[Mesa-dev] [Bug 61764] invalid enum in glEnable, glConvolutionFilter, glSeparableFilter, glColorTable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61764 Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com --- Mesa does not (or rather, no longer, it did at some point) support the clunky and legacy ARB_imaging subset. Therefore, trying to use functions or enumerants requiring that extension will indeed generate errors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
[Mesa-dev] [Bug 61764] invalid enum in glEnable, glConvolutionFilter, glSeparableFilter, glColorTable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61764 --- Comment #2 from Blaž Hrastnik speed.the.b...@gmail.com --- I'd still argue that this is a bug. If the extensions were removed, their implementation should be fully removed (as in, these functions, especially the EXT/ARB versions of them should be removed), instead of leaving some sort of a buggy shell, which can still be called (or at least can be tried to be called). So I'd just fully remove these, so there'd be no confusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
[Mesa-dev] [Bug 61764] invalid enum in glEnable, glConvolutionFilter, glSeparableFilter, glColorTable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61764 --- Comment #3 from Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com --- (In reply to comment #2) I'd still argue that this is a bug. If the extensions were removed, their implementation should be fully removed (as in, these functions, especially the EXT/ARB versions of them should be removed), instead of leaving some sort of a buggy shell, which can still be called (or at least can be tried to be called). So I'd just fully remove these, so there'd be no confusion. No this is not correct. The problem is there never was a separate ARB_imaging extension, this is (rather was) part of core but optionally supported. As such there's language in the spec which says you have to return invalid_enum for invalid operands and invalid_operation for unsupported functions belonging to this imaging subset. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
[Mesa-dev] [Bug 61764] invalid enum in glEnable, glConvolutionFilter, glSeparableFilter, glColorTable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61764 --- Comment #4 from Blaž Hrastnik speed.the.b...@gmail.com --- Ah yes, I have found that bit later in the documentation. Thank you for clarification! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
[Mesa-dev] [Bug 61764] invalid enum in glEnable, glConvolutionFilter, glSeparableFilter, glColorTable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61764 Blaž Hrastnik speed.the.b...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||speed.the.b...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
[Mesa-dev] [Bug 61764] invalid enum in glEnable, glConvolutionFilter, glSeparableFilter, glColorTable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61764 Blaž Hrastnik speed.the.b...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS|All |Linux (All) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
