anak saya?" Tanpa menunggu jawaban saya, lelaki separuh baya itu berkata lirih, -- "Biayanya lima ratus dua puluh enam juta rupiah. Sama persis dengan uang kotor yang saya terima, pak!" Beliau tertunduk dan menggeleng-gelengkan kepala disertai isak tangis yang makin keras. Dengan terbata lelaki itu berkata, -- "Uang korupsi itu telah merusak anak saya, pak. Saya menyesal. Saya bukan orang tua yang baik. Saya telah merusak anak saya, pak!" *** Allah me
