Re: [MBZ] 114/115 was: WOW! Nice 220D W114

2017-05-21 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes
Well, if the nose is longer I'd _expect_ more welds.

-- Jim
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] 114/115 was: WOW! Nice 220D W114

2017-05-20 Thread Dan--- via Mercedes
That should be "more welds".  Not sure where I got rivets...

-D

> On May 20, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Curley McLain via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> Chassis codeYearsModelEngine  
>   Number built[6]
>DisplacementModel
> Type
> W114.0151968–19732302.3 LM180I6   
>  152,822
> W114.6151973–1976230.62.3 L M180I6
> 63,497
> W115.0171973–1976230.42.3 L M115I4
> 87,609
> 
> Lang:
> Chassis codeYearsModelEngine  
>   Number built[6]
>   
>  DisplacementModelType
> W114.0171968–1973230 Lang (LWB saloon)2.3 L
> M180I61,082
> W114.6171968–1973230.6 Lang (LWB saloon)2.3 L 
> M180I61,131
> 
> 
> Wikipedia knows all.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_W114
> 
> So, both 4 and cy cyl versions of the 230 are floating around in 114 and 115 
> chassis.  No wonder everyone is confusticated.
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] 114/115 was: WOW! Nice 220D W114

2017-05-20 Thread Dan--- via Mercedes
I always thought the "more rivets" claim was BS, as there was nothing to 
support it.

If there was a model series I know the least about it's the W114/115. I've had 
one of them, a W114 1970 250C, which had the same M130 engine my 1970 250S had 
with the wonderful Zenith carbs that no one other than myself and Jaime like.

That car came cheap, and a good thing as it was a closet rust bucket.  The 
driver's side rocker panel was rusted through as was the inside of the fender 
above it. I had to slap a bunch of fiberglass on the floor to keep from getting 
splashed when I drove through a puddle.

Otherwise, it was a fun car. That's if you ignore the ordeal of replacing the 
heater blower motor that I still have scars from doing on my right hand...

-D

> On May 20, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Curley McLain via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> Chassis codeYearsModelEngine  
>   Number built[6]
>DisplacementModel
> Type
> W114.0151968–19732302.3 LM180I6   
>  152,822
> W114.6151973–1976230.62.3 L M180I6
> 63,497
> W115.0171973–1976230.42.3 L M115I4
> 87,609
> 
> Lang:
> Chassis codeYearsModelEngine  
>   Number built[6]
>   
>  DisplacementModelType
> W114.0171968–1973230 Lang (LWB saloon)2.3 L
> M180I61,082
> W114.6171968–1973230.6 Lang (LWB saloon)2.3 L 
> M180I61,131
> 
> 
> Wikipedia knows all.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_W114
> 
> So, both 4 and cy cyl versions of the 230 are floating around in 114 and 115 
> chassis.  No wonder everyone is confusticated.
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] 114/115 was: WOW! Nice 220D W114

2017-05-20 Thread Curley McLain via Mercedes
Chassis codeYearsModelEngine
Number built[6]
Displacement
ModelType
W114.0151968–19732302.3 LM180I6
152,822
W114.6151973–1976230.62.3 L M180I6  
  63,497
W115.0171973–1976230.42.3 L M115I4
87,609


Lang:
Chassis codeYearsModel
EngineNumber built[6]

DisplacementModelType
W114.0171968–1973230 Lang (LWB saloon)2.3 L
M180I61,082
W114.6171968–1973230.6 Lang (LWB saloon)2.3 L
 M180I61,131



Wikipedia knows all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_W114

So, both 4 and cy cyl versions of the 230 are floating around in 114 and 
115 chassis.  No wonder everyone is confusticated.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] 114/115 was: WOW! Nice 220D W114

2017-05-20 Thread Curley McLain via Mercedes
That might make sense as the early 230s were 6 cyl vergassers (I don't 
know if it was M180 or M130) and some of the 230 vergassers were 4 cyl.


I completely skipped the 114/5 generation other than the one rustbucket 
115 300D I scrapped.

Kaleb Striplin via Mercedes 
May 20, 2017 at 3:51 PM
I think the pre 74 114 might have had a longer hood but I think 74 and 
after is the same.




___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] 114/115 was: WOW! Nice 220D W114

2017-05-20 Thread Kaleb Striplin via Mercedes
I think the pre 74 114 might have had a longer hood but I think 74 and after is 
the same.

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 20, 2017, at 3:38 PM, Curley McLain via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> I always thought the only difference was the length of hood/fenders/front of 
> body subframe (in front of firewall) to accommodate short or long engines.  
> Kaleb's explanation makes sense.  The R/E myth does not.  IF there was such a 
> thing as a taxi version, it would be denoted in digits 4-6 of the type number 
> (VIN)
> 
> with the prior series, 110 was the short hood and 111 was the long hood, so 
> logic would dictate that the 114 would be short hood and 115 the long hood 
> (and 5 cyl could be either, depending on which type was designed to 
> accommodate it.)   When did the MB marketing bowties ever use logic?
> 
> I've even had people argue with me that there never was a 114, but I know 
> that is wrong because I have seen them.
> 
>> Dan Penoff via Mercedes 
>> May 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM
>> Meh, I guessed. And has anyone ever clearly defined what the difference is? 
>> I can’t recall…
>> 
>> -D
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] 114/115 was: WOW! Nice 220D W114

2017-05-20 Thread OK Don via Mercedes
To add to the confusion, the 220D W115 had the short front end. They curved
the radiator support, and angles the front of the fenders forward along
with lengthening the hood and moving the grill forward for the OM617 in the
'74-'75 300D W115. I had both at the same time once - it was easy to see
the difference side-by-side. The front bumper on the 220D was almost
straight, it was a shallow V on the 300D with the center point forward.
Both were W115 chassis. I never saw a W114 to compare the 300D to.

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Curley McLain via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> I always thought the only difference was the length of hood/fenders/front
> of body subframe (in front of firewall) to accommodate short or long
> engines.  Kaleb's explanation makes sense.  The R/E myth does not.  IF
> there was such a thing as a taxi version, it would be denoted in digits 4-6
> of the type number (VIN)
>
> with the prior series, 110 was the short hood and 111 was the long hood,
> so logic would dictate that the 114 would be short hood and 115 the long
> hood (and 5 cyl could be either, depending on which type was designed to
> accommodate it.)   When did the MB marketing bowties ever use logic?
>
> I've even had people argue with me that there never was a 114, but I know
> that is wrong because I have seen them.
>
> Dan Penoff via Mercedes 
>> May 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM
>> Meh, I guessed. And has anyone ever clearly defined what the difference
>> is? I can’t recall…
>>
>> -D
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>


-- 
OK Don

*“Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of
our people need it sorely on these accounts.”* – Mark Twain

"There are three kinds of men: The ones that learns by reading. The few who
learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence
for themselves."

WILL ROGERS, *The Manly Wisdom of Will Rogers*
2013 F150, 18 mpg
2012 Passat TDI DSG, 44 mpg
1957 C182A, 12 mpg - but at 150 mph!
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com