Re: [MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-26 Thread Loren Faeth
I've got/had all three.  I think the 103 is better in a 124 
body.  The SDL is the world's most wonderful car. The 123 with a OM 
616/617 is very reliable and inexpensive to operate.  I'd RUN FAST 
away from a recently welded head.  Unless you have a good head and 
don't mind changing it.



At 12:04 PM 9/21/2007, you wrote:
Gang,

Recently transferred from Toronto to the SF Bay area for a couple of 
years. I'm trying to control myself as I look at all the car candy 
on craigslist and in local dealer lots.

Although I am an MB diesel nutter, I have been tempted by the 
straight-6 300SE/L W126 machines. They seem to be plentiful and cheap.

So far I've stuck to OM617 engines, and in fact to W123 models 
because they are simple and indestructible. Since my focus for the 
last 10+ years has been on diesel engines, I've not really paid 
attention to gassers, but it seems like the M103 engine is pretty 
good. I lust after a 300SDL (except the 3.5, obviously), but I'm 
afraid of all the trouble people seem to have with the OM603 
engines, especially head cracks, failing tensioners, and engine 
management issues. I was talking to someone this a.m. who was 
selling an SDL. 170k.mi, $6k. The engine had overheated and a 
machine shop welded the head etc. Almost no mileage since the 
rebuild. I presume this approach will not last, and that there is 
trouble waiting in the wings on that car...

So what's the deal? Is the M103 a good machine (as good as the 
venerable M110), or am I just as well with an OM603.961?

D.

PS: For torture, look at pics of the stunningly gorgeous W116 for 
sale on  http://www.misterdiesel.com  If only I could afford it...


--
David Bruckmann, Palo Alto, CA
Current Reality:
1970 Citroen DS21 Pallas (170,000 km) Goettin
1976 Citroen 2CV6 (145,000 km) Piaf  http://dolly.bruckmann.com/
Shady Past:
1971 Citroen DS21 Pallas (137,000km), 1972 Citroen DS21 Pallas (502,000km)
1978 Mercedes-Benz 300D (1,200,000 km or thereabouts) Sieglinde
1979 Mercedes-Benz 300TD non-turbo (260,000 km)  Diva
1981 Citroen 2CV6 Charleston (120,000km), 1988 Merkur XR4Ti (209,000km)
1981 Peugeot 505 GRD (350,000km), 1984 MB 300TD (385,000 km) Gertraud
1985 Toyota Camry The Slamry (330,000km) 1986 Renault 9 1.7L (155,000 km)
2002 VW Golf GLS TDI (74,000 km)

--

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Loren Faeth 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-23 Thread Marshall Booth
OK Don wrote:
 Having owned both 617 and 603 cars, I far prefer the 603. It's a much
 nicer engine - smoother and quieter.  By at least one estimate, must
 of the heads that are going to crack, have already. Mine has over
 300,000 miles, original #14 head, is still strong, and no cracks (yet)
 (knocking on wood as I type this). I love the SDL -
 

Fewer than 25% of the #14 heads have cracked (despite all the heads 
brought to the US in '86-'87 being flawed - redesigned in '89). The trap 
oxidizer was implicated in the head failures based on the fact that most 
junked 126s and 124s that were equipped with traps also sported cracked 
heads while the '86 126s without traps (Fed certified, but NOT Calif 
certified) seldom exhibited head cracks.

603 engined cars that are largely highway driven seldom exhibit head 
cracks provided they are rarely (and only briefly) overheated, while 
cars that spent a lot of time in stop and go city traffic seem to have 
higher than average head cracking problems.

My own 603.96 engine with 180+ kmi has no head cracking symptoms.

The 603.96 powered 124 and 126s are smoth, wonderful cars to drive 
and are NOT difficult to maintain, but they have very different 
maintenance issues than cars powered by 617.95 engines.

Marshall
-- 
Marshall Booth Ph.D.
Ass't Prof. (ret.)
Univ of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-22 Thread Tony Wirtel
 Nice but breathless, lousy milage from too small an engine.

 The SDL is a better buy IF it has a new head.  I've never heard of
 anyone successfully welding those up.

 New head will be good for about 300,000 more miles.

 Peter

I had a 300sd and 300e and side by side and in daily driving preferred
the performance of the sd.  If you have any hills, the 617 pulls
better.  For the same peformance the 103 is shifting more often to get
into a powerband that isn't that great to begin with- and this is in a
124 chassis car.  The 126 is heavier, but not by a huge amount.

420's and 560's can be had for dirt cheap now, and the mileage
difference isn't great.

Tony Wirtel

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-22 Thread OK Don
Having owned both 617 and 603 cars, I far prefer the 603. It's a much
nicer engine - smoother and quieter.  By at least one estimate, must
of the heads that are going to crack, have already. Mine has over
300,000 miles, original #14 head, is still strong, and no cracks (yet)
(knocking on wood as I type this). I love the SDL -

 
  The SDL is a better buy IF it has a new head.  I've never heard of
  anyone successfully welding those up.
 
  New head will be good for about 300,000 more miles.

-- 
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics.
-Benjamin Disraeli
'90 300D, '87 300SDL, '81 240D, '78 450SLC, '97 Ply Grand Voyager

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


[MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-21 Thread David Bruckmann
Gang,

Recently transferred from Toronto to the SF Bay area for a couple of years. I'm 
trying to control myself as I look at all the car candy on craigslist and in 
local dealer lots.

Although I am an MB diesel nutter, I have been tempted by the straight-6 
300SE/L W126 machines. They seem to be plentiful and cheap.

So far I've stuck to OM617 engines, and in fact to W123 models because they are 
simple and indestructible. Since my focus for the last 10+ years has been on 
diesel engines, I've not really paid attention to gassers, but it seems like 
the M103 engine is pretty good. I lust after a 300SDL (except the 3.5, 
obviously), but I'm afraid of all the trouble people seem to have with the 
OM603 engines, especially head cracks, failing tensioners, and engine 
management issues. I was talking to someone this a.m. who was selling an SDL. 
170k.mi, $6k. The engine had overheated and a machine shop welded the head etc. 
Almost no mileage since the rebuild. I presume this approach will not last, 
and that there is trouble waiting in the wings on that car...

So what's the deal? Is the M103 a good machine (as good as the venerable M110), 
or am I just as well with an OM603.961?

D.

PS: For torture, look at pics of the stunningly gorgeous W116 for sale on  
http://www.misterdiesel.com  If only I could afford it...


-- 
David Bruckmann, Palo Alto, CA
Current Reality:
1970 Citroen DS21 Pallas (170,000 km) Goettin
1976 Citroen 2CV6 (145,000 km) Piaf  http://dolly.bruckmann.com/
Shady Past:
1971 Citroen DS21 Pallas (137,000km), 1972 Citroen DS21 Pallas (502,000km)
1978 Mercedes-Benz 300D (1,200,000 km or thereabouts) Sieglinde
1979 Mercedes-Benz 300TD non-turbo (260,000 km)  Diva
1981 Citroen 2CV6 Charleston (120,000km), 1988 Merkur XR4Ti (209,000km)
1981 Peugeot 505 GRD (350,000km), 1984 MB 300TD (385,000 km) Gertraud
1985 Toyota Camry The Slamry (330,000km) 1986 Renault 9 1.7L (155,000 km)
2002 VW Golf GLS TDI (74,000 km)

--

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-21 Thread Allan Streib
David Bruckmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 So what's the deal? Is the M103 a good machine (as good as the
 venerable M110), or am I just as well with an OM603.961?

I've heard it is.  Valve stem seals may be an issue. I don't have any
firsthand experience though.

 PS: For torture, look at pics of the stunningly gorgeous W116 for sale
 on http://www.misterdiesel.com If only I could afford it...

$18,500!?!  he's insane.


-- 
1983 300D
1966 230

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-21 Thread Peter Frederick
Nice but breathless, lousy milage from too small an engine.

The SDL is a better buy IF it has a new head.  I've never heard of 
anyone successfully welding those up.

New head will be good for about 300,000 more miles.

