Actually it's the families of the dead crispy people in the cars that really 
care. If you actually had something constructive to say we might listen. But, 
with your selfish pig headed "I need to go first attitude" it doesn't work in 
the US. On the autobahn they also move over to the right so faster cars can 
pass. Have you seen that in the US? In Germany every car in equipped with a 
first aid kit. Does that happen in the US? Comparing apples to oranges is 
stupid. 
On stretches of the autobahn there are no speed limits, does that mean I can 
speed here? Pull your head out and look at reality.

Ken


In a message dated 9/29/2005 8:07:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: "Gabriel S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Road rules
To: Mercedes mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Well that doesen't change the fact that it's been proven to work in the
autoban; mind you, there are less accidents on the autobahn than the
American interstate...it's crybabies like you that cut short any sort of
innovation in this country.

On 9/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I care about it because those jackasses keep me from getting to my job.
> When
> they finally figure out that I'm going to keep my siren and air horn
> blowing
> in back of them, then they try feebly to get out of the way by cutting in
> front
> of some poor person who is waiting like they should. When I was new on the
> job I had a Captain who swore that on his last day he was going to drive,
> and
> run over the dimwits that did that. Now that I have that position, I'm
> thinking
> he was absolutely right. They should get rammed by the rig and left to
> rot.
>
> If you were hanging upside down trapped in your car because some jackass
> clipped you as he cut in front of you and you're busy bleeding to death
> waiting
> for me to get there, I'll bet you'd think different.
>
> Not that I have strong opinions on this subject or anything........
>
> Ken
>

Reply via email to