Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-13 Thread Trampas
I checked boost at the IP thus line is clear. Also since it smokes I know it
is getting fuel. 

The acceleration has a slight increase when the turbo kicks in, but not a
lot. 

The engine does have lots of blow by and is an EGR engine, do all 617's have
EGRs? 

I have adjusted the valves several times with no difference. 

Since the engine was smoking black smoke I know the fuel is getting into
cylinders but it appears not enough oxygen is getting into cylinders, either
due to plugged exhaust or plugged intake. I was thinking intake since I know
theTDI's have problems with intake plugging. 

Regards,
Trampas Stern 
  
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steve MacSween
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 6:57 PM
To: Mercedes mailing list
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have an 85 300SD with about 300k miles on it. The poor old car is slower
 than dirt. 0-60 times are in the days.

That is not normal for 300k, especially on an '85 unless the car has HUGE
blow-by. 

Questions:

Does the car accelerate gradually, or start off slow then you feel a kick
when the boost comes in?

Are you CERTAIN the transmission is dropping back into first, when you give
it pedal coming off a stop?

When were the valves last adjusted?

Have you checked (that is, made sure it's clean/clear) the pressure sensing
line that runs from the manifold over to the overboost switch on the
firewall?

Just some quick ideas

 BTW I just purchased a 560SEL to replace the 300SD but with gas prices
 lately it may be a bad idea.

Oh lordy, I'm afraid so.

mac


___
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-13 Thread Steve MacSween
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Since the engine was smoking black smoke I know the fuel is getting into
 cylinders but it appears not enough oxygen is getting into cylinders, either
 due to plugged exhaust or plugged intake. I was thinking intake since I know
 theTDI's have problems with intake plugging.

Okay, I forgot to mention the EGR. If it has not been disabled, then
probably it is plugged up. I am 'cribbing' a response from another list,
below, as the Web page that dealt with this (from the Ritter/Easley list)
isn't responding tonight. (Or maybe my link is out of date?)

The TDi problem is pretty much unique to that engine, and IIRC has something
to do with the EGR setup (some valve or other) and the driving patterns of
the owner. There's precious little to clog up on an OM617, it's just a
gaping hole and a set of intake runners.

Mac

Previous response to an SD owner with similar symptoms to yours:

1. ALDA pressure line clogged: Hollow bolt / banjo fitting on intake
manifold, and / or switchover (boost safety) valve need to be cleaned. If
ALDA pressure line circuit is plugged, you get no power increase from the
turbo. Slightly plugged, less power. The switchover valve is a safety
device in the event of an over boost condition. Not good to bypass it but
OK for a quick test to see if the valve is plugged up. Note: cap on top
of switchover valve is a vented dust cap. Don't replace it with a solid
rubber cap. 
Don't over torque hollow bolt when re-installing. Don't lose the two
washers (one on each side of banjo fitting). Don't pull the plastic hose
off the fitting. 

2. EGR: Plug its vacuum line with a BB gun BB. Although this will keep
the EGR from working, the valve may leak. Any leaking will reduce turbo
boost. Fix is replace EGR (dumb since you want it disabled) or fabricate a
solid metal plate (holes only for bolts) and install it between EGR and
intake manifold. Maybe need a sealing gasket on each side of the plate. I
haven't done this yet to my SD.

3. Air Recirculating Valve: If your '84 is a California emissions '84, it
has a vacuum actuated Air Recirculating Valve on the output of the turbo,
at the intake manifold, just to the left of the EGR. This valve cuts the
turbo boost from 1000rpm to 2500rpm by 30 to 50%. Worse yet, if the vacuum
system's return line vent filter is plugged up, the Air Recirculating Valve
will be operating throughout the RPM range and your turbo boost will be
reduced by 30 to 50% throughout the RPM range.
If your 300SD has this valve, pull the vacuum hose from it and test drive
the car. If you get more power off the line and all the way to ~ 5000 rpm,
find and replace the vacuum return line vent filter, re-attach the hose to
the Air Valve and test drive again.
And then, trace the Air Valve vacuum line to the other end. It should be
connected to the front port on the other switchover valve that's located
near the front (passenger side) wheel well. Pull the rubber coupling hose
from the port on the switchover valve and insert a BB gun BB in
it. Re-attach coupling hose.

4. ALDA might be set too lean: Opening it up 1/2 to 1 turn (CCW) will
increase power regardless of Items 2, 3, 5, and 6.

5. Waste gate spring may be fatigued. May need to tighten it up. Requires
a boost gauge, several hours' time, and lots of patience. However, turbo
manufacturers and repair outfits have told some list members that waste
gate springs do not fatigue. I've tightened mine up almost as far as it
will go. Since my boost is not at full ( 0.9bar + / - 0.1bar) spec., I
will soon be checking my SD for manifold and EGR leaks.
You should inspect, clean, plug, everything else before fiddling with the
waste gate. 
When / if you fiddle with the waste gate, you must first adjust (open) the
ALDA. 

6. Other vacuum or pressure leaks: If shifts from gear to gear are harsh,
you have vacuum leaks and your ALDA pressure line circuit is probably
plugged up. Your brake booster could be going out. You should inspect /
replace all rubber (vacuum) hose couplings. Especially any that are dry,
cracked looking, or feel spongy. Do them one at a time so as not to
re-attach any to the wrong ports. 




Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-13 Thread OK Don
Carbonned up injectors? Needs a couple of cans of Diesel purge and a
lot of serious Italian tune-ups???  That's what the smoke makes me
think of  -- --

On 9/12/05, Trampas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I checked boost at the IP thus line is clear. Also since it smokes I know it
 is getting fuel.
 
 The acceleration has a slight increase when the turbo kicks in, but not a
 lot.
 
 The engine does have lots of blow by and is an EGR engine, do all 617's have
 EGRs?
 
 I have adjusted the valves several times with no difference.
 
 Since the engine was smoking black smoke I know the fuel is getting into
 cylinders but it appears not enough oxygen is getting into cylinders, either
 due to plugged exhaust or plugged intake. I was thinking intake since I know
 theTDI's have problems with intake plugging.
 
 Regards,
 Trampas Stern
 

-- 
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK 
'87 300SDL
'81 240D
'78 450SLC
The FSM created the Diesel Benz
http://www.venganza.org/



Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-13 Thread JFreezn
 
In a message dated 9/12/2005 4:21:42 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The  engine does have lots of blow by and is an EGR engine, do all 617's  have
EGRs? 



Trampas,
 
My 79 300SD does not have EGR but they started adding it in 1980.   Most will 
recommend that you block the EGR off permanently.  A thin metal  plate where 
the EGR valve is mounted works wonders.   A functioning  EGR WILL clog up the 
intake manifold and build up carbon around the intake  valves.
 
Did you check chain stretch?  Your chain could be bad enough to be  retarding 
timing of both valves and fuel injection.  The result would be  loss of power 
and smoke!
 
Regards  

Jim  Friesen
Phoenix AZ
79 300SD, 261 K miles 
98 ML 320, 137 K  miles



Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-13 Thread Peter Frederick
The intake doesn't carbon up on that car, but the pressure line to the 
ALDA does, and the overboost protection switchover valve often fails 
open.  Check for a clear line between the manifold and the ALDA and 
make sure the switchover valve doesn't vent pressure when not energized.


I would also check injection timing and chain stretch -- late 
injection and valve timing will make the car sluggish and smoke at full 
throttle.


Peter




Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-13 Thread RAH
  Does your 85 300SD have a trap-oxidizer? check for rust holes in it. Or it 
could be plugged up. The stuff inside can come loose and damage the turbo. I 
know someone who has a 85 300SD and it had the performance of a 240D (very 
small rust holes in trap) But now it runs like it should with a complete swap 
of the intake manifold, exhaust manifold,turbo and header pipe from a 81 300SD. 
I think he said the new trap cost $800. He also said there was some kind of 
recall but MB said his car already had that done.   Russ H.

Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-13 Thread Marshall Booth

Trampas wrote:

I have an 85 300SD with about 300k miles on it. The poor old car is slower
than dirt. 0-60 times are in the days. I have checked the boost ALDL etc.
The car will smoke when floored so I know it is getting fuel, and since the
boost pressure is high I was assuming it was getting air. However I recently
thought about the intake being plugged with carbon. Is the 617 known for
this? I don't think the intake has ever been off on the car. 


What is the 0-60 acceleration time? If 15 seconds or better (16 seconds 
for a Calif. rated car) you are right where you belong and there is 
nothing that will substantially improve what you have without seriously 
compromising engine longevity. If slower than that, there is something 
wrong.


It's MUCH more likely to be a stretched timing chain (more than 4-5 
degrees) or plugged air filter than clogged intake manifold. I suppose 
it can happen but I know of lots of people (including me) that have 
cleaned out intake manifolds that seemed to be close to half full of 
soot/carbon residue and there was NEVER any measurable performance 
improvement.


Marshall
--
Marshall Booth Ph.D.
Ass't Prof. (ret.)
Univ of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Department of Pharmacology  1300 BST
Pittsburgh PA 15261 USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-13 Thread redghost
yeah!!! the POS SDL had a plugged trap and made the same Bondian smoke 
and gutless motion.  There were IP issues as well, but the Trap was a 
mess


On Tuesday, September 13, 2005, at 06:33 AM, RAH wrote:

  Does your 85 300SD have a trap-oxidizer? check for rust holes in 
it. Or it could be plugged up. The stuff inside can come loose and 
damage the turbo. I know someone who has a 85 300SD and it had the 
performance of a 240D (very small rust holes in trap) But now it runs 
like it should with a complete swap of the intake manifold, exhaust 
manifold,turbo and header pipe from a 81 300SD. I think he said the 
new trap cost $800. He also said there was some kind of recall but MB 
said his car already had that done.   Russ H.

___
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net




--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner

1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz




Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-13 Thread ernest breakfield
there were actually at least 2 separate Campaigns to change out
Particulate Traps; my '85 300D had it done the first time @ ~66K miles to
replace the original TO, and again just a couple of years ago at MBZs
insistence to replace that TO with yet a different one. neither of these
changes cost me anything; they were both paid for by MBZ.

   i've heard that recently some of the larger indies have been getting
calls from MBZ USA looking for more of the TOs; apparently there may
not be any more available.


cheers!
e

'85 300D


   Does your 85 300SD have a trap-oxidizer? check for rust holes in it. Or
 it could be plugged up. The stuff inside can come loose and damage the
 turbo. I know someone who has a 85 300SD and it had the performance of a
 240D (very small rust holes in trap) But now it runs like it should with
 a complete swap of the intake manifold, exhaust manifold,turbo and
 header pipe from a 81 300SD. I think he said the new trap cost $800. He
 also said there was some kind of recall but MB said his car already had
 that done.   Russ H



Re: [MBZ] 300SD Intake carbon

2005-09-12 Thread Steve MacSween
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have an 85 300SD with about 300k miles on it. The poor old car is slower
 than dirt. 0-60 times are in the days.

That is not normal for 300k, especially on an '85 unless the car has HUGE
blow-by. 

Questions:

Does the car accelerate gradually, or start off slow then you feel a kick
when the boost comes in?

Are you CERTAIN the transmission is dropping back into first, when you give
it pedal coming off a stop?

When were the valves last adjusted?

Have you checked (that is, made sure it's clean/clear) the pressure sensing
line that runs from the manifold over to the overboost switch on the
firewall?

Just some quick ideas

 BTW I just purchased a 560SEL to replace the 300SD but with gas prices
 lately it may be a bad idea.

Oh lordy, I'm afraid so.

mac