Peter


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-21 Thread Frederick Moir
Hi, All, David  Allan.
The 260E ( 198Kmi.) M103.960, that was given to me with 5 cyl. is now running 
smooth and quiet on all six and burns no oil (M1 15W50)
Problem was #6 cyl. had a burnt exh valve. Also found that both sets of guides 
were very worn, all exh. valves had a groove around the sealing face, about 8 
to 10 thou. Replaced. All of the valve stem oil seals were akin to cheap 
plastic. The rear oil feed to the valve assy. was properly sealed, I checked 
because it is a known leaker, either into the water or out the pass. rear of 
the head.
Only real difficulty was getting the air intake support brackets back on. 
(Grumble grumble, gettin' too old for this sh-tuff.)
YMMV
Fred Moir
But it's NOT a Diesel!



Allan Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Bruckmann  writes:

 So what's the deal? Is the M103 a good machine (as good as the
 venerable M110), or am I just as well with an OM603.961?

I've heard it is.  Valve stem seals may be an issue. I don't have any
firsthand experience though.



   
-
Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV.  Watch previews, get listings, 
and more!
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-21 Thread E M
anybody want to give me a quick walk though of changing valve guides and
also the stem seals??  I'm sure mine are about due wiht 340,000 on them.
:-)  Have an idea about the stem seals, but would like to hear all tips?
Never did valve guides and not even sure it's a do it your self job?
Willing to give it a shot if there is anyway to do it. :-)

Thanks in advance,

Ed
300E

On 21/09/2007, Frederick Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi, All, David  Allan.
 The 260E ( 198Kmi.) M103.960, that was given to me with 5 cyl. is now
 running smooth and quiet on all six and burns no oil (M1 15W50)
 Problem was #6 cyl. had a burnt exh valve. Also found that both sets of
 guides were very worn, all exh. valves had a groove around the sealing face,
 about 8 to 10 thou. Replaced. All of the valve stem oil seals were akin to
 cheap plastic. The rear oil feed to the valve assy. was properly sealed, I
 checked because it is a known leaker, either into the water or out the pass.
 rear of the head.
 Only real difficulty was getting the air intake support brackets back on.
 (Grumble grumble, gettin' too old for this sh-tuff.)
 YMMV
 Fred Moir
 But it's NOT a Diesel!



 Allan Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Bruckmann  writes:

  So what's the deal? Is the M103 a good machine (as good as the
  venerable M110), or am I just as well with an OM603.961?

 I've heard it is.  Valve stem seals may be an issue. I don't have any
 firsthand experience though.




 -
 Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV.  Watch previews, get
 listings, and more!
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] M103 vs OM603 vs OM617: Help me decide

2007-09-21 Thread Frederick Moir
Ed.
Valve guides are replaced with the head off. It is theoretically possible to 
pull the guides with out removing the head but most likely the valve seats will 
be worn and would no longer be concentric with the valves and guides. The 
guides are driven in and usually have to be reamed.
Replacing the seals is just tedious not difficult. Remove spark plug, inject 
air pressure via an adapter to keep the valve hard against the seat. If you can 
balance the piston that you are working on at TDC it may help stop the valve 
from falling into the engine should the air pressure fail. (BTDT) remove valve 
gear at the cyl. that you are working on only (rocker etc.) use an external 
valve spring compressor ( hooks under the cam and pushes down on the valve 
spring ) remove keepers (use pencil magnet) gently release compressor and take 
off the spring. Pull out the seal, check for debris around the valve guide, use 
the seal protector, ( clear tube supplied with VSOS kit) and put a smear of 
engine oil around the seal lip and press on. Hand pressure against a deep 
socket with extension works for me. Curse a bit as you wrestle the seal 
protector off
Replace spring, compress and install keepers. Do the other valve in that pair.
Repeat.
As we say in Yinglant, Rotsa Ruck!
All you genii please add you comments, condemnations and insults.
Fred Moir
Lynn MA
Dieselitis Maximus ( With a little gas on the side)

E M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anybody want to give me a quick walk though of 
changing valve guides and
also the stem seals??  I'm sure mine are about due with 340,000 on them.
Ed
300E


 
   
-
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! 
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com