Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] radv: add more assertions to make sure packets are correctly emitted

2019-07-12 Thread Bas Nieuwenhuizen
Okay, r-b for the series then.

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 12:00 PM Samuel Pitoiset
 wrote:
>
>
> On 7/12/19 11:54 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:13 AM Samuel Pitoiset
> >  wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset 
> >> ---
> >>   src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h | 6 +++---
> >>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
> >> index 5f8b59c34cb..2ba7da1fb44 100644
> >> --- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
> >> +++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
> >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static inline unsigned radeon_check_space(struct 
> >> radeon_winsys *ws,
> >>
> >>   static inline void radeon_set_config_reg_seq(struct radeon_cmdbuf *cs, 
> >> unsigned reg, unsigned num)
> >>   {
> >> -assert(reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
> >> +assert(reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONFIG_REG_END);
> > Shouldn't the first condition be "reg >= SI_CONFIG_REG_OFFSET" ?
> Right, will fix before pushing.
> >
> >
> >>   assert(cs->cdw + 2 + num <= cs->max_dw);
> >>   assert(num);
> >>   radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONFIG_REG, num, 0));
> >> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline void radeon_set_config_reg(struct 
> >> radeon_cmdbuf *cs, unsigned reg,
> >>
> >>   static inline void radeon_set_context_reg_seq(struct radeon_cmdbuf *cs, 
> >> unsigned reg, unsigned num)
> >>   {
> >> -assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
> >> +assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_END);
> >>   assert(cs->cdw + 2 + num <= cs->max_dw);
> >>   assert(num);
> >>   radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONTEXT_REG, num, 0));
> >> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline void radeon_set_context_reg_idx(struct 
> >> radeon_cmdbuf *cs,
> >>unsigned reg, unsigned idx,
> >>unsigned value)
> >>   {
> >> -   assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
> >> +   assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_END);
> >>  assert(cs->cdw + 3 <= cs->max_dw);
> >>  radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONTEXT_REG, 1, 0));
> >>  radeon_emit(cs, (reg - SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET) >> 2 | (idx << 28));
> >> --
> >> 2.22.0
> >>
> >> ___
> >> mesa-dev mailing list
> >> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] radv: add more assertions to make sure packets are correctly emitted

2019-07-12 Thread Samuel Pitoiset


On 7/12/19 11:54 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:13 AM Samuel Pitoiset
 wrote:

Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset 
---
  src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
index 5f8b59c34cb..2ba7da1fb44 100644
--- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
+++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static inline unsigned radeon_check_space(struct 
radeon_winsys *ws,

  static inline void radeon_set_config_reg_seq(struct radeon_cmdbuf *cs, 
unsigned reg, unsigned num)
  {
-assert(reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
+assert(reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONFIG_REG_END);

Shouldn't the first condition be "reg >= SI_CONFIG_REG_OFFSET" ?

Right, will fix before pushing.




  assert(cs->cdw + 2 + num <= cs->max_dw);
  assert(num);
  radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONFIG_REG, num, 0));
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline void radeon_set_config_reg(struct radeon_cmdbuf 
*cs, unsigned reg,

  static inline void radeon_set_context_reg_seq(struct radeon_cmdbuf *cs, 
unsigned reg, unsigned num)
  {
-assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
+assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_END);
  assert(cs->cdw + 2 + num <= cs->max_dw);
  assert(num);
  radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONTEXT_REG, num, 0));
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline void radeon_set_context_reg_idx(struct 
radeon_cmdbuf *cs,
   unsigned reg, unsigned idx,
   unsigned value)
  {
-   assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
+   assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_END);
 assert(cs->cdw + 3 <= cs->max_dw);
 radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONTEXT_REG, 1, 0));
 radeon_emit(cs, (reg - SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET) >> 2 | (idx << 28));
--
2.22.0

___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] radv: add more assertions to make sure packets are correctly emitted

2019-07-12 Thread Bas Nieuwenhuizen
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:13 AM Samuel Pitoiset
 wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset 
> ---
>  src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
> index 5f8b59c34cb..2ba7da1fb44 100644
> --- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
> +++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static inline unsigned radeon_check_space(struct 
> radeon_winsys *ws,
>
>  static inline void radeon_set_config_reg_seq(struct radeon_cmdbuf *cs, 
> unsigned reg, unsigned num)
>  {
> -assert(reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
> +assert(reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONFIG_REG_END);

Shouldn't the first condition be "reg >= SI_CONFIG_REG_OFFSET" ?


>  assert(cs->cdw + 2 + num <= cs->max_dw);
>  assert(num);
>  radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONFIG_REG, num, 0));
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline void radeon_set_config_reg(struct 
> radeon_cmdbuf *cs, unsigned reg,
>
>  static inline void radeon_set_context_reg_seq(struct radeon_cmdbuf *cs, 
> unsigned reg, unsigned num)
>  {
> -assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
> +assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_END);
>  assert(cs->cdw + 2 + num <= cs->max_dw);
>  assert(num);
>  radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONTEXT_REG, num, 0));
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline void radeon_set_context_reg_idx(struct 
> radeon_cmdbuf *cs,
>   unsigned reg, unsigned idx,
>   unsigned value)
>  {
> -   assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
> +   assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_END);
> assert(cs->cdw + 3 <= cs->max_dw);
> radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONTEXT_REG, 1, 0));
> radeon_emit(cs, (reg - SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET) >> 2 | (idx << 28));
> --
> 2.22.0
>
> ___
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] radv: add more assertions to make sure packets are correctly emitted

2019-07-12 Thread Samuel Pitoiset
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset 
---
 src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
index 5f8b59c34cb..2ba7da1fb44 100644
--- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
+++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cs.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static inline unsigned radeon_check_space(struct 
radeon_winsys *ws,
 
 static inline void radeon_set_config_reg_seq(struct radeon_cmdbuf *cs, 
unsigned reg, unsigned num)
 {
-assert(reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
+assert(reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONFIG_REG_END);
 assert(cs->cdw + 2 + num <= cs->max_dw);
 assert(num);
 radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONFIG_REG, num, 0));
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline void radeon_set_config_reg(struct radeon_cmdbuf 
*cs, unsigned reg,
 
 static inline void radeon_set_context_reg_seq(struct radeon_cmdbuf *cs, 
unsigned reg, unsigned num)
 {
-assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
+assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_END);
 assert(cs->cdw + 2 + num <= cs->max_dw);
 assert(num);
 radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONTEXT_REG, num, 0));
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline void radeon_set_context_reg_idx(struct 
radeon_cmdbuf *cs,
  unsigned reg, unsigned idx,
  unsigned value)
 {
-   assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET);
+   assert(reg >= SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET && reg < SI_CONTEXT_REG_END);
assert(cs->cdw + 3 <= cs->max_dw);
radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_SET_CONTEXT_REG, 1, 0));
radeon_emit(cs, (reg - SI_CONTEXT_REG_OFFSET) >> 2 | (idx << 28));
-- 
2.22.0

___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev