Re: Missed 4.9.1 release - should we do it now? (was: Re: Missing march update?)

2019-03-19 Thread Augie Fackler 
4.9.1 is now posted, sorry for it getting missed.

> On Mar 18, 2019, at 19:29, Matt Harbison  wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 11:16:11 -0400, Boris FELD  > wrote:
> 
>> On 18/03/2019 16:01, Boris FELD wrote:
>>> There is an open issue with subrepository support in 4.9 on Windows:
>>> 87a6e3c953e045d92147925fc71aad7c327fdbfd
>> 
>> I wanted to paste this link instead:
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54868056/can-a-mercurial-subrepostiory-reside-in-a-subfolder/54940807#54940807
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry for the noise
>> 
>>> 
>>> So I would vote for a 4.9.1 release
> 
> +1.  The subrepo problem on Windows forced me to downgrade at work.  In 
> addition, TortoiseHg tends to lag a few weeks.  So if we wait until April 1, 
> it might not get its first point release until around the time 5.0-rc is 
> available.
> 
>>> On 18/03/2019 14:35, Augie Fackler wrote:
 (mercurial@ to bcc, mercurial-devel@ to cc)
 
> On Mar 16, 2019, at 22:10, Jesus Cea  wrote:
> 
> Mercurial 4.9.1 is late. Any issue?
 Got overlooked because I was on vacation and the other people that can 
 roll releases were similarly absent.
 
 I guess we'll make a judgement call today and tomorrow if we should bother 
 with .1 now, or just hold it to April.
 
 Denizens of -devel, what do you think?
 
> Thanks for your work!.
> 
> --
> Jesús Cea Avión _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/_/
> j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
> Twitter: @jcea_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/_/
> jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
> "Things are not so easy"  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
> "My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
> "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
> 
> ___
> Mercurial mailing list
> mercur...@mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
 ___
 Mercurial-devel mailing list
 Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
 https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>>> ___
>>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>>> Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
>>> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>> ___
>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>> Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org 
>> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel 
>> 
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Re: Missed 4.9.1 release - should we do it now? (was: Re: Missing march update?)

2019-03-18 Thread Matt Harbison 
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 11:16:11 -0400, Boris FELD   
wrote:



On 18/03/2019 16:01, Boris FELD wrote:

There is an open issue with subrepository support in 4.9 on Windows:
87a6e3c953e045d92147925fc71aad7c327fdbfd


I wanted to paste this link instead:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54868056/can-a-mercurial-subrepostiory-reside-in-a-subfolder/54940807#54940807

Sorry for the noise



So I would vote for a 4.9.1 release


+1.  The subrepo problem on Windows forced me to downgrade at work.  In  
addition, TortoiseHg tends to lag a few weeks.  So if we wait until April  
1, it might not get its first point release until around the time 5.0-rc  
is available.



On 18/03/2019 14:35, Augie Fackler wrote:

(mercurial@ to bcc, mercurial-devel@ to cc)


On Mar 16, 2019, at 22:10, Jesus Cea  wrote:

Mercurial 4.9.1 is late. Any issue?
Got overlooked because I was on vacation and the other people that can  
roll releases were similarly absent.


I guess we'll make a judgement call today and tomorrow if we should  
bother with .1 now, or just hold it to April.


Denizens of -devel, what do you think?


Thanks for your work!.

--
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/_/
j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/   
_/_/

Twitter: @jcea_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz

___
Mercurial mailing list
mercur...@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial

___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Re: Missed 4.9.1 release - should we do it now? (was: Re: Missing march update?)

2019-03-18 Thread Boris FELD 
On 18/03/2019 16:01, Boris FELD wrote:
> There is an open issue with subrepository support in 4.9 on Windows:
> 87a6e3c953e045d92147925fc71aad7c327fdbfd

I wanted to paste this link instead:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54868056/can-a-mercurial-subrepostiory-reside-in-a-subfolder/54940807#54940807

Sorry for the noise

>
> So I would vote for a 4.9.1 release
>
> On 18/03/2019 14:35, Augie Fackler wrote:
>> (mercurial@ to bcc, mercurial-devel@ to cc)
>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2019, at 22:10, Jesus Cea  wrote:
>>>
>>> Mercurial 4.9.1 is late. Any issue?
>> Got overlooked because I was on vacation and the other people that can roll 
>> releases were similarly absent.
>>
>> I guess we'll make a judgement call today and tomorrow if we should bother 
>> with .1 now, or just hold it to April.
>>
>> Denizens of -devel, what do you think?
>>
>>> Thanks for your work!.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Jesús Cea Avión _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/_/
>>> j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
>>> Twitter: @jcea_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/_/
>>> jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
>>> "Things are not so easy"  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
>>> "My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
>>> "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mercurial mailing list
>>> mercur...@mercurial-scm.org
>>> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
>> ___
>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>> Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
>> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
> ___
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Re: Missed 4.9.1 release - should we do it now? (was: Re: Missing march update?)

2019-03-18 Thread Boris FELD 
There is an open issue with subrepository support in 4.9 on Windows:
87a6e3c953e045d92147925fc71aad7c327fdbfd

So I would vote for a 4.9.1 release

On 18/03/2019 14:35, Augie Fackler wrote:
> (mercurial@ to bcc, mercurial-devel@ to cc)
>
>> On Mar 16, 2019, at 22:10, Jesus Cea  wrote:
>>
>> Mercurial 4.9.1 is late. Any issue?
> Got overlooked because I was on vacation and the other people that can roll 
> releases were similarly absent.
>
> I guess we'll make a judgement call today and tomorrow if we should bother 
> with .1 now, or just hold it to April.
>
> Denizens of -devel, what do you think?
>
>> Thanks for your work!.
>>
>> -- 
>> Jesús Cea Avión _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/_/
>> j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
>> Twitter: @jcea_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/_/
>> jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
>> "Things are not so easy"  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
>> "My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
>> "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
>>
>> ___
>> Mercurial mailing list
>> mercur...@mercurial-scm.org
>> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
> ___
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Missed 4.9.1 release - should we do it now? (was: Re: Missing march update?)

2019-03-18 Thread Augie Fackler 
(mercurial@ to bcc, mercurial-devel@ to cc)

> On Mar 16, 2019, at 22:10, Jesus Cea  wrote:
> 
> Mercurial 4.9.1 is late. Any issue?

Got overlooked because I was on vacation and the other people that can roll 
releases were similarly absent.

I guess we'll make a judgement call today and tomorrow if we should bother with 
.1 now, or just hold it to April.

Denizens of -devel, what do you think?

> 
> Thanks for your work!.
> 
> -- 
> Jesús Cea Avión _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/_/
> j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
> Twitter: @jcea_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/_/
> jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
> "Things are not so easy"  _/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
> "My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/
> "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
> 
> ___
> Mercurial mailing list
> mercur...@mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial

___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